The L(2,1) – Labeling of Dragon and Armed Crown Graphs

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS2261

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

The L(2,1) – Labeling of Dragon and Armed Crown Graphs

Priyam Vashishta

Abstract

An L(2,1)-labeling of a graph G is a function f from

(1)

(2)

f x f y

f x f y

2 if d x, y 1

1 if d x, y 2

the vertex set V(G) to the set of all nonnegative

A L(2,1) – labeling in which no label is greater than

integers such that

and f x f y

f x f y

  1. if d x, y

  2. if d x, y 1

2 . The L(2,1)-

k is called a k – L(2,1) – labeling. The smallest number k such that G has a k – L(2,1) labeling is called the L(2,1) labeling number of G and is

labeling number of G, denoted by G or , is the smallest number k such that max f v : v V G k . In this paper I will

completely determine G -number for dragon and armed crown graphs.

key – words:

L(2,1)-labeling, -number , dragon, armed crown.

  1. Introduction

    denoted by G or . The L(2,1) labeling has

    been studied extensively in recent past by many researchers like Yeh [8], Sakai [6], Georges, Mauro and Whittlesey [3], Georges and Mauro [2], and Vaidya, Vihol, Dani and Bantva[7].

    Throughout this work, I will consider the finite, connected and undirected simple graph

    G V G , E G . Following is the brief summary

    of definitions and information which are prerequisites for the present work.

    Definition 1.2: A Dragon, Dn m is a graph in

    The channel assignment problem is to assign a channel (non negative integer) to each TV or radio transmitters located at various places such that communication do not interfere. In 1980, Hale [5] introduced the notion of T coloring of a graph. He formulated the channel assignment problem as a graph coloring problem.

    In 1988, Roberts proposed a variation of the channel assignment problem in which close transmitters must receive channels that are at least two apart. In a graph model of this problem, the transmitters are represented by the vertices of a graph. Two vertices are very close if they are adjacent in the graph and close if they are at a distance two apart in the graph. In [4], Griggs and Yen motivated by the above problem proposed by Roberts introduced L(2,1) labeling.

    Definition 1.1: An L(2,1) labeling (or distance two labeling) of a graph G V G , E G is a

    which path Pm is attached to any vertex of cycle Cn . Definition 1.3: An armed crown, Cn Pm is a graph in which path Pm is attached at each vertex of

    the cycle Cn .

    Proposition 1.4: [4] The -number of a star K1,

    is 1, where is the maximum degree.

    Proposition 1.5: [4] The -number of a complete graph Kn is 2n 2 .

    Proposition 1.6: [1] H G , for any subgraph H of a graph G.

  2. Main Result

    Theorem 2.1: The -number of a Dragon

    Dn m for n 3 and m 1 is 4.

    Proof: Let v0 , v1 ,, vn 1 be the vertices of the

    function f from vertex set G V G , E G to the

    cycle of

    Dn m such that vi is adjacent to

    vi 1 ,

    set of all nonnegative integers such that the following conditions are satisfied:

    0 i n 2 and v0 is adjacent to vn 1 . Also, let

    u0 ,u1,,um 1 be the vertices of the path or tail of

    Dn m such that u j

    is adjacent to

    uj 1 , 2 4

    0 j m

    2 and u0

    is adjacent to v0 . The graph

    K1,3

    is a subgraph of

    Dn m and hence by

    Proposition 1.4 and 1.6

    Dn m

    4 . Now define

    0

    4 1 3 0

    f :V Dn m

    0,1, 2, 3, 4

    as follows. We start

    vertex labeling from v0 . 4 2

    1. n

      0mod 3

      Figure – 1

      0 , i

      0 mod 3

      Theorem 2.3: The -number of an armed crown

      f vi

      2 , i

      1mod 3

      Cn Pm for n

      3 and m

      1. is 5.

        4 , i

        2 mod 3

        Proof: Let

        v0 , v1 ,, vn 1

        be the vertices of the

        and

        cycle of

        Cn Pm

        such that vi

        is adjacent to

        vi 1 ,

        3 , j

        0 mod 4

        0 i n

      2. and v0

      is adjacent to

      vn 1 . Also, let

      1 , j

      f u

      1mod 4

      u0 ,u1,,um 1 be the vertices of the path which is

      j 4 , j

      2 mod 4

      attached to every vertex of Cn such that

      u j is

      0 , j

      3 mod 4

      adjacent to uj 1 , 0 j m 2

      . We denote the

    2. n

      1mod 3

      then redefine the above f at

      vertices of the path adjacent to the vertex vi

      , , as

      vn 4 ,vn 3 ,vn 2 ,vn 1 as

      ui 0 , ui1 ,, ui m 1

      where

      ui 0

      adjacent to vi

      0 , i n 4

      0 i n

      1 . The graph

      K1,3

      is a subgraph of

      f vi

      3 , i n 3

      1 , i n 2

      Dn m and hence by Proposition 1.4 and 1.6

      4 , i n 1

      Cn Pm 4

      . Now define

      and

      f :V Cn Pm

      0,1, 2,3, 4,5

      as follows.

      3 , j

      0 mod 4

      (1)

      n 0mod 3

      f u j

      1 , j

      4 , j

      0 , j

      1mod 4

      2 mod 4

      3 mod 4

      f vi

      5

      , j

      0 mod 3

      f

      u

      3

      , j

      1mod 3

      0

      , j

      2 mod 3

      f

      v

      2, i

      1m

      od 3

      5

      , j

      0 mod 3

      f

      uij

      0

      , j

      1mod 3

      2

      , j

      2 mod 3

      an

      f

      d

      vi

      4, i 2 mod 3

      1 , j 0 mod 3

      f

      uij

      3 , j 1mod 3

      5 , j 2 mod 3

      5

      , j

      0 mod 3

      f

      u

      3

      , j

      1mod 3

      0

      , j

      2 mod 3

      f

      v

      2, i

      1m

      od 3

      5

      , j

      0 mod 3

      f

      uij

      0

      , j

      1mod 3

      2

      , j

      2 mod 3

      an

      f

      d

      vi

      4, i 2 mod 3

      1 , j 0 mod 3

      f

      uij

      3 , j 1mod 3

      5 , j 2 mod 3

      ij

      0, i

      0 mod 3

    3. n

    2mod 3

    then redefine f in (1) at vn 2

    and vn 1 as

    i

    f vi

    1 , i n 2

    3 , i n 1

    and

    f u j

    Hence,

    4 , j

    1 , j

    3 , j

    0 , j

    Dn m

    0 mod 4

    1mod 4

    2 mod 4

    3 mod 4

    4 .

    Illustration 2.2: In the following Figure-1 the

    L(2,1)-labeling of graph D6 4 is shown.

    (2)

    n 1mod 3

    then redefine the above f at

    vn 4 ,vn 3 ,vn 2 ,vn 1 and the corresponding uij 's as

    f vi 0, i n 4 ,

    5

    , j

    0 mod 3

    2

    f

    uij

    3

    , j

    1mod 3

    0

    0

    , j

    2 mod 3

    5

    f

    vi

    3, i

    n

    3 ,

    2

    5

    , j

    0 mod 3

    4

    f

    uij

    2

    , j

    1mod 3

    0

    , j

    2 mod 3

    0

    3

    5

    0

    5

    , j

    0 mod 3

    2

    f

    uij

    3

    , j

    1mod 3

    0

    0

    , j

    2 mod 3

    5

    f

    vi

    3, i

    n

    3 ,

    2

    5

    , j

    0 mod 3

    4

    f

    uij

    2

    , j

    1mod 3

    0

    , j

    2 mod 3

    0

    3

    5

    0

    3 5

    0

    f vi

    f u j

    and

    f vi

    f uij

    1, i n

    5 , j

    2 , j

    0 , j

    4, i n

    2 , j

    5 , j

    0 , j

    2 ,

    0 mod 3

    1mod 3

    2 mod 3

    1 ,

    0 mod 3

    1mod 3

    2 mod 3

    3 1

    2

    2

    0 5 5 0

    2 Figure 2

  3. Conclusion

    Here I have proved that the number of a dragon is 4 and the number of an armed crown is 5.

  4. References

(3) n 2mod 3 then redefine f in (1) at vn 2

and vn 1 and the corresponding uij 's as

  1. G. J. Chang, and D. Kuo, The L(2,1) -labeling problem on graphs, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 9(2), 1996,

    f vi

    f uij

    f vi

    f uij

    and

    f vi

    f uij

    4, i n

    0 , j

    3 , j

    5 , j

    1, i n

    5 , j

    0 , j

    2 , j

    3, i n

    5 , j

    0 , j

    2 , j

    3 ,

    0 mod 3

    1mod 3

    2 mod 3

    2 ,

    0 mod 3

    1mod 3

    2 mod 3

    1 ,

    0 mod 3

    1mod 3

    2 mod 3

    pp.309-316.

  2. J. Georges, and D. Mauro, Generalized vertex labelings with a condition at distance two, Congr. Numer. 109, 1995, pp.141-159.

  3. J. Georges, D. Mauro, and M. Whittlesey, Relating path covering to vertex labelings with a condition at distance two, Discrete Math. 135, 1994, pp.103-111.

  4. J. R. Griggs, and R. K. Yeh, Labeling graphs with a condition at distance 2, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 5, 1992, pp.586-595.

  5. W. K. Hale, Frequency assignment: Theory and applications, Proc. IEEE, 68, 1980, pp.1497-1514.

  6. D. Sakai, Labeling chordal graphs: Distance two condition, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 7(1), 1994, pp.133-140.

  7. S. K. Vaidya, P. L. Vihol, N. A. Dani, and D. D. Bantva, L(2,1) – labeling in the context of some graph operations, Journal of Mathematics Research, 2(3), 2010, pp. 109-119.

  8. R. K. Yeh, Labeling graphs with a condition at distance two, Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Math., University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 1990.

Hence,

Dn m 5 .

Illustration 2.4: In the following Figure-2 the

L(2,1)-labeling of graph C5 P3 is shown.

Leave a Reply