Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication
- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 49
- Authors : Aejaz Ahmad , Natasha Ahirwar , Mayank Sinha
- Paper ID : IJERTV8IS060095
- Volume & Issue : Volume 08, Issue 06 (June 2019)
- Published (First Online): 03-06-2019
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM) in Himalayan Geology: Emphasis on Execution Cycle Methodology
Aejaz Ahmad Geotechnical Expert, Research Scholar, GD Geoenka University
Gurugram Haryana INDIA
NICMAR Pune Maharashtra
Abstract : Tunneling is a vast and continuously growing field in the construction industry. It is considered as the most complex construction methods considering the unexpected behavior of the rock mass during the construction phase. Generally wedge formations, shear zones, debris material, presence of nalas/small water channels, less overburden, heavy ingress of water and many more are the conditions which may be encountered during the execution phase. Therefore a precise and safe method is required which could save time and provides safer environment for the construction. New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM) of tunneling is considered as the most effective method in the region of varying geology, as it works on the observational approach of tunneling. This paper gives a brief idea about the various sequences followed and material specifications for the construction of the tunnels by NATM method.
Keywords: NATM; Himalayan Geology; Tunnelling Method
This paper is based on the observations made during the construction of the tunnels in Udhampur- Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link Project (USBRL Project). The project is of national importance which is directly monitored by the PMO(Prime Minister Office). Since the project is in Himalayan range with varying geological conditions the most effective method for tunnel construction seems to be the New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM) which works on the principle of continuous observations after each execution cycle. Furthermore, the stages in an execution cycle have been explained.
The New Austrian Tunneling Method can be defined as a support method to stabilize the tunnel perimeter with the help of sprayed concrete ,anchors and other support and uses regular monitoring to control stability of the tunnel. It was Rabcewicz in 1948 who patented the very idea of this tunneling method (Schubert,2015).
NATM is based on the following principles of :
Prevention from disintegrating of rock mass, hence keeping its strength
Rock mass classification
Monitoring the behaviour
Action of Stress on Tunnel Opening
Rocks are initially stressed, and any opening created can cause changes in the initial stress. The study of stresses around underground openings gives an insight into the basic mechanisms like displacements and the stress fields and helps to provide suitable support for the underground opening. The major conditions around an opening can be classified as in-situ stresses due to the overburden rock, induced stresses due to the excavation for the opening and traffic loads not significant in the case of deep tunnels.
GEOLOGY OF HIMALAYAN REGION
The Himalayas, which stretch over 2400 km are the result of an ongoing orogeny, the result of a collision between two continental tectonic plates. The Geology of the Himalaya is a record of the most dramatic and visible creations of modern plate tectonic forces. This immense mountain range was formed by huge tectonic forces and sculpted by unceasing denudation processes of weathering and erosion, which resulted in varying geology of this region.
Fig. 1 Himalayan Geology
With the presence of soft rock formations such as limestone, siltstone, claystone with the occurrence of active earthquake zones and faults it is difficult for the civil industry to conduct construction activities in this mountainous region. During excavation stage of tunnels at every 100 m interval the
geology differs which means the same designs cannot be applied to every rock formation. Henceforth, The NATM methodology is widely used for these kinds of geological situations as it is based on observational approach and design measures are taken accordingly.
SEQUENCE OF NATM:
The sequence followed here for the initial support system through NATM is as follows:
Charging and Blasting
Scaling (if required)
Geological Face Mapping
Face Sealing Shotcrete
Lattice Girder Erection
Fore polling (if required)
3D Monitoring Targets installation
Initial Lining with Shotcreting
Rock Bolting & Grouting
Fig.2 NATM Sequence
To achieve the designed shape profile marking is required. It has its own significance in the sequential excavation method. Its main purpose is to define the minimum excavation line on the working face. Accuracy in
profile marking helps to maintain the minimum excavation line and prevents over breaks. Points are defined and marked by the survey team. Equipment used here is Leica total station with TMS (Tunnel Measurement System) software.
Fig. 3 Profile Marking Fig.4 Face Drilling
Once the profile is marked working face is drilled with the help of 2 boom hydraulic boom Jumbo (figure 4). The drilling pattern followed is VEG CUT. 107 number of holes (variable) are drilled having a diameter of 41mm. The Number as well as length of holes (pull length) varies, depending on the rock type, if the rock encountered is in good condition then length of the hole can be increased. Generally, 1m, 1.5m, 2m pull lengths are used here, depending upon the Rock class.
CHARGING AND BLASTING
Inserting the Explosives and charging them for blast is termed as charging and blasting. Charging of holes is done manually by expert staff. Drill Jumbos basket is used so lift the man-power to charge the holes which are on the upper portion of the working face. The explosive is having 32mm diameter and 300mm length weighing 120gm. Non-electric detonators are used with cortex wires (figure 5 to 10).
Fig. 5 Emulsion explosive cartridge Fig. 6 Detonating cord/cordex
Fig. 7 Exploder Fig. 8 Ohm meter
Fig. 9 Charging Fig. 10 Blasting
NED significances include simultaneous working practices and efficient working in damp to wet conditions. Trained engineers and foreman are deployed to execute the work in most efficient and safe way. Minimum clearance distance of 100m is taken to avoid any accident. Figures 4- 11 shows the materials used in charging and blasting.
Once the blast is taken various harmful gases are emitted in the tunnel. Expelling out these harmful gases is
termed as defuming as shown in figure 11. Generally, due to their lighter weight they travel along the crown portion of the tunnel. A proper ventilation system with jet fans has been planned to maintain fresh air and to take out harmful gases from the tunnel. Ventilation duct is installed along the crown portion considering the height over less diameter of tunnels. All the workers are provided with air filter masks as a safety precaution. A minimum of 15-30 minutes is required for defuming.
Fig. 11 defuming of gases after blasting from tunnel
Material obtained from blasting/Fragmented rock after blasting is termed as Muck, shown in figure 12, the whole procedure of gathering and removal of muck isknown as mucking. Machinery used for mucking depends on the availability of working area inside the tunnels. Since
the diameter of Rescue/Escape tunnel is less therefore Hagg Loader (figure 13) is used for collection and filling of Muck in dumpers. Whereas, diameter of Main Tunnel is enough for the movement of side tilt loader. Dumpers with a Capacity of 25 tons are used to carry muck from tunnel face to the acquired dumping yards.
Fig. 12 Muck in the tunnel Fig.13 Hagg Loader used in removal of muck
SCALING AND CHIPPING
Fig.14 Chipping Fig.15 Geological Mapping of Tunnel face
Once mucking is completed the whole blasted area is thoroughly checked for presence of undercuts or some loose material or cracks which are removed with the use of excavators or breakers. Scaling is necessary to provide accurate excavated profile for the installation of Lattice girders and safety of the workers executing the works.
Examining the types and number of joints and type of rock conditions of the obtained face is termed as geological mapping (figure 15 and 16). After scaling and chipping geologist along with survey team and other supporting workers inspect the face. Geologist examines the face and prepares a face log after every pull and keeps a record of the same. Based on the actual site conditions and face log geologist decided whether designed support is enough or less or more for that section.
Fig. 16 Face Log
Whereas Survey team examines if any over break is there or not and brings in the notice of the face in charge after which required measures are taken to control the over breaks.
FACE SEALING SHOTCRETE
A protecting layer is applied on the obtained face and the periphery to avoid falling of loose materials which is termed as face sealing shotcrete (figure 17). Minimum 30mm and maximum 50mm face sealing is applied depending on the site conditions. The main purpose of applying face sealing shotcrete is to prevent any casualty which may happen due to falling of loose material from the excavated face. It acts as a protecting layer or umbrella under which workers and machines can perform safely.
Fig. 17 Face Sealing Shotcrete
3D MONITORING TARGETS INSTALLATION
The NATM principle includes the 3D monitoring instrumentation, which plays a very important role in tunneling, Observation is required whether the support system is sufficient for the particular rock type or not. In instrumentation the 3D monitoring targets are installed to check the deformations inside the tunnels after the excavation. Monitoring targets as shown in figure 18, are attached to rocks in the periphery. Once they are installed initial readings are taken and recorded with the help of total station. After installation of targets readings are taken in the following pattern:
1-5 days Daily
6-15 days Every Alternate day 16-27 days Every 3rd day
28-41 days Weekly
42-69 days Every Next week 70-99 days Monthly
Depending on the rock class longitudinal distance between two consecutive targets are:
Class A 25m Class B 20m Class C1 15m
Radial Deformations with whole cross section are: Class A 20mm
Class B 40mm Class C1 60mm
Class C215m Class D 10m Class E 5m
Class C2 60mm Class D 80mm Class E 100mm
Fig. 18 Optical Target for 3-D Monitoring
Fig. 19 3-D Monitoring Process
3-D monitoring process is shown in figure 19.Once the deformation reaches warning limit additional rock bolts are suggested for better support but if deformation reaches alarm limit then additional supports such as erection of ribs or closing of ring by providing deep invert is done.
