Smart Community Health Monitoring and Early Warning System for Water-Borne Diseases using AI

Smart Community Health Monitoring and Early Warning System for Water-Borne Diseases using AI

Madan Mohan M,

Assistant Professor (Senior Grade), Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology Coimbatore -641105

Aiswarya S, Alagu Abishek P, Kaviraj S, Akeel Ahmad Peerzada

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology Coimbatore -641105

Abstract – This project presents a Smart Community Health Monitoring and Early Warning System (SCHM-EWS) designed to detect, classify and provide early warnings for water-borne disease outbreaks at the community/district level. The system integrates crowdsourced symptom reports (public users), field data and sample uploads (ASHA workers), and environmental/wastewater signals with a modular AI pipeline that performs symptom classification, anomaly detection, and short-term outbreak forecasting. The AI layer combines natural language models (fine-tuned transformer-based models) for free-text symptom classification with gradient-boosted trees and LSTM/temporal models for tabular and time-series forecasting[1]. The platform supports role-based access (public / ASHA / government), privacy-preserving data handling, and an operator dashboard for rapid response. Expected outcomes include improved detection lead time, higher sensitivity for localized outbreaks, and actionable alerts for public health teams to prioritize sample collection and interventions. Practical deployment considerations (data quality, connectivity, and ethical safeguards) and evaluation metrics (precision, recall, F1, lead time improvement, and AUC for forecasts) are discussed.

Keywords: Community Health Monitoring, Water-Borne Diseases, Early Warning System, Symptom Classification, Transformer Models, Time-Series Forecasting

1. INTRODUCTION

   The burden of water-borne diseases (diarrhoeal illnesses, cholera, typhoid, norovirus, etc.) remains significant in many low- and middle-income regions due to inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services [2]. Monitoring and rapid detection of community clusters of water-borne illness are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. The COVID-era demonstrated the value of combining novel surveillance streams (wastewater, crowdsourced reports) with artificial intelligence (AI) to provide early signals before formal case counts rise[3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) WASH guidance emphasizes integrating environmental surveillance with clinical reporting to make surveillance actionable and effective at the community level.

2. PROBLEM STATEMENT

   Traditional surveillance for water-borne diseases often suffers from delayed reporting, sparse sampling, and low geographic granularity[4]. Community members can report symptoms but the data is noisy and unstructured; field workers collect samples but face logistic constraints. There is a critical gap for a scalable, AI-enabled pipeline that (1) classifies symptom reports correctly, (2) integrates environmental (including wastewater) signals and field sample metadata, and (3) issues early warnings with quantified uncertainty so public health officials can prioritize responses efficiently.

   Fig 2.1 & 2.2 India Water-Borne Disease Burden Map (2005-2022): 20.98 crore cases, 86% Acute Diarrheal Disease and Deaths

3. LITERATURE SURVEY

   • Recent research demonstrates significant advances in AI-driven disease surveillance and water quality monitoring:

   • Machine learning approaches have been applied to classify and predict water-borne disease occurrences from clinical and environmental data; comparative studies show tree-based ensembles (Random Forest, XGBoost achieving 99.66% and 99.52% accuracy respectively) and deep models perform well on tabular outbreak datasets[5].

   • Wastewater and environmental surveillance (WES) can act as an early-warning signal for enteric pathogens; WHO recommends integrating WES with clinical surveillance to guide interventions. Studies show wastewater detection achieves positive predictive values of 50-71% for forecasting disease clusters[6].

   • Transformer-based language models in healthcare have demonstrated exceptional performance in medical text classification tasks, with accuracy ranging from 86.7% to 97.1%, making them ideal candidates for symptom classification from unstructured patient reports[7].

   • Time-series forecasting using LSTM networks has achieved Mean Squared Error (MSE) values as low as 0.1631 for environmental parameters, demonstrating their capability for predicting disease occurrence trends[5].

   • IoT-based automated systems for water-related disease prediction and anomaly detection enable continuous monitoring that can identify faint patterns missed by traditional methods[5].

4. PROPOSED SYSTEM OVERVIEW

   1. System Goals

      The SCHM-EWS is designed to achieve the following objectives:

      • Classify incoming symptom reports (mobile/web free text + checkboxes) accurately into probable water-borne disease categories (e.g., cholera, acute gastroenteritis, norovirus, unspecified diarrhoeal disease).

      • Fuse environmental sensor data and wastewater surveillance to detect anomalies in real-time.

      • Forecast short-term outbreak risk (14 weeks horizon) at the ward/village level with quantified uncertainty.

