Design Of Two Stage CMOS Op-Amp with Low Power and High Slew Rate

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV1IS8023

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Design Of Two Stage CMOS Op-Amp with Low Power and High Slew Rate

P.K.SINHA, Assistant Professor, Department of ECE, MAIT, Delhi

ABHISHEK VIKRAM, Research Intern, Robospecies Technologies Pvt. Ltd.,Noida DR. K.S.YADAV, HOD, Department of ECE, NIEC, Delhi.

  1. ABSTRACT

    In this paper a CMOS operational amplifier is presented which operates at 1.5V power supply and 20uA input bias current at 1 um technology using non conventional mode of operation of MOS transistors and whose input is depended on bias current. The unique behavior of the MOS transistors in sub-threshold region not only allows a designer to work at low input bias current but also at low voltage. While operating the device at weak inversion results low power dissipation but dynamic range is degraded. Optimum balance between power dissipation and dynamic range results when the MOS transistors are operated at moderate inversion. In comparison with the reported low power low voltage op-amps at 1 um technology, this op-amp has very low standby power consumption with a high driving capability and operates at low voltage. The proposed two stage op amp produces gain bandwidth (GBW) of 10MHZ operated at 1.5v power supply.

  2. INTRODUCTION

    CMOS op-amps are ubiquitous integral parts in various analog and mixed-signal circuits and systems. The two- stage op-amp shown in fig.1 is widely used because of its structure and robustness. In designing an op-amp, numerous electrical characteristics, e.g. gain bandwidth, slew rate, common mode range, output swing, offset, all have to be taken into consideration. Furthermore, since op- amps are designed to be operated with negative-feedback connection, frequency compensation is necessary for closed-loop stability. Power dissipation can be reduced by reducing either supply voltage or total current in the circuit or by reducing the both. As the input current is lowered though power dissipation is reduced, dynamic range is degraded. As the supply voltage decreases, it also becomes increasingly difficult to keep transistors in saturation with the voltage headroom available. Another concern that draws from supply voltage scaling is the threshold voltage of the transistor. A decrease in supply voltage without a similar decrease in threshold voltage leads to biasing issues. In order to achieve the required degree of stability, generally indicated by phase margin, other performance parameters are usually compromised. As a result, designing an op-amp that meets all specifications needs a good compensation strategy and design methodology.

    The reported low power low voltage amplifiers using classical schemes have good small signal characteristics but

    their slew rate is small. By using the same technique slew rate is improved, as well as lower power dissipation is achieved. Also as the transistors are operated at weak and moderate inversion of MOS transistor, the op-amp operates at low power as well as low voltage

    Fig.1 A Two stage op amp (block diagram)

    =

    10 v/µs

    =

    1.25v

    =

    0.75v

    =

    1.0v

    =

    2.0v

    • slew rate

    • Vout(max)

    • V (min)

    • Vic(min)

    • V (max)

    The design of two stage op-amp was done with given specification;

    out

    ic

    • GB = 10.0 MHZ

    • Phase margin = 60 when, the output pole= 2GB and, the rhp zero = 10GB.

    • Mirror pole is kept at >= 10GB,

    • Oxide capacitance cox = 0.5f/µm2.

      Model parameters;

    • KN = 24.0 µA/V2

    • K´P = 8.0 µA/V2

    • VTN = -VTP = 0.75 V

    • N = 0.01/V,

    • P = 0.02

  3. ANALYSIS

1 CIRCUIT DIAGRAM

The circuit diagram of two stage op-amp is given below. It consists of twelve transistors.

The circuit comprises of active load, differential amplifier, and current mirror for biasing, output buffer stage. The current source provides the necessary biasing needed. M5 and M8 are used to reduce the fluctuations in current to give constant current for driving. M3 and M4 (current mirror) provides necessary current to output stage or to bias the output stage.

Fig.2 transistor level diagram

M6 and M7 increase the gain of the circuit.

All transistors work in saturation mode as the dynamic range is large in this mode. Aspect ratio of each transistor is calculated which helps in simulation to great extent.

to add flexibility.

