An Analysis of Human Resource Practices and Their Impact on Employee Performance in the Insurance Sector

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV14IS050137

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

An Analysis of Human Resource Practices and Their Impact on Employee Performance in the Insurance Sector

Mr. K. Sai Viswanath,

Associate Professor, KITE, Korangi, Kakinada

Dr. Ch.Venkateswarlu,

Professor, School of Science, GGU, Rajamahendravarm

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impact of human resource (HR) practices on employee performance within the insurance sector. A convenience sampling method was employed to gather data from employees working across various insurance companies. To explore the relationship between HR practices and employee performance, key areas such as career planning, performance appraisal, training and development, and employee involvement were examined. The findings reveal that all these HR practices have a significant and positive influence on employee performance in the insurance industry.

Keywords: HR Practices, Career Planning, Performance Appraisal, Training and Development, Employee Involvement

INTRODUCTION

Human Resource (HR) practices play a crucial role within the broader HR function, as they are directly linked to employee performance. Numerous studies have been conducted to assess the impact of HR practices on employee outcomes. This study aims to examine the influence of HR practices on employees working in the insurance sector. It focuses on key HR practices such as career planning, performance appraisal, training and development, and employee involvement.

In the insurance industry, employee performance is particularly critical, as it directly affects overall organizational performance. Therefore, insurance companies place strong emphasis on implementing HR practices that enhance employee productivity. This research is based on primary data collected from employees across various insurance companies.

The study provides insights into the current HR practices being utilized in the insurance sector and evaluates their impact on employee performance. The findings are expected to support HR professionals within the industry in enhancing employee performance through the adoption of effective HR strategies.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Schuler and Jackson (1987) conducted a research study to explore the impact of human resource (HR) practices on employees. The study was based on primary data collected from employees across various organizations. It revealed that HR practices are processes used to attract, motivate, and retain employees over the long term. Furthermore, the study highlighted that HR practices play a significant role in enhancing employee job satisfaction, which is essential for achieving organizational success.

Locke et al. (1997) explored employee involvement in relation to the creation of a productive working environment. Their study found that involving employees in various decision-making processes empowers them to perform more effectively. It also revealed that such involvement helps organizations retain employees by fostering a sense of ownership and commitment. The study concluded that an engaging work environment enhances employee motivation and contributes to organizational success by empowering employees through participation in decision- making.

Wright and Snell (1998) also focused their research on HR practices, specifically incorporating career planning. According to their study, career planning involves setting career goals and identifying appropriate strategies to achieve them. It is considered a crucial process related to planning an employees work life. The authors recommended career planning as one of the most important tools for motivating employees and promoting the overall development of the organization.

Purcell (2003) carried out a study to examine the importance and scope of HR practices in employee-employer relationships. The research analyzed various HR practices within organizations and suggested that the appropriate implementation of these practices positively influences employee performance and strengthens the relationship between employees and employers. Moreover, the study emphasized that among all HR practices, career planning and compensation have the most significant impact on employee performance.

Sels et al. (2003) conducted a study on performance appraisal and found that it is a systematic evaluation of employee performance based on their work outcomes. The primary aim of performance appraisal is to boost employee motivation and self-esteem. Additionally, the study indicated that performance evaluations lead to increased employee productivity, thereby improving overall organizational performance.

Dessler (2008) conducted a research study to examine the systematic approach of training and development programs. The study emphasized that training and development are vital HR practices that equip employees with the necessary skills and knowledge to perform their jobs effectively and contribute to organizational goals. Dessler further suggested that training and development have a positive impact on organizational growth and are essential for skill enhancement required to meet job demands.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

  • To examine the relationship between career planning and employee performance in the insurance sector.

  • To analyze the relationship between performance appraisal and employee performance in the insurance sector.

  • To investigate the relationship between training and development and employee performance in the insurance sector.

  • To explore the relationship between employee involvement and employee performance in the insurance sector.

    HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY

  • Ha1: There is a significant relationship between career planning and employee performance in the insurance sector.

  • Ha2: There is a significant relationship between performance appraisal and employee performance in the insurance sector.

  • Ha3: There is a significant relationship between training and development and employee performance in the insurance sector.