      • Provide role-based dashboards and actionable alerts for ASHA workers and government officials enabling rapid response.

   2. High-Level Architecture

      Figure 4.2.1: SCHM-EWS High-Level Architecture Diagram

      The system consists of the following core components:

      • Frontend: Role-based React interface supporting Public, ASHA Worker, and Administrator roles with appropriate data access and visualization capabilities.

      • Backend: REST API with authentication, authorization, and asynchronous task queueing for model inference.

      • Data ingestion: Multi-modal data intake including symptom reports, uploaded lab/test results (ASHA), environmental sensors/IoT streams, and wastewater aggregated metrics.

      • AI/ML pipeline: Preprocessing Symptom classifier Anomaly detector Forecasting model Alerting &

        explainability module for end-to-end analysis.

      • Storage: Encrypted user database, time-series database for environmental signals, and object storage for uploaded documents with privacy-preserving access controls.

        Figure 4.2.2: Frontend dashboard for public user

        Figure 4.2.3: Frontend dashboard for Staff/ASHA workers

5. AI MODEL DESIGN

   1. Symptom Classification (Text + Structured Fields)

      Model Family: Transformer-based language models (fine-tuned BERT / ClinicalBERT / DistilBERT) for classifying short symptom texts into disease categories. Transformer models handle medical jargon and contextual nuance better than traditional bag- of-words methods [7]. Fine-tuning on labeled symptom datasets and augmenting with domain lexicons improves accuacy.

      Implementation Strategy: Use a lightweight DistilBERT for on-device inference on the public mobile app (for low-connectivity scenarios), and deploy larger ClinicalBERT at the server backend for high-accuracy classification.

      Figure 5.1.1: DistilBERT Transformer Pipeline for Symptom Classification

      Features:

      • Free-text symptom description

      • Checkbox-selected symptoms

      • Geographic location

      • Age group / demographic

      • Symptom onset date

        Output: Probabilities across disease classes + confidence score + top contributing tokens for explainability and clinical validation.

   2. Tabular & Environmental Models

      Model Family: Gradient Boosted Trees (XGBoost / LightGBM) for tabular predictors including sample positivity rates, turbidity, pH, recent rainfall, temperature, and sanitation indicators. These models are robust with mixed numeric/categorical features, fast to train and serve, and provide feature importance analysis through SHAP values[5].

      Environmental Features:

      • Water quality metrics (turbidity, pH, chlorine residual)

      • Weather data (rainfall, temperature, humidity)

      • Wastewater pathogen concentration indices

      • Sanitation infrastructure indicators

   3. Time-Series Forecasting and Anomaly Detection

      Model Family: LSTM/GRU or Temporal Convolution Networks (TCN) for short-term forecasts combined with statistical models (Facebook Prophet) for seasonality and trend decomposition [5]. Models output predicted case counts with forecast uncertainty intervals.

      Anomaly Detection: Autoencoders or z-score based control charts on wastewater signal residuals to flag unusual epidemiological patterns.

      Temporal Window: 14 week forecast horizon for actionable lead time improvement.

   4. Ensemble & Alert Logic

      Combine signals through weighted ensemble of:

      • Symptom classifier probability mass

      • Tabular risk score (environmental/wastewater)

      • Wastewater anomaly score

      • Environmental risk indices

        If ensemble risk exceeds threshold (tuned for desired sensitivity), create an alert (info/urgent) and route to ASHA teams. The ensemble approach reduces false positives while maintaining high sensitivity for localized outbreaks.

6. DATA SOURCES & DATASET REQUIREMENTS

   The system leverages multiple heterogeneous data sources:

   Data Source	Description	Privacy Level
   Crowdsourced symptom reports	Mobile/web forms with structured checkboxes, free text, photo uploads	Anonymized
   ASHA worker sample metadata	Sample type, GPS location, timestamp, lab results	Encrypted
   Wastewater surveillance	Aggregate pathogen concentration indices per site	Aggregated
   Environmental sensors/IoT	Turbidity, pH, temperature, rainfall, water flow	Real-time
   Historical case counts	Lab-confirmed cases for training and validation	De-identified

   Table 1: Primary Data Sources and Privacy Considerations for SCHM-EWS Data Quality Requirements:

   • Location validation and GPS accuracy checks

   • Timestamp synchronization across sources

   • De-duplication of symptom reports

   • Handling missing values and data imputation

7. METHODOLOGY & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

   1. Data Pipeline & Preprocessing

      The system follows a structured 5-stage data processing pipeline:

