 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 0
 Authors : Vinay Sati , Shivasheesh Kaushik , Rahul Pandey , Ankit Kumar Shukla , Dr. Anirudh Gupta
 Paper ID : IJERTV7IS080005
 Volume & Issue : Volume 07, Issue 08 (August – 2018)
 Published (First Online): 05012019
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Hydrodynamic Flow Analysis across bent sections of Pipe using CFD Software
Hydrodynamic Flow Analysis across bent sections of Pipe using CFD Software
Rahul Pandey1, Ankit Kumar Shukla2, Vinay Sati3, Shivasheesh Kaushik4, Dr. Anirudh Gupta5
1&2Scholar, B.Tech, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amrapali Institute of Technology And Science, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
3&4Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, AITS Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
5Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, BTKIT Dwarahat, Uttarakhand, India
Abstract – The energy losses occur in a flowing fluid whenever there is a change in the path of flow. In this paper an approach has been made to reduce the energy losses occurring at bends of a pipe containing a flowing fluid. Velocity and Pressure are the parameters on which have been our areas of primary interest. All the calculations and simulations have been done on the 2D axissymmetric sketches of pipe models using ANSYS R16.0. The fluid being considered is water.
Keywords: KEpsilon, NaiverStokes equation, FLUENT Flow, fillet
.

INTRODUCTION
Fluid has a tendency to flow in layers, as the layer distance increase from the surface of flow the higher becomes the
velocity gradient (). Conversely with the decrease in layer distance from the surface leads to a rise in pressure
(
gradient
). Also just at the surface of the body where the layer is in contact with it, due to its low velocity and
relatively high pressure gradient a situation is created as such that the layer moves at a relatively slow speed as
compared to other layers present, known as the noslip condition. The energy which is useful for transformation lies in the free stream region and when the fluid flows over a bend which changes its direction of flow then the width of the boundary layer starts increasing leading to a lesser free stream region with a reduced energy. Such losses can be rectified by providing smooth curved surfaces which bend the path of flow with a lesser energy loss.
Let net be the resultant velocity of fluid in 2D then,
net= drag cos+ lift sin —(1.1)
In ideal condition the drag and lift component both will be equal and hence the energy loss is minimum in such case. In this paper we have removed the negative pressure zones and thus rectified the problem of back flow/reverse flow in the pipe which thus in leads to lesser variation between input and output parametric quantities. Also the drag effect is reduced using the fillet which is proved in this paper.

MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
There are two models used for this analysis, the first one being a pipe bent at 90 degrees sharply and the other model is a pipe bent at 90 degree using 2 fillets. Both the pipes are of same dimensions as described and the direction of flow is also the same.
We will be using named references further for these pipes, the first pipe described be referred to as T90 and the second one described is F90. For the geometric modelling both have been constructed taking zero tolerance.
Figure T90 Figure F90
The specifications of T90 are as follows: –

Diameter= 0.80 m

Base length= 2.00 m

Boundary length= 11.2 m

Surface Area= 3.84 m2
Similarly, the specifications of F90 are as follows: –

Diameter= 0.80 m

Base length= 1.35 m

Boundary length = 11.03 m

Arc lengths= 1.23,1.30 m
As evident from the above values, both have the same discharge capacity although having varying geometries. Since all the forces due to turbulence are neglected we have done the simulation by applying NaiverStokes equation and KEpsilon model.
The fluid from region 1 to region 2 as shown on the flow diagram, considering that no mass has been stored thus rate of mass inflow=rate of mass outflow. Applying momentum integral and continuity equations at these regions
Continuity Equation
() + 1 ()
—(1.2)
Momentum Equations:
Axial component (zcomponent)
+ =
+
+
1
+
+
1
—(1.3)
Radial component(rcomponent)
+ = + + 1 + + 1 2 + w2
—(1.4)
2
Tangential component (component)
+ = + 1 2 [] —(1.5)
Here ,,w are the velocity components along z, r, directions respectively and the variables =rw and Âµ=Âµeff.


INPUT PARAMETERS
Analysis of the flow conditions was done using ANSYS Fluent 16.0 CFD Software. These equations are solved by converting complex partial equation into simple algebraic equation. Both the geometries T & F 90 are 2D rigid solids comprising of 1 region 3 named selections as inlet, outlet, and path. These 2D geometries were used for solving momentum and energy equations. The initial phase velocity of the flow was defined at the inlet section of the pipe upstream. Acceleration due to gravity has been taken as 9.81 m2/sec. The standard wall functions were applied to the – turbulence models for solving the problems. The initial velocity given to both the T & F 90 geometries were 1 m/sec.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Keeping the inlet velocity constant at 1 m/sec in both cases we get the following data:

Inlet velocities
Figure inlet velocity at T90 Figure Inlet velocity at F90

Outlet velocities
Figure Outlet Velocity at T90 Figure Outlet velocity at F90

Pressure at inlet
Figure Inlet pressure at T90 Figure Inlet pressure at F90

Pressure at outlet
Figure Outlet pressure at T90 Figure Outlet pressure at F90

Pressure Contours
Figure Pressure Contour for T90 Figure Pressure Contour for F90
Discussion
Providing a fillet in the bend course we observe the cavitation is reduced significantly as compared to direct bend in the pipe course. As cavitation is removed also the case of back flow at the bend region is removed and the continuity equation remains valid by a greater degree as compared to that in the 90degree bend. The energy losses as observed are also reduced significantly by providing the fillets. The flow tends to greater degree of continuity when fillet is employed as evident from the above mentioned results.


CONCLUSION
We must employ fillets while providing bends in the course of the pipeline layout to reduce the energy losses and hence forth increase our I/O ratio, from the above results we can interpret that providing a smooth curved path results in greater efficiency as compared to sharp edged bends. These results were obtained using the ANSYS Fluent 16.0 CFD Software. In practice there will be a variation in the above calculated parameters by a certain factor, as these abovecalculations were done for an ideal case of flow, but the conclusion shall remain the same that curved path is better than sharp edged path if high velocity is required at the output of the section.

REFERENCES