  1. CALCULATIONS

    Vdd = 1.5V

    Slew rate = sr = 10V/µs Load capacitance = Cl = 10 pf

    Capacitance in output stage = Cc = Cl/5

    I = Cc * sr (1)

    Conductance = gm1 = 2.GB.Cc (2)

    (W/L)1 = (W/L)2 = gm12/2.KN.(I/2) (3)

    Vd5 = Vic(min) ((I/KN*W1) + Vtn) (4)

    (W/L)5 = (W/L)8 = 2I/(KN*Vd52) (5)

    Vd11 = Vdd + Vtn Vic(max) (6) (W/L)11 = (W/L)12 = 2 *1.5I/(Kp* Vd112) (7) (W/L)6 = 2 *10I/(KN*(1.2323 -Vtn)2) (8)

    (W/L)3 = (W/L)4 = 2I/(KN*(1.25-Vtn)2) (9)

    Vd7 = 0.25v

    (W/L)7 = 2*10I/(Kp*Vd72) (10)

    (W/L)9 = (W/L)10 = (W/L)7/10 (11)

    Power dissipated = Pdiss = 15I*1.5 W (12)

    = 15*20*1.5= 450mW

    Length of each transistor is taken as constant which is equal to 1micrometer.

  2. T SPICE CODE

  1. DC ANALYSIS OF TWO STAGE OP AMP

    vd 101 0 dc 0.05v

    e+ 2 100 101 0 +0.025

    e- 4 100 101 0 -0.025

    rd 101 0 1

    vci 100 0 dc 2v

    M1 3 2 1 0 NMOS1 W=33U L=1U

    M2 5 4 1 8 NMOS1 W=33U L=1U

    M3 5 5 8 8 NMOS1 W=7U L=1U

    M4 3 5 8 8 NMOS1 W=7U L=1U

    M5 1 9 8 8 NMOS1 W=202U L=1U

    M6 10 3 8 8 NMOS1 W=71.65U L=1U

    M7 10 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=800U L=1U

    M8 9 9 8 8 NMOS1 W=202U L=1U

    M9 6 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=80U L=1U

    M10 9 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=80U L=1U

    M11 3 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=120U L=1U

    M12 5 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=120U L=1U

    IBIAS 6 8 20UA

    vdd 7 0 dc 1.5v

    v8 8 0

    CC 3 10 2pf

    .MODEL NMOS1 NMOS VTO=0.75 KP=24U LAMBDA=0.01

    .MODEL PMOS1 PMOS VTO=-0.75 KP=8U LAMBDA=0.02

    cl 10 0 10pf

    .dc vd 0v 1.5v 0.01v

    .print dc v(10)

    .OP

    .END

    Waveform

  2. AC ANALYSIS OF TWO STAGE OP AMP

    vdd 7 0 DC 1.5V

    vss 8 0

    vd 101 0 DC 0V AC 1V e+ 2 100 101 0 +0.5

    e- 4 100 101 0 -0.5

    rd 101 0 1

    VIC 100 0 DC 2v

    M1 3 2 1 8 NMOS1 W=33U L=1U

    M2 5 4 1 8 NMOS1 W=33U L=1U

    M3 5 5 8 8 NMOS1 W=7U L=1U

    M4 3 5 8 8 NMOS1 W=7U L=1U

    M5 1 9 8 8 NMOS1 W=202U L=1U

    M6 10 3 8 8 NMOS1 W=71.65U L=1U

    M7 10 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=800U L=1U

    M8 9 9 8 8 NMOS1 W=202U L=1U

    M9 6 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=80U L=1U

    M10 9 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=80U L=1U

    M11 3 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=120U L=1U

    M12 5 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=120U L=1U

    CL 10 0 10pf

    .MODEL NMOS1 NMOS VTO=0.75 KP=24U LAMBDA=0.01

    .MODEL PMOS1 PMOS VTO=-0.75 KP=8U LAMBDA=0.02

    .ac dec 20 100 30meg

    .tf v(10,0) vd

    .print ac vm(10), vp(10), vdb(10)