      1. Ingest symptom submissions and ASHA field uploads in real-time

      2. Normalize text (Unicode handling, PII removal, tokenization)

      3. Extract structured symptom features and encode geographic location

      4. Merge environmental & wastewater time series into aligned daily/hourly windows

      5. Label historical symptomatic clusters using confirmed lab results for supervised learning

   2. Model Training & Validation Symptom Classifier:

      • Fine-tune pre-trained transformer on labeled symptom dataset

      • Use stratified k-fold cross validation (k=5)

      • Evaluate Precision, Recall, F1 per disease class

      • Generate confusion matrix and SHAP explainability values

        Tabular Risk Model:

      • Train XGBoost with grid search hyperparameter optimization

      • Cross validation with stratified 5-fold strategy

      • Use SHAP values for feature importance ranking

        Forecasting Model:

      • Train LSTM with sliding windows (window size: 14-28 days)

      • Evaluate with RMSE, MAE, and probabilistic metrics (CRPS)

      • Back-test on previous outbreak events (e.g., cholera/dengue water-linked) to measure lead time improvements

   3. Deployment & Edge Considerations

      • Use lightweight DistilBERT or quantized transformer model for on-device inference in low-connectivity areas

      • Host heavier models in cloud infrastructure with asynchronous sync from field devices

      • Implement continuous model monitoring and periodic retraining pipelines (quarterly)

      • Deploy containerized microservices (Docker/Kubernetes) for scalability

8. EVALUATION METRICS

   The system success is measured across multiple dimensions:

   Classification Metrics

   • Per-disease F1 Score: Precision × Recall / (Precision + Recall) for each disease category

   • Macro-averaged F1: Mean F1 across all disease classes

   • Confusion Matrix: Class-wise true positive, false positive, false negative rates

   • Area Under Curve (AUC-ROC): Multi-class ROC analysis per disease

     Forecasting Metrics

   • RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error): 1 ( )2

     =1

   • MAE (Mean Absolute Error): Resilience to outliers

   • AUC: Binary classification performance (outbreak vs. no outbreak)

   • Lead Time Improvement: Days earlier than official case reporting (primary metric for public health value)

     Operational Metrics

   • False alert rate (% of alerts not validated by lab confirmation)

   • Time-to-action (hours from alert to ASHA notification)

   • Positie predictive value (% of validated samples after alert)

9. PRIVACY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE

   Data Protection Strategy

   Data Minimization: Collect only essential PII; store encrypted using AES-256; apply role-based access control (RBAC) with audit logging.

   Consent & Transparency: Public users must provide explicit informed consent; display clear privacy notices in regional languages (Tamil, Telugu, English).

   De-identification: Remove direct identifiers (name, phone) while retaining geographic granularity (village/ward level); implement differential privacy for aggregate statistics.

   Bias & Fairness

   Monitor model performance across demographic subgroups (age, gender, socioeconomic status) and geographic regions to ensure equitable detection performance. Conduct quarterly fairness audits and adjust model weights if disparities emerge.

   Governance Framework

   • Tie all alerts to established public health authority workflows

   • Implement human-in-the-loop validation before major interventions

   • Establish clear escalation protocols for high-confidence alerts

   • Regular stakeholder consultation (ASHA workers, health officials, community representatives)

10. EXPECTED RESULTS & DISCUSSION

    Integrating AI with wastewater and crowdsourced symptom reports should significantly increase detection sensitivity and reduce detection lag compared to passive surveillance. Published ML studies in water-borne disease contexts demonstrate promising classification and forecasting performance [5][6][7]. WHO increasingly supports integrating WES into surveillance strategies for infectious disease management.

    Realistic Expectations

    • Initial Performance: Modest false positive rate (10-15%) that can be reduced through operational tuning and human verification

    • Lead Time: 3-7 day advancement in outbreak detection compared to official reporting

    • Sensitivity: 80-90% detection of localized clusters (ward level)

    • Operational Adoption: 6-12 month ramp-up for ASHA worker training and system integration

    • Cost-Benefit: Reduced disease burden offsetting operational costs within 18 months

11. LIMITATIONS

    • Data Sparsity: Low connectivity regions may have delayed or missing symptom reports

    • Wastewater Resolution: Signal aggregation may reduce spatial resolution and localization accuracy

    • Training Data: Availability of labelled training data specific to local disease patterns remains challenging

    • Operational Constraints: Logistics for sample collection and follow-up investigations

    • Model Drift: Performance degradation over time due to seasonal patterns and disease evolution

    • Resource Requirements: Initial capital investment in IoT sensors and computing infrastructure

12. FUTURE SCOPE

    • Mobility Data Integration: Incorporate fine-grained mobility patterns (with privacy safeguards) to model disease spread dynamics

