Two Dinuclear Lanthanide Coordination Er(III),Yb(III) Complexes: Structure and Near-Infrared Luminescence

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV8IS020001
Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication
Text Only Version


Two Dinuclear Lanthanide Coordination Er(III),Yb(III) Complexes: Structure and Near-Infrared Luminescence

Ali.A Shamshoom a*, Cai.Yun Wanga, Mo.Zhanga, Huan.Huan Menga, Wei.Xia, Xue.Qin Song a*

School of Chemical and Biological Engineering Lanzhou Jiaotong University

Lanzhou 730070, China

Abstract:- Two lanthanide complexes based on phenoxy bridged dinuclear complexes, [Ln2(HL)2(NO3)4].3CH3CN.CH3

OH(Ln = Er(1),Yb(2)),

Constructed structurally by salicylamide Salen-like ligand, H3L= 2-hydroxy-N-(2-(((3-hydroxynaphthalen-2- yl)methylene)amino)-ethyl)benzamide, were prepared and structurally characterized, Signal-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed by analysis is dinuclear complexes. Coordinated by two phenoxys bridged Ln, two doubly deprotonated HL- ligand, two bidenates nitrate oxygen atom, the luminescent properties indicate this complexes display near-infrared emission of the corresponding Ln3+


Keywords Saliylamide salen-like ligand; dinuclear complex; Crystal structure; NIR Luminescence properties.


    Most of the studies in the field of luminescent lanthanide ions have been consecrate to Eu(III) and Tb(III), which emit in the visible spectral region, but recently many researchers much attention has been paid to near-infrared (NIR) luminescence of trivalent lanthanide Ln() ions, such as Yb(III), Er(III), due to their potential applications as biomolecule labels in luminescent bioassays, as functional materials for optical telecommunication networks and laser systems[1,4]. For instance, the relative transparency of human tissue at around 1000 nm suggests that in vivo luminescent probes operating at this wavelength (Yb-based emission) could have diagnostic value. NIR luminescence from (Er- based emission) it proved very useful when employed in telecommunication network optical signal amplifiers [5, 7].

    However, the f-f transitions of lanthanide ions (Ln3+) are usually laporte forbidden, which results in low absorption cross section and poor luminescence efficiency which limits their efficient application[8]. To circumvent this problem, often we introduce coordinate organic ligand to assemble lanthanide coordination complexes to obtain highly efficient lanthanide luminescence via so called Antenna effect [9]. In which, the organic ligands that high efficiently absorb the light like an antenna, followed by energy transfer to the excited states of lanthanide ions [10]. When the lanthanide ions return to the ground state via radiative transitions, characteristic fluorescence of the lanthanide is produced [11, 12].

    Lanthanide ions have not only high coordination number and flexible coordination geometry but also the affinity for organic ligands containing hard donor atoms. So we proceeded the study of Coordination behavior of the salicylamide salen-like ligand (Scheme.1.) 2-hydroxy-N-(2-

    (((3-hydroxynaphthalen-2-yl)- methylene)amino)ethyl)benzamide (H3L) as the following considerations: () H3L possesses two phenolic hydroxyl group and one NH group that may be completely or partially deprotonated. () It is a flexible ligand which can allow the rotation of two aromatic rings around the C_C single bond [13]. To construct lanthanide (Ln3+) complexes and in aid of excellent phenoxy atom bridging ability, we succeeded synthetized two novels of the dinuclear complexes formula:[Ln2(HL)2(NO3)4].3CH3CN.CH3OH(Ln =

    Er(1),Yb(2)) Are obtained, Their structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses, FT-IR spectroscopy, and near-infrared emission.

    1. Materials and instrumentation

      All operations were performed in an open atmosphere. Solvents and other chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification. The synthesis of ligand H3L was prepared according to the literature [14] using N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-hydroxybenzamide instead. Melting points were determined on a Kofler apparatus. IR spectra were recorded in the range (4000400 cm-1) on a Perkin-Elmer FTIR spectrometer using KBr sdiscs on a Nicolet FT-170SX instrument in the wavenumber range of 4000400 cm-1 with an average of 128 scans and 4 cm-1 of spectral resolution. Near-IR photophysical data were obtained on a Jobin Y von- Horiba flourolog-3 spectrometer fitted with a Hamamatsu R5509-73 detector.

