Treatment of Textile by Adsorption Using Sawdust

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV10IS06032

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Treatment of Textile by Adsorption Using Sawdust

Abhirami Dilip 1

Student

Department of Civil Engineering Mangalam College of Engineering Ettumanoor, India

Ananthakrishnan S 3

Student

Department of Civil Engineering Mangalam College of Engineering Ettumanoor, India

Alfin P Reji 2

Student

Department of Civil Engineering Mangalam College of Engineering Ettumanoor, India

Saparya S 4

Student

Department of Civil Engineering Mangalam College of Engineering Ettumanoor, India

Drishya Babu 5

Assistant Professor

Department of Civil Engineering Mangalam College of Engineering Ettumanoor, India

Abstract In the present study adsorption capacity of Sawdust was used for the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution at varying PH, Contact time, adsorbent dosage a concentration after the sawdust is treated with formaldehyde Initial pH ranges of 6-9 is favourable. This study indicates that and the sawdust is a good adsorbent for removing the harmful dye from the textile waste water. The Sawdust is an efficient and low cost bio adsorbent for the removal of textile dye from aqueous solution

Keywords: Formaldehyde, Sawdust, Methylene blue.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Dyes may be defined as substances that, when applied to a substrate, provide color by a process that alters, any crystal structure of the coloured substances. Such substances with considerable coloring capacity are widely employed in the textile, cosmetics, plastics, photographic and paper industries. The presence of dyes in the environment can generate serious problems to the living organisms, humans and aquatic life, because their possible toxicity. They are no biodegradable and difficult to remove from the industrial effluents. Various methods like chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, adsorption, ion exchange, oxidation, coagulation process…etc. are the used for the treatment of textile dye. Considering the fact that the textile dyeing process is recognized as one of the most environmentally unfriendly industrial processes, it is of extreme importance to understand the critical points of the dyeing process so as to find alternative, eco-friendly methods.

    Adsorption is a wastewater purification technique for removing a wide range of compounds from industrial wastewater. Adsorption is most commonly implemented for the removal or low concentrations of non-degradable organic

    compounds from ground water, drinking water preparation. It has certain advantages in comparison with other methods, because the removal of contaminants is easy to design and operate (technologically simple and adaptable to many treatment formats, it works at a wide pH range), the process does not produce any toxic by product, requires low energy, it is efficient and cost-effective a wide range of products can be used as adsorbent (Waste materials or by products).

    Hence, this study is aimed at the removal of colour, the most visible component of wastewater from textile industries using chemically treated sawdust of Mahogany.

  2. LITERATURE REVIEW

    Parihar et.al (2013) studied about the role of sawdust in the removal of waste substances from textile wastewater. The textile wastewater was treated with sawdust which is an adsorbent and then filtered. The various physicochemical characteristics of both sawdust treated and untreated textile effluent were analysed. The maximum percentage removal of 37% was observed for total suspended solids while minimum removal of 9% for chemical oxygen demand. The investigations showed that after treatment with sawdust, the treated effluent had lower values of all the parameters than the untreated effluent. T Pseudo first and second order kinetic models were used to calculate the amount adsorbed at equilibrium condition. It is established that treated sawdust has been used as a better adsorbent for the removal of Remazol Red as compared to commercial charcoal. This process may eventually be used to get industrial waste free purified water. The reduction in pollution load of treated effluent may be

    attributed to the adsorption of chemicals in effluent by sawdust through hydrogen bonding and ion exchange mechanism [1]

    Sidiras et.al (2012) conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility of removing hexavalent chromium and methylene blue, taken as representative species for heavy metals and dyes, respectively from aqueous solutions, using industrial by- products, specifically pine sawdust, which comes from many sources. Maximum dye was adsorbed within 30 min after the beginning for every experiment. Similar experiments were carried out with commercially available activated carbon to compare the results. The material was tested in raw form and after acid treatment under mild conditions. Adsorption experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of adsorbent dose, pH, contact time and initial adsorbent concentration. The adsorption kinetics and adsorption equilibrium were further studied using the data obtained from these experiments. [2

    Khattri et.al (2010) established that under various experimental conditions such as agitation time, dye concentration, adsorption dose, pH and temperature to assess the potentiality of neem sawdust for the removal of malachite green dye from wastewater. Neem sawdust was used as an adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from an aqueous solution. A greater percentage of dye removal was observed with decrease in the initial concentration of dye and increase in amount of the adsorbent. The adsorption of dye on neem 4 sawdust was found to follow a gradual process. The effects of different system variables, like adsorbent dosage, initial dye concentration, pH and contact time were studied. Higher adsorption percentages were observed at lower concentrations of dye. Optimum pH value for dye adsorption was determined as 7.0 for both adsorbents. Maximum dye was adsorbed within 30 min after the beginning for every experiment. The dimensionless factor, RL of the malachite green, neem sawdust isotherm revealed that the adsorption process is favourable in nature. [3]

    Garg et.al (2013) studied about Formaldehyde treated and sulphuric acid treated sawdust were used to adsorb malachite green at varying dye concentration, adsorbent dose, pH and agitation time. Similar experiments were conducted with activated carbon to compare the results. The adsorption efficiency of sulphuric acid treated sawdust was higher than formaldehyde treated Sawdust. An initial pH in the range of 69 was favourable for the dye removal by both the adsorbents. Dilute solutions were effectively decolorized by the adsorbents. It is proposed that in batch or stirred tank reactors, both adsorbents can be an attractive option for dye adsorption. [4]

    Garg et.al (2014) studied about the potential use of Indian Rosewood sawdust, pre-treated with formaldehyde and sulphuric acid, for the removal of methylene blue dye from simulated wastewater. The effects of different system variables, like adsorbent dosage, initial dye concentration, pH and contact time were studied. Higher adsorption percentages were observed at lower concentrations of dye. Optimum pH value for dye adsorption was determined as 7.0 for both

    adsorbents. Maximum dye was adsorbed within 30 min after the beginning for every experiment. Similar experiments were carried out with commercially available activated carbon to compare the results. [5]

    Giwa et.al (2018) conducted a study of the decolourisation of wastewater from a local textile facility by concentrated Sulphuric acid modified sawdust was conducted. The adsorbent wa characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Elemental Diffraction X – ray Spectroscopy (EDS) techniques. The effects of adsorbent dose, contact time and temperature were investigated. The characterization analysis indicates that the adsorbent has potential adsorption sites with several pores, and carbon content as high as 66.77%. The percentage colour removal from the wastewater increased with adsorbent dose, contact time and temperature. [6]

  3. EXPERIMENTAL WORKS

    1. Adsorbent

      In this studies sawdust of Mahogany were used as adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue dye from the aqueous solution. It is collected from the mill at Kottayam district, Kerala, India which were available in abundant.

      The collected sawdust from the mill were dried in the sunlight to evaporate the moisture present in it. The dried material sieved with a particle size of 53 microns. The sieved adsorbent sample prepared was kept in an airtight container for further tests.

    2. Formaldehyde Treated Sawdust

    Sawdust of Mahogany tree is collected from the local saw mill was dried in the sunlight until all the moisture evaporated. The sawdust is treated with 1% of formaldehyde in the ratio 1:5 at 50°C for 4 hours. Then washed with distilled water to remove formaldehyde and oven dried at 80°C for 24 hours. Then the dried material kept in an airtight container.

    Fig.1 Formaldehyde Treated Sawdust

    C. Dye Solution Preparation

    Methylene blue was used in this study for the adsorption. 5 ml of methylene blue is added to 500ml of distilled water used for each tests. The concentration of the methylene blue is measured by using UV/visible spectrometer at a maximum value is 665mm.

    Fig 2- Prepared Dye Solution

  4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    Effect of Contact Time

    Here use 5 containers for the test having 100 ml of prepared dye solution in each. Add same amount of adsorbent in each container and stir it for different time intervals (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 minutes). Then the maximum efficiency is 91.07

    at 40 minute.

    Effects of Initial Concentration:

    In this study the same amount of adsorbent is used in 5 containers but variations in the quantity of stock solution taken in the 5 containers for the test (100,150,200,250&300 ml ) and stir at a constant time. Then measure the efficiency of the solution. In this study the maximum efficiency is 82.14 at 100 ml of stock solution taken.

    TABLE II.

    SL No.

    Initial Concentration(mL)

    Initial Colour

    Final Colour

    Effitiency(%)

    1

    100

    0.56

    0.1

    82.14

    2

    150

    0.56

    0.14

    75

    3

    200

    0.56

    0.2

    64.28

    4

    250

    0.56

    0.22

    60.71

    5

    300

    0.56

    0.27

    51.78

    Sl No.

    Contact Time(Min)

    Initial Colour

    Final Colour

    Effitiency(%)

    1

    10

    0.56

    0.11

    80.35

    2

    20

    0.56

    0.08

    85.71

    3

    30

    0.56

    0.06

    89.28

    4

    40

    0.56

    0.05

    91.07

    5

    50

    0.56

    0.05

    91.07

    TABLE I.

    EEFECT OF CONTACT TIME

    92

    % removal

    90

    88

    86

    84

    82

    80

    78

    0 20 40 60

    Contact Time (Min)

    350

    300

    % removal

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    EFFECT OFCHANGE OF INITIAL CONCENTRATION

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Initial Concentration (mL)

    Fig 5 Effect of change of initial concentration

    Effects of Adsorbent Dosage :

    Fig. 3 Effect of Contact Time

    The effects of adsorbent dosage on adsorption was investigated by adding various quantities of adsorbent to the stock solution (2, 4 ,6 ,8 ,10 ,12 ,14 and 16g). Then the chemical flasks were well corked and the mixture was constantly shaken in a shaker for 15 minutes. The final dye concentration reading were measured after agitation.

