 Open Access
 Authors : Gokul Anand
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV7IS11019
 Volume & Issue : CONFCALL – 2019 (Volume 7 – Issue 11)
 Published (First Online): 20112019
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Flow Control Over the NACA 4415 Airfoil using Micro Cylinder A Computational Study
Gokul Anand
Turbulence & Flow control Lab, School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University.
Abstract: The effect of passive flow control methods is widely studied and investigated due to its slight variation in the geometrical parameterswith significant improvement in the aerodynamic efficiency. The computational study of the flow over theNACA 4415 airfoil section with the microcylinders placed, upstream of the leading edge at the Re= 3.3 Ã—105 wasinvestigated. The physical model of the problem was solved by Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Equation(RANS) and turbulence model was generated with standard k (2 equations) turbulence model.The airfoil section was simulated with and without (baseline model) microcylinder along with two variations of diameter. The result shows that the increase in the diameter of the microcylinder delays the stall phenomenon by reducing the separation region in the range of 15Â° to 25Â°.
Keywords : Micro cylinder, passive flow control, stall delay

INTRODUCTION:
Several studies and methods are stillunder development to improve the aerodynamic efficiency of the airfoil, which is primarily used in aircraft wings, wind turbine blades and so on. The formation of a wake region in the suction surface of airfoil when it pitches up to higher angles of attack is the highly unavoidable situation. So the passive way of energizing the flow around the airfoil is necessary which significantly alters the aerodynamic characteristics. One of the ways for vitalizing the flow field so that it may be more attached with the airfoil in the downstream is by utilizing the diverse dimensions of microcylinders and placing them near the leading edge of the airfoil. The need to know how well the enhancement of the aerodynamic characteristics can be achieved by the passive methods lies in the improvements in the efficiency of the aircraft.Some of the computational studies onpassive flow control are as follows.Computational analysis of the flow over the NACA 0012 at Re= 6Ã—106was done by Dahai Luo and et al [1]. In that analysis, the RANS calculations and SpalartAllmaras (SA) modelwere used. Menter's k shearstress transport (SST) model was also used for comparison. Theyfoundthatnarrow spacing (s/c<0.01)and very less diameter ofthe cylinder(D/c=0.01) leads to a considerable decrease in lift coefficient.The stall separation region gets varied with different airfoils, spacing, and diameter of the cylinder.Another computational analysis on NREL S809 wind turbine airfoil at Re = 1Ã—106in the range of = 10Â°24Â°by Xuyang Shi and et al [2].They found that the aerodynamic characteristics were improved while using oscillating microcylinder instead of a static microcylinder. Similarly,
the other works related to passive flow such as vortex cylinders, square rods in front of bluff bodies were also done,to reduce the wake region.

COMPUTATIONAL METHODOLOGY:
2.1.MODEL DESCRIPTION
TheNACA 4415 airfoil was chosen for this computational work. The span of the airfoil in the computational domain is 0.3 m and the ends of the airfoil model are closed by the walls in the computational domain which results in the absence of the wingtip vortices. The chord of the airfoil is 0.1 m.By making the adjustmentsin the dimensions of the microcylinder, the flow field alterssignificantly. The two different dimensions of the microcylinder are 0.5 mm and 1mm. The microcylinder is placed at 5mm in the negative xaxis and 5 mm in the positive yaxis near the leading edge of the airfoil. This computational study was done at the Reynolds number 3.5×105. The baseline case without microcylinder is simulated and tested for the same Reynolds number for the comparison of the data.

GRID GENERATION:
In this computational study, the adaptive grid was generated around the microcylinders and the airfoil. In the near boundary of the airfoil and microcylinder, the finer grids are used in order to getthe high accuracy flow field data in both streamline and wallnormal.The chord length of the NACA 4415 airfoil is c = 0.1 m, the computational domain extends 5c from the airfoil leading edge at 1c.Theunstructured mesh is generated around all solid surfaces. The initial grid count normal to the wall is set to be 100.The flow field parameters getvaried around the surface of the airfoil compared to the far field conditions which significantly provides the information regarding the flow. Flow around the microcylinder which is nearer to the leading edge and the flow variation in trailing edge greatly influence the computational simulation.

GOVERNING EQUATION AND TURBULENCEMODEL:
The physical model is considered to have the incompressible flow generated by the wind tunnel. The governing equation for this problem is Reynolds averaged two dimensional viscous incompressible Navier Stokes equation, whose mathematical form as follows:
Continuity equation:
()
+
()
= 0 (1)
Twodimensional viscous incompressible NavierStokes equation:
()
()
+ +
()
=
2
+ (
2
2
+ ) (2)
2
FIG. 1.1 NACA 4415 BASELINE AIRFOIL COEFFICIENT OF LIFT (CL) VS ANGLE OF ATTACK ()
FIG.2.1 NACA 4415 BASELINE AIRFOIL COEFFICIENT OF DRAG (CD) VS ANGLE OF ATTACK()
()
()
+ +
()
=
2
+ (
2
2
+ ) (3)
2
For the simulation of the airfoil and the microcylinder,the standard kmodelwasused everywhere in the low velocity flow field.Nearwall is treated with standard wall functions. The transport equation of the kmodel used is:For turbulent kinetic energy k,
FIG. 1.2. NACA 4415 AIRFOIL WITH 1MM DIAMETER COEFFICIENT OF
FIG. 2.2. NACA 4415 AIRFOIL WITH 1MM DIAMETER COEFFICIENT OF
()
LIFT(CL) VS ANGLE OF
DRAG(CD) VS ANGLE
+ ( ) =
[(Âµ + ) ] + +ATTACK()
OF ATTACK()
+ (4) For dissipation,
() + ( ) =
[( + ) ] +
(
+ )
2
2
+
(5)
1
3
2
1 = 1.44, 2 = 1.92, = 0.09, = 1.0, = 1.3

SOLUTION METHODOLOGY
A noslip adiabatic solid wall condition is adopted for both the airfoil and microcylinder surface. The free stream Mach number is fixed at M = 0.14693. The Reynolds number based on the airfoil chord length c is fixed at Re = 3.3×105. The coordinate system origin is set at thestarting vertex point of control volume and the coordinate of the microcylinder center is denoted by ( X, Y ). k(two
FIG. 1.3. NACA 4415 AIRFOIL WITH 2MM DIAMETER COEFFICIENT OF LIFT(CL) VS ANGLE OF ATTACK()
FIG. 2.2. NACA 4415 AIRFOIL WITH 2MM DIAMETER COEFFICIENT OF DRAG (CD) VS ANGLE OF ATTACK()
equation) turbulence model was adopted and based on Pressurebased,SIMPLE algorithm was adopted. Air was considered as material. Momentum equations, turbulent kinetic energy equations, and dissipation terms all adopt the firstorder upwind style. Discretization method used for pressure momentum turbulent kinetic and dissipation rate is first order upwind. AMG method of stabilization is used and smoother type is GaussSeidel. AReference frame is set relative to the cell zone.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION :
CHANGES IN THE AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS USING THE MICROCYLINDER:
Figure 1.1 to 1.3 describes the Coefficient of lift
distribution for a range of the angles of attack starting from 0Â° to 25Â°. The CL distribution of the baseline airfoil shows that the stall occurs at = 15Â° with the maximum CL value 1.39.In the presence of microcylinder ahead of the leading edge at optimumposition and size significantly delays the stall phenomenon. This statement is substantiated by the above figure 1.3, the microcylinder witp mm indicates the maximum value of CL=1.4 at =20Â° which was the stall angle for this case . Therefore the increase in the size of microcylinder greatly energized the flow field on the upper surface of the airfoil which resulted in the more attachment of the flow throughout the downstream of the airfoil by
delaying the flow separation.On the other hand, the drag slightly increases comparedto the baseline case,due to the presence of the microcylinder in the upstream of the leading edge of the airfoil. This can be found from the abovementioned figures 2.1 to 2.3.The drag of the baseline case, from the fig 2.1 ranges from 0.04 to 0.29. But from the figures 2.2 and 2.3 the drag range were 0.04 to 0.31 and
0.04 to 0.325. This clearly indicates that the drag increases when the microcylinder is placed in upstream of the leading edge of the airfoil.But at the angle of attack 20Â°, the drag for the baselinecase, 1mm and 2 mm diameter cases were 0.24, 0.245 and 0.22 respectively. This may be the optimum angle of attack of the airfoil with the 2mm diameter microcylinder produces the high lift and less drag.
leading edge. The positioning of the microcylinder should be on the suction surface near the leading edge. In this report, the microcylinder was in the position of negative xaxis 5 mm and positive yaxis 5 mm. The results showed that the lift coefficient is more for the diameter 2mm microcylinder compared to the diameter 1mm microcylinder and baseline case. From thevelocity contours, it can found that the presence of the microcylinder significantly makes the flow streamlined over the suction surface and delays the stall phenomenon by maximum =5Â°.

The drag coefficientwas increased at higher anglessince the stalling region makes the aerodynamic loads act majorly in the drag direction.

At the angle of attack 20Â°, the lift increases which was shown in the figures from 1.1 to 1.3. Similarly, the drag decreases in this angle of attack which was shown in the figures from 2.1 to 2.3. In this report, the optimum angle of attack for this airfoil microcylinder ( 2 mm diameter) combination is =20Â°.
REFERENCES :
FIG3.1 VELOCITY CONTOUR OF AIRFOIL WITHOUT MICROCYLINDER AT
=20Â°
FIG3.2 VELOCITY CONTOUR OF AIRFOIL WITH MICRO CYLINDER OF 2MM DIAMETER AT
=20Â°

Dahai Luo, Diangui Huang,and Xiaojing Sun ., 2017. Passive flow control of a stalled airfoil using a microcylinderJournal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics 170: 256273.

Xuyang Shi, Shuai Xu, Li Ding, and Diangui Huang., 2019.Passive flow control of a stalled airfoil using an oscillating microcylinder. Computers and Fluids 178:152165.

Haipeng Wang, Bo Zhang, Qinggang Qiu and Xiang Xu., Flow control on the NREL S809 wind turbine airfoil using vortex generators Energy:112

Christoph Brucker and ChristophWeidner., 2014. Influence of selfadaptive hairy flaps on the stall delay of an airfoil in rampup motion Journal of Fluids and Structures47: 3140.

Julien Favier, Antoine Dauptain, Davide Basse and Alessandro
This statement is substantiated by the above figure 1.3, the microcylinder witp mm indicates the maximum value of CL=1.4 at =20Â° which was the stall angle for this case . Therefore the increase in the size of microcylinder greatly energized the flow field on the upper surface of the airfoil which resulted in the more attachment of the flow throughout the downstream of the airfoil by delaying the flow separation.On the other hand, the drag slightly increases comparedto the baseline case,due to the presence of the microcylinder in the upstream of the leading edge of the airfoil.
From the above figures 3.1 and 3.2 , it can be found that at the angle of attack =20Â°, in the case without microcylinder the flow on the suction surface has low velocity which shows that the flow was separated. But in the case with microcylinder, the velocity of the flow on the suction surface is much higher compared to its baseline model due to the momentum imparted by the microcylinder. Hence, the flow remains attached which can be clearly seen in the fig 3.2.
CONCLUSION:
The following conclusions were made for the NACA 4415 airfoil which wascomputationally studied in the range 0Â° 25Â°angle of attack at Re= 3.3Ã—105 :


The increment in the lift coefficient is purely based on the spacing and diameter of the microcylinder near the
Bottaro., 2009.Passive separation control using a selfadaptive hairy coating Journal of Fluid Mechanics 627: 451483.