Thermodynamic Analysis Of Counter Flow Vortex Tube

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS2086

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Thermodynamic Analysis Of Counter Flow Vortex Tube

Upendra S. Gupta (Asst. Prof. SVITS Indore) Manoj K. Joshi (SGSITS Indore)

Saurabh Rai

Abstract: The vortex tube also known as Ranque tube, with no moving parts and reliable device it produces hot and cold gas streams simultaneously from the source of the compressed gas, An experiment has been conducted to evaluate the thermodynamic analysis of the vortex tube. During the study the cold mass fraction was varied from 0.2-0.8 for a fix inlet pressure of 4 bar and the inlet pressure was varied between 2 -7 bar for a fix opening of the cone valve. The maximum temperature drop was observed for cold mass fraction of 0.4 and the effective refrigerating effect was observed between the 0.35-0.65 of the cold mass fraction, as the refrigerating effect and heating effect is a function of mass of the cold air and the temperature drop. A thermodynamic model has been used to investigate vortex tube energy separation, the results indicated that as hot tube length or inlet pressure increases the temperature difference increases too,The second law analysis shows that the for air, it is middle tube which generates lowest entropy.

Keywords:-Vortex tube (RHVT), counter-flow type vortex tube, energy separation, temperature reduction, coefficient of performance (COP),Second law analysis .

Introduction: The vortex tube also known as Ranque tube is a remarkably a simple device, reliable (since no moving parts) and produces hot and cold gas streams simultaneously from the source of the compressed gas. It is also light in weight, ozone friendly, free from pollution, low cost and effective solution to a wide variety of industrial cooling problems especially like drilling, turning and welding and heating problems as early start of the boilers and drying chambers etc.

The vortex tube was first discovered by G. J. Ranque (1933) then Hilsch (1947) [1], a German engineer, performed comprehensive experimental and theoretical studies aimed at improving the efficiency. Martynovskii and Alekseev [2] studied experimentally the effect of various design parameters of vortex tubes. Hilsch [1] suggested that ratio L/D should be around 50 for good temperature separation. According to Westley [3] the only requirement is that the tube exceeds 10D. Gulyaev [4,5] determined that the minimum length for cylindrical hot tube was about 10D. If the hot tube is conical, rather than cylindrical, the minimum length must be increased, to about 13D. Lewellen [6] stated that as long as the tube wall is insulated the temperature separation in the tube remains unaffected by L/D as long as some minimum length is exceeded. Takahama and Yokosawa [7] suggested a tube length L/D 100 in order to obtain a better performance. Amitani et al. [8] indicated that the shortened vortex tube of six tube diameters length had the same efficiency. Saidi and Yazdi [9] found that increasing tube length increases temperature differences and decreases exergy destruction. For L/D 20 energy separation was quite low. Saidi and Valipour [10] concluded that the optimum value of L/D is in the range of 2055. Singh et al. [11] concluded that length of the tube has no effect on the performance of the vortex tube in the range of L/D 4555. Behera et al. [12] presented that increase in the length of tube enhances the temperature separation up to the condition that stagnation point is within the length of tube. The investigations had

shown that L/D ratio should be more than 10 for the tube to be effective. Gao [13] investigated three different shapes of hot plug to study the energy separation effect and concluded that the shape of the hot plug is not a critical component in RHVT.

