DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20132563
- Open Access
- Authors : Jose Ryan L. Aguilar
- Paper ID : IJERTV15IS050919
- Volume & Issue : Volume 15, Issue 05 , May – 2026
- Published (First Online): 12-05-2026
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The Performance of Grade Seven Students Through Numpa (Numeracy Project Assessment) in Remedial Teaching in Tañong National High School
An Action Research Presented to the Department of Education as Grantee of Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) 2016
Jose Ryan L. Aguilar
Teacher I – Mathematics Tañong National High School Schools Division Office of Malabon City
Abstract – This action research aims to develop an intervention and effective instructional strategies. The respondents of this research are the Grade 7 students of Tañong National High School. The main objective of this research is the enhancement of learners performance in the level of 4Fs (Four Fundamental Operations). Data from the respondents were treated carefully through weighted average mean and percentage scores.
The Quarterly Examination of students is the key point to measure their performance.
Mathematics Department of Tañong National High School found out that the Grade 7 level has Low Mastery Level while the rest of the grade levels fall on Average Mastery Level. Their Mastery Level has an increased of 1% as compared from their First Quarter Examination. However, based on the Second Quarter results their level of achievement is in Low Mastery Level only. It means that the students have partial understanding and application of the skills that are fundamental for proficient work.
In this study, only the data for the pre-test and post-test were used.The study showed that the achievement of the students, who undergo the remediation program, significantly increased, revealing a better performance.
Results of the study could provide a basis on school remediation program for the succeeding grading periods, as well as the other subjects.
Keywords: remediation program, Four Fundamental Operations, achievement, mastery level, intervention
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
CONTEXT AND RATIONALE
With the implementation of the K to 12 curriculum, the Mathematics department constructs a device test called 4 Fs Test to assess the learners basic operations. The result of the test has been used to determine the Mastery Level.
Numeracy is the capacity to reason and to apply simple numerical concepts. Basic numeracy skills consist of comprehending fundamental operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.
It is believed that techniques in learning Mathematics are of different strategies and ways. Thus, it is students-centered approach. Students are catered using drill-practice, and demonstration-prompt-practice (Mercer & Miller 1992). These ways are combination of teacher demonstration of the skill (input) and applied by the students (output). Remediation practice is injected if these two did not work. It is said that remediation is the process of filling up what is lack or what to improve in teaching-learning process (Moscardini 2009).
Designing or choosing remedial approach or strategy for the learners with difficulties is not an easy task because every student has distinctive features in learning. The researcher has chosen this remedial class as strategy and technique to address the
issue on increasing the level of mastery on numeracy (Basic Fundamental Operations) because it has been the way towards improving the performance of the students from emerging to mastered.
Delisle and Berger (1990); Witmore (1980) believed that there is something in intrinsic motivation/stimulus and remedial strategies as they focused on students strength. It should be combined: the stimulus and strategies. Stimulus are used to push students learn Mathematics willingly, and the most fitted strategies which is really part of the teacher himself. It is said that if the students are interested to learn, the higher the chance the strategies are effective.
The philosophy of assessment based on the Department of Education (DepEd) Order No. 73 s. 2012, Guidelines on the Assessment and Rating of Learning Outcomes Under K to 12 Basic Education Program stated that assessment shall be used primarily as a quality assurance tool to track student progress in attainment of standards, promote self-reflection and personal accountability for ones learning, and provide a basis for profiling the students performance.
Considering appropriate and motivating instructional materials is believed better of too much and complex teaching pedagogy. Students are seen as easily get bored species. Their listening span is usually short. It is believed that the shortest the process, the fastest the mastery has on the part of the students. It is of value if the instructional materials are appropriate and motivating (Bottge et al. 2006).
Remedial programs are the alternative for promoting students and teachers in closing achievement gaps. The utilization of remediation may benefit all involved citizens under the No Child Left Behid Act of 2008.
Villanueva A.(2015); Salandanan (2009), pointed out that assessment and evaluation of pupils learning in the ultimate test of ones teaching effectiveness. Some instruments and procedures provided to serve as pattern in gathering and interpreting data in other valuable information. Decisions arrived that could help in future planning of the lesson especially in the choice of appropriate teaching methodology.
BACKGROUND OF THE INTERVENTION
This program will work the combination of the use of learning modules and guided learning materials which the Mathematics teachers will give considering the competencies that are needed to be enhanced.
Tañong National High School, the idea of remedial class that aim to develop potential learners to become teachers assistant in increasing the 4Fs Mastery level of the learners who are educationally at risk and in support to No Filipino Child Left Behind of 2008. Remedial teaching program conduct every tuesdays and thursdays during 11:00-12:00pm for afternoon teachers and 1:30 2:30pm for morning teachers facilitated, monitored and supervised by the Math teachers and CI Team.
As reflected in the learners performance, majority of the learners fall under the developing in mastery level. To address the issue on the performance of the learners, this program was launch.
ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This study sought to answer the following questions:
-
What is the pretest performance in Math of Grade 7 students in terms of:
-
Addition
-
Subtraction
-
Multiplication
-
Division
-
-
What is the post-test performance in Math of Grade 7 students in terms of:
-
Addition
-
Subtraction
-
Multiplication
-
Division
-
-
Is there a significant difference in the pretest and post-test performances among the Grade 7 students?
-
What program can be proposed that will enhance the performance of the learners in the basic operations?
Hypothesis
There is no significant differences among the scores of the respondent in the pre-test and post-test performance among the Grade 7 students.
Chapter 2
ACTION RESEARCH METHOD
This chapter, research methodology includes research locale, research population and sample, data gathering procedures and statistical treatment data.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND POPULATION
This study was conducted in Tañong National High School in Brgy. Tañong in the City of Malabon for the school year 2017 2018. As one of the Math teachers of this institution, the researcher choose this locale in preparation for the upcoming years to focus in the National Achievement Test (NAT).
Population and Sample
The research population in this study were Grade 7 students of Tañong National High School. There were ninety-nine (99) males and ninety-four (94) females a total of 193 students who took the 4 Fs Test on July 10, 2017 .
|
Section |
No. of Students |
|
Rizal |
39 |
|
Bonifacio |
34 |
|
Del Pilar |
26 |
|
Mabini |
25 |
|
Luna |
25 |
|
Jacinto |
22 |
|
Diego Silang |
22 |
|
TOTAL |
193 |
STATISTICAL TREATMENT DATA
The data collected were all descriptive data, including the pre-test and post-test scores of the assessment.
A Z-test was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the tool of the achievement of the respondents, Mean, Standard Deviation, and MPS (Mean Percentage Score) were also used for analysis.
Scale of Mastery Level
|
MASTERY LEVEL DESCRIPTIVE EQUIVALENT |
|
EMERGING (0% – 20%) |
|
DEVELOPING (21% – 40%) |
|
ACHIEVING (41% – 60%) |
|
APPROACHING MASTERY (61% – 80%) |
|
MASTERED (81% – 100%) |
Simple Mean
Percentage Score
Standard Deviation Z Test
Pre-Implementation
-
Pre-Assessment
-
Identification of Respondents
-
Conduct a Survey
-
Conduct an Interview
-
Orientation of Parents
-
Signing of Agreement
Implementation
-
Conduct a Remedial Class
-
Assess Weekly Remediation
Post-Implementation
-
Administer a post-assessment
-
Conduct an Interview
-
Analyze Observation
-
Conclusion and Recommendations
-
Share Result
December, 2017-January, 2018
July-August, 2017
September-November, 2017
WORK PLAN
Chapter 3
RESULTS AND REFLECTIONS
This chapter presents the data gathered by the researcher from the respondents through pretest and post-test.
Based on the data gathered from the respondents, the following are the findings of the study:
Scores and the Mean of the Pretest of Grade 7 Table 1 Summary of the Means of the Pre-Test of Grade 7
on Basic Four Fundamental Operations
|
Number of Sample |
Basic Four Fundamental Operations |
MEAN |
S.D. |
MASTE RY LEVE L |
Mastery Level |
|
62 |
ADDITION |
7.26 |
1.56 |
72.60 |
Approaching Mastery |
|
62 |
SUBTRACTION |
6.11 |
1.76 |
61.10 |
Approaching Mastery |
|
62 |
MULTIPLICATION |
4.13 |
1.82 |
41.30 |
Developing |
|
62 |
DIVISION |
3.38 |
1.15 |
33.80 |
Developing |
The table above shows the performance of Grade 7 students. These were given before the beginning of the remediation program. The pre-test contained 10 items per operation, with a total of 40 item questions. It is shown that the highest mean score is
7.26 (Addition) and describe as approaching mastery level with the standard deviation of
1.56 while the lowest mean of 3.38 described as developing with a standard deviation of
1.15 (Division).
