Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Cultivars under Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Defoliation

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV8IS010078

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Cultivars under Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Defoliation

Abdullah Ahmed Bjaili, Samir G. Al-Solaimani and Fathy S. EL-Nakhlawy

Department of Arid Land Agriculture, Faculty of Meteorology,

Environment & Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University

Abstract:-

This study was conducted in 2017 and 2018 seasons to investigate the effects of 3 nitrogen fertilizer rates (100, 200 and 300 kg N/ha), 3 defoliation levels ( 0.0, 2 and 4 leaves/plant) on yield attributes and yield of 3 different sunflower cultivars ( Egyptian cv. Sakha -53, Argentina cv. Argentina -11 and Turkish cv. May Hybrid ). The experiments were conducted in the Agriculture Research station of king abdulaziz university at Hada Al-sham. The experiments were laid out in split plot design using 4 replicates. The results showed that there were significant effects of the treatments and their interactions on sunflower yield and yield parameters, and on soil characteristics. Nitrogen fertilizer rate 300 kg N/ha increased sunflower head diameter, seed weight per plant, seed yield per hectare, and increased soil nitrogen percentage and soil organic matter (OM%), while soil pH was significantly reduced. Defoliation of 4 leaves of the plant bottom at flowering stage significantly affected yield components of sunflower cultivars, head diameter, seed weight per plant, weight of 100 seeds and total seed yield kg/ha. The highest seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and total seed yield/ha were obtained by the sunflower cultivar Argentina under nitrogen rate 300 kg/ha and removal of 4 leaves. The highest head diameter was obtained by Sakha under nitrogen rate 300 kg/ha and removal of 4 leaves from plant bottom at flowering stage. Highest soil nitrogen continents was obtained by Sakha and applying 300kg/ha and removal of 4 leaves, and highest soil organic matter (OM%) was obtained by May Hybrid and applying 300 kg/ha nitrogen and removal of 2 leaves.

Key words: Sunflower, Defolation, Nitrogen, Soil characteristics, Fertilizer.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important crop plant, it ranks third to the oil producing plants in the world, and it grows well in arid lands, besides its leaves represents good forage products. There was significant increase in seed production, with increase in the nitrogen fertilization rate from zero to 184 kg N / ha (Salih, 2013). N fertilization significantly increased head diameter in sunflower (Aripa et al. 2016). There was reduction in sunflower seed yield below

    the expected levels with application of nitrogen fertilizer at a rate of 90 to 195 kg / ha in the form of ammonia nitrate (Russo and Fish, (2012). Yield production and nitrogen efficiency of safflower qualities have been improved and increased by the addition of nitrogen fertilizer (Shahrokhnia and Sepacehah 2016). Application of N at rates of 0, 100, and 200 kg per hectare on two safflower cultivars, and increased head diameter, and increased seed yield in fertilized plants compared to non-fertilized plants (Dordas, and Sioulas, 2009). Addition of nitrogen fertilizer to the sunflower increased seed production (Zubillaga et al., 2002 and Koutroubas et al., 2008). High yield and yield components of sunflower cultivars were achieved by (Giza 102, Sakha 53) cultivar with increase in N rates (15, 30, 45 kg nitrogen / fed) In Egypt (Abd EL-Satar, et al., 2016). Sunflower hybrids attained the maximum production of sunflower seeds (4.031 t/ha) at 93 kg of nitrogen per hectare (Mina Kiani et al., 2016). Three Sunflower cultivars were treated with three defoliation levels (without removing leaves, removing 4 leaves and removing 8 leaves) and the highest values for, head diameter, number of seeds per disc, 1000 seed weight, total seed production were for the treatment without removing of leaves (AL-Dori and Hassan, 2011). Under application of defoliation at four levels (0 – 4 – 8 – 12 leaves removal) from the stem base of the sunflower plants before the start of flowering, there were significant increase in head diameter and weight of 1000 seeds (Karadogan et al., 2009). Defoliation up to 3 leaves / plant from the stem base of the plant after the end of flowering did not significantly affected seed yield or seed oil content (El-Nakhlawy, 2002). There was reduction in seed weight in castor oil plants due to removal of leaves from the plant (Severinoa et al., 2010). The results obtained from removal of leaves from garlic plants at four levels of leaf removal: 0, 33, 66 and 100% at seven different stages of growth in Spain showed significant relationship between low production and defoliation, and the greater the clearance of leaves, the lower the production of seeds.

  2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:

    Experimental site

    This study was carried out in the Agricultural Research Station at Hada Al Sham , King Abdul Aziz University in 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons, to study the effects of N, defoliation and cultivar treatments on the sunflower crop growth and its components and seed quality. The experiments were laid out in in split- split plot design using four replicates. The nitrogen fertilizers rates (N1: 100 kg N/ha, N2: 200 kg N/ha and N3: 300 kg N/ha) were distributed over the.main plots, The defoliation rates (: F1: without leaf removal F2: Removal of 2 leaves F3: Removal of 4 leaves.) were distributed over the sub-plots and the

    sunflower cultivars (Cv1: Egyptian cultivar : Sakha 53, Cv2: Argentina cultivar: Argentina-11, Cv3: Turkish cultivar : May hybrid) were distributed over the sub- sub plots. The plots sizes were 3.20 m × 2.1m and contained 8 rows with distance 40 cm and 30 cm between plants. Plots were fertilized before planting with mono superphosphate (P2O) at 100 kg / ha, potassium (K2O) at 100 kg / ha. The nitrogen rates were applied at equal dosages after 15, 30, 45 and 60 days from planting.

    Analysis of soil before planting:

    Before planting, the following soil properties were determined:

    soil organic matter, soil (pH), soil (EC), and soil N content according to Pansue and Gautherlou (2006) (Table 1).

    TABLE (1) INITIAL SOIL ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL SITE BEFORE PLANTING.

    Soil Depth

    pH

    EC

    OM

    (N)

    (P)

    (K)

    dS m-1

    (%)

    (mg kg-1)

    0-15 cm

    7.27

    3.26

    0.651

    500

    42.10

    570

    15-30 cm

    7.38

    2.5

    0.990

    700

    35.30

    460

    Measurements

    Sunflower growth components:

    Six random plants were taken within each experimental plot and the following parameters were assessed:

    Head diameter (cm), seed weight / head (g), weight of 100 seed (g), seed yield ton/ha.

    Data Analysis:

    Statistical analysis were done for the results recorded in each season according to the statistical design used. Analysis of variance of the trails means were conducted using SAS program (SAS, 2006). The statistical comparisons of the treatments means will be test by RLSD at P <0.05, according to El- Nakhlawy (2010)

  3. RESULTS

    Effects of nitrogen rates on sunflower yield and yield components

    The results obtained by analysis of variability (Table 2) indicate hig significant differences (P0.01) of head diameter, grain weight / plant, 100 grain weight, yield ton/ha under all nitrogen and defoliation treatments in both seasons. There are significant effects of the interactions between nitrogen fertilizer rates and sunflower cultivars on all measured parameters, while significant interaction between defoliation and the sunflower cultivars with regard weight of 100 grains Table (2).

    TABLE (2) ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF HEAD DIAMETER, SEED WEIGHT/PLANT,100-SEED WEIGHT AND SEED YIELD/HA OF SUNFLOWER UNDER THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES, DEFOLIATION, AND CULTIVARS AND THEIR INTERACTIONS DURING 2016/2017 AND 2017/2018 SEASONS.

    Source of variation

    df

    Head diameter

    Seed weight/plant

    100-seed weight

    Seed yield/ha

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    Replicate

    3

    1.14 NS

    0.19 NS

    3.92 NS

    11.46 NS

    0.49 NS

    0.12 NS

    0.24 NS

    0.01NS

    Nitrogen fertilizer rates (N)

    2

    27.87 **

    36.69**

    783.91 **

    1583.49 **

    68.37 **

    30.07 **

    13.54 **

    7.82 **

    Error (a)

    6

    0.83

    0.06

    9.79

    10.75

    0.93

    0.25

    0.15

    0.03

    Defoliation (D)

    2

    3.48 **

    0.50 **

    59.01**

    **64.17

    1.93 *

    1.48 **

    2.06 **

    1.46 **

    N*D

    4

    0.44 NS

    0.08 NS

    14.35 NS

    12.63 NS

    1.55 NS

    0.34 NS

    0.06 NS

    0.03 NS

    Error (b)

    18

    0.58

    0.06

    6.88

    9.94

    0.70

    0.20

    0.16

    0.03

    Cultivars (V)

    2

    132.78**

    17.76 **

    1516. 57 **

    97.50 **

    535.80 **

    27.87 **

    10.64 **

    7.52 **

    N*V

    4

    1.32 NS

    2.16 **

    58.05 **

    29.21*

    9.06 **

    0.89 **

    1.27 **

    0.06 *

    D*V

    4

    0.16 NS

    0.06 NS

    8.93 NS

    12.00 NS

    2.15 *

    0.57 *

    0.23 NS

    0.03 NS

    N*D*V

    8

    0.46 NS

    0.09 NS

    6.29 NS

    14.86 NS

    0.87NS

    0.33 NS

    0.16 NS

    0.03 NS

    Error (c)

    54

    0.55

    0.05

    5.71

    5.31

    0.64

    0.20

    0.14

    0.02

    NS: Not significant at P0.05 *: significant at P0.05 **: significant at P0.01

    Head diameter and Seed weight / plant (gm):

    There was a significant increase in diameter of the head with increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer in the two seasons. The longest diameter was under 300 kg N / ha with an average of

    14.21 cm in the first season, 11.87 cm in the second season (table 3). There was a significant increase in seed weight/plant with increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer in the two seasons, and the highest seed weight/plant was under 300 kg N / ha with an average of 50.09 gm in the first season, and 47.4 gm in the second season (table 3).

    Weight of 100 seed and seed yield ton/ha

    There are no significant differences in weight of 100 seeds under all N fertilizer rates (table 3).: The mean values of sunflower seed yield/ha (table 3) show that the highest yield of seed / ha was given under the rate of 300 kg N / ha (5.21 tons/ha) in the first season, and 4.38 tons/ha in the second season. There was no significant difference in seed yield under 100 and 200 kg N / ha in the first season while there was significant difference in the second season.

    Effects of defoliation rates on sunflower yield and yield components

    Head diameter (cm)and Seeds weight/plant (gm):

    The mean results of head diameter (table 14) under defoliation treatments indicate that the highest values of the diameter of the head resulted with the removal of 4 leaves / plant (13.65 and 11.05 cm) and do not significantly differ from removal of two leaves, but exceeded values of the treatment without leaves removal in the two seasons. The mean values of the seed weight/plant (table 4) under defoliation treatments indicate that the highest seeds weight/plant resulted with the removal of 4 leaves / plant (46.34 gm) and do not significantly differ from removal of two leaves during the first season, but exceeded values of both treatments 2 leaves removal and without leaves removal in the two seasons.

    Weight of 100 seeds (gm) and Seed yield ton/ha

    Also defoliation with removal of 4 leaves significantly dominated the treatment without leaves removal by giving the highest weight of 100 seeds (11.68 and 12.03 gm) with no significant difference with treatment 2 leaves removal during both seasons (table 4). The highest seed yield 4.67 t/ha and 4.06 t/ha was obtained in the treatment with 4 leaves removal with no significant difference with 2 leave removal treatment, but dominating the treatment without leaves removal which in its turn gave 4.23 and 3.66 t/ha in the first and second seasons respectively (table 4).

    Genotypic Effects on sunflower yield and yield components Head diameter (cm) and Seed weight per plant (gm):

    The highest head diameter was significantly obtained by the cultivar Sakha 53 (15.11 cm) seconded by Argentina with

    13.64 cm and last of Hybrid May with 11.5 cm during the first season, while during the second season Argentina cultivar significantly gave the highest head diameter (11.58 cm) (table 5). Cultivar Argentina significantly gave the highest seed weight/plant (49.51 gm) and 41.68 gm during first and second seasons respectively, then Sakha 53 with

    48.2 and 40.51 gm and the cultivar with the least value of seeds/plant was Hybrid May with 37.67 and 38.58 gm respectively during the two seasons (table 5).

    100-Seed weight (g)and seed yield (tonlha):

    Results in table (5) show that Argentina Cultivar significantly dominated both other cultivars giving the highest 100-seed weight (15.17 gm) and 12.84 gm during first and second seasons respectively, and Sakha 53 dominated Hybrid May in the first season with 10.08 gm, but during second season no significant difference between these two cultivars. As illustrated in table (5) the cultivar Argentina gave significantly the highest seed yield per hectare (4.97 t/ha) then Sakha 53 cultivar with 4.64 t/ha , then Hybrid May with the least seed yield (3.91 t\ha) with significant differences between the 3 cultivars. No significant difference was observed between Argentina and Sakha 53 cultivars during the second season.

    TABLE (3) MEANS OF HEAD DIAMETER (CM), SEED WEIGHT/PLANT (G), 100-SEED WEIGHT(G) AND SEED YIELD/HA (T) OF SUNFLOWER UNDER THE EFFECT OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES, DURING 2016/2017, AND 2017/2018 SEASONS.

    Nitrogen fertilizer rate (kgN/ha)

    Head diameter (cm)

    Seed weight/plant (g)

    100-seed weight (g)

    Seed yield/ha (t)

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    100

    12.45c

    9.86c

    40.82c

    34.25c

    9.91c

    10.91c

    4.26b

    3.46c

    200

    b13.38

    10.94b

    44.47b

    39.30b

    11.72b

    11.85b

    4.05b

    3.81c

    300

    14.21a

    11.87a

    50.09a

    47.40a

    12.62a

    12.74a

    5.21a

    4.38a

    RLSD (0.05)

    0.53

    0.15

    1.8

    1.89

    0.56

    0.22

    0.23

    0.11

    *: Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to RLSD at P0.05.

    TABLE (4) MEANS OF HEAD DIAMETER (CM), SEED WEIGHT/PLANT (G),100-SEED WEIGHT(G) AND SEED YIELD/HA (T) OF SUNFLOWER UNDER THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION TREATMENTS, DURING 2016/2017, AND 2017/2018 SEASONS.

    Defoliation treatments

    Head diameter (cm)

    Seed weight/plant (g)

    100-seed weight (g)

    Seed yield/ha (t)

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    Without defoliation

    13.03b

    b 10.78

    43.79b

    39.32b

    11.23b

    11.63b

    4.23b

    3.66b

    2 leaves removed

    13.36bb

    b 10.87

    45.25a

    39.79b

    11.35ab

    11.83ab

    4.62a

    3.94a

    4 leaves removed

    13.65a

    a 11.02

    46.34a

    41.83a

    11.68a

    12.03a

    4.67a

    4.06a

    RLSD (0.05)

    0.37

    0.13

    1.29

    1.48

    0.35

    0.23

    0.16

    0.15

    *: Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to RLSD at P0.05.

    TABLE (5) MEANS OF HEAD DIAMETER (CM), SEED WEIGHT/PLANT (G), 100-SEED WEIGHT(G) AND SEED YIELD/HA (T) OF THE STUDIED SUNFLOWER CULTIVARS DURING 2016/2017 AND 2017/2018 SEASONS.

    Cultivars

    Head diameter (cm)

    Seed weight/plant (g)

    100-seed weight (g)

    Seed yield/ha (t)

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    2016/17

    2017/18

    Sakha 53

    15.11a

    10.90b

    48.20b

    40.51a

    10.08b

    11.45 b

    4.64b

    4.09a

    Argentina 11

    13.64b

    11.58a

    49.51a

    41.86a

    15.77a

    12.84a

    4.97a

    4.21 a

    Hybrid May

    11.30c

    10.18c

    37.67c

    38.58b

    8.41c

    11.21 b

    3.91c

    3.36b

    RLSD (0.05)

    0.39

    0.12

    1.12

    1.52

    0.38

    0.22

    0.19

    0.14

    *: Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to RLSD at P0.05.

    Interaction effects of nitrogen rates and sunflower cultivars on yield and yield components

    There is no significant difference in the interaction of fertilizer rates and cultivars as regard sunflower head diameter, but there are significant differences in the case of seed weight per plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield per hectare (table 6). The significantly higher seed yield and

    yield components were for Argentina cultivar under 300 kgN/ha, then the Egyptian cultivar Sakha 53 under 300 kgN/ha, then the Turkish cultivar Hybrid May under 100 kgN/ha during the two seasons. Seed yield ranged between

      1. 3.41 kgN/ha during the first season and 4.54 2.91 kgN/ha during the second season.

        TABLE (6). MEANS OF HEAD DIAMETER (CM), SEED WEIGHT/PLANT (G), 100-SEED WEIGHT (G) AND SEED YIELD/HA (T) OF SUNFLOWER UNDER THE INTERACTION BETWEEN NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES AND CULTIVARS DURING 2016/2017 AND 2017/2018 SEASONS.

        Nitrogen fertilizer rate

        (KgN/ha)

        Cultivar

        Head diameter (cm)

        Seed weight/plant (g)

        100-seed weight (g)

        Seed yield/ha (t)

        2016/17

        2017/18

        2016/17

        2017/18

        2016/17

        2017/18

        2016/17

        2017/18

        100

        Sakha 53

        13.91

        10.27

        42.43

        31.86

        7.84

        10.04

        4.02

        3.82

        Argentina 11

        13.08

        10.66

        45.13

        36.46

        14.81

        11.95

        5.00

        3.65

        Hybrid May

        10.36

        8.64

        34.92

        34.43

        7.10

        10.74

        3.77

        2.91

        200

        Sakha 53

        15.10

        10.72

        47.61

        39.58

        10.35

        11.15

        4.51

        4.13

        Argentina 11

        13.46

        11.73

        47.56

        39.31

        15.45

        13.01

        4.23

        4.07

        Hybrid May

        11.60

        10.37

        38.24

        39.02

        9.36

        11.37

        3.41

        3.24

        300

        Sakha 53

        16.32

        11.72

        54.58

        44.58

        12.06

        12.43

        5.39

        4.67

        Argentina 11

        14.37

        12.36

        55.84

        50.09

        17.04

        13.55

        5.68

        4.54

        Hybrid May

        11.95

        11.53

        39.85

        34.43

        8.76

        12.24

        4.54

        3.94

        RLSD (0.05)

        NS

        0.20

        1.96

        1.89

        0.65

        0.37

        0.32

        0.12

        NS: Not significant at 0.05

        Means of soil chemical properties as affected by nitrogen and defoliation rates and sunflower cultivars:

        Table (7) illustrates significant differences between N rates and defoliation treatments and their interactions on soil pH, EC, N% and organic matter percentage (OM%), and also

        between cultivars in N% and their interactions with N rates, defoliation treatments and with both N and defoliation.

        TABLE (7) ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF SOIL PH, EC, N, AND OM UNDER THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES, DEFOLIATION, CULTIVARS AND THEIR INTERACTIONS AFTER HARVESTING SECOND SEASONS (2017/2018)

        Source of variation

        df

        PH

        EC (dSm-1)

        N (%)

        OM (%)

        Replicate

        3

        0.0275

        0.002

        0.000005

        0.00021

        Nitrogen rates (N)

        2

        0.1741**

        0.017

        0.000190 **

        0.00617**

        Error (a)

        6

        0.0012

        0.006

        0.000000

        0.00012

        Defoliation (D)

        2

        0.0074*

        0.021*

        0.000005

        0.00096**

        N*D

        4

        0.0637**

        0.001

        0.000010 **

        0.00275**

        Error (b)

        18

        0.0014

        0.004

        0.000002

        0.00015

        Cultivars (V)

        2

        0.0009

        0.009

        0.000052 **

        0.00052

        N*V

        4

        0.0071

        0.006

        0.000018 **

        0.00099**

        D*V

        4

        0.0161*

        0.015**

        0.000022 **

        0.00029

        N*D*V

        8

        0.0102

        0.013**

        0.000006*

        0.00061**

        Error ©

        54

        0.005

        0.003

        0.000002

        0.0002

        Effects of Nitrogen rates on Soil pH, EC, Nitrogen contents and organic matter

        Soil pH is above 7, and 100 N rate has the highest pH (7.76) while 300 N rate has the lowest pH (7.62) (table 8). No significant differences were observed in EC of the soil under the different N rates, and it ranged between 2.21 2.17 dSm- 1 (table 8). Soil N content increased with increase in N rate and reached its maximum under 300 kgN/ha giving 0.049% (table 8). Soil organic matter increased with increase in N rates reaching its maximum at 300 kgN/ha (0.543%).

        Effects of defoliation rates on Soil pH, EC, Nitrogen contents and organic matter

        Soil pH value, EC, Nitrogen contents and organic matter Soil pH is above 7, and the highest pH (7.71) was under treatment without leaves removal (table 8). No significant differences were observed in EC of the soil between treatments without leaf removal and 2 leaves removal which dominated 4 leaves removal treatment, and EC ranged between 2.17 2.22 dSm-1 (table 8). No significant

        differences between defoliation treatments in soil N content which ranged between 0.046-0.047% (table 8). Soil organic matter was the highest under 2 leaves removal treatment (0.538%) with no significant differences between the two other treatments (table 8).

        Effects of sunflower cultivars on Soil pH, EC, Nitrogen contents and organic matter

        Soil pH, EC, Nitrogen contents and organic matter

        No significant differences between the different cultivars in soil pH value and it is above 7. No significant differences were observed in EC of the soil between cultivars treatments and EC ranged between 2.18-2.20 dSm-1 (table 8). Hybrid May cultivar dominated with 0.048% N content in the soil, and no significant differences between cultivars Sakha 53 and Argentina (table 8). Soil organic matter was the highest under Argentina cultivar (0.535%) with no significant differences between the two other cultivars (table 8).

        TABLE (8). MEANS OF SOIL PH, EC, N, AND OM UNDER THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES, DEFOLIATION, CULTIVARS AND THEIR INTERACTIONS AFTER HARVESTING SECOND SEASONS (2017/2018).

        Source of variation

        PH

        EC (dSm-1)

        N (%)

        OM (%)

        Nitrogen rates (kgN/ha)

        100

        7.76a

        2.20a

        0.045c

        0.517c

        200

        7.70b

        2.17a

        0.046b

        0.536b

        300

        7.62c

        2.21a

        0.049a

        0.543a

        RLSD (0.05)

        0.020

        0.047

        0.0005

        0.006

        Defoliation

        Without defoliation

        7.71a

        2.19ab

        0.046a

        0.530b

        2 leaves removed

        7.69b

        2.22a

        0.047a

        0.538a

        4 leaves removed

        7.68b

        2.17b

        0.047a

        0.528b

        RLSD (0.05)

        0.018

        0.032

        0.0007

        0.006

        Cultivars

        Sakha 53

        7.69a

        2.18b

        0.046b

        0.528b

        Argentina 11

        7.70a

        2.20ab

        0.046b

        0.535a

        Hybrid May

        7.69a

        2.21a

        0.048a

        0.533ab

        RLSD (0.05)