Promvonge and Smith [14] concluded that increasing the number of inlet nozzle increases the temperature drop and the isentropic efficiency. Prabakaran. J et al [15] performed investigation for vortex tube of L/D ratio 10 and three different sizes of orifices i.e. 5mm, 6 mm and 7mm and inlet pressure 4 bar and concluded that the maximum temperature drop is obtained for 5mm and the temperature difference is reduced as the size of the orifice increase. Volkan kirmaci [16] used Taguchi method to optimize the design of counter flow Ranque- Hilsch vortex tube for the performance. Balmer (1988) who investigated theoretically the temperature separation phenomenon in a vortex tube, used the second law of thermodynamics to show temperature separation effect with a net increase in entropy is possible when incompressible liquids are used in the tube. This was confirmed by experiments with liquid water which showed that temperature separation occurred when an inlet pressure was sufficiently high. Silverman (1982)[17] questioned whether the VT is a violation of the second law of thermodynamics or not. Usage of exergy concepts in evaluating the performance of energy systems are increasing nowadays due to its clear indication of loss at various locations which is more informative than energy analysis. Exergy is the work potential of energy in a given environment. It has been also employed in studying vortex tube performance theoretically. Rosen and Dincer (2004) studied the effect of dead state variation on energy and exergy analysis of thermal system and showed that the variation does not affect the energy and exergy values significantly. In exergy analysis losses are measured in terms of exergy destruction, which provide direct measure of thermodynamic inefficiencies. Saidi (1999)[9] studied the effect of inlet pressure on temperature difference in the vortex tube and discussed the advantage of an exergy analysis. He also listed equation for calculating rates of entropy generation and total irreversibility. Krmac (2009)[16] studied the exergy analysis on vortex tube for two different gases (air, oxygen) by using different inlet pressures and different nozzle numbers. Farezaneh-Gord and Kargaran (2010)[23] have carried out an experimental study to investigate natural gas temperature behaviors in a VT. The effects of the VT cold orifice diameter on the VT thermal separation are also studied. Farzaneh-Gord et al. (2012a)[24,25] have studied the effects of hot tube length on the VT thermal separation.

In this work, an attempt was made to fabricate and test the performance of a counter flow vortex tube of total length 15D and a vortex generator which was fixed inside the tube to create four vortices along the inner periphery of the rube. Different parameters were evaluated like temperature reduction in cold tube end, temperature rise in hot tube, refrigerating effect, heating effect, amount of entropy generation and the coefficient of performance was compared for different operating parameter like cold mass fraction and inlet pressure.

Fig. 1 Schematic sketch of Counter-flow Vortex Tube.

Geometrical parameter of Counter Flow Vortex Tube

Parameter

D(mm)

dc(mm)

di(mm)

dn

Lh(mm)

Lc(mm)

(degree)

Value

12

6

4

2

120

30

45

Fig 2. Nozzle Configuration or Swirl generator

EXPERIMENTAL SET UP

The detailed drawing and of the vortex tube is given in Fig. 1 and Fig.2. The schematic sketch of the complete experimental set is as shown in Fig.3. It consists of a two stage compressor and a receiver as a source of compressed air, auto pressure cut-off switch, an air filter, a counter-flow vortex tube. Compressed air frm the receiver of compressor is supplied through a hand operated control valve to control the pressure at the inlet to the vortex tube as shown in figure. The pressure at the inlet to the vortex tube is measured with the help of a calibrated pressure gauge indicator. The temperature of the hot air and temperature of the cold air coming out of the vortex tube is measured with the thermocouple located immediately on the downstream of the cone shaped valve, and downstream of the orifice located next to the inlet respectively. The temperature of the air is also measured at the inlet to the vortex tube to calculate the temperature drop or temperature rise of the cold and hot air respectively. The thermocouples along with the digital indicator used in this experiment are calibrated to an accuracy of ±0.1°C.The mass flow rates of the cold air and hot air discharges are measured by calibrated orifice flow meters. The pressure difference across the orifice is measured by an inclined tube manometer connected to the pressure tapping at distance d (orifice diameter) on the upstream side and d/2 on the downstream side of the orifice. The ratio, called a cold mass fraction is changed by regulating the cone-shaped valve opening.

The complete vortex tube is further insulated with the insulating material to minimize the heat loss/gain from the surrounding.

Fig 3. Experimental apparatus, 1) Compressed air Receiver , 2) Hand operated Valve , 3) Pressure gauge , 4)Counter flow Vortex Tube , 5) a set of orifice flow meters,6-7) Orifice Flow meter, 9) Cone-shape valve.

Thermodynamic Analysis

The cold flow mass ratio (cold mass fraction) is the most important parameter used for indicating the vortex tube performance of RHVT. The cold mass fraction is the ratio of mass of cold air that is released through the cold end of the tube to the total mass of the input compressed air. It is represented as follows

= =

(1)

Where, mc represents the mass flow rate of the cold stream released, mi represents the inlet or total mass flow rate of the pressurized air at the inlet. Therefore, varies in the range of 0-1.

Cold air temperature difference or temperature reduction is defined as the difference between inlet flow temperature and cold air temperature:

= (2)

where Ti is the inlet flow temperature and Tc is the cold air temperature. Similarly, hot air temperature difference is defined as

= (3)

Had the expansion been isentropic from inlet of the nozzle to the exit pressure and the air to behave like an ideal gas, isentropic efficiency is given by

=

(4)

For isentropic expansion the exit temperature

1

=

(5)

Where, pe is the exit pressure of the cold air i.e. atmospheric pressure (pa) at outlet. The refrigerating /cooling effect produced by the cold air of vortex tube is give as

= (6)

Since cooling and heating streams are obtained simultaneously the heating effect produced by the vortex tube is give as

= (7)

Since RHVT can be used as a cooler and heater simultaneously hence both the effect that i.e. cooling effect and heating effects are considered. The COP of the system is calculated accordingly. The coefficient of performance of refrigerator is defined as the ratio of refrigerating effect produced by the system to the work done on the system. In the conventional vapor compression refrigeration (VCR) system work input or power is the work of compression or the compressor work. But, the vortex refrigeration systems are used where compressed air or gas is available. Making analogy to the VCR system, the work of

compression from the exit/atmos. i.e. from pe to pi by a reversible isothermal process, the COP of the system is given as

=

1

(8)

= 1

1

(9)

In the above relation the pressure drop in the supply pipe has been neglected and the pressure at the exit of the cold and the hot air in the vortex tube are assumed to be atmospheric.

The second law analysis

The first law analysis accounts only for heat balance and cooling or heating effect. The second law analysis based on irreversibility approach, considers also the losses due to separation effect as well as the pressure drop losses. As mentioned by Saidi and Yazdi (1999), the separation losses account for a significant portion of vortex-tube irreversibility. Therefore, the vortex-tube optimal design couldnt be accessible following a first law analysis. Assuming steady state condition and neglecting heat transfer, the second law of thermodynamics for the system could be expressed as:

= + + (10)

Applying the mass conservation and considering the definition of the cold mass fraction, the above equation could be re-expressed as:

= 1 + = 1 ( + ( )) (11)

The equation 11 could be non-dimensionalized as:

= / = 1/ 1 ( + ( )) (12)

For the case of a prefect gas, by employing the following Tds relation

=

R

(13)

The equation 12 could be simplified as

= 1 1 1 + 1

(14)

In most cases (as here) , this makes the above equation to be more simplified as: pc = ph

1-

1

=

(15)

If the process could be assumed reversible, then:

1

=

1-

(16)

For the case of an irreversible process

1 1

=

1-

=

(17)

The equation 17 and 1 could be combined to obtain an equation for determining cold stream temperature in case of knowing dimensionless entropy generation as:

1

1

1

=

(18)

Results and discussions:

The experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of the cold mass fraction on the cold air temperature drop, rise in hot air temperature, isentropic efficiency and the thermodynamic analysis was carried out to evaluate the performance of the vortex tube keeping inlet air pressure to the vortex tube constant at 4 bar.

Fig.4 shows the plot of temperature reduction in cold air to the cold mass fraction for input pressure of 4 bar. It was observed that the temperature reduction ( ) of the cold air increase with increase in cold mass fraction up to 0.4 and then the temperature reduction decreases. The maximum temperature drop recorded was 16°C.

Fig. 5 Shows the increase in hot air temperature as a function of cold mass fraction, it is observed that the increase/rise in temperature ( ) increases almost linearly with increasing in the cold mass fraction up to 0.8. and maximum rise in temperature recorded at of 0.8 is 29.8°C.

Fig. 6 shows the effect of cold air to the mass fraction on the isentropic efficiency of vortex tube. It follows the qualitatively the same trend as that of the drop in cold air temperature as it is the ratio of the actual cold air temperature drop to the isentropic drop in the temperature. The maximum isentropic efficiency varies between 0.08-0.2, and the maximum isentropic efficiency is found 0.2 for cold mass fraction of 0.4.

Fig. 7 shows the effect of the refrigerating effect as a function of cold mass fraction . It is observed that the refrigerating effect increase initially and hen decrease after 0.5. The range in which the refrigerating effect is found to be effective lies between the cold mass fraction of 0.35-0.65 and the corresponding refrigerating effect is found 32.51 (W) to 95.781 (W) for the present experimental set of reading.

Fig. 8 shows the plot of COP of refrigerator as a function of . It is observe that the maximum COP is found to be 0.08.Here it is assumed that the work of compression required to increase the pressure from the exit (atmosphere) condition to the inlet pressure follows reversal isothermal process.

Fig. 9 shows the plot of drop in temperature of cold air as a function of increase in the inlet pressure keeping the valve opening fix, orifice diameter and tube diameter constant. It is observe the drop in the cold air temperature enhances linearly with the increase in the inlet pressure. It may be due to stronger vortex that is created on the inner periphery of the tube due to increase in the inlet pressure and the temperature separation is a function of the inlet pressure and the exit pressure.

Fig. 10 shows the effect of the Heating effect as a function of cold mass fraction . It is observed that the Heating effect increase initially and then decrease after 0.5. The range in which the Heating effect is found to be effective lies between the cold mass fraction of 0.32-

0.475 and the corresponding Heating effect is found 79.04 (W) to 94.735 (W) for the present experimental set of reading.

Fig. 11 shows the plot of COP of Heat Pump as a function of . It is observe that the maximum COP is found to be 0.013.

Fig. 12 shows the effect of the Entropy generation as a function of cold mass fraction . It is observed that the Entropy generation for D =12 mm and air as working fluid .With increasing temperature differences increases and entropy generation decreases.

Conclusion: An experimental study on the temperature separation and thermodynamic analysis in the vortex tube has been carried out and these findings summarized are as follows:

  1. The maximum temperature drop and temperature rise is found between 0.3-0.4 and 0.8 cold air mass fractions respectively.

  2. The temperature drop increases with increase in inlet pressure.

  3. The refrigerating effect is more effective when the cold air mass fraction lies between the 0.35-0.65.

  4. The maximum COP on the vortex tube is found to 0.08 for inlet pressure of 4 bar and assuming the work of compression from exit to inlet pressure follows reversible isothermal process and the working medium obeys ideal gas laws.

  5. The Heating effect is more effective when the cold air mass fraction lies between the 0.32-0.60.

  6. The maximum COP of Heat pump is found to 0.013 for inlet pressure of 4 bar.

  7. The results indicated that as hot tube length or inlet pressure increases the temperature difference increases too, The second law analysis shows that the For air, it is middle tube which generates lowest entropy.

References

  1. Hilsch R,The use of expansion of gases in a centrifugal field as a cooling process, Rev Sci Instrum,18(2),108113(1947).

  2. Martynovskii VS and Alekseev VP, Investigation of the Vortex Thermal Separation Effect for gases and Vapors,Soviet Physics-Technical Physics,26(2), 2233 43,(1956).

  3. Westley R,Vortex tube performance data sheets, Cranfield College Note 67,College of Aeronautics, (1957).

  4. Gulyaev AI,Ranque effect at low temperatures,J Eng Phys,9(3),242244,(1965).

  5. Gulyaev AI,Investigation of conical vortex tubes,J Eng Phys,10(3),193195,(1966).

  6. LewellenWS,A review of confined vortex flows,Space PropulsionLab., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Contract Report NASA-CR-1772,N71- 32276(1971).

  7. Takahama H and Yokosawa H,Energy Separation in Vortex with a Divergent Chamber, Transactions of ASME,Journal of heat Transfer vol.103,196- 203,May(1981).

  8. Amitani T, Adachi T, Kato T, A study on temperature separation in a large vortex tube.,Trans JSME 49:877884, (1983).

  9. Saidi MH, Yazdi MR,Exergy model of a vortex tube system with experimental results. Energy 24,Issue (7),625632,July(1999).

10 Saidi MH, Valipour MS, Experimental modeling of vortex tube refrigerator. Appl Therm Eng 23,Issue(15),19711980 Oct.(2003).

  1. Singh.KP,An experimental performance evaluation of vortex tube, IE(I) J- Mc84,; pp 149-153 (2004).

  2. Behera U, Paul PJ, Kasthurirengan S, Karunanithi R, Ram SN, Dinesh K et al, CFD analysis and experimental investigations towards optimizing the parameters of RanqueHilsch vortex tube, Int J Heat Mass Transfer 48(10),19611973(2005).

  3. Gao,Experimental study on a simple Ranque- Hilsch Vortex tube, Cryogenics45 Issue(3),173-183 March(2005).

  4. Pongjet Promvonge and Smith Eiamsa,Investigation on the VortexThermal Separation in a Vortex Tube Refrigerator, ScienceAsia, 31(3), 215-223,(2005).

  5. Prabakaran. J et al,Effect of diameter of orifice and nozzle on the performance of counter flow vortes tube,International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2(4),704-707,(2010).

  6. Volkan kirmaci, Optimization of Counter flow Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube performance using Taguchi method, International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 32Issue(6), pp1487-1494,Sept.(2009).

  7. P.M. Silverman, The vortex tube: a violation of the second law, Eur J Phys 3, (1982), 8892.

  8. V. Krmac, O. Uluer, An Experimental Investigation of the Cold Mass Fraction, Nozzle Number and Inlet Pressure Effects on Performance of Counter Flow Vortex Tube, Journal of Heat Transfer-Transactions of The ASME, 131 (8), (2009), 081701- 081709.

  1. M. Farzaneh-Gord, S. Hashemi, M. Sadi, Energy destruction in Irans Natural Gas Pipe Line Network, Energy Exploration and Exploitation, Volume 25, Issue 6, (2007).

  2. M. Farzaneh-Gord, M.J. Magrebi, Exergy of Natural Gas Flow in Irans Natural Gas Fields, International Journal of Exergy, Vol 6, No. 1, (2009), 131-142.

  3. M. Farzaneh-Gord, M. Deymi Dashtbayaz, Recoverable Energy in Natural Gas Pressure Drop Stations: A Case Study of the Khangiran Gas Refinery, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, Volume 26, No. 2, (2008).

  4. M. Farzaneh-Gord, M. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Effect of Various Inlet Air Cooling Methods on Gas Turbine Performance Energy, Energy 36 (2011), 1196-1205.

  5. M. Farzaneh-Gord, M. Kargaran, Recovering energy at entry of natural gas into customer premises by employing a Counter-Flow vortex tube, oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l'IFP, Vol. 65 (2010), No. 6, pp. 903-912.

  6. M. Farzaneh-Gord, M. Kargaran, Y. Bayat, Sh. Hashemi (a), Investigation of Natural Gas Thermal Separation through a Vortex Tube, Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol. 19, No. 1, 8794, (2012).

  7. M. Farzaneh-Gord, A. Arabkoohsar, M. Deymi Dasht-bayaz, V. Farzaneh-Kord (b), Feasibility of accompanying uncontrolled linear heater with solar system in natural gas pressure drop stations,Energy41(2012),pp.420- 28,i10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.058.

Leave a Reply