LATTICE GIRDER ERECTION
Once the protecting layer is applied then survey team along with the supporting staff reaches the face. Survey team with the help of total station marks the location of the Lattice girders and executes the placing of LGs. Lattice girders act as initial support and provides a defined shape to the tunnel (figure 20). Figure 21 shows layout system of lattice girder. Three types of LGs are used here:
Type one Three steel bars of 25mm dia.
Type Two One steel bar of 25 mm and two steel bars of 32mm dia.
Type three Three steel bars of 32mm dia.
Fig. 20 Lattice Girder Ach
Fig. 21 Layout System; (a) Standard, (b) Vienna
FORE POLING The process of installing fore poles is termed as fore poling
(figure 22). In case of weak rock in the crown portion fore poles are provided for additional support.In this project the length used is 4m with 0.3m center to center spacing for a pull length of 1m at an angle of 50- 7Â°.
Fig. 22 Forepoling
Fig. 23 Shape of Excavation without Forepoling
Fig. 24 Shape of Excavation with Forepoling
The material used is Self-Drilling Anchor having a diameter of 32mm. SDAs have a minimum yield strength (fy) of 200KN. These are installed with the help of 2 boom hydraulic jumbo. Moreover, they are passed through the
lattice girder to counter the weight of the rock mass in the crown portion. Figure 23 and 24 shows shape of excavation with and without forepoling.
Fig.25 Construction Steps:
Installation of wire mesh (fixed to previous forepoling)
Erection of steel rib
Shotcreting: Complete 1st layer where no forepoling to be installed
Installation of forepoling
Completion of 1st layer shotcrete
Shotcreting is considered as one of the main component of initial support system. Shotcreting is of two types : sealing shotcrete and main shotcrete. Sealing shotcrete is used to avoid loose ground and prevent fall-downs, whereas main shotcrete is used to carry load uintroduced by ground in the lining. After the installation of LGs a thick layer of shotcrete is applied. Putzmister is used to spray the shotcrete. Highly skilled staff is required for this work. Mix inclusive of cement, sand, aggregate and admixture is poured in the putzmister where accelerator is also added and then sprayed for quick setting. Face is cleaned with high pressure air or water before application. A minimum of 1.5 m and maximum of 2.5 m distance between the nozzle and the face should be kept for best results. Thickness of shotcrete layer depends on the rock conditions. If poor rock is encountered, then 300 mm thickness is applied and in case of good rock class thickness is reduced to 250mm to 200mm to 100mm. Two types of reinforcements are used here during Shotcreting:
Wire mesh 150*150*60 dia.
If the thickness of shotcrete layer is 250 mm then two layers of wire mesh is applied. One on protecting layer of thickness and other at 130mm. In case of steel fiber 30 kg per cubic meter is used applied directly on the face. Different type of shotcreting is shown in figure 26.
Fig. 26 Shotcrete methods : (a) Dry method; (b) Wet Method
After the application of shotcrete rock bolts are installed to stitch the whole shotcrete with the rock so compact that shotcrete and rock becomes one unit for supporting the whole burden. The rock bolts help to stitch the joints and make it a bulk body, bolts used here are Self-drilling Anchors with a diameter of 32mm and length 3m & 4m in general. Directions of installing rock bolts are shown in figure 27 and figure 28 shows the flow chart of different types of rock bolts.
Fig. 29 Tunnel Profile with rock bolts and forepoles
Fig. 27 General the Direction of Rock Bolts
Fig. 28 Flow Chart of Types of Rock Bolts
Fig. 29 Tunnel Profile with rock bolts and forepoles
Fig.30 Rock Bolt Installation
2 boom hydraulic jumbo is again used to drill these bolts in the periphery.A staggered pattern is adopted in installing these bolts with a spacing of minimum 1 m longitudinal and 1.75 radial. Then grout is injected in rock bolts which fills all the cracks up to 3m or 4m. Grout is a mixture of cement and water. Desired quantity of water is added in grout mixture so that it can easily flow in the cracks. Bearing plates of 250*250*10 with nuts are installed after grouting. 10 hours after injecting grout torqueing is done to tighten the bearing plates and if any space is left between plate and the face then padding is done with cement sand mixture in the ratio of 1:4.
Various rock bolts of grouting and non-grouting categories are shown in figure 31,32 and 33, 34 repectively.
Fig. 31 SN Bolts Fig. 32 Self-drilling Bolt
Fig. 33 Expansion Rock Bolts
Fig. 34 Swllex Rock Bolt
Fig. 35 Difference between not grouted and grouted forepoling installed in pre-drilled holes
NATM is based on the observational approach whole outcome depends on the Geological interpretation and 3D Monitoring data. This method provides flexibility to change the support systems at regular intervals depending on received data from face logs and 3D monitoring. A quick analysis is done and applied on the field saving time, money and material. With this approach and sequence followed better progress is achieved in a safer environment. Deformation data provided by 3D Monitoring ease outs in identifying the exact locations to be countered for additional supports thus reducing the number of mis happenings. Moreover, we can say that NATM provides better options to choose between anticipated conditions and actual conditions due to its flexible nature thus saves our time, money and material. and provides better progress in such unexpected conditions.
Deinard M, Prinz H and Zeidler K (1991), Variations on a NATM Theme, Tunnels and Tunnelling November, Pages 49-51.
Ettel E (1991), NATM Forward Stress Distribution, STUVA (Koln) Conference at Dusseldorf, Germany.
Forrest T and Gay I (1988), First Experience with The New Austrian Tunnelling Method in the United States, Vol.1, Pages 30-38.
Gartung E and Bauernfeind P (1993), Construction of Adjacent Tubes By NATM, Proceedings of the 5th Congress of The International Society for Rock Mechanics . Published by a A Balkema, Pages D163-166, Melbourne.
Goel, B.K., Dwivedi R.D., Viswanathan, G., Rathore, J.S. (2013), Monitoring of tunnel through mixed geology in the Himalaya, World Tunnel Congress, GenÃ¨ve, pp 2115-2122.
H. Bhavsar, A. Dinis, E. Mira Fernandes, P. Antunes, F. MelÃ¢neo (2014), Design and Construction of Tunnels in Zones Subjected to High Convergences, World Tunnel Congress, Brazil.
Ito I and Hisatake M (1981), Analytical Study of NATM, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Published by A A Balkema Pages 311-314.
Kuhnhenn K (1995), The Accuracy of NATM Demonstrated Through Typical Failure Cases. Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference (USA), Proceedings Pages 671-681.
Muller L (1990), Removing Misconceptions on The New Austrian Tunnelling Method, Tunnels and Tunnelling NATM Edition of Summer, Pages 15- 18.
Muir Wood A M (1987), To NATM or Not To NATM, The 35th Geomechanics Colloquy, Pages 26-30, Salzburg.
Nussbaum H (1973), Recent Developments of The New Austrian Tunnelling System, Journal of The American Society of Civil Engineers, Volume 99, Pages 115-132.
Palomba, M., Russo, G., Amadini, F., Carrieri, G., Jain, A.R. (2013), Chenani-Nashri Tunnel the Longest Road Tunnel in India: A Challenging Case for Design-Optimization During Construction, World Tunnel Congress, pp 964-971, GenÃ¨ve.
R.K. Goela, R.D. Dwivedia, G. Viswanathanb and J.S. Rathoreb (2012), Challenges of Design and Construction of a Highway Tunnel through Mixed Geology in Himalayas, 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, South Korea.
Rabcewicz, L.V. (1964-65), The New Austrian Tunnelling Method, Water Power, Vol. 16, M. 11-12 And Vol. 17 N. 1, London.
Sauer G, The New Austrian Tunnelling Method; theory and practice, Tunnel edition of 4/86, pages 280-288.
Schubert w, Development and Background of NATM, Austrian Tunnelling Seminar Ankara, Austrian Society for Geomechanics, March 31st & April 1st, 2015.
Wallis S. (1995), First principles of NATM, World Tunnelling, Vol. 8, 197-200.