      Scheme. 1. The molecular structure of H3L

    2. General Synthetic Procedure for Complexes 1 and 2

      0.1 mmol (0.0334g) of ligand H3L was added to 20 ml of an acetonitrile solution, 27 uL (0.2 mmol) of triethylamine was added to make a clear solution, stirring for 30min, then

      0.1 mmol of Ln(NO3)3.6H2O was added as a solid, and the solution was Stirring at room temperature for another 4 h

      produces a large amount of precipitation, then adding 5 ml of anhydrous methanol to obtain clear solution which was filtered into a sealed 1020 mL glass vial for crystallization at room temperature. After about two weeks, pale yellow single crystals like tetrahedron shape. Suitable for crystal analysis were obtained and collected by filtration, washed with cold methanol, and dried in the air.

      [Er2(HL)2(NO3)4].3CH3CN.CH3OH(1)The empirical formula: C42 H35 N9 O18 Er2, Yield: 34.2 mg, 48% based on Er(NO3)3.6H2O. Analytical data (%), calculated: C, 39.16; H, 2.71; N, 9.79 found: C, 39.26; H, 2.69; N, 9.84%; IR (KBr, ,

      cm-1): 3482 (m), 1624 (s), 1542 (s), 1480 (m), 1335 (m), 1266

      (m), 1053 (w), 1028 (m) 976 (w), 851 (s), 756 (s), 625 (m),

      486 (s).

      [Yb2(HL)2(NO3)4].3CH3CN.CH3OH(2) The empirical

      formula: C47 H47 N11 O19 Yb2, Yield: 37 mg, 57% based on Yb(NO3)3.6H2O. Analytical data (%), calculated: C, 39.85; H, 3.32; N, 10.88 found: C, 39.87; H, 3.31; N, 10.89%; IR (KBr,

      , cm-1): 3482 (m), 1624 (s), 1542 (w), 1480 (m), 1347 (m),

      1266 (w), 1159 (w), 1028 (m), 982 (w), 851 (s), 750 (s), 631

      (m), 486 (s).

    3. X-ray crystallographic analysis

      Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of complexes were carried out on a Bruker SMART Apex CCD area detector diffractometer (Mo K, = 0.71073 Å ) at 293K. Data processing was accomplished with the SAINT processing program [15]. Multiscan absorption corrections were applied by using the program SADABS [16].The structures were solved with direct methods and refined with full-matrix least squares on F2 using the SHELXL-97 program package [17]. All non-hydrogen atoms were subjected to anisotropic refinement, and all hydrogen atoms were added in idealized positions and refined isotropically. The R1 values are defined as R1=Fo||Fc/|Fo| and wR2 = {[w(Fo2 Fc2)2]/[w(Fo2)2]}1/2. Crystallographic diagrams were drawn using the DIAMOND software package [18]. A summary of the relevant crystallographic data and the final refinement details are given in Table. 1, important bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) are presented in Table. 2.

      Table. 1. Crystallographic data and structure refinement parameters for complexes 1and 2

      Empirical formula C42 H35 Er2 N9 O18 C47 H47 Yb2 N11 O19
      Formula weight 1288.31 g/mol 1416.03 g/mol
      T (k) 1288.31 g/mol 1416.03 g/mol
      Dcalcd (g/cm3) 1.64098 1.79699
      Crystal system Monoclinic, Monoclinic,
      Space group P 1 21/c1 P 1 21/c1
      a(Ã…) a=20.7546(19) a=20.7521(2)
      b(Ã…) b=19.2955(11) b=19.3342(2)
      c(Ã…) c=13.6681(10) c=13.6296(10)
      (°) 90 90
      (°) 107.707(9) 106.8520(10)
      (°) 90 90
      V /Ã…3, Z 5214.4(7), 2 5233.70(9), 4
      / mm1 7.271 3.638
      F(000) 3610 2792
      Theta range for data collection. 3.351 to 25.242 1.914 to 25.595
      Completeness 99.6% 98.1%
      Limiting indices 27p5




