 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 8
 Authors : Shankar Kumar Vijay
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV3IS10047
 Volume & Issue : NCETEMS – 2015 (Volume 3 – Issue 10)
 Published (First Online): 24042018
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
MCML: Design and analysis of CMOS Invertor and MCML Invertor
Shankar Kumar Vijay 1
1 Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management,
Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, INDIA
Abstract In this paper, a new Dlatch topology has been implemented in MOS Current Mode Logic (MCML) that works on lower supply voltage than the Dlatch topology already implemented in MCML. The already implemented D latch topology is called Traditional DLatch Topology and the new Dlatch topology that works on lower voltage is called lowvoltage DLatch Topology. Power consumed by MCML circuit is directly related to the supply voltage given to the circuit. For a particular amount of current drawn from the power supply, if supply voltage increases then power consumption of the circuit also increases and vice versa. Thus, the lowvoltage Dlatch topology consumes lesser power than the traditional Dlatch topology.
Keywords MCML, Dlatch, VLSI, Low Power, MOSFET, Ttraditional Dlatch.

INTRODUCTION
The demand for electronic circuits with extremely low supply voltages and power consumption is important in development of microelectronic technologies. In many applications, additional requirements appear, particularly the extreme speed or the accuracy of signal processing. Simultaneous fulfilment of the above demands is problematic. In the last two decades, the evolution of modern applications of analog signal processing has followed the trends of socalled current mode, where signals, representing the information, are in the form of electric currents. In contrast to the conventional voltage mode, which utilizes electric voltages, the current mode circuits can exhibit under certain conditions among other things higher bandwidth and better signal linearity. The current mode approach for analog signal processing circuits and systems has emerged as an alternate method besides the traditional voltage mode circuits due to their potential performance features like wide bandwidth, less circuit complexity, wide dynamic range, low power consumption and high operating speed [1].The continued growth of market of mobile and satellite communication as well as multiple optical fiber system, demands for the implementation of high performance MCML circuit. In many applications, the Dlatch gate is the basic circuit used to implement a number of fundamental blocks, whose performance strongly depends on Dlatch gate performance.
The traditional implementation of MCML Dlatch is based on stacked sourcecoupled pairs of MOSFETs. To keep its speed performance as high as possible, transistor operation
in the saturation region has to be ensured by using a high enough supply voltage according to the number of stacked MOSFET. In addition, a high bias current must be used to improve the speed performance, thereby determining a high static power dissipation that reduces the battery life time in portable devices and limits the feasibility of complex circuits [2].
MCML Dlatch topology has been developed to reduce the supply voltage by decreasing the number of stacked MOSFET. This topology will be accordingly referred as the low voltage topology. The interest in MOS current mode logic (MCML) is increasing because of its ability to dissipate less power than conventional CMOS circuits at high frequencies, while providing an analog friendly environment. It is used as a technique for obtaining low power mobile wireless systems operating in GHz range. MCML is a logic style for high speed, low power circuits. This type of logic was 1st implemented using bipolar transistors and extended for application with MOS transistors. MCML circuits with constant bias current are intended for accurate highspeed mixed signal application [3]. MCML dissipates constant static power and requires techniques more analogous to analog design. However, MCML requires smaller dynamic power than that of the conventional logic because of the smaller output swings. MCML seems to be promising in both reducing power consumption and providing an analog friendly environment. The reduced output swing and a faster switching makes MCML a promising candidate for certain mixedsignal applications. The constant supply currents, lower cross talk between analog and digital circuits of MCML improve the accuracy of mixedmode systems.

BASIC CONCEPT OF MCML
MCML in general consists of three main components, as shown in the Fig 2.1, which includes the pullup load, the pulldown network (PDN) and a constant current source.
Fig. 1: Basic blocks of MCML
MCML is a completely differential logic, i.e. all signals and their complements are required. Depending on the logic implemented by PDN, all the current flows through one of the two branches, providing complementary output signals. Voltage at the output of branch with no current reaches VDD, whereas for the other branch some voltage drops across the load. resistor and the output voltage becomes VDD – Ibias*RL. Due to the reduced swing, it has smaller dynamic power dissipation.
MCML circuits are faster than other logic families, because it uses NMOS transistors only. Due to its differential nature, it is highly immune to common mode noise. It has almost flat power curve over a wide range of frequency as opposed to other logic styles where power consumption increases directly with frequency. Therefore at very high frequencies its power consumption is comparable or lower than other logic styles. This makes it a good choice for high speed and low power integrated circuit design

COMPARISON BETWEEN CMOS AND MCML CODE
Till recently, CMOS technology was being used extensively to implement digital circuits. CMOS has the advantage that its static power consumption is extremely less. It uses power only when charging and discharging. That is, dynamic power consumption of CMOS logic is considerable.
Now a days frequency of operation of the digital circuit is increasing day by day. With the increase in frequency, dynamic power consumption of CMOS circuit increases considerably. Hence at higher frequency of operation, power consumption of CMOS circuits is substantial. Another problem with CMOS logic is that its operation is relatively slow