        0.035

        0.026

        0.0007

        0.0067

  4. DISCUSSION

    Application of nitrogen fertilization significantly affected yield and yield components of sunflower. Head diameter of sunflower increased with increase in N rates up to 300kgN/ha. Seed weight per plant significantly increased with increase in N rates, and also seed yield per hectare increased with increase in N rates up to 300 kgN/ha. But N rates have no effects on weight of 100 seeds. The mostly needed natural element by plants for healthy, hastened and convenient growth is nitrogen fertilizer. And under its addition to the soil N fulfils all the necessary activities and functions demanded by the plants, and plants respond to N in a very fast way. High concentration. of nitrogen, leads to an increase in the number of cells and the cell size of the leaf with an overall increase in leaf production, and this may be explained by the fact that nitrogen is a necessary component of amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins and nucleic acids, which prepare genetic material and protein which are useful in plant growth and also encourage a fast growth as stated by Haque and Jakhro (2001). The results obtained in this study agree with many research results obtained by other workers. Also defoliation treatments significantly affected yield and yield components of sunflower. The highest head diameter, seed weight per plant, weight of 100 seeds and total seed yield per hectare were given by the 4 leaves removal treatment. It might be noted that sunflower plants are able to compensate for the removed leaves either by development of new ones or enlargement of

    the existing leaves. This is supported by Severinoa et al. (2010) who removed leaves from castor oil plant (Ricinus communis) at rates up to 60% o the total leaf area to assess the effect of leaf fall on growth and yield components, and found that plants were able to fully regrow the lost leaf area. Also Moriondoa et al. (2003) removed 50% of the sunflower leaf area in different plant growth stages, and found that removal of leaves during vegetative stage initiated significant increase in the leaf area, which compensated for the decrease in light intercept during the season, while subsequent treatments, during flowering and full flower maturity, showed no increase in single leaf area. The results obtained in this study agree with results obtained elsewhere. Karadogan et al. (2009) tested defoliation effect at four levels (0 – 4 – 8 – 12 leaves) from the stem base of the sunflower plants before the start of flowering, and found significant effect of leaves removal on many sunflower traits, including head diameter and weight of 1000 seeds. Severinoa et al. (2010) obtained reduction in seed weight in castor oil plants due to removal of leaves. On the other hand AL-Dori and Hassan (2011) treated 3 Sunflowers cultivars with three levels (without removing leaves, removing 4 leaves and removing 8 leaves) and found that the highest values for, head diameter, number of seeds per disc, 1000 seed weight, total seed production were for the treatment without removing of leaves. Also El-Nakhlawy, (2002) showed that defoliation up to 3 leaves / plant from the stem base of the plant after the end of flowering did not significantly affected

    seed yield or seed oil content. On the other hand, response of sunflower cultivars varied significantly with N and defoliation treatments. The results obtained in this study revealed significant differences between the sunflower cultivars ( the Egyptian variety Sakha 53, Argentina cultivar and the Turkish variety Hybrid May) in their responses to N fertilization and defoliation treatments regarding growth and growth components, yield and yield components, sunflower seed qualities and soil characteristics. The results obtained in this research study agree with results obtained by many other researchers. Laura (2015) tested response of two sunflower genotypes to N fertilization, and found significant differences between cultivars. Presottoa et al. (2017) found significant differences between the varieties of the sunflower in response to the removal of leaves (defoliation). Russo and Fish, (2012) found production of seeds in sunflower differed according to the different cultivars of sunflower. Abd-Elsatar et al. (2016) found that yield, yield components and seed quality were significantly affected by genotypes (Giza 102, Sakha 53 and producing line of L120) yield and yield components as well as their interactions.

  5. CONCLUSION

    The results of this study concluded the significant effects of N, defoliation and cultivars and their interactions on sunflower yield and yield parameters, and on soil characteristics. Application of nitrogen fertilizer up to 300 kgN/ha increased sunflower head diameter, seed weight per plant, seed yield per hectare, and increased soil nitrogen percentage and soil organic matter (OM%). But soil pH value was reduced by 300 kgN/ha. Removal of leaves (defoliation) significantly affected growth of Sunflower cultivars, and the highest head diameter, seed weight per plant, weight of 100 seeds and total seed yield per hectare were attained under the defoliation treatment of 4 leaves removal. As for sunflower yield and yield components, the best yield and yield components (seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and total seed yield/ha) were attained by the interaction treatments Argentina cultivar under 300 kgN/ha with 4 leaves removal (Argentina x 300 N x 4 leaves). But the best treatment for head diameter was given by the interaction (Sakha 53 x 300 N x 4 leaves). AS for soil nitrogen percentage (N%) the best treatment combination was 300 kgN/ha x 4 leaves removal for Sakha 53 cultivar, and 300 kgN/ha x 2 leaves removal for Hybrid May, and for the highest soil organic matter (OM%) the best combined treatments was 300 kgN/ha x 2 and 4 leaves removal for the three cultivars .

  6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The researcher wish to thanks King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology for their financial support to this work (1-17 -04 -009 0002).

REFERENCES

      1. M.A. Abd EL-Satar, A.A. Ahmed, T.H.A. Hassan. Response of seed yield and fatty acid compositionsfor some sunflower genotypes to plant spacing andnitrogen fertilization. Information processing in agriculture 4, 241252.2017.

      2. S.A.M. Al-Dori. Effect of Leaves Defoliation and Plant Density on Growth, Yield and Quality of Some Sunflower Genotypes (Helianthus annuus L., Compositae). College Of Basic Education Researches Journal, 11(3), 724-751. 2011.

      3. C.A. Dordas, C. Sioulas. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, partitioning, and retranslocation insafflower (Carthamus tinctoriusL.) as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Field Crops Research 110: 3543. 2009.

      4. F.S. El-Nakhlawy. Effects of plant density, genotype and defoliation timing on sunflower seed yield, yield components and oil contents and fatty acids. .Acta agronomica Hungarica, 34: 123- 134. 2002.

      5. D. Frazen. Fertilizing sunflower. NDS U Extension Service, Feb. 2016.

      6. Haque, A.A. Jakhro. Soil and fertilizer potassium. In A. Rashid, Soil Science (p.261-263). Islamabad: National Book Foundation. 2001.

      7. T. Karadogan, I. Akgun, N. Tindal. Effect of leaf removal on sunflower yield components and some quality characters. Turkish

        J. of Field crops, vol.14 NO.2, PP:45-54,2009.

      8. D.K. Koutroubas, D. Papakosta, A. Doitsinis. Nitrogen utilization efficiency of sunflower hybrids and open pollinated varieties under Mediterranian conditions. Field crop Research vol.107 NO.1,

        .56-61. 2008.

      9. C. Laura, R. Jach-Smitha, D. Jacksona. Nitrogen conservation decreases with fertilizer addition in two perennial grass cropping systems for bioenergy. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 204, 6271. 2015.

      10. M. Mina Kiani, M. B, Mostafazadeh-Fard, M. Mahdi Majidi, K. Karchani, H. Gerrit. Effect of the interaction of water and nitrogen on sunflower under drip irrigation in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management, vol. 171, pp. 162-172. 2016.

      11. M. Pansue, J.Gautheyrou. Handbook of soil analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods. Springer. PP. 983. 2006.

      12. V.M. Russo, W.W.Fish. Biomass, extracted liquid yields, sugar content or seed yields of biofuel feedstocks as affected by fertilizer. Industrial Crops and Products 36, 555559.2012.

      13. M.N.T. Salih. Response of sunflower to phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions, Sudan HELIA, 36, NO. 58, PP.101-110, 2013.

      14. S. Severinoa, A.O. Maria, M.A. Amanda, S.V. Leandro.Sequential defoliations influencing the development and yield components of castor plants (Ricinus communisL.) Industrial Crops and Products 32: 00404.2010.

      15. M. H. Shahrokhnia, A.R. Sepaskhah. Effects of irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization on yield, water and nitrogen efficiencies of safflower. Agricultural Water Management 172, 1830.2016.

      16. M.M. Zubillaga, J.P. Aristi, R.S. Lavado. Effect of phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization on sunflower nitrogen uptake and yield. Journal of Agronomy and crop science, vol.118. NO.4, PP.267- 276, 2002.

Leave a Reply