 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 5
 Authors : Deepthi Mariam John , B. Kruthika
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV3IS04046
 Volume & Issue : NCRTET – 2015 (Volume 3 – Issue 04)
 Published (First Online): 30072018
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Comparative Analysis of different Interference Cancellation Schemes for OFDMA Systems
Deepthi Mariam John
PG Student
1Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Parisutham Institute of Technology and Science, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India.
Mrs. B. Kruthika
Assistant Professor2
2Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Parisutham Institute of Technology and Science, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India
Abstract: Each user in the uplink of an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) system may experience a different carrier frequency offset (CFO). These uncorrected CFOs destroy the orthogonality among subcarriers, causing intercarrier interference and multiuser interference, which degrades the system performance severely. In this paper, novel time domain multiuser interference cancellation schemes for OFDMA uplink are proposed. They employ architecture with multiple OFDMAdemodulators to compensate for the impacts of multiuser CFOs at the base stations side. Analytical and numerical evaluations show that the SAMUIC and CAMUIC schemes achieve a significant performance gain compared to the conventional receiver and a reference frequencydomain multiuser interference cancellation scheme. In a particular scenario, a maximum CFO of up to 40% of the subcarrier spacing can be tolerated, and the CFOfree performance is maintained in the OFDMA uplink. In the cancellation schemes used till now the multiple access interference are not removed. The proposed work of this project would be a scheme called Selective Parallel Interference that reduces multiple access interference and reduces the data loss. This paper provides a comparative analysis of different interference cancellation schemes.
Keywords OFDMA, Uplink, Multiuser Interference, Self Interference, CFO
1.INTRODUCTION
A.Overview of OFDMA
In recent years, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) has emerged as the primary transmission and multiple access schemes for broadband wireless networks. Being a multiuser version of the famous Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Division Multiplexing (OFDM) technique, OFDMA operates by separating data into multiple lowerrate streams and transmitting them in parallel over orthogonal carrier frequencies, or subcarriers. Due to the orthogonality, those subcarriers are allowed to overlap in the frequencydomain; therefore high spectral efficiency can be achieved. The lowrate parallel subcarriers transmission turns multipath fading channels into flat fading ones, thus simplifying the equalization task at the receiver. In OFDMA, available subcarriers are grouped into subchannels, which are assigned to different users operating simultaneously. This allows a finer granularity for multiple accesses, compared to Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Time
Division Multiple Access (OFDMTDMA) scheme, in which all subcarriers are given to only one user at any given time.In OFDMA systems, the multiple user signals are separated in the time/frequency domains. Typically, a burst in an OFDMA system consists of several OFDM symbols. The subcarriers and the OFDM symbol are the finest allocation units in the frequency and time domain, respectively. Hence, multiple users are allocated to different slots in the time and frequency domain, i.e. different of subcarriers and/or OFDM symbols are used for transmitting the signals to/from multiple users.
B.Subchannels in OFDMA
Subchannels are the smallest granular units in the allocation of frequency domain and are created by grouping subcarriers in an OFDM symbols in various ways. The formation of these subchannels from subcarriers is an important concept in OFDMA systems. The formation can be classified into 2 types; one is the mapping of a contiguous group of subcarriers into a sub channel called as adjacent subcarrier method (ASM) and the other is the diversity/permutation based grouping called as diversity subcarrier method (DSM) wherein the subchannel typically contains noncontiguous subcarriers. In ASM method, a subchannel typically contains a group of contiguous subcarriers and it is expected that the channel frequency responses on the subcarriers in a subchannel will be strongest correlated. This is based on the fact that subcarriers which fall within the coherence bandwidth have similar responses. In DSM, subcarriers from seemingly random positions in the frequency domain are grouped into a subchannel. Thus a subchannel has a potential frequency diversity which can be leveraged when the data to be sent on this subchannel is suitably coded and interleaved.

ANALYSIS OF INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION SCHEMES
A.SIMUIC Scheme
SIMUIC stands for Simple Time Domain Multi User Interference Cancellation Scheme. This scheme is
based on multiFFT receiver. In this each active user is assigned one OFDM demodulator block so that the CFOs can be compensated independently in time domain. The FrequencyDomain MultiUser interference Cancellation scheme that was employed before the SIMUIC scheme had the disadvantage of power loss. This could be corrected by the SIMUIC scheme. Assume that the users are sorted in order of their Received Signal Strength (RSS) and the BS processes from the user with the strongest received power to the one with lowest power, thus increases the chances of correct estimation and decoding.
The block diagram of the SIMUIC Scheme consists of a frequency offset block followed by an IFFT block at the transmitter side. The transmitted signal of serial bits is converted to parallel bits and given to IFFT. Data symbols modulate the spectrum and time domain symbols are obtained using the IFFT. Cyclic Prefix is added to the start of each bit. The main advantage of using the cyclic prefix
is to maintain the orthogonality. We know that each user my experience a CFO and in order to eliminate it we employ a method by which certain CFO is added with the transmitted signals and the receiver determines the strongest received signal and the weakest signal is eliminated with the strongest signal. Receiver demodulates the signal with strongest RSS first. Fast Fourier Transform is used in the receiver side where the time domain symbols are converted to frequency domain symbols and data is obtained. Cyclic Prefix is removed here. The output is sent to the decoder section.Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) algorithm is used here where the feedback from every iteration till the uthuser is taken. On each iteration the CFO gets cancelled giving the reduced rate of estimation errors. SIC algorithm in the SIMUIC scheme is superior to that of the Parallel interference Cancellation (PIC) algorithm that was used in the FDMUIC scheme.
B.CAMUIC Scheme
Fig.1 Demodulator block of SIMUIC Scheme
MUIC scheme. This provides the reduction in provision for
CAMUIC scheme stands for Code Aided Time Domain MultiUser Interference Cancellation Scheme. It is similar to the SIMUIC scheme, however differs in the fact that the feedback is added in the scheme at the receiver in order to avoid the residual noise that is appeared in the SIMUIC Scheme. The main difference between the two schemes is that, instead of output of the OFDMA demodulator, the received signal itself is used to calculate the feedback. For estimating the correct estimate of the received signal and output of the demodulator the carrier transfer function and the transmitted data symbols has to be perfectly estimated. This method removes all the cross interference terms thus enabling a CFO free performance at the otput of the demodulator. In order to achieve the correct estimate of the data symbols, channel coding is applied in the CAMUIC scheme, thus it is named as code aided TDMUIC scheme.The main difference in the SIMUIC scheme with the latter is that the symbol mapping is applied to the CA
multiple symbols for modulation and increased performance with the reduced CFO.
Channel Estimation in both the above schemes is based on the pilot signal that is sent along with the transmitted signal. The delay subspace is estimated and delay subspace using the Least Mean Square Estimates. Pilot signals are multiplexed along with the data streams to estimate the channels. When the channel is slow fading the channel estimation inside the block can be updated using the decision feedback equalizer at the each subcarrier. The main idea behind such equalization is the use of channel estimate of the previous symbol for the data detection of current estimation and thereafter using the newly detected data for the estimation of current channel.

Channel Estimation
Channels are fading both in time and in frequency. Channel estimator has to estimate timevarying amplitudes and
phases of all subcarriers. One way to do this is to use a twodimensional channel estimator that estimates the reference values based on a few known pilot values. In this case, the signal has 4 subcarriers containing known pilot values to allow the estimation.
To be able to interpolate the channel estimates both in time and frequency from the available pilots, the pilot spacing has to fulfil the Nyquist sampling theorem, which states that the sampling interval must be smaller than the inverse of the doublesided bandwidth of the sampled signal. For the case of OFDM, this means that there exist both minimum subcarrier spacing and minimum symbol spacing between pilots.
By choosing the pilot spacing much smaller than these minimum requirements, a good channel estimation can be made with a relatively easy algorithm. The more pilots are used, however, the smaller the effective SNR, becomes that is available for data symbols. Hence, the pilot density is a tradeoff between channel estimation performance and SNR loss.

Channel Correction
The receiver estimates the channel using the mean square estimate. The user with the strongest RSS is demodulated first and given as input. The channel correction is done as the next section where the estimated CFO (wrong channel)
is corrected. This is done by subtracting the feedback from all the users except itself. The result of the channel correction would be the compensation of the CFO of the particular user.

Symbol Mapping
During symbol mapping the input data is converted into complex value constellation points, according to a given constellation. Typical constellations for wireless applications are, BPSK, QAM, and 16 QAM. The amount of data transmitted on each subcarrier depends on the constellation. Channel condition is the deciding factor for the type of constellation to be used. In a channel with high interference a small constellation like BPSK is favourable as the required signaltonoiseratio (SNR) in the receiver is low. For interference free channel a larger constellation is more beneficial due to the higher bit rate. Known pilot symbols mapped with known mapping schemes can be inserted at this moment.

Symbol DeMapping
When channel estimation is done the complex received data is obtained which are demapped according to the transmission constellation diagram. At this moment, FEC decoding and deinterleaving are used to recover the originally transmitted bit stream.
Fig.2 Demodulator block of CAMUIC Scheme


PROPOSED SYSTEMSPIC
SPIC stands for Selective Parallel Interference Cancellation. In this technique we explain a method to counteract the effect of different frequency offsets of the users in a OFDMA uplink system with frequency selective Rayleigh fading channel. The multiple access interference is reduced by reconstructing and removing the interfering signals. This is done by accomplish Successive or Selective Cancellation. We analyze the performance of these cancellation schemes assuming either ideal or estimated
frequency offsets. SPIC, the cancellation is performed on a reliability classification basis. The received signals are divided between reliable and unreliable after a threshold comparison. If the carrier has been evaluated as reliable, it is directly detected, reconstructed and removed from the received signal. For the unreliable carriers, instead, the decision is taken after the cancellation of the reliable ones. The multiple access interference due to the frequency misalignment of the users was removed by using Interference Cancellation. The advantage of this scheme is mainly the reduction of BER followed by the better
performance in SNR. Reduction in data loss would be the most notable improvement.
A. SPIC as an effective algorithm
Before the SPIC stages all the signals of the users are ranked according to the signal power. Without the loss of generality we assume that the first user has the strongest received power followed by the second user. The SPIC performs the cancellation of interfering users from the whole received signal based on their relative reliability that is determined by the ranks. In each Interference Cancellation stage all the active users are divided into two groups: one is regarded as the reliable group, the users with the strongest power and the other is the unreliable group with the users of weaker power. Since the users in the reliable group have higher probability to be correctly demodulated, their BER performance will reach to be satisfied with fewer stages than those in the unreliable group. The estimated MUI due to those users is then
subtracted from the received signal and the resulting residual signal is used for the detection of the left users in the reliable group, within which the parallel detection is performed to estimate the user's transmitted signal and MUI. Meanwhile, the estimated MAI due to the whole reliable group is also subtracted from the received signal and its residual signal is processed for the detection of the unreliable group. The signals in the unreliable group won't contribute to the cancellation part in the same stage due to its relative lower reliability. The SPIC combines the advantages of SIC and PIC together. Similar to PIC, its parallel process in each stage reduced the detection delay greatly compared with SIC. With the selective cancellation based on the power rank which is a key feature of the SIC, the "PingPong" behaviour of PIC may be overcome. The computational complexity and processing delay depend on the number of SPIC stages, the size of the reliable group and the necessary cancellation operations at each stage.
Fig.3. Demodulator Block of SPIC Scheme
4. ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Fig.4. Average CINR v/s No. of iterations
Fig.5. BER v/s SNR of existing system
Fig.6. BER v/s SNR of existing and proposed system

DISCUSSION
From the results it is evident that the proposed system has a better performance than the existing system. The BER performance of the system is low in the proposed system than the existing interference cancellation scheme. The CINR performance is also improved in the proposed system.

CONCLUSION

This paper has proposed novel MUI cancellation schemes, which are very effective against the effects of multiple CFOs scenario in the uplink of the OFDMAbased system. Analytical and numerical evaluation has shown that the schemes outperform the performance of the conventional OFDMA receiver and the FDMUIC scheme, for both block and interleaved subcarrier allocations. The proposed schemes are especially useful in scenarios where BS cannot instruct users to adjust their CFO or implementation of such instruction is expensive (e.g. there is no feedback channel or low cost terminal does not have ability to adjust its frequency base accurately). They are compatible with current standard for MS using OFDMA technique, for example the IEEE 802.16, since all changes are transparent for MS. The proposed schemes introduce additional complexity, which can be justified by the fact that the complexity is added only to BS and the lower cost and faster operation of FFT processing chip. The schemes show good performance under practical CFO estimator, and the performance converge after several iterations. However the selfinterference problem that could not be corrected is expected to be corrected in the proposed system. The extension of the work is expected to reduce the data loss with improved SNR value and decreased BER. Number of users and the corresponding BER would be calculated.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank our guide Mrs.B.Kruthika Asst. Prof., Electronics and Communication engineering Department, Parisutham Institute of Technology and Science, Thanjavur for her help and guidance to enable me to propose this system.
REFERENCES

Defeng(David)Huang, Khaled Ben Letaif, Fellow IEEE,An InterferenceCancellation Scheme for Carrier Frequency Offset Correction in OFDMA Systems , IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol 53, no 7, July 2005.

H. C. Nguyen, E. de Carvalho, and R. Prasad, Multiuser interference cancellation scheme(s) for multiple carrier frequency offset compensation in uplink OFDMA, IEEE PIMRC in 2006

J. Choi, C. Lee, H. W. Jung, and Y. H. Lee, Carrier frequency offset compensation for uplink of ofdmfdma systems, IEEE Commun.Lett.,vol. 4, pp. 414416, Dec. 2000.

S.Barbarossa, M.Pompiili, G.B Giannakis, Time and Frequency Synchronization of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access Systems IEEE 2001.

SrinivasYerramalli, MilicaStojanovic and UrbashiMitra, Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation for Uplink OFDMA using Partial FFT Demodulation(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2009

An Efficient Inter Carrier Interference Cancellation Schemes for OFDM Systems. IEEE Transactions on Communication, vol 43, No.
/2/3/4, February 1998

Thierry Pollet , Mark Van Bladel and Marc Moeneclaey,BER Sensitivity of OFDM Systems to Carrier Frequency Offset and Weiner Phase Noise IEEE
AUTHOR DETAILS
DEEPTHI MARIAM JOHN1 received degree B.E (ECE) from Trichy Engineering College, Trichy, Tamilnadu, India, affiliated to Anna University Chennaiin 2008. She is currently persuading M.E Communication Systems in Parisutham Institute of Technology and Science, Thanjavur,Tamilnadu, India, (affiliated to Anna University Chennai).