INVERTERS OF THE CMOS LOGIC
The data plotted there was obtained by SPICE simulations using the parameters of 0.18Âµm CMOS transistors with a 1.8V supply voltage. The MCML is faster than CMOS logic because of its smaller input capacitance and smaller
signal amplitude. Because the CMOS logic uses power only when charging and discharging, its power consumption is generally than that of the MCML. The power consumption of this CMOS logic is the product of the operation frequency and the charging and discharging power unit switching.
On the other hand, the power consumption of the MCML is the sum of the penetration currents of MN1 and MN2 in the figure, which is the same as the drain current of the current source transistor MC1. Since MC1 operates at saturation region, this drain current is mainly determined by the gate bias and the contribution of the voltage at the common source node NC is small. Moreover, the operation frequency has little effect on the voltage at NC because of the power consumption of the MCML is nearly independent of the operation frequency. In the Fig.4.1and Fig. 5.1, there are two MOSFETs in the CMOS logic and five in the MCML.
Fig.2 CMOS Inverter

CONVENTIONAL MCML
In addition, the MCML requires two lines for each signal. Therefore, a chip area with a given function is about two to four timeslarger in the MCML than in the CMOS logic.
Fig.3 MCML Inverter

TRADITIONAL DLATCH
A MOS current mode logic (MCML) DLatch consists of a sourcecoupled pair driven by the input CLK, that alternatively activates the transistor pair M3M4 or M5 M6. When CLK is high, M2 is OFF, hence the bias current Is flow through M1 and is then steered by transistors M3 M4 according to the value of input D. Being the output set by input D, the latch is said to be in the transparent state. When CLK is low, the bias current is flow through transistor M2 and crosscoupled transistors M5M6, that store the previous out value by virtue of their positive feedback connection, and the is in hold mode which is shown in fig.6.1
Fig. 4 Traditional DLatch

RESULT AND ANALYSIS

Inverters of the CMOS logic
The CMOS logic has the advantage of low power consumption, but its operation is relatively slow. For example, the maximum toggle frequency of a conventional 0.18Âµm CMOS inverter is only about 3.5 GHz. Simulated inverter delay time as a function of fanout and power consumption is a function of a operation frequency for the CMOS logic and the MCML are shown in the Fig.7.1.
signal amplitude. The data plotted there was obtained by SPICE simulations using the parameters of 0.18Âµm CMOS transistors with a 1.8V supply voltage.

Conventional MCML
Spice simulations were performed using the parameters of 0.18Âµm CMOS transistors. However, in the gigahertz frequency range, the power consumption of the CMOS logic
becomes larger than that of the MCML, as shown in the Fig7.1[b].From the graph it is clear that the MCML is suitable for lowpower operation in the gigahertz frequency range
Fig. 6 Power dissipation Vs Frequency for CMOS and MCML

Simulation result for DLatch
When data is high all the current passes through one branch, as a result the voltage at the drain of that transistor drops to a voltage level (VDD – IsRL). As the other transistor is in cut off and no current is flowing through it, the voltage at the drain of that transistor becomes high (VDD). When clock goes low, the hold pair is activated.
Fig 5 Delay Vs Fan out of MCML and CMOS inverter
The data plotted there was obtained by SPICE simulations using the parameters of 0.18Âµm CMOS transistors with a 1.8V supply voltage. The MCML is faster than CMOS logic because of its smaller input capacitance and smaller
.
Fig. 7. Simulation result for DLatch


CONCLUSIONS

The concept of MOS current mode logic is explained in. CML logic is very useful for high frequency application because power consumption of CMOS based circuit increase in high frequency. MCML based Low Voltage D latch topology has been developed and compared to the traditional implementation of MCML DLatch in terms of supply voltage. It allows for a supply voltage reduction by a factor of 25 % with respect to the traditional topology, which could be exploited to achieve power savings.
REFERENCES

M. Sumathi, Kartheek, Performance and analysis of CML Logic gates and latches IEEE 2007 International Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation, and EMCTechnologies for Wireless Communications

FERRI, G., GUERRINI, N. C. Lowvoltage lowpower CMOS current conveyors. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.2003.

B. Razavi, Y. Ota, and R. G. Swartz, Design techniques for low voltage highspeed digital bipolar circuits, IEEE J. SolidState Circuits, vol. 29, pp. 332339, Mar. 1994.

Hassan, Mohab Anis, Mohamed Elmasry, MOS Current Mode Circuits Analysis, Design IEEE transactions on very large scale integration (vlsi) systems, vol. 13, no. 8, august 2005.

K.Kishine, Y.Kobayashi, H.Ichno, A high speed low power by polar digital circuit for Gb/LSI: current mirror control logic,IEEE solid state ckt(1997).

M. Alioto, R. Mita, G. Palurnbo, Analysis and Comparison of LowVoltage by CML D Latch 0780375963/02,2002 IEEE

TOUMAZOU, C., LIDGEY, F.J., HAIGH, D.G. Analogue IC Design: The current mode approach. IEE Circuits and Systems Series 2, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1990.

M. Yamashina and H. Yamada, An MOS current mode logic (MCML) circuit for low power subGHz processors, IEICE Trans. Electron., vol. E75C, no. 10, pp. 11811187, Oct. 1992.

J. Musicer and J. Rabaey, MOS current mode logic for low power, low noise CORDIC computation in mixedsignal environments, in Proc. Int. Symp. Low Power Electronic Design (ISLPED00), Jul. 2000, pp. 102107.

M. Alioto and G. Palumbo, Design strategies for source coupled logic gates, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 50, pp. 640654, May 2003.

B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Devices. New York: McGrawHill, 2001.

M. Alioto – G. Palumbo, "Modeling and optimized design of current mode MUX/XOR and D FlipFlop,'' IEEE Trans. on CASpart I I , V. 47, No.5, pp.452461, May2004