  • Ha4: There is a significant relationship between the work environment and employee performance in the insurance sector.

RESEARCH DESIGN

The research design of the present study is analytical, utilizing both primary and secondary data to examine the relationship between HR practices and employee performance in the insurance sector."

DATA GATHERING AND MEASUREMENT TOOLS

For the present study, data was collected through a structured questionnaire utilizing a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Strongly Disagree' to 'Strongly Agree.' The target population comprised employees from the insurance sector, representing diverse demographic backgrounds. A convenience sampling technique was employed to gather responses from this group."

DATA ANALYSIS

A t-test has been utilized in data analysis to assess the relationship between HR practices and employee performance.

TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS:

Hypothesis

Statements

df

t

Sig

Ha1

Impact of carrier planning on employee

performance

4

2.79

0.00

Ha2

Impact of Performance appraisal on employee performance

3.16

0.01

Ha3

Impact of training and development on

employee performance

4

3.82

0.01

Ha4

Impact of employee environment on

employee performance

4

4.56

0.00

The results presented in the table highlight the significant relationship between various HR practices and employee performance in the insurance sector, focusing on career planning, performance appraisal, training and development, and employee environment. The findings from hypothesis testing are as follows:

  1. The study indicates a significant and positive correlation between career planning and employee performance in the insurance sector. With a t-value of 2.79, which is significant at the 0.05 level, the first hypothesisThere is a significant relationship between career planning and employee performance in the insurance sectoris supported (Ha1 = Accepted).

  2. The analysis reveals a significant and positive relationship between performance appraisal and employee performance in the insurance sector. The t-value of 3.16, significant at the 0.05 level, confirms that the second hypothesisThere is a significant relationship between performance appraisal and employee performance in the insurance sectoris accepted (Ha2 = Accepted).

  3. The study demonstrates a significant and positive link between training and development and employee performance in the insurance sector. The t-value of 3.82, which is significant at the 0.05 level, affirms that the third hypothesisThere is a significant relationship between training and development and employee performance in the insurance sectoris valid (Ha3 = Accepted).

  4. The findings suggest a significant and positive association between the employee environment and performance in the insurance sector. With a t-value of 4.56, which is significant at the 0.05 level, the fourth hypothesisThere is a significant relationship between the employee environment and employee performance in the insurance sectoris accepted (Ha4 = Accepted).

    In conclusion, all four hypotheses were found to be supported by the data, highlighting the positive impact of these HR practices on employee performance in the insurance sector.

    CONCLUSION

    The study revealed a significant relationship between HR practices and employee performance, particularly in the areas of career planning, performance appraisal, training and development, and the work environment. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that employee performance can be improved by providing opportunities for effective decision-making, offering training and development programs, conducting performance appraisals, and encouraging employee involvement. The results clearly indicate that various HR practices in the insurance sector have a notable impact on employee performance. However, it is important for the insurance sector to maintain a balanced approach and regularly review these practices to ensure their continued effectiveness in the future.

    REFERENCES

    1. Dessler, G. (2008). Human Resource Management (11th ed.). Pearson Education.

    2. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1997). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 23 39.

    3. Purcell, J. (2003). Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box. CIPD Publishing.

    4. Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1(3), 207219.

    5. Sels, L., De Winne, S., Delmotte, J., Maes, J., Faems, D., & Forrier, A. (2003). Human resource management and performance: A literature review. Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series.

    6. Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 756772.

    7. Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th ed.). Kogan Page.

    8. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53101.

    9. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and Human Resource Management (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

    10. Cascio, W. F. (2015). Managing Human Resources (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

    11. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949969.

    12. Guest, D. E. (1997). Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), 263276.

    13. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635672.

    14. Ivancevich, J. M. (2010). Human Resource Management (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

    15. Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2011). Human Resource Management (13th ed.). South-Western College Publishing.

    16. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

    17. Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Harvard Business School Press.

    18. Torrington, D., Hall, L., Taylor, S., & Atkinson, C. (2017). Human Resource Management (10th ed.). Pearson Education.

    19. Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2008). HR Competencies: Mastery at the Intersection of People and Business. Society for Human Resource Management.

    20. Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295320.

    21. Zwick, T. (2006). The impact of training intensity on establishment productivity. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 45(1), 2646.