Utilization Photovoltaic Plan for Energy Conservation and Decrease CO2 in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS80432

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Utilization Photovoltaic Plan for Energy Conservation and Decrease CO2 in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

1 Amirreza Naderipour

P.S, Department of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

2 Abdullah Asuhaimi Mohd Zin Full professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

3 Jalal Tavalaei

P.S, Department of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Abstract

The fossil fuels combustion for electricity production releases greenhouse gasses (GHG) into the environment Currently, electricity price is raising rapidly, therefore cost saving and pollution preventing carry out by increase energy efficiency. This research investigate energy consumption pattern and co2 emission rate in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). In order to reduce Carbon Footprint and its impact on the environment in UTM solar power energy is used.

Keywords: Renewable energy, Sustainability, Global warming, Carbon dioxide emission.

Correspondence should be addressed Abdullah Asuhaimi Mohd Zin;

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most important anthropogenic GHG, and the global increases in CO2 concentration are due primarily to fossil fuel use and land use change [1]. According to the International Energy Outlook 2006, world CO2 emissions from the consumption of fossil fuels are expected to grow at an average rate of 2.1% per year from 2003 to 2030. The world CO2 emission from the consumption of fossil fuels is predicted to increase from about 25,000 billion metric tons in 2003, to more than 40,000 billion metric tons by 2030 [2]. Indirect emissions associated with the

consumption of purchased electricity are a required element of any organizations accounting and reporting under the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard. Because purchased electricity is a major source of GHG

emissions for companies, it presents a significant reduction opportunity.

Fig 1. World energy-related CO2 emissions by region, 2003-2030.

Table 1 shows, CO2 emissions of Malaysia in comparison with the world [3]. Due to rapid economic growth and industrialization, CO2 emission of Malaysia is relatively high compared to the world average. In term of per capita emission, it is 6.51 metric tons for Malaysia, much higher than the world average in 4.44 metric tons.

Table 1: CO2 emissions of the world and Malaysia, 2010

.

Country

Population

, million

CO2

emissions, million metric tons

CO2/capita metric tons

World

6,825

30,326

4.44

Malaysia

28.40

185.00

6.51

Malaysia's electricity demand is expected to reach 18,947 MW in 2020 and 23,092 MW in 2030 which is 35% increment from 14,007 MW in 2008.[4] These non- renewable fuels are gradually depleting and contribute huge amount of GHG. The implementation of various policies and programs by the government of Malaysia has increased the awareness of the importance of the role of renewable energy in a sustainable energy system [5]. Fossil fuel technologies (coal, oil, gas) have the largest carbon emission, because they burn these fuels during operation. PV, are often referred to as low carbon or carbon neutral because they do not emit CO2 during their operation. It is expressed as grams of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt hour of generation (gCO2eq/kWh) [6]. The past records of Malaysia climate show similar trend that has been encountered globally as found in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments [7]. The countrys temperature had increased 0.18 0C per decade for over 40 years since 1951.

Solar energy or Photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation is a form of green and renewable energy (RE) which is clean, non-depleting and does not emit any GHG since it generates energy directly from the sun by means of PV effect [8].PV is the conversion of sunlight into electricity via the use of solar cell installed in a solar panel. PV cells produce electricity when sunlight excited electrons in the cells.

Malaysias current focus is on developing effective policies on renewable energy (RE) in order to reduce dependency on fossil fuel and contribute towards mitigating the effects of climate change [9]. In 8th Malaysia Plan (8MP 20012005), the fifth-fuel strategy was introduced to promote the use of RE as well as to address rising global concern on climate change. A year after the introduction of the Fifth Fuel Policy, the Small Renewable Energy Power (SREP) program was launched in May 2001. A target of 350 MW of electricity generation from RE such as biomass, biogas, municipal waste, solar and mini-hydro as alternatives to fossil fuel was set but has so far not been achieved [10]. Malaysia is positioned on the South China Sea and lies between 1° and 7° in North latitude and 100° and 120° in East longitude. Malaysia is entirely equatorial, which is characterized by the annual Southwest (AprilOctober) and Northwest (OctoberFebruary) monsoons. The ambient temperature remains uniformly high throughout the year between 27 °C and 33 °C, with an annual average daily solar irradiations for Malaysia were from

4.21 kWh/m2 to 5.56 kWh/m2 and average daily sunshine duration of about 12 h [11]. The highest solar radiation was estimated at 6.8 kWh/m2 in August and November while the lowest was 0.61 kWh/m2 in December [12].