This supports the idea of Moscardini 2009; Gurganus 2007; Fuchs 2001; Mercer & Miller 1992 that students are helped to understand mathematical concepts using a concrete-representation-abstract sequence which is based on teacher-centered approach.
Scores and the Mean of the Post-test of Grade 7 Table 2 Summary of the Means of the Post-Test of Grade 7
on Basic Four Fundamental Operations
|
Numbe r of Sample |
Basic Four Fundamental Operations |
MEAN |
S.D. |
MASTE RY LEVE L |
Mastery Level |
|
62 |
ADDITION |
8.97 |
1.17 |
89.70 |
Mastered |
|
62 |
SUBTRACTION |
8.55 |
1.47 |
85.50 |
Mastered |
|
62 |
MULTIPLICATION |
7.05 |
1.32 |
70.50 |
Approaching Mastery |
|
62 |
DIVISION |
5.65 |
1.16 |
56.50 |
Achieving |
The table above shows the performance of Grade 7 students in the post-test in four fundamental operations.
This was given after the Remediation Program. This served as one of the main data of the study. The post-test contained 10 items per operation, with a total of 40 items questions.
Table 2 shows that the highest mean score obtained was in the addition, 8.97 and described as mastered with the standard deviation of 1.17, while division operation obtained the lowest mean of 5.65, described as achieving level with a standard deviation of 1.16.
The findings, as emphasized by Delisle and Berger (1990); Witmore (1980), that remedial strategies are effective as they focus on students
strengths to create thier intrinsic motivation while remediation is done in a safe environment so that the learners can make their own understanding of knowledge.
Table 3.1 Test of Significant Difference among the Mean Scores in the Pretest and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Addition
|
Mean |
SD |
Compute d z-value |
Critic al Value |
df |
Decision |
Interpretation |
|
|
Pre-test |
7.26 |
1.56 |
6.905 |
1.96 |
61 |
Reject the null hypothesis |
Significant |
|
Post-test |
8.97 |
1.17 |
Table 3.1 shows that the mean has improved in the post test results in addition operation. Similarly, the computed z-value is greater than the critical value which means that there is a significant difference among the mean score in Addition because of the remediation program.
The findings are congruent with (Bottge et al. 2006) students can learn new concepts when instructional techniques and materials are motivating and appropriate.
Table 3.2 Test of Significant Difference among the Mean Scores in the Pretest and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Subtraction
|
Mean |
SD |
Compute d Z-value |
Critic al Value |
df |
Decision |
Interpreation |
|
|
Pre-test |
6.11 |
1.76 |
8.378 |
1.96 |
61 |
Reject the null hypothesis |
Significant |
|
Post-test |
8.55 |
1.47 |
Table 3.2 shows that the mean has improved in the post test results in subtraction operation. Similarly, the computed z-value is greater than the critical value which means that there is a significant difference among the mean score in subtraction because of the remediation program.
The findings are congruent with (Bottge et al. 2006) students can learn new concepts when instructional techniques and materials are motivating and appropriate.
Table 3.3 Test of Significant Difference among the Mean Scores in the Pretest and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Multiplication
|
Mean |
SD |
Compute d Z-value |
Critic al Value |
df |
Decision |
Interpretation |
|
|
Pre-test |
4.13 |
1.82 |
10.226 |
1.96 |
61 |
Reject the null hypothesis |
Significant |
|
Post-test |
7.05 |
1.32 |
Table 3.3 shows that the mean has improved in the post test results in multiplication operation. Similarly, the computed z-value is greater than the critical value which means that there is a significant difference among the mean score in multiplication because of the remediation program.
The findings are congruent with (Bottge et al. 2006) students can learn new concepts when instructional techniques and materials are motivating and appropriate.
Table 3.4 Test of Significant Difference among the Mean Scores in the Pretest and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Division
|
Mean |
SD |
Compute d Z-value |
Critic al Value |
df |
Decision |
Interpretation |
|
|
Pre-test |
3.38 |
1.15 |
10.943 |
1.96 |
61 |
Reject the null hypothesis |
Significant |
|
Post-test |
5.65 |
1.16 |
Table 3.4 shows that the mean has improved in the post test results in division operation. Similarly, the computed z-value is greater than the critical value which means that there is a significant difference among the mean score in division because of the remediation program.
The findings are congruent with (Bottge et al. 2006) students can learn new concepts when instructional techniques and materials are motivating and appropriate.
CONCLUSION
Chapter 4
Conclusion and Recommendations
Based from the summary of the findings, the following conclusions
are:
-
In terms of the pre-test performance in Math Grade 7, the Division operation obtained the lowest mean of 3.38 that falls under emergent level.
