Comparative Study of 1-Bit Full Adder using Transmission Gate and CMOS Logic Style

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS01002

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Comparative Study of 1-Bit Full Adder using Transmission Gate and CMOS Logic Style

Ketkee Kambli Dept of Electronics & Telecommunication

Atharva College of Engineering

Juili Kolapte Dept of Electronics & Telecommunication

Atharva College of Engineering

Shivani Kulaye Dept of Electronics & Telecommunication

Atharva College of Engineering

Pooja Dharade

Dept of Electronics & Telecommunication Atharva College of Engineering

Mahalaxmi Palinje

Dept of Electronics & Telecommunication Atharva College of Engineering

AbstractPaper discusses comparative study of 1-bit full adder cells with two logic styles namely, Complementary MOS (CMOS) and Transmission Gate (TG). The simulations of 1 Bit full adder at 180nm, 45nm and 32nm technology is carried. Analysis of performance and efficiency of 1-bit full adder cell designs is carried out for different parameters like average power, supply voltage and transistor count is done. The average power for CMOS technology for 32nm is 1.474uW and for Transmission gate technology for 32nm is 1.193uW. It is observed that within a given logic style, as the technology decreases the average power decreases with decrease in the area for a constant supply voltage of 1 V. It is observed that less power is consumed by transmission gate based 1-Bit full adder than the conventional CMOS 1-Bit full adder for all technologies.

Keywords CMOS; TG; Full Adder; Logic Styles; SPICE simulator component;

  1. INTRODUCTION

    These days close-packed, high performance, efficient, low power microprocessor is in demand. The central processing unit (CPU) is the integral part of each microprocessor. Key element of CPU is Arithmetic Logic Unit. ALU can perform basic arithmetic and logical operations. Addition is the most commonly used arithmetic operation in microelectronic systems and it is one of the speed-limiting elements. There are various full adder designs have been designed owing to its significance in many micro-electronic circuits. The full adder circuit is the core of many digital and analog circuits. Therefore, the development of the adder in terms of efficient parameters such as speed and power consumption should be pursued. It is necessary to optimize the performance of full adder cell for fast and low energy operations of arithmetic block. So, energy efficient, high speed, low power and reliable microprocessors are in demand in the recent and innovative silicon technology processes have resulted in the rapid growth of modern IC. Various performance determining

    Factors are strongly influenced by chosen logic style. So, the objective of the paper is to find the most efficient logic style between CMOS and Transmission Gate for 1- bit Full Adder circuit.

    In Section II, the overview of the full adder has been given along with its mathematical equations. In Section III the logic styles used in experimentation are discussed. Section IV shows the Full Adder circuit simulation results with different logic styles. Performance analysis is done in section V and obtained results are presented with the comparative results of cell designs in section VI. The paper concludes in Section VII.

  2. OVERVIEW OF FULL ADDER

    The circuit diagram of a 3-bit full adder is shown in the figure. The output of XOR gate is called SUM, while the output of the AND gate is the CARRY. The AND gate produces a high output only when both inputs are high. The XOR gate produces a high output if either input, but not both, is high. The truth table of 3-bit full adder is given. The 3-bit full adder circuit has a provision to add the carry generated from the lower bits.

    Table 1: Truth table of 1-bit full adder

    INPUT

    OUTPUT

    A

    B

    C

    SUM

    CARRY

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1

    1

    0

    0

    1

    0

    1

    0

    0

    1

    1

    0

    1

    1

    0

    0

    1

    0

    1

    0

    1

    0

    1

    1

    1

    0

    0

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    The expression for SUM and CARRY is given by, SUM=A B Cin

    CARRY= A.B + Cin (A B)

  3. CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION

    1. Complementary MOS Logic Style (CMOS)

      D Complementary MOS Logic Style consists of Pull- Up Network (PUN), which has PMOS transistors and the Pull-Down Network (PDN), which consists of NMOS transistors. The Pull-Up Network connects the output of the gate with Vdd whenever the output of the gate is high. The Pull-Down Network connects gate output and GND when the gate output is low. This logic style consists of 28 transistors.

      Figure 2: 1-Bit Transmission Gate Full Adder [1]

  4. SIMULATION RESULTS

    Figure 1: 1-Bit CMOS Full Adder [2]

    1. Transmission Gate

      It consists on n-channel and p-channel transistors with common connections for source and drain and separate gate connection. The circuit has a total of 20 transistors, comprising of transmission gates, PMOS and NMOS. The use of transmission gates enables the circuit to have high speed and low power dissipation.

      The CMOS based 1-bit full adder and transmission based 1-bit full adder circuits are simulated on the SPICE simulator in the 180nm, 45nm and 32nm technologies. Signals having equal rise and fall time with 50% duty cycle are used for the simulation. Optimization of the length and width of the MOSFETs are carried out such that simulation results have minimum error. The power supply for MOSFET based circuits for all the technologies is 1V. The simulation analysis is carried out with three inputs (A, B, C) and two outputs (Sum and Carry) of full Adder.

      Table 3 shows the transistor specification for CMOS and Transmission gate logic style for different technologies.

      Table 3: Transistor specifications

      Technologies

      NMOS

      PMOS

      32nm

      Length=32nm

      Length=32nm

      Width=42nm

      Width=216nm

      45nm

      Length=45nm

      Length=45nm

      Width=129.375nm

      Width=303.75nm

      180nm

      Length=180nm

      Length=180nm

      Width=517.5nm

      Width=1.21um

      Following results in Fig. 3 to Fig. 8 show behavior of 1- bit full adder for CMOS and Transmission gate logic style for different technologies (180nm.45nm, 32nm).Simulation has been carried out for the supply voltage of 1V

      Figure 3: Simulation result of 1-Bit Full Adder using CMOS logic style using 180 nm technologies

      Figure 4: Simulation result of 1-Bit Full Adder using CMOS logic style using 45 nm technology

      Figure 5: Simulation result of 1-Bit Full Adder using CMOS logic style using 32 nm technology

      Figure 6: Simulation result of 1-Bit Full Adder using Transmission Gate using 180nm technoloy

  5. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

    Table 2: Performance parameters of 1-bit CMOS & Transmission gate Full adder

    Parameters

    1-Bit full adder using CMOS logic style

    1-Bit full adder using Transmission Gate logic

    style

    Technology

    (nm)

    180

    45

    32

    180

    45

    32

    Transistor

    Count

    28

    28

    28

    20

    20

    20

    Tool

    Spice

    Simul ator

    Spice

    Simul ator

    Spice

    Simulat or

    Spice

    Simulat or

    Spice

    Simulat or

    Spice

    Simulat or

    Supply Voltage

    (V)

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    Average power (uW)

    7.057

    1.735

    1.474

    6.792

    1.677

    1.193

    Figure 7: Simulation result of 1-Bit Full Adder using Transmission Gate using 45 nm technology

    Figure 8: Simulation result of 1-Bit Full Adder using Transmission Gate using 32 nm technology

    From the above Table 2 following is the comparative analysis of 1-Bit full adder circuit:

      • On comparing performance analysis, it is observed that 1-bit full adder using CMOS and Transmission gate, the average power for CMOS is more than the Transmission gate for different technology.

      • In CMOS technology, it is found that keeping the voltage constant, as technology decreases from 180nm to 32nm, the transistor count remains the same but the average power decreases from 7.057uW to 1.474uW.The minimum power is 1.474uW for 32nm.

      • In Transmission gate technology, it is found that keeping the voltage constant, as technology decreases from 180nm to 32nm, the transistor count remains the same but the average power decreases from 6.792uW to 1.193uW.The minimum power is 1.193uW for 32nm.

      • CMOS 1-bit full adder contains more number of transistors than Transmission gate 1-bit full adder, hence it is bulky.

  6. CONCLUSION

Low power consumption is preferred in V.L.S.I systems owing to their greater reliability. In this paper, the performance of 1-Bit full adder using CMOS and Transmission gate logic styles are compared and analyzed over three different technologies (180nm, 45nm, 32nm) for the parameters like average power supply voltage, transistor count. It is observed that within a given logic style, as the technology decreases the average power decreases with decrease in the area. Also it is observed that for one given technology the transmission gate based 1-Bit adder has lower average power, less transistor count and smaller area than the CMOS based 1-Bit full adder circuits.

REFERENCES

Figure 9: Comparative analysis for 1-bit full adder using CMOS and Transmission gate logic style

Figure 9 shows comparative analysis of 1-Bit full adder using CMOS and Transmission gate logic style. From the graph it is observed that

  1. The average power increases as the technology increases.

  2. The 1-bit full adder designed using transmission gate has lesser average power than CMOS for all the technologies.

  1. Mr. Kapil Mangla, Mr. Shashank Saxena, "Analysis of different CMOS full adder circuits based on various parameters for low voltage VLSI design", International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2015.

  2. Shivani Sharma, Gaurav Soni, "Comparative study of finFET based 1-bit full adder cell implemented using TG And CMOS logic styles at 10, 22 And 32nm", IOSR Journal of VLSI and Signal Processing (IOSR-JVSP), Volume 6, Issue 1, Ver. I (Jan. -Feb. 2016).

  3. S.M. Kang and Y.Leblebici, CMOS digital integrated circuits analysis and design, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA-2003.

  4. Aminul Islam, M.W. Akram, S.D. Pable, Mohd. Hasan, "Robust 1- bit full adder design using finFET at 32 nm technology node", 2010 International Conference on Communication, Computers and Devices, Kharagpur, INDIA December 10-12.

  5. A. M. Shams, T. K. Darwish, andM.A. Bayoumi, Performance analysis of low-power 1-bit CMOS full adder cells, IEEETransactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2029, 2002.

  6. K. Navi, M. Maeen, V. Foroutan, S. Timarchi, and O. Kavehei, A Novel low-power Full Adder cell for low voltage, Integration, the VLSI Journal,Volume42,issue4,2009

  7. N. P. Singh and Ravi Yadav, Performance Analysis of Various CMOS Full Adder Circuits for Low Voltage VLSI Design, NIT Kurukshetra, 2013.

  8. http://ptm.asu.edu

Leave a Reply