      -6I18 -12I16
      Reflections collected/ unique 22472/11897 23087/9581
      Data/restraints/params 11897/0/703 9581/1.078/820
      Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.084 1.078
      Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)] R1= 0.0676,

      wR2 = 0.1287

      R1= 0.0361,

      wR2 = 0.1103

      R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1485,

      wR1 = 0.1725

      R1 = 0.0381,

      wR1 = 0.1124

      Table. 2. Selected bond lengths (Ã…) and angles () for Er(III) and Yb(III) complexes

      Er1-O4 2.275(6) Er1-O5 2.278(6) Er1-O6 2.231(5)

      Er1-O7 2.432(7) Er1-O8 2.388(6) Er1-O10 2.436(6)

      Er1-O11 2.403(6) Er1-O1 2.323(5)

      O1-Er1-O7 84.6(2) O1-Er1-O8 137.9(288) O1-Er1-O10 122.4(2)

      O1-Er1-O11 84.1(2) O4-Er1-O1 72.0(2) O4-Er1-O5 76.18(19)

      O4-Er1-O7 156.5(2) O4-Er1-O8 149.0(2) O4-Er1-O10 78.9(2)

      O4-Er1-O11 98.7(2) O5-Er1-O1 138.0(2) O5-Er1-O7 125.1(2)

      O5-Er1-O8 80.0(2) O5-Er1-O10 75.9(2) O5-Er1-O11 127.8(2)

      O6-Er1-O1 86.1(2) O6-Er1-O4 98.8(2) O6-Er1-O5 72.4(2)

      O6-Er1-O7 80.8(2) O6-Er1-O8 92.5(2) O6-Er1-O10 147.8(2)

      O6-Er1-O11 156.1(2)O7-Er1-O10 113.9(2) O8-Er1-O7 53.9(2)

      O8-Er1-O10 76.4(2) O8-Er1-O11 80.6(2) O11-Er1-O7 76.7(2)

      O11-Er1-O10 52.5(2)

      O10-Yb1 2.392(3) O8-Yb1 2.372(4) O1-Yb1 2.230(3)

      O2-Yb1 2.250(3) O3-Yb1 2.259(3) O6-Yb1 2.277(3)

      O11-Yb1 2.394(3) O7-Yb1 2.402(3) O1-Yb1-O2 73.5(1)

      O1-Yb1-O3 98.73(11) O2-Yb1-O3 76.58(10) O1-Yb1-O6 85.71(10)

      O2-Yb1-O6 139.84(1) O3-Yb1-O6 73.06(10) O1-Yb1-O8 159.78(1)

      O2-Yb1-O8 126.71(1) O3-Yb1-O8 86.88(14) O6-Yb1-O8 77.32(12)

      O1-Yb1-O10 83.12(13) O2-Yb1-O10 127.55(1) O3-Yb1-O10 154.52(1)

      O6-Yb1-O10 81.79(11) O8-Yb1-O10 83.64(15) O1-Yb1-O11


      O2-Yb1-O11 76.37(10) O3-Yb1-O11 152.04(1) O6-Yb1- O11


      O8-Yb1-O11 103.79(1) O10-Yb1-O11 53.43(11) O1-Yb1-O 146.42(1)

      O2-Yb1-O7 74.91(12) O3-Yb1-O78 4.70(11) O6-Yb1-O7 126.64(1)

      O8-Yb1-O7 53.10(13) O10-Yb1-O7 107.84(1) O11-Yb1-O7


  1. synthesis and characterization

    The reaction between H3L with Ln (NO3)3.6H2O and NEt3 in 1:1:2 molar ratio in methanol and acetonitrile mixture (v:v

    =1:4) at room temperature. Which volatilized to obtain the desired complexes as analytically pure solids, the two compounds which were found to be rather insoluble in most solvents other than methanol, DMSO and DMF. In the infrared spectra of H3L, the characteristic band of carbonyl group of free ligand in IR spectra at band 1644 cm-1 Upon coordination appearance new band presented at ca.1624 cm1 of the complexes sifted 20 from (1644 to 1624) compared to free ligands, indicates the complete coordination of the ligand as shown in (fig .1). The absorption bands assigned to the coordinated nitrates were observed as two group bands at about 1480 cm -1 (1) and 1335 cm -1 (4) for the complexes. The differences between the strongest absorption band 1 and 4 of nitrate group ca.145 cm- 1, indicating that coordinated nitrate groups in the complexes are bidentate anions.