    Volume 10, Issue 06 Fig 4 Stirring of Solution

    Published by, www.ijert.org

    108

    TABLE III.

    Sl No.

    Adsobent Dose(g)

    Initial Colour

    Final Colour

    Efficiency(%)

    1

    2

    0.56

    0.20

    64.28

    2

    4

    0.56

    0.17

    69.64

    3

    6

    0.56

    0.14

    75

    4

    8

    0.56

    0.09

    83.92

    5

    10

    0.56

    0.06

    89.28

    6

    12

    0.56

    0.04

    92.85

    7

    14

    0.56

    0.03

    94.64

    8

    16

    0.56

    0.03

    94.64

    Fig 7 Testing of pH

    Sl No.

    pH

    Initial Colour

    Final Colour

    Effitiency(%)

    1

    2

    0.4

    0.1

    77

    2

    4

    0.6

    0.12

    80

    3

    6

    0. 55

    0.08

    85.45

    4

    8

    0.52

    0.09

    82.69

    5

    10

    0.43

    0.06

    79

    TABLE IV.

    100

    90

    80

    % removal

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    EFFECT OF CHANGE OF ADSORBENT DOSAGE

    0 5 10 15 20

    adsorbent dosage (g)

    Fig 6 Effect of change of adsorbant dosage

    EFFECT OF CHANGE OF pH

    86

    % removal

    84

    82

    80

    78

    76

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12

    variation of pH

    Effects of pH

    The effect of pH was investigated by varying the pH values of the stock solution (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10).The pH value of the stock solution is 7 so add 0.5N H2SO4 for reducing the pH value. (6, 4 and 2) and then add 0.5N NaOH for increasing the pH value (8 and 10).After this process add 5 mL of sawdust in each container and shaken for 15 minutes. Then the final reading measured after agitation.

    Fig 8 Effect of change of pH

  5. CONCLUSION

    Sawdust is used in the study that is Mahogany shows significant adsorption capacity for methylene blue under suitable experimental conditions and it will serve as an useful adsorbent. Sawdust is abundantly available and inexpensive too. Its binding capacity of basic dye is appreciably high. This method may be helpful for designing and fabricatinga basic dye rich effluent treatment plant in the future. In this journal generally studied the batch study such as effect initial dye concentration, effect of pH, effect of adsorbent dosage, effect

    of contact time and graphically represented it's variation and effectiveness.ph over the range of 6 to 8 shows maximum efficiency where increasing the amount of adsorbent dosage the efficiency reaching maximum after a particular limit it will become constant. The study related to contact time will shows the maximum efficiency at 40 minute then it become constant also the initial dye concentration maximum at 100ml then the efficiency decreasing with the increasing amount of initial dye concentration.

  6. REFERENCES

[1] Akrity Parihar and Piyush Malaviya (2013), Textile Wastewater Treatment Using Sawdust as Adsorbent, International Journal of Environmental Sciences 2 (9) , 110-113

[2] D. Politi , D. Sidiras (2012), Wastewater treatment for dyes and heavy metals using modified pine sawdust as adsorbent, Procedia Engineering 42 (4),1969 1982

[3] S.D. Khattri , M.K. Singh (2010), Removal of malachite green from dye wastewater using neem sawdust by adsorption, Journal of Hazardous Materials 167 (5),10891094

[4] V.K. Garg , Renuka Gupta, Anu Bala Yadav, Rakesh Kumar (2013), Dye removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on treated sawdust, Bioresource Technology 89(2),121124

[5] V.K. Garg, Moirangthem Amita, Rakesh Kumar, Renuka Gupta (2014), Basic dye (methylene blue) removal from simulated wastewater by adsorption using Indian Rosewood sawdust: a timber industry waste, Dyes and Pigments 63 (7),243-250

[6] Abdulsalam K. A, Giwa A. A (2018), Adsorptive De-Colouration of Textile Wastewater using an Acid-Modified Sawdust,

ChemSearch Journal 9(1), 13 18

[7] Viorica Dulman, Simona Maria Cucu-Man (2014), Sorption of some textile dyes by beech wood sawdust, Journal of Hazardous Materials 162 (6), 14571464

[8] B.H. Hameed, A.L. Ahmad, K.N.A. Latiff (2017), Adsorption of basic dye (methylene blue) onto activated carbon prepared from rattan sawdust, Dyes and Pigments 75 (9), 143-149

[9] Basavaraj S Karadagi , Prof. G.M.Hiremath (2016), Removal of COD and Colour from Textile Wastewater Using Sawdust as an Adsorbent, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 5 (6), 256-266

[10] O. A. A. Eletta, S. I. Mustapha , O. A. Ajayi , A. T. Ahmed (2018), Optimization of Dye Removal from Textile Wastewater using Activated Carbon from Sawdust, Nigerian Journal Of Technological Development 15 (3), 369-385

Leave a Reply