The Impact of Network Topology on Data Transmission Speedand Efficiency

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV12IS03012

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

The Impact of Network Topology on Data Transmission Speedand Efficiency

Ashish Bedi,Dr Varsha Grover Department of Computer Applications Chandigarh School of Business, JhanjeriMohali

Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri Mohali, India


This study's objective is to explore the forefront of network evolution requires a profound grasp of the intricate web of computer network topologies and the forces propelling their transformation to meet the shifting requirements of upcoming network advancements comprehensive insights into the status and composition of network systems are imperative for navigating the evolving landscape of network technologies this research paper delves deeply into the exploration of computer networks shedding light on their present developmental stage encapsulating recent progress and underscoring the significance of network system frameworks the wisdom gleaned from this scrutiny is indispensable in steering the course of future computer network developments.

Keywords: Network evolution, Computer network topologies, Future network developments, Network systems, Developmental analysis, Network technologies, Evolution of computer networks, Network system frameworks, Future developments, Network advancements.

  1. Introduction

    The effectiveness and speed of data transmission are crucial factors influencing network performance in today's networked digital world. The way nodes and connections are arranged in a network, or network topology, greatly affects how data is processed and transferred. To design and optimize current networking infrastructures, one must comprehend the relationship between data transmission efficiency and speed and network topology. This study aims to investigate how network topology affects data transmission efficiency and speed, examine performance metrics related to various topologies, and offer suggestions for improving network configurations for better data transfer capabilities.

    Network topology includes a variety of topologies, each having unique properties, including Bus, Star, Ring, Mesh, and Hybrid topologies. It has the potential to greatly impact data transfer. Network performance is influenced by various factors, including fault tolerance measures, routing algorithms, connectivity patterns, and node count. These factors collectively determine how fast, reliable, and scalable a network is. The importance of researching how various network topologies affect data transfer rates and operational efficiency is highlighted by the growing demand for high-speed data transmission across industries, including telecommunications, cloud computing, IoT (Internet of Things), and multimedia streaming. Reducing latency, minimizing packet loss, increasing throughput, and improving overall network performance can all be achieved by optimizing network topology.

    Through a thorough examination of how network architecture affects data transmission efficiency and speed, this study seeks to offer insightful information to researchers, system architects, and networkengineers that are involved in creating and overseeing contemporary networks. The results of this research can help make strategic decisions about network configuration, design, and optimization, which will ultimately help build reliable and effective communication infrastructures.In order to advance network engineering and telecommunications technology, this study paper attempts to elucidate the intricate relationship between network architecture and data transmission dynamics through practical tests, case studies, and a review of the literature.[1]

  2. Network Topology Overview

    In a topology for bus networks clients are connected to one another by a shared dialogue because of its simplicity in deployment and setup, the bus channel is ideal for small or transient networks that don't need fast speeds,that leading to quicker Cable issues arise during network building detection is easy to do and in addition to being economically priced, bus networks offer a simple method of connecting several clients nevertheless, they can acquaintance issues if multiple clients make an effort to transmit data simultaneously over the same bus switched Ethernet for can, for instance, be thought of as a While not being a physical bus network, it is a logical bus network. Other active designs, on the other hand, can also operate like buses and offer logical functions that are equivalent to those of passive buses.[2]

    Fig 1. Types of Network Topologies

    1. Mesh Topology

      In a mesh topology, there are numerous redundant pathways for data transmission because each and every networked deviceis directly linked to every other gadget. Performance, scalability, as well as fault tolerance all improved by this redundancy. However, maintaining a fully connected mesh network can be difficult and expensive, necessitating effective network management techniques and routing protocols.[3]

    2. Star Topology

      This topology is widely utilized, where all systems within it are linked to a single central hