Benefits of the Use of Biofuel As the Transportation and Industrial Applications: Indian Scenario

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS2584

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Benefits of the Use of Biofuel As the Transportation and Industrial Applications: Indian Scenario

1Ajay Oraon, 2Rakesh, 3A. G. P. Kujur

1Department of Chemical Engineering, B.I.T. Sindri, Dhanbad 828123 2Department of Production Engineering, B.I.T. Sindri, Dhanbad 828123 3Department of Computer Science, B.I.T. Sindri, Dhanbad 828123

GASOHOL GASOLINE + ETHANOL

Gasohol is presently being used as a fuel in a few vehicles in U.S. Ethanol is also valuable as it can be converted to hydrocarbons such as alkanes, cycloalkanes, alkenes and aromatic hydrocarbons. Biomass is defined as living matter or its residue, and is therefore a renewable and abundant resource of energy. Biomass include all organic material obtained either directly or indirectly form the growth of plants. Biomass includes trees, grasses, grains, sugarcane, water hyacinth, algae and residue from domestic uses. The most common residue includes forest, agriculture, animal, municipal and industrial organic matter. This calls for multi-disciplinary approach. Labs specializing in Biotechnology, chemical engineering, synthetic biology need to work in a net work.

Introduction: Biomass can be converted into biofuels either by thermochemically or biochemically. The best known thermochemical conversion process is direct combustion. In the thermochemical method, biomass is subjected to high temperature and depending upon the quality of O2 supplied, process such as pyrolysis, combustion and gasification occurs. Direct heating of biomass in stoves and open fire is example of combustion in which O2 supply is generally higher than that required. Under condition of lower rate of O2 supply, pyrolysis and gasification occurs.

In biochemical route of conversion of biomass to other useful forms is low energy process and relies upon the action of bacteria, which degrades complex molecules of biomass into simpler ones. Government is also taking interest on biofuel:

National Biofuel Policy

Specific mandates and incentives for biofuels:

20% biofuels by 2017 (National Policy on Biofuels, 2008). Mandatory 5% blending for ethanol and biodiesel (Nov 2009).

Government agreed on a prefixed price for biodiesel / ethanol purchase by oil companies (Nov 2009).

Prices reviewed periodically. Biofuels are Ethanol and Biodiesel.

Rather than no specific road map to achieve these targets.

Year

Petrol Demand (MMTPA)

Ethanol Blending Requirement (MMTPA)

Diesel Demands (MMTPA)

Biodiesel Blending Requirements (MMTPA)

5%

10%

20%

5%

10%

20%

2006-07

10.07

0.5

1.01

2.01

52.32

2.62

5.23

10.46

2011-12

12.85

0.64

1.29

1.57

66.91

3.35

6.69

13.38

2016-17

16.4

0.82

1.64

3.28

83.58

4.18

8.36

16.72

Source: Planning commission, Report of the Committee on Development of Biofuel, 16 April 2003.

Current Situation Inspite of Mandates & Incentives we have Fuel Ethanol – 60 million gallons in India vs. 15 billion gal worldwide in 2009 (0.4%) and biodiesel – 10 million gallons vs. 3 billion gallons in 2009 (0.3%)

Less than 0.5% of total transportation fuel in India uses biofuels.

We need to increase it 40 times in 6 years to meet policy targets of 20 % It can be inferred that our performance in biofuels has been very poor.

Achieving Vision Biofuel Vision very optimistic, Huge quantity of biofuel required, New feedstocks / technology necessary, Road map and action plan necessary, Long range planning necessary, Split vision target into actionable projects.

Possible Solutions: No single feedstock or technology platform can achieve targets, Non-edible oils will contribute somewhat but will not be the only one. We need to look at all possibilities like second generation biofuels. Bio-oils from biomass pyrolysis, Gasification of Biomass, Conversion of waste gases ( CO) to ethanol, Biogas / ethanol from municipal waste and all other options.