    .OP

    .END

    Waveform

  3. TRANSIENT ANALYSIS OF TWO STAGE OP AMP

    M1 3 2 1 8 NMOS1 W=33U L=1U

    M2 5 4 1 8 NMOS1 W=33U L=1U

    M3 5 5 8 8 NMOS1 W=7U L=1U

    M4 3 5 8 8 NMOS1 W=7U L=1U

    M5 1 9 8 8 NMOS1 W=202U L=1U

    M6 10 3 8 8 NMOS1 W=71.65U L=1U

    M7 10 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=800U L=1U

    M8 9 9 8 8 NMOS1 W=202U L=1U

    M9 6 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=80U L=1U

    M109 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=80U L=1U

    M11 3 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=120U L=1U

    M12 5 6 7 7 PMOS1 W=120U L=1U

    IBIAS 6 8 20UA

    VDD 7 0 dc 1.5v

    V8 8 0 dc 0v

    CC 3 10 2pf

    .MODEL NMOS1 NMOS VTO=0.75 KP=24U LAMBDA=0.01

    .MODEL PMOS1 PMOS VTO=-0.75 KP=8U LAMBDA=0.02

    cl 10 0 10P

    VIN 2 0 PULSE(0V 1.5V 5US 1NS 1NS 20US 30US) VSHORT 4 10 DC 0V

    .trans 1ns 30us

    .print tran v(2) v(10)

    .PROBE

    .END

    Waveform

    transient

    1 .5

    v( 10)

    1 .4

    1 .3

    1 .2

    1 .1

    1 .0

    0 .6

    0 .5

    0 .4

    0 .3

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    Tim e (us)

    transient

    1 .5

    v( 2)

    1 .0

    0 .5

    0 .0

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    Tim e (us)

    0 .7

    0 .8

    0 .9

    Vo l tag e (V)

    Vo l tag e (V)

    TABLE 1

    Step 1

    Cc = Cl/5 where Cl = 10pf

    Step 2

    I = slew rate * Cc

    Step 3

    (W/L)1,2 = (2.GB.Cc)/(2.Kn.(I/2))

    Step 4

    (W/L)5,8 = 2I/(Kn(Vic(min) – ((I/Kn.(W/L)1) + Vtn)

    Step 5

    (W/L)11,12 =2*1.5I/(Kp(Vdd+Vtn-Vic(max))2)

    Step 6

    (W/L)6 = 2*10I/(Kn(1.2323 Vtn)2)

    Step 7

    (W/L)3,4 = 2I/(Kn(1.25-Vtn)2)

    Step 8

    (W/L)7 = 2*10I/Kp(0.25)2

    Step 9

    (W/L)9,10 = (W/L)7

    OP-AMP DESIGN

  4. LAYOUT

    The layout of my circuit shown in figure below is done using professional software TANNER. The layout is both DRC and LVS clean. Parasitic extraction and Post Simulation is performed successfully.

    TABLE 2

    Name

    Unit (µm/µm)

    (W/L)1,2

    32.865

    (W/L)3,4

    6.667

    (W/L)5,8

    202.310

    (W/L)6

    71.649

    (W/L)7

    800.000

    (W/L)9,10

    80.000

    (W/L)11,12

    120.000

    Cc

    12pf

    DESIGN PARAMETERS OF OPAMP

    Output Specification:

    Slew rate

    10 Volts/ µs

    Output Voltage(max)

    1.25 Volt

    Output Voltage(min)

    0.75 Volt

    Phase Margin

    60°

    Power dissipated

    450 mW

    Gain (Av)

  5. CONCLUSION

    The amplifier presented in this paper operates in saturation mode and regulates its bias current. When a signal is applied the current in the amplifier increases so that these amplifiers have very high driving current. The op-amp has low power as well as low voltage. Its slew rate is higher than reported low power low voltage amplifiers at 0.5 um technology.

  6. REFERENCES

  1. P.E.Allen and D.R.Holberg, CMOS Analog Circuit Design, first Indian edition, 2010.

  2. P.R.Gray, P.J.Hurst, S.H.Lewis and R.G.Meyer, Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 4th edition, 2001.

  3. Sung Mo Kang, Yusuf Leblebici, CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits, 14th reprint,2003.

  4. Praween Kumar Sinha, Dr.K.S.Yadav,Design Of current and Temperature Effect with Compensation Technique, IJERT VOL 1, 2005.

Leave a Reply