The monthly solar radiation in Malaysia is approximately around 400600 MJ/m2. Fig.2 shows the annual average of solar radiation (MJ/m2/day) in Malaysia [13].

Fig2. the annual average of solar radiation (MJ/m2/day) in Malaysia.

The abundance of solar radiation in Malaysia makes it highly potential for solar power generation [14]. Table 2 is a summary of yearly average solar radiation in various towns in this country [15].

Table2. Solar radiation in Malaysia (average value throughout the year).

Irradiance

Yearly (kWh/m2)

Kuching

1470

Bandar Baru Bangi

1487

Kuala Lumpur

1571

Petaling Jaya

1571

Seremban

1572

Kuantan

1601

Johor Bahru

1625

Senai

1629

Kota Baru

1705

Kuala Terengganu

1714

Ipoh

1739

Taiping

1768

George Town

1785

Bayan Lepas

1809

Kota Kinabalu

1900

  1. Methodology

    The efficiently reducing energy-related CO2 emissions are to quantify how much an individual or organization emits through various activities. Moreover, indirect sources, GHG emissions are extracted from the electricity consumed based on utility bills. Activity data relate to the activity that produces an emission into the atmosphere in the average years, based on 2010,2011 and 2011 data for UTM main campus in Johor Baharu. The calculation of carbon emission per capita is achieved by total carbon emission to total number of student and staff. The activity data have been collected to measure GHG emissions

    7

    Electrcity Purchased (kWh)

    Electricity Purchased (kWh)

    6.5

    6

    5.5

    5

    4.5

    6

    x 10

    Year 2010

    Year 2011

    Year 2012

    using this method is the quantity of purchasing electricity. Electricity consumption is generally measured in kilowatt hours (kWh) [17] because carbon

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Month

    Fig 3: Monthly electricity consumption on UTM.

    4800

    emission is calculated from electricity generation; this Year 2010

    study adopts the baseline emission factor calculated by Malaysia Green Tech Cooperation, formerly known as Malaysia Energy Centre (PTM). Satellite images have been finded as an alternative and accurate method for predicting average annual daily solar radiation of a specific location. These images can be use to predict the efficiency and sizing of various solar energy systems such as solar photovoltaic applications. The data from satellite images are used and compared with the actual readings from solar instruments. The results are then used to estimate solar intensity for other places where solar

    instrument is not available. Malaysia lies entirely in the equatorial region. The tropical environment has been

    4600

    CO2 Emission (MTCO2)

    CO2 Emission (MTCO2)

    4400

    4200

    4000

    3800

    3600

    3400

    3200

    3000

    Year 2011

    Year 2012

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    characterized by heavy rainfall, constantly high temperature and relative humidity [5].

  2. Result and Discussion

    The study identified UTMs carbon emission Rate because the electricity Average electricity consumption

    in the years 2010, 2011 and 2012 of per month Which is shown in Table 3. Figure 3 portrays compare UTMs electricity usage (kWh) in the years 2010,2011 and 2012 and Figure 4 shows compare the carbon emission rate in the years 2010,2011 and 2012.

    Month

    Fig 4. UTMs carbon emissions from electricity purchased in years 2010,2011 and 2012.

    Figure 5 shows the graph for the Maximum, minimum and average value of the monthly average daily solar irradiation for Johor-Malaysia from Satellite images. This plotted graph, shows that there are three months where the maximum average daily solar radiation is almost as high as 7.0 kWh/m2.