Each of above will contribute to achieve biofuel Mission.

Ethanol Advantages: Good blend component for gasoline, Ethanol (Gen. 1st ) can reduce CO2 by 30- 60 % , Cellulosic ethanol will reduce CO2 by 70-90 % and Ethanol can be converted to several chemicals

Out of which more than half is being used for fuel in US

Fuel Ethanol Scenario

Item/Year

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

2009/10

Sugar Production/1(Million Tons)

28.40

26.40

15.30

18.9

Molasses Production (Million Tons)

13.31

11.31

6.88

8.4

Potential Alcohol Production (Million Lits)

3,195

2,700

1,650

1950

Demand (Million Lits)

Portable Liquor and Other Use

1,550

1,660

1,680

900

I: Ethanol for 5 Percent Blending

600

650

700

820

I: Total Demand (including 5% EBP)

2,150

2,310

2,380

1720

I: Surplus/Shortfall (Million Lits)

+1,045

+390

-730

+230

II: Ethanol for 10% blend with Gasoline

1,200

1,300

1,400

1640

II: Total Demand(including 10% EBP)

2,750

2,960

3,080

3390

II: Surplus/ Shortfall

+445

-260

-1,430

-590

Route to Ethanol

Ethanol production processes

/td>

Lignin Cellulose

Hemicellulose

Lignocellulose structure

Lignin Cellulose

Hemicellulose

Lignocellulose structure

Major components of Lignocellulosic biomass

Cellulose (Easy conversion)

Hemicelluloses ( Difficult Conversion)

Cellulose is easy to convert ethanol but hemicelluloses are very difficult for conversion to ethanol. Lignin structure is very complex.

Typical flow process of fuel production:

Lignin

Lignin

The typical process of fuel alcohol from lignocellulosic biomass is Pre treatment followed by saccharification and fermentation followed by separation where lignin is removed and purification process is done to produce fuel alcohol.

Major Challenging Areas

Pretreatment about 30 % of cost

  • Producing low toxins

    Enzyme Hydrolysis high opex

  • High turn over & resistance to toxins

    Fermentation – Utilisation of both C5 & C6 sugars

    Current Cellulosic Ethanol Status:

    More than 70 pilot plant (1 ton /day to 100 ton/day) operational. High yield biomass variety being developed.

    Enzyme cost down significantly ( from 5 USD/L to 0.5 USD/L) Robust enzymes continuously evolving.

    Fermenting strains continuously improved. Ethanol dehydration technologies being improved.

    Flexible multiproduct pretreatment technologies are required. New enzymes/reaction systems should be developed.

    New fermenting strains are required.

    New fermenter design should be done on large scale. New dehydration technologies are needed.

    This calls for multi-disciplinary approach . Labs specializing in Biotechnology, chemical engineering, synthetic biology need to work in a net work

    Comparison of Technology Platform

    First Gen

    Second Gen

    Food vs. Fuel

    Non food biomass

    Needs arable land

    Can grow on marginal lands & already available agri. waste

    Conversion technology available

    Technology still evolving

    Low yields and viability

    Viable- with R&D advances

    Indian Efforts in Cellulosic Ethanol Technology:

    Some basic R&D in several universities / research labs since last decade, Isolation / evaluation of natural enzymes main activity, Almost no work on enzyme characterization , modification, All efforts isolated and none was targeted at commercial level, Serious efforts , by few players, started about 5 years ago, Ms Praj Matrix ,Pune established a 1 TPD pilot with international collaborations (Qteros).

    Good amount of data collected on pre-treatment , fermentation ICT-DBT centre in last 2 years has done excellent basic R&D. ICT-DBT developed a lab scale process based on enzyme recirculation , Collaboration with IGL to set up 8tpd unit at Kashipur. ICT-ICGEB-IOC combine to re-engineer micro-organisms for hydrolysis & pentose fermentation,Basic work on synthetic biology initiated.