  2. Crystal structure descriptions

    Signal-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that as synthesized of The crystals structural [Ln2(HL)2(NO3)4].3CH3CN.CH3OH containing complexes 1 and 2 dinuclear complexes and crystallizes in the monoclinic

    system, space group P 1 21/c1. The Er(), Yb() complexes are isostructural, so here we select complex 2 to describe their structure features in detail. A view of the molecular structure, organized with its numbering scheme, is depicted in (Fig. 2a). The ytterbium atom is in a distorted dodecahedron coordination geometry (Fig. 2b), of which the coordination sphere for YbIII is defined by, one amide oxygen atom(O2), two phenolic oxygen atom (O1, O3) from the same partly deprotonated HL2- ligand, one phenolic oxygen(O6) bridging another partly deprotonated HL2- ligand and the remaining four oxygen atoms from two bidentate nitrates (O7, O8, O11, O10).as shown in (Fig. 2c ) two crystallographically equivalent YbIII ions are bridged by phenoxy ocygen atom to give a dinuclear building block.

    Fig. 1. IR Spectra of ligand H3L and lanthanide complexes




    Fig. 2. a) The coordination environment of YbIII ion in compound 2 with thermal elliposids at 30% probability (All hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).color code: Yb, green; O, red; N, blue; C, black.(b) Coordination polyhedron of Yb(III) in compound 2 (c) the dinuclear structure of compound 2 with a YbOYbO four-membered ring

  3. NIR luminescence properties

We have studied herein the NIR luminescence properties of complexes 1, 2 in the solid state. Upon excitation, at 470 nm (in fig.3) characteristic Er() ion emissions were observed. The Er ion emits spectra cover a broad spectral range 12001600 nm. With the emission sharp peak maxima centered at1530 nm. The emission obtained is attributed to

the typical 4I13/2 4I15/2 transition of the Er3+ ion. Actually, Er-doped materials with high bandwidth and optical gain

were of great interest in optical communications technology because the 4I13/2 4I15/2 transition around 1540 nm matches

one of the fiber low-loss windows [19]. For Yb() ion When excited at 368 nm (in Fig. 4), the typical emission band of the Yb(III) ion in the complex is a single sharp transition in which well-split NIR emission peaks are observed. The Yb3+

ion emits in the range 8701200 nm. The emission sharp peak centered at 978 nm was assigned to the transition of

2F5/2 2F7/2. The Yb3+ ion plays an important role in laser emission because of its (a) very simple ff energy level

structure. (b)There is no excited-state absorption on reducing the effective laser cross section, (c) no up-conversion, (d) no concentration quenching, (e) no absorption in the visible range [20]. Moreover, upon excitation of the ligandcentered absorption band in NIR region, noticeable is very weak NIR emission and strong emission for 1, 2 complexes respectively.these indications in fact that the ligandcenter has absorbed and transferred energy to lanthanide ions as a type of organic antenna. The weak emission of 1 complex may be due to the fact Er() NIR emission can be quenched by C-H vibrations of the ligand.

Fig. 3. The NIR emission spectra of 1 (ex = 470 nm) in solid state

Fig. 4. The NIR emission spectra of 2 (ex = 368 nm) in solid state

Appendix Supplementary material

Crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been eposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, CCDC nos. 1012481 and 1012485. Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from the director, CCDC, 12