-
In terms of the post-test performance in Math Grade 7, the Division operation obtained the computed mean of 5.65 and interpreted as Approaching Mastery.
-
The pre-test and post-test revealed that there is signficant difference in the pre-test and post-test because the computed value is greater than the critical value. Hence, the hypothesis is rejected.
-
Based from the results, the researcher proposed a program which is remediation program that will help the learners to increase the level of numeracy and enhance the performance of the students in the basic operations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In the light of the significant findings and conclusions of this study, the following recommendations are pressented:
-
To the Students
-
Be active, attentive and participative during the Math class/Remedial class.
-
Develop a study habit.
-
-
To the Teachers
-
Prepare learning devices using illustrations, pictures and other presentations to catch the learners attention.
-
Monitor learners progress using portfolio.
-
Provide instructional materials to be manipulated by the learners.
-
-
To the Parents
-
Assist their children in studying and cooperate with the school to monitor their childrens performance.
-
Attend parent conference to update the progress of their children.
-
-
To the Administrators
Provide updated materials to win the students interest and to inform them about the changes and innovations in the present situation.
-
To the Future researchers
Explore other possible interventions/programs that would encourage students to enhance their mathematical skills.
REFERENCES
-
DepEd Order No. 73, s. 2012
-
Lee-Chua Q. (2015) Foundations First: Arithmetic Mastery and Algebra Performance. Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines.
-
Salandanan, G. (2009). Teachers Education. Quezon City Katha Publication Inc.
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remedial_education
-
Corpuz, B. (2007). Principle of Teaching. Quezon City
-
Lumogdang, Lumogdang, D. .(2013). Performance of Grade 7 Students in Four Fundamental Operations in Integers using Computer-Based Learning Approach in Teaching Mathematics among Grade Seven students (Descriptive). Meycauayan College, Meycauayan Bulacan.
-
Safer, N. And Fleischman, S. (2006). How students progress monitoring improves instruction. Educational Leadership. Vol.5 No.62 pp.81-83
-
Villanueva, Villanueva A. . (2015). Numeracy Level Test results as predictor of students performance in Mathematics in Lucena City National High School. Lucena City Quezon
Jose Ryan L. Aguilar
Teacher I Mathematics Tañong National High School
Schools Division Office of Malabon City
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T
This research was supported by the Department of Education through the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF). The researcher conveys his deepest appreciation and profound gratitude to the ALMIGHTY GOD, the source of all wisdom and strength, and direction for making all things possible.
Likewise, the researcher wishes to thank Schools Division Office Malabon City, for allowing the conduct of this research to Tañong National High School and the following persons for their valued contribution to make this work a meaningful one:
Mrs. Marites B. Jarina, Principal I of Tañong National High School, for her friendly advice, support and encouragement for the fulfillment of this study;
The Continuous Improvement (CI) Team, for their support and persistence that made the researcher finished this study;
Mr. Irwin S. Jopio, Mathematics Coordinator, and the Math Department for their assistance and effort that greatly improved and completed this study;
Tañong National High School Grade 7 students, the respondents of this study, for their cooperation in answering the research instrument;
Mrs. Elizabeth R. Aguila, his wife, for her love, patience, support, understanding and enormous help for completing this research; and
And to those who were not mentioned but will be forever kept in the reserchers
heart.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter I INTRODUCTION Page Context and Rationale 1
Background of the Intervention 2
Action Research Questions 3
Chapter II ACTION RESEARCH METHODS
Research Design and Population 4
Data Gathering Methods 4
Statistical Treatment 5
Data Analysis 5
Work Plan 6
Chapter III RESULTS AND REFLECTIONS
Table 1 Summary of the Means of the 7
Pre-Test of Grade 7 on Basic Four Fundamental Operations
Table 2 Summary of the Means of the 8
Post-Test of Grade 7 on Basic Four Fundamental Operations
Table 3.1 Test of Significant Difference 9
among the Mean Scores in the Pre-test
and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Addition
Table 3.2 Test of Significant Difference 10
among the Mean Scores in the Pre-test
and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Subtraction
Table 3.3 Test of Significant Difference 10
among the Mean Scores in the Pre-test
and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Multiplication
Table 3.4 Test of Significant Difference 11
among the Mean Scores in the Pre-test
and Post-test of Grade 7 students in Division Chapter IV CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusion 12
Recommendations 13
Action Plan 14