    IOC(R&D) designed countrys first multi-feed multi-technology pilot with assistance of NREL,US This facility , costing Rs 8 crores , will help generate authentic data which can be safely used in subsequent scale up, IOC-DBT centre shall in network with ICT & ICGEB develop hydrolysis & fermentation technologies. Real life data on biomass type and availability shall be priority LCA of each process

    Cellulosic Ethanol Prospects & Problems

    Prospects

    Problems

    Effective utilization of waste biomass

    Technology not yet commercial

    Could take care of all Indias gasoline substitute needs

    Basic technology platform exists

    High costs of production Core biotech part missing

    Some process routes highly scalable

    Lack of R&D in India

    Algae is not as well understood as plants, animals and microbes, large scale of algae production are still under study and third challenge is downstream processing to useful return.

    Cellulosic Ethanol is fast evolving. Enzymes are getting better & cheaper

    Production costs have dropped from $ 8/gallon in 2007 to $ 3 in 2010 and are expected to be ~ $ 2 / gallon by 2015

    Still technical challenges are formidable

    India needs to develop best suited technology platform. Current focus on R&D is very promising.

    • Caye Drapcho, Nhuan Phú Nghiêm, Terry Walker (August 2008). Biofuels Engineering Process Technology. [McGraw-Hill]. ISBN 978-0-07-148749-8. http://www.mhprofessional.com/product.php?isbn=0071487492.

    • IChemE Energy Conversion Technology Subject Group (May 2009). A Biofuels Compendium. [IChemE]. ISBN 978-0-85295-533-8. http://www.icheme.org/biofuelscompendium.

    • Fuel Quality Directive Impact Assessment

    • Biofuels Journal

    • James Smith (November 2010). Biofuels and the Globalisation of Risk. [Zed Books]. ISBN 978-1-84813-572-7. http://www.zedbooks.co.uk/book.asp?bookdetail=4363.

    • Mitchell, Donald (2010) (Available in PDF). Biofuels in Africa: Opportunities, Prospects, and Challenges. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.. ISBN 978-0-8213-8516-6. http://africaknowledgelab.worldbank.org/akl/node/67. Retrieved 2011-02-08.

    • Li, H.; Cann, A. F.; Liao, J. C. (2010). "Biofuels: Biomolecular Engineering Fundamentals and Advances". Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 1: 1936. doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-100938

  • The Impact of US Biofuel Policies on Agricultural Price Levels and Volatility, By Bruce A. Babcock, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, for ICTSD, Issue Paper No. 35. June 2011.

  • Lane, Jim. "US warplanes can fly faster, carry additional weapons load using advanced fuels and biofuels." Biofuels Digest, 21 May 2012.

  • "Mustard Hybrids for Low-Cost Biofuels and Organic Pesticides" (PDF). http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/mustard_hybrids.pdf. Retrieved 2010-03-15.

  • Future Energies (2003-10-30). "PORT HUENEME, Calif: U.S. Navy to Produce its Own Biofuels :: Future Energies :: The future of energy". Future Energies. http://www.futureenergies.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=77 0. Retrieved 2009-10-17.

  • "Newsvine – Ecofasa turns waste to biofuels using bacteria". Lele.newsvine.com. 2008-10-18. http://lele.newsvine.com/_news/2008/10/18/2014473-ecofasa-turns-waste-to-biofuels-using- bacteria-. Retrieved 2009-10-17.

  • Ethanol Research (2012-04-02). "National Corn-to-Ethanol Research Center (NCERC)". Ethanol Research. http://www.ethanolresearch.com/ethanolresearch/about.shtml. Retrieved 2012-04-02.

  • American Coalition for Ethanol (2008-06-02). "Responses to Questions from Senator Bingaman". American Coalition for Ethanol. http://www.ethanol.org/pdf/contentmgmt/USDA_DOE_biofuels_letter_61208.pdf. Retrieved 2012-04-02.