  1. Zhou J, Song X. Substituent-tuned structure and luminescence sensitizing towards Al3+ based on phenoxy bridged dinuclear EuIII complexes. RSC Adv. 2017;7:2554959.
  2. Zheng S, Dong W, Zhang Y, Chen L, Ding Y. Four Salamo-type 3d–4f hetero-bimetallic [ZnIILnIII] complexes: syntheses, crystal structures, and luminescent and magnetic properties. New J Chem. 2017;41:496673.
  3. Yang X, Schipper D, Liao A, Stanley JM, Jones RA, Holliday BJ. Anion dependent self-assembly of luminescent Zn Ln ( Eu and Tb ) salen complexes. Polyhedron. 2013;52(3):1659.
  4. Song X, Wang C, Meng H, Alhafeez A, Shamshoom A, Liu W. Coordination-Driven Self-Assembled Zn. 2018;613.
  5. Song X, Liu P, Xiao Z, Li X, Liu Y. Inorganica Chimica Acta Four polynuclear complexes based on a versatile salicylamide salen-like ligand: Synthesis , structural variations and magnetic properties. Inorganica Chim Acta. 2015;438:23244.

Union Road, Cambridge CB2 IEZ, UK (e-mail: or



Finally, two dinuclear complexes have been prepared under similar reaction conditions. By the salicylamide Salen- like ligand H3L with lanthanide (III) nitrate. The structures of the 1,2 complexes have been determined by single-crystal X- ray diffraction revels bridged by phenoxy dinuclear Ln(III) ions complexes all of the emission spectra of the complexes in the solid state are characteristic NIR luminescence of the corresponding Ln3+ ions. This is ascribed to efficient energy transfer from the ligands to the Ln3+ ion (the so-called antenna effect).


  1. Feng J, Yu JB, Song SY, Sun LN, Fan WQ, Guo XM. Near-infrared luminescent xerogel materials covalently bonded with ternary lanthanide [Er(III), Nd(III), Yb(III), Sm(III)] complexes. J Chem Soc Dalt Trans. 2009;(13):240614.
  2. Chen H, Yang X, Jiang D, Shi D, Zhang L. Construction of NIR luminescent polynuclear lanthanide-based nanoclusters with sensing properties towards metal ions. Dalt Trans. 2018;47(39):138806.
  3. Fei B, Yan P, Liu T, Yang F, Li G. Synthesis and NIR luminescence of a series of salen type erbium complexes. J Lumin. 2016;177:3806
  4. Feng W, Zhang Y, Lü X, Hui Y, Shi G, Zou D, et al. Near-infrared (NIR) luminescent homoleptic lanthanide Salen complexes Ln 4(Salen) 4 (Ln = Nd, Yb or Er). CrystEngComm. 2012;14(10):345663.
  5. Dwivedi N, Panja SK, Verma A, Takaya T, Iwata K. NIR luminescent heterodinuclear [ Zn II Ln III ] complexes: Synthesis , crystal structures and photophysical properties. 2017;192(April):15665.
  6. Guo Y, Lu Z, Tang X, Dou W, Qin W, Wu J, et al, crystal structures and luminescence properties of lanthanide complexes with a tridentate salicylamide-type ligand. Inorganica Chim Acta. 2012;391:1828.
  7. Song X, Wang L, Zhao M, Cheng G, Wang X, Peng Y. Author s personal copy Inorganica Chimica Acta Synthesis , crystal structure and luminescence properties of homodinuclear lanthanide complexes with a new tetrapodal thenylsalicylamide ligand.
  8. Song X, Wen X, Liu W, Wang D. Journal of Solid State Chemistry Synthesis , structure and luminescence properties of lanthanide complex with a new tetrapodal ligand featuring salicylamide arms. J Solid State Chem. 2010;183(1):19.
  1. Liu PP, Sheng L, Song XQ, Xu WY, Liu YA. Synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of a new one dimensional manganese coordination polymer constructed by a new asymmetrical ligand. Inorganica Chim Acta. 2015;434:2527.
  2. SAINT, version 6.02, Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, 2002.
  3. SADABS, version 2.03, Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, 2002.
  4. G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Solution and Refinement, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
  5. DIAMOND, Visual Crystal Structure Information System, version 3.1, Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany, 2004.
  6. Singaravadivel, S., Babu, E., Velayudham, M., Lu, K. & Rajagopal, S. Sensitized near-infrared luminescence of lanthanide complexes by energy transfer from a ruthenium antenna. Polyhedron 60, 5458 (2013).
  7. X. Zou, P. Yan, J. Zhang, F. Zhang, G. Hou, and G. Li, Dalton Transactions, pp. 1319013199, 2013.

Leave a Reply