    • Multimodal Inputs: Add image recognition (stool test photos, lab reports), IoT rapid water analyzers for point-of-care testing

    • Multi-disease Fusion: Expand model to detect other environmental diseases (vector-borne, foodborne) and cross-disease early-warning signals

    • WASH Integration: Collaborate with water and sanitation programs to trigger automated interventions (chlorination increases, water source switching)

    • Cross-border Surveillance: Extend system to regional and national surveillance networks for coordinated response

    • Real-time Dashboard Enhancements: Advanced visualization (heat maps, time-series plots, predictive scenarios) for decision-makers

13. CONCLUSION

This document outlines a practical design for a Smart Community Health Monitoring and Early Warning System (SCHM-EWS) for water-borne diseases that integrates AI-based symptom classification, environmental/wastewater surveillance, and role-based operational dashboards. The modular architecture supports deployment in resource-constrained settings while maintaining scientific rigor through cross-validation and explainability. With careful implementation, comprehensive data governance, ethical safeguards, and iterative validation in partnership with public health authorities, such a system can materially improve the timeliness and targeting of community-level public health responses to water-borne disease outbreaks.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the guidance of our research advisor and thank the ASHA worker network, water quality monitoring agencies, and public health officials who provided domain expertise and operational insights during system design.

REFERENCES

1. Automated Diagnosis of Ringworm Infection Through a Web Application, Zibaldone. Estudios Italianos, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7175, Apr. 2025, ISSN: 2255- 3576.

2. A Detailed Review on Challenges in the Computational Frameworks in Building 6G for Healthcare System, in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Sep. 2024.

3. A Portable Device for Monitoring Fetal Movement Count, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 13, no. 4, Apr. 2024.

4. Pioneering Stroke Detection for Proactive Healthcare Interventions, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 13, no. 4, Apr. 2024.

5. Classification of Kidney Cancer Data Using Depth Aware Generative Adversarial Networks Approach, The Seybold Report, vol. 18, Jun. 2023, ISSN: 1533- 9211.

6. Survival Study on Load Balancing Methods in Edge Computing with Healthcare Data, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Apr. 2022, ISSN: 0974-5823.

7. Enactment of Firefly Algorithm and Fuzzy C-Means Clustering for Consumer Request and Demand Prediction, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), vol. 9, no. 3, Mar. 2022.

8. Augmented Reality Watch Try-On Application, Journal of Science Technology and Research (JSTAR), vol. 3, Jul. 2021.

9. Identification of Plant Syndrome Using IPT, Journal of Science Technology and Research (JSTAR), vol. 3, Jul. 2021.

10. Automatic Face Mask Detection Using Python, Journal of Science Technology and Research (JSTAR), vol. 3, Jul. 2021.

11. A Multiple Sensor Data-Fusion for EFD Using IoT, Journal of Science Technology and Research (JSTAR), vol. 3, Jul. 2021.

12. Hussain, M., et al. (2023). "Machine learning based efficient prediction of positive cases for waterborne diseases," Scientific Reports, 13, 19507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46747-x

13. World Health Organization. (2023). "Drinking-water," WHO Fact Sheet, 13 September 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking- water

14. Wastewater Surveillance Task Forc. (2023). "Wastewater and environmental surveillance (WES) as an early warning system," WHO Technical Guidance, Geneva.

15. Zhang, T., et al. (2024). "A machine learning-based universal outbreak risk assessment framework," Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 634, 118547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118547

16. Arora, V., et al. (2024). "IoT-based automated system for water-related disease prediction using machine learning and time-series forecasting," Nature Scientific Reports, 14, 27988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79989-6

17. Choi, P. M., et al. (2023). "Wastewater surveillance can function as an early warning system for community transmission of SARS-CoV-2," Emerging Microbes & Infections, 12(3), 21102119. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2171860

18. Reddy, A., et al. (2024). "Task-specific transformer-based language models in health care: Scoping review," JMIR Medical Informatics, 12, e49724. https://doi.org/10.2196/49724

19. Carducci, A., et al. (2023). "Wastewater and environmental surveillance for infectious disease monitoring," WHO Guidelines, World Health Organization.

20. Villanueva-Miranda, I., & Ortiz-Martínez, M. (2025). "Artificial intelligence in early warning systems for infectious diseases: Opportunities and challenges,"

    Epidemiology & Infection, 153, e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268824001899

21. Xiao, L., et al. (2024). "Developing a digital data platform for surveillance of food and water borne disease outbreaks," Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1422373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422373