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2007-03-02). "Research Advantages: Cellulosic Ethanol". National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/pdfs/40742.pdf. Retrieved 2012-04-02.

  • Sheehan, John; et al. (July 1998). "A Lok Back at the U. S. Department of Energy's Aquatic Species Program: Biofuels from Algae". National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/fy98/24190.pdf. Retrieved 16 June 2012.

  • Briggs, Michael (August 2004). "Widescale Biodiesel Production from Algae". Archived from the original on 24 March 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20060324084858/http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.ht ml. Retrieved 2007-01-02 publisher = UNH Biodiesel Group (University of New Hampshire).

  • "Valcent Products Inc. Develops "Clean Green" Vertical Bio-Reactor". Valcent Products. http://www.valcent.net/t/news_detailf62c.html?id=36. Retrieved 2008-07-09.

  • "Technology: High Yield Carbon Recycling". GreenFuel Technologies Corporation.

  • R. E. Teixeira (2012). "Energy-efficient extraction of fuel and chemical feedstocks from algae". Green Chemistry 14 (2): 419427. doi:10.1039/C2GC16225C.

  • B.N. Divakara, H.D. Upadhyaya, S.P. Wani, C.L. Laxmipathi Gowda (2010). "Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L.: A review". Applied Energy 87 (3): 732742. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.013.

  • Biofuels Digest (2011-05-16). "Jatropha blooms again: SG Biofuels secures 250K acres for hybrids". Biofuels Digest. http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2011/05/16/jatropha-blooms- again-sg-biofuels-secures-250k-acres-for-hybrids. Retrieved 2012-03-08.

  • SG Biofuels (2012-03-08). "Jmax Hybrid Seeds". SG Biofuels. http://www.sgfuel.com/pages/hybrid-seeds-and-services/jMax-hybrid-seeds.php. Retrieved 2012-03-08.

  • Plant Research International (2012-03-08). "JATROPT (Jatropha curcas): Applied and technical research into plant properties". Plant Research International. http://www.pri.wur.nl/UK/research/plant-based_raw_materials/jatropha/JATROPT. Retrieved 2012-03-08.

  • Biofuels Magazine (2011-04-11). "Energy Farming Methods Mature, Improve". Biofuels Magazine. http://www.biofuelsmagazine.com/articles/7743/energy-farming-methods-mature- improve. Retrieved 2012-03-08.

  • Sergeeva, Y. E.; Galanina, L. A.; Andrianova, D. A.; Feofilova, E. P. (2008). "Lipids of filamentous fungi as a material for producing biodiesel fuel". Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 44 (5): 523. doi:10.1134/S0003683808050128. edit

  • Strobel, G.; Knighton, B.; Kluck, K.; Ren, Y.; Livinghouse, T.; Griffin, M.; Spakowicz, D.; Sears, J. (2008). "The production of myco-diesel hydrocarbons and their derivatives by the endophytic fungus Gliocladium roseum (NRRL 50072)". Microbiology (Reading, England) 154 (Pt 11): 33193328. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2008/022186-0. PMID 18957585. edit

  • National Non-Food Crops Centre. "GHG Benefits from Use of Vegetable Oils for Electricity,

    Heat, Transport and Industrial Purposes, NNFCC 10-016", Retrieved on 2011-06-27

  • Concawe Well to Wheels LCA.

  • Searchinger, Timothy; Ralph Heimlich, R.A. Houghton, Fengxia Dong, Amani Elobeid, Jacinto Fabiosa, Simla Tokgoz, Dermot Hayes, Tun-Hsiang Yu (2011 [last update]). "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change". sciencemag.org. doi:10.1126/science.1151861. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/319/5867/1238. Retrieved 8 November 2011.

  • Kim, Hyungtae; Seungdo Kim, Bruce E. Dale (2009). "Biofuels, Land Use Change, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Some Unexplored Variables". pubs.acs.org. doi:10.1021/es802681k. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es802681k. Retrieved 8 November 2011.

Leave a Reply