    Max Min Ave

    Max Min Ave

    7

    Solar Energy kWh/m2

    Solar Energy kWh/m2

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Resource

    Electricity consumption (kwh)

    carbon emission

    Average Monthly Use in 2010

    6,000,649 kWh

    4,032

    MTCO2

    Average Monthly Use in 2011

    5,982,371 kWh

    4,020

    MTCO2

    Average Monthly Use in 2012

    5,912,268 kWh

    3,973

    MTCO2

    Resource

    Electricity consumption (kwh)

    carbon emission

    Average Monthly Use in 2010

    6,000,649 kWh

    4,032

    MTCO2

    Average Monthly Use in 2011

    5,982,371 kWh

    4,020

    MTCO2

    Average Monthly Use in 2012

    5,912,268 kWh

    3,973

    MTCO2

    0

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Month

    7 8 9 10 11 12

    Table3. Average monthly use of electricity (kWh) and carbon emission.

    Fig 5. Maximum, minimum and average value of the monthly average daily solar irradiation.

  3. Conclusions

    Malaysia has been dynamic in its energy planning so far by aligning its national energy policies towards global trends. The CO2 emission rate at UTM University comes mainly from the consumption of electricity. In order to reduce the environmental impact at UTM University, the CO2 emission a very important starting point. There are many strategies, can conserve energy and reduce CO2 emissions. With PV, the sun can be used to reduce the need for GHG causing fuels whenever it shines. The amount of power generate by a solar system depends upon the amount of sun light to which it is exposed. On the other hand, environmental benefits would be reduction in air pollution and GHG emissions. This will improve air quality, increase of public health.

  4. Reference

  1. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

  2. EIA. 2007. International Energy Outlook 2007.Washington D.C.: Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy.

  3. Key World Energy Statistics 2012. Paris: International Energy Agency.

  4. Razak N. Keynote speech during the launch of the National Green Technology Policy; July 2009.

  5. A.W. Azhari, K. Sopian, A Zaharim and M.A. Ghoul A new approach for predicting solar radiation in tropical environment using satellite images case study of Malaysia WSEAS Transactions on environmental development (2008), pp.3738.

  6. Postnote, Carbon footprint of electricity generation. October 2006 Number 268.

  7. Bindoff, N.L., J. Willebrand, V. Artale, A, Cazenave, J. Gregory, S. Gulev, K. Hanawa, C. Le Quéré, S. Levitus, Y. Nojiri, C.K. Shum, L.D. Talley and A. Unnikrishnan, 2007: Observations: Oceanic Climate Change and Sea Level. In: Climate Change 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

  8. Shing Chyi Chua, , Tick Hui Oh. Solar energy outlook in Malaysia. Volume 16, Issue 1, 2012, pp, 564574.

  9. Haslenda Hashim , Wai Shin Ho. Renewable energy policies and initiatives for a sustainable energy future in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011), pp. 4780 4787.

  10. Mustapa SI, Leong YP, Hashim AH. Issues and challenges of renewable energy development: a Malaysian experience. In: PEA-AIT international conference on energy and sustainable development: issues and strategies. 2010.

  11. S. Mekhilefa,, A. Safaria, W.E.S. Mustaffaa, R. Saidurb, R. Omara, M.A.A. Younisc. Solar energy in Malaysia: Current state and prospects. Volume 16, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 386396.

  12. A.W. Azhari, K. Sopian, A. Zaharim, M.A. Ghoul. A new approach for predicting solar radiation in tropical environment using satellite images case study of Malaysia WSEAS Transactions on Environmental Development, 4 (2008), pp. 373378.

  13. A.M. Nugroho. The impact of solar chimney geometry for stack ventilation in Malaysia's single storey terraced house. Malaysia'sGeography (January) (2010), pp. 163177.

  14. Sriram S. Solar power in Malaysia impediments to growth. Asia pacific Energy Practice. Frost & Sullivan Market Insight; 2006.

  15. R. Saidur, N.A. Rahim, H.W. Ping, M.I. Jahirul, S. Mekhilef, H.H. Masjuki. Energy and emission analysis for industrial motors in Malaysi. Energy Policy, 37 (9) (2009), pp. 36503658.

  16. Malaysia Energy Center (PTM),2008. Study on Grid Connected Electricity Baseline in Malaysia year: 2008.

  17. GHG Protocol guildline: Calculating CO2 Emissions from Mobile Sources, (2005). WRI, GHG Protocol Maobile Guide (03/21/05) v1.3.

Leave a Reply