Study on the Effect of Swimming Pool as Tuned Mass Damper

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV6IS06022

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Study on the Effect of Swimming Pool as Tuned Mass Damper

Shilpa Sara Davidson

Dept. of Civil engineering

Sree Buddha College of Engineering Pathanamthitta India

Aswathy S Kumar

Dept. of Civil engineering

Sree Buddha College of Engineering Pathanamthitta India

Abstract The ever-increasing height of the high-rise structure poses considerable challenges for structural engineers and researchers. Among the many difficult technical problems involved in design, the effects of wind and earthquakes on these structures are definitely the most critical issues. The control of structural vibrations produced by earthquake or wind can be done by various means. Tuned mass dampers (TMD) have been widely used for vibration control in mechanical engineering systems.

This paper presents the study carried out to find the feasibility of implementing swimming pool as passive TMD using SAP2000. Multi-storey concrete structures without swimming pool and with swimming pool were taken for the study. The swimming pool was placed at the roof. The mass and frequency of the swimming pool including its water were tuned to the optimized values. The behaviour of the pool was studied under various conditions, such as different shape. The results show if the pool is tuned properly it can reduce the peak response of structures subjected to seismic forces.

Keywords: Tuned Mass Damper (TMD), swimming pool, SAP2000

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Vibration control is having its roots primarily in aerospace related problems such as tracking and pointing, and in flexible space structures, the technology quickly moved into civil engineering and infrastructure-related issues, such as the protection of buildings and bridges from extreme loads of earthquakes and winds.

    The number of tall buildings being built is increasing day by day. Today we cannot have a count of number of low-rise or medium rise and high rise buildings existing in the world. Mostly these structures are having low natural damping. So increasing damping capacity of a structural system, or considering the need for other mechanical means to increase the damping capacity of a building, has become increasingly common in the new generation of tall and super tall buildings. But, it should be made a routine design practice to design the damping capacity into a structural system while designing the structural system. The control of structural vibrations produced by earthquake or wind can be done by various means such as modifying rigidities, masses, damping, or shape, and by providing passive or active counter forces. To date, some methods of structural control have been used successfully and newly proposed methods offer the possibility of extending applications and improving efficiency. The selection of a particular type of vibration control device is governed by a number of factors which

    include efficiency, compactness and weight, capital cost, operating cost, maintenance requirements and safety.

    Tuned mass dampers (TMD) have been widely used for vibration control in mechanical engineering systems. In recent years, TMD theory has been adopted to reduce vibrations of tall buildings and other civil engineering structures. Dynamic absorbers and tuned mass dampers are the realizations of tuned absorbers and tuned dampers for structural vibration control applications. The inertial, resilient, and dissipative elements in such devices are: mass, spring and dashpot (or material damping) for linear applications and their rotary counterparts in rotational applications. Depending on the application, these devices are sized from a few ounces (grams) to many tons. Other configurations such as pendulum

    absorbers / dampers, and sloshing liquid absorbers/dampers have also been realized for vibration mitigation applications. TMD is attached to a structure in order to reduce the dynamic response of the structure. The frequency of the damper is tuned to a particular structural frequency so that when that frequency is excited, the damper will resonate out of phase with the structural motion. The mass is usually attached to the building via a spring-dashpot system and energy is dissipated by the dashpot as relative motion develops between the mass and the structure.

    Fig.1 TMD installed in Taipei 101tower

  2. OBJECTIVES

    • To find out whether swimming pool as tuned mass damper is effective

    • To find out whether providing a damper or swimming pool as damper is more effective

  3. METHODOLOGY Methodology employed is modal analysis.

    1. Modelling of Building

      Here the study is carried out for the behaviour of G+20 storied building with 2%, 4%, 6% and 8% mass for TMD and without TMD. The modeling of buildings was created in SAP2000 software.

    2. Building with and without TMD

      A building of plan 16m x 16m (i.e. 256m2) is considered with G+20storey in zone V. A medium soil stratum is considered at the location.

      Fig.2 Plan of building without TMD

      Fig.3 Elevation of building without TMD

      Fig.4 3D view of building without TMD

      Fig.5 Plan of building with TMD

      Fig.6 Elevation of building with TMD

    3. Loads considered

      The loads considered for the present study is given in Tables

      Table 1

      Dead load and live load data

      Live Load

      3 kN/m2

      Roof Live Load

      1.5 kN/m2

      Floor Finish

      1 kN/m2

      Table 2 Earthquake load data

      Seismic zone

      V

      Soil Type

      Medium (Type -2)

      Zone Factor ,Z

      0.36

      Importance factor ,I

      1

      Response reduction factor, R

      5

      Damping Ratio

      5%

    4. Building with swimming pool on top floor

    A building of plan 16m x 16m (i.e. 256m2) is considered with G+20 storey in zone V. A medium soil stratum is considered at the location. The top floor of the building contains swimming pools of various positions. Modal analysis is conducted and result is obtained.

    Fig.7 Plan of building

    Fig.8 Elevation of building with swimming pool at two sides

    Fig.9 Elevation of building with swimming pool at centre

    Fig.10 Elevation of building with swimming pool at one side

    Fig.11 Elevation of building with swimming pool at four sides

    Fig.12 Elevation of building with swimming pool at three sides

  4. RESULTS

After analyzing the models the natural frequency and time period is obtained.

Table 4

Frequency and time period obtained from analysis of building with and without TMD

MASS RATIO

FREQUENCY

TIME PERIOD

0%

0.2273905

4.420033

2%

0.22517309

4.441028

4%

0.22215846

4.501292

6%

0.21923276

4.561362

8%

0.21639378

4.621205

Table 5

Frequency and time period obtained from analysis of building with swimming pool

POSITION OF

SWIMMING POOL

FREQUENCY

TIME PERIOD

4 side

<>0.21109729

4.737152

3 sides

0.21164858

4.724813

2 sides

0.20774612

4.813567

1 side

0.21069070

4.746294

center

0.21412554

4.670157

Fig.13 Frequency of building with various percentage of mass ratio for TMD

Fig.15 Frequency of building with swimming pool at various positions

Fig.16 Time period of building with swimming pool at various positions

VI. CONCLUSIONS

Analytical study has been conducted to understand the behavior of TMD with various mass percentages and swimming pool at various positions on buildings. From the modal analysis we obtained that the building without TMD has high value of frequency and low value of time period. When TMD is provided the frequency of the building is reduced. Mass of the TMD has direct influence on frequency and time period of the building. As the mass of the TMD increases frequency decreases and time period of building increases.

When swimming pools are provided on top of the building, we can see that the frequency of building is less than that without a swimming pool on top. From this it is clear that swimming pools act as TMD in buildings.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I am thankful to my guide, Asst. Professor, Aswathy S Kumar in Civil Engineering Department for her constant encouragement and able guidance. Also I thank my parents, friends etc. for their continuous support in making this work complete.

REFERENCES

Fig.14 Time period of building with various percentage of mass ratio for TMD

  1. Alex Y. Tuan and G. Q. Shang, Vibration Control in a 101- Storey BuildingUsing a Tuned Mass Damper, Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, vol. 17, 2014, pp. 141-156.

  2. Chidige Anil Kumar, E Arunakanthi, A Seismic Study on Effect of Water Tank Modelled as TMD, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, issue 2 February 2017, pp.1903-1910.

  3. D. Rupesh Kumar, Fahimeh Hoseinzadeh, A Study on Effect of Water Tanks Modelled as Tuned Mass Dampers on Dynamic Properties of Structures, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 4,December 2015, pp.484-499.

  4. G. Hemalatha and K.P. Jaya, Water Tank as Passive TMD for Seismically Excited Structures, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building And Housing), vol. 9, 2008, pp.349-366.

  5. Manjusha M, Dr.Vra Saathappan, Analytical Investigation of Water Tank as Tuned Mass Damper Using Etabs 2015, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, Issue 5, May 2017, pp.1622- 1624.

  6. Prashant Pandey, Shrinivas Raydu, Laxmikant Tibude, Tuned Mass Dampers as an Energy Dissipater, International Journal of Innovative and Emerging Research in Engineering, vol. 2, Issue 5, 2015, pp.48-57.

  7. R.N. Jabary, S.P.G.Madabhushi, Tuned mass damper effects on the response of multi-storied structures observed in geotechnical centrifuge tests, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, pp.373-380.

  8. Rutuja S. Meshram, S N. Khante, Effectiveness of Water Tank as Passive TMD for RCC Buildings, International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 5, February 2016, pp.731-736. 27

  9. Swaroop K. Yalla and Ahsan Kareem, Semiactive Tuned Liquid Column Dampers: Experimental Study, Journal of Structural Engineering © Asce, July 2004, pp.960-971.

Leave a Reply