Characterization of Na2CO3 activated Calcium Bentonite and its application as a GCL

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS08009

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Characterization of Na2CO3 activated Calcium Bentonite and its application as a GCL

Reshma R Unnithan

Mtech : Geotechnical Engineering Marian Engineering College Trivandrum, Kerala

Soorya S R

Assistant professor: dept of civil engineering Marian engineering college

Trivandrum, Kerala

AbstractLiners are the major component of landfills. They are provided at the base of the landfill. The main function

A. Soil

II MATERIALS AND METHODS

of landfill liners is to eliminate the percolation of leachate to the soil beneath and ground water table. Modern lining systems integrate clay minerals sealing layers with feasible geosynthetic liners to evolve a nearly impermeable layer which is called Geosynthetic Clay liner (GCL).The permeability of clay used in GCL should be below 10-11cm/sec. Calcium bentonite is the most commonly available clay in India with permeability between 10-5 to 10-7 cm/sec. Permeability and other properties of bentonite can be improved by additives or activation include exchange activation, grinding or pulverizing. In this study commercially available calcium bentonite is treated with sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) at three different ratios and the properties of the treated bentonite are studied and check the suitability of sodium carbonate activated calcium bentonite as GCL. The properties include Atterbergs limit, free swell, UCC and permeability are also studied.

Keywords liner system,GCL, permeability, calcium bentonite

  1. INTRODUCTION

    GCL is a composite liner comprised of geosynthetic material and low permeability earth material like clay. The main advantages of the GCL are the limited thickness, the good compliance with differential settlements of underlying soil or waste, easy installation and low cost. On the other hand, the limited thickness of this barrier can produce: (1) vulnerability to mechanical accidents, (2) limited sorption capacity, and (3) an expected significant increase of diffusive transport if an underlying attenuation mineral layer is not provided. The geosynthetic liner system of GCL is almost impermeable; therefore the thickness of the GCL depends on the thickness of the clay layer.

    The lowest permeability clay available in India is Calcium Bentonite with permeability varying from 10-6 to 10-7 cm/sec. Therefore, if it has to be used in GCL its permeability has to be reduced to the range of 10-10 cm/sec. The properties of calcium bentonite can be modified to some extend by processing, e.g. to remove impurities or to incorporate additives or by activating the bentonite. Additives may include dispersants, flocculants or gelling agents and are usually designed to improve performance and manageability of bentonite suspension. Activation includes exchanging activation grinding or pulverizing and is designed primarily to improve dispersion.

    Commercially available bentonite was purchased from quarry near Coimbatore. The Fig. 1 shows the soil sample collected. The bentonite was high permeability calcium bentonite. Hence it was decided to treat it with Na2CO3 to improve its properties. The selected calcium bentonite was activated with Sodium compounds at different mass ratios (2.5, 5 and 7.5g/100g of clay). Index and engineering properties of calcium bentonite were found out in the laboratory as per Bureau of Indian Standards. The properties of bentonite are presented in Table I. Chemical analysis of the soil sample was done at Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram. Chemical constituent of the selected bentonite sample are presented in Table II . Fig. 2 shows the particle size distribution curve of soil.

    Fig.1.Soil sample collected

    TABLE I. PROPERTIES OF CALCUIM BENTONITE

    PROPERTIES

    VALUES

    Specific Gravity

    2.67

    Natural water content (%)

    8.064

    Liquid limit (%)

    276

    Plastic limit (%)

    52

    Plasticity index (%)

    224

    IS classification

    CH

    OMC (%)

    19.12

    Dry density(g/cc)

    1.463

    % clay

    82

    % silt

    18

    Coefficient of permeability(cm/s)

    2.79×10-5

    Free swell (ml/2g)

    15.8

    UCC strength (kN/m2)

    43.16

    Fig.2 Particle size distribution curve

    TABLE II Chemical Composition of Calcium

    Bentonite

    Sample

    Unit

    Values

    Available N

    Kg ha-1

    44.69

    Available P

    Kg ha-1

    44.69

    Available K

    Kg ha-1

    44.69

    Available Ca

    Kg ha-1

    44.69

    Available Na

    Kg ha-1

    44.69a

    Available Carbon

    Kg ha-1

    44.69

    B . Na2CO3

    Sodium carbonate (also known as washing soda, soda ash and soda crystals, and in the monohydrate form as crystal carbonate),Na2CO3,isthe water soluble sodium salt of carbonic acid. It most commonly occurs as a crystalline decahydrate, which readily effloresces to form a white powder, the monohydrate. Pure sodium carbonate is a white, odorless powder that is hygroscopic (absorbs moisture from the air). It has a strongly alkaline taste, and forms a moderately basic solution in water. Sodium carbonate is well known domestically for its everyday use as a water softener. The sodium carbonate

    molecule is quite basic, or alkaline, meaning that it's the chemical opposite of an acid. Acids lower the pH of solutions, while bases, conversely, increase it. While the related chemical sodium bicarbonate, or baking soda, is a mild base, sodium carbonate is a much stronger base, notes the "CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics." As such, it can counteract acids in solution

    D Preparation Of Sodium Activated Bentonite

    The bentonite and the sodium compounds were added to 800ml boiling water. It is kept boiling for one hour. Then it is diluted with large quantity of water .Clay settled at the bottom of the container was collected, dried in atmospheric temperature and dried in the oven at 1050C (N.Yildis et.al.,1998).Properties of these activated soils have been studied and compared with Na bentonite.

    Fig 3 Bentonite treating with 2.5% Na2CO3

  2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Effect of Na2CO3 on calcium bentonite

  1. Variation in liquid Limit

    Liquid Limit of Ca Bentonite was 272 and that of commercial Na Bentonite was 407. After activating with Na2CO3 compounds ,it shows an increase in liquid limit. Liquid limits of the samples are shown in Table III. Variation of liquid limits are shown in Fig 4

    TABLE III. LIQUID LIMITS OF VARIOUS SAMPLES

    Type of sample

    Ca Bentonite

    Ca Bentonite activated with Na2CO3

    % additives

    2.5 %

    5%

    7.5%

    Liquid Limit

    276

    416

    408

    436

    Fig 4 Variation in liquid limit of sodium actiated bentonite

    Liquid Limit of Ca bentonite treated with 7.5% of Na2CO3 is 436, which is near to the Liquid Limit of Na bentonite. Clay particles are dispersed when the clay interacted with chemicals. Due to the dispersion and deflocculation of clay, the geotechnical properties (especially,hydraulic conductivity) of clay were significantly changed Increase in Liquid Limit could be attributed to dispersion of the clay particle. Additionally salt solution might cause the formation of new swelling compounds and these new compounds lead to the increase of Liquid Limit( Sivapullaiah et,all,2005)

  2. Variation in Plasticity Index

    Plasticity Index of Ca Bentonite is 238 and that of comercially available Na Bentonite is 373. After activating with Na2CO3 compounds ,it shows an increase in plasticity index. Plasticity Index of the samples are presented in Table IV. Graphical Representation is shown in Fig 5.

    Table IV Plastic Limits of Various Samples

    Type of sample

    Ca Bentonite

    Bentonite activated with NaCl

    % additives

    2.5

    %

    5%

    7.5%

    Platicity Index

    238

    310

    352

    390

    Fig 5.variation in plasticity index of sodium activated bentonite

    PI of Ca bentonite treated with 5% of Na2CO3 is 204,which is near to the PI of Na bentonite

  3. Variation in Free Swell

    Free swell of Ca Bentonite was 16 ml/2mg and Free swell of Na Bentonite was 22 ml/2mg. Addition of Sodium Carbonate shows increase in the free swell. Free swell of Na2CO3treated Ca Bentonite increases sharply. Maximum free swell of 19.2 ml was obtained for Ca bentonite treated with 7.5% of Na2CO3. Free swell of the samples are presented in table 5.Variation of free swell are shown in Fig

    6. Smaller ions tend to have greater hydration energies, and thus within the interlayer of clays can attract more water than large ions. The degree of attraction to the clay surface of Na+ is less, so a Na+ is more conductive to swelling when present at the clay surface, because adjacent negatively charged layers can be made to repel one another during the absorption of water into the interlayer. N. Yildiz and A. Calimli.(1999) On the other hand, Ca2+ saturation results in only limited swelling because the attraction of the cation for adjacent surface is stronger.

    Table V Free Swell Of Various Samples

    Type of sample

    Ca Bentonite

    Bentonite activated with

    Na2CO3

    %

    additives

    2.5

    %

    5%

    7.5%

    Free swell

    (ml/2g)

    16

    16.5

    17.9

    19.2

    Fig 6.variation in fee swell of sodium activated bentonite

  4. Variation in Unconfined Compressive Strength

    UCC Tests were conductd to study the change in strength of calcium bentonite due to sodium activation. UCC of Ca Bentonite 43.16 KPa and that of Na Bentonite is 29.3 KPa.After an initial increase ,UCC value for all the samples were observed to be consistently reducing . UCC values of the samples are presented in Table VI. Variation of UCC values are shown in Fig 7.

    Table VI.UCC of Various Samples

    Type of sample

    Ca Bentonite

    Bentonite activated with Na2CO3

    % additives

    2.5 %

    5%

    7.5%

    UCC (Kpa)

    43.16

    73.5

    89.6

    94.3

    Fig 7 variation in UCC values of sodium activated bentonite

    The increase in UCC values can be attributed to the formation of stabilizing chemicals during chemical treatment.Na+ ions replace divalent ions such as Ca2+ Mg2+

    etc. These ions react with the anions in the additives such as OH- Cl- CO 2- SiO 2- etc to form stable compounds

    IV CONCLUSIONS

    The index properties, strength and permeability of calcium bentonite changes considerably when treated with Na2CO3.From the chemical analysis conducted on modified soil it has been observed that the percentage of Na2O increases and the percentage of CaO decreases. This is due to the replacement of Ca2+ ions by Na2+ ions. Liquid limit of the samples have been increased and permeability decreases due to activation. The results show that for Na2CO3, 7.5 % is optimum. Treatment of Calcium Bentonite with 7.5% of Na2CO3 additive is better because of its less permeability and high UCC strength.

    The availability of Na Bentonite is less and also it is costly. Hence Calcium bentonite modified with 7.5% Na2CO3 shall be opted for the construction of GCL.

    REFERENCES

    [1]. Calimli.(1999) The characterization of Na2CO3 Activated

    3 2 Kutahya Bentonite. Applied Clay Science, Vol 14, Issue 23,

    (Lowenstam and Weiner,1989)

  5. Variation in Permeability

    Permeability was found to be decreased by several orders due to chemical treatment. Permeability of the calcium bentonite treated with Na2CO3 are shown in table VII.

    Table VII. Permeability Of The Calcium Bentonite Treated With Na2CO3

    Type of sample

    Ca Bentonite

    Bentonite activated with Na2CO3

    % additives

    2.5%

    5%

    7.5%

    Permeability

    2.79×10

    6

    4.2×10-9

    -8

    1.19×10

    8.31×10-

    7

  6. Chemical analysis

Percentage of sodium oxide and calcium oxide present in the samples were analyzed in NCESS,Akkulam . Ca ions of the samples are replaced by Na ions. CaO % decreases consistently and the Na2O % increases. Percentage of Na2O and CaO present in Bentonite samples treated with Na2CO3 are shown in Table VIII.

Na2CO3 %

0

2.5

5

7.5

Na2O

1.33

6.52

8.10

8.00

CaO

2.09

1.44

1.33

1.39

Table VIII Percentage Of Na2O and Cao Present In Bentonite Samples Treated With Na2CO3 (Chemical Analysis Result)

309 317.

[2]. Craig H., Benson.,(2004). Probability distributions for hydraulic conductivity of compacted soil liners. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 119, Issue 3, 471-486, ASCE.

[3]. Daniel D.E.,(1992). Geosynthetic Clay Liners Used in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2001.

[4]. Ennio.M.Palmeria.,Fumio,tatsuoka.,(2007).Advances in geosynthetic meterial and aplication for soil reinforcement and environmental protection works.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 11, Issue 1, 1-28, ASCE.

[5]. Ernst.A.Iauser,Umberto,Colombo.(1997)Collodial Science of montmorillonites and bentonites. Thesis report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Physical Chemistry, Novara, Italy.

[6]. G. Didier, A. Bouazza, D. Cazaux.(2000). Gas permeability of geosynthetic clay liners. Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Volume 18, Issue 2-4, 235 250, ELSEVIER.

[7]. Lange K., Rowe R. K., Jamieson H.,(2007). Metal retention in geosynthetic clay liners following permeation by different mining solutions. Geosynthetics International, Volume 14, Issue 3, 280-283.

[8]. Naim Muhammad.(2004) Hydraulic, Diffusion, and Retention Characteristics of Inorganic Chemicals in Bentonite. Thesis report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

,College of Engineering, University of South Florida.

[9]. Lee O., Chun K. S., Cho W. S.,(1998). The temperature effect on the hydraulic conductivity of compacted bentonite. Applied Clay Science, Volume 14, Issues 1-3, 47-58.

[10]. Ryley., Anne., Beddoe., (2009). Evaluation of the water retention behaviour of geosynthetic clay liners. Thesis report, Queens University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

[11]. Sounthen,j.M.,Kerry Rowe R.(2007). Evaluation for the water retension curve GCLs. Journal of geotextiles and geomembranes, Volume 25, Issue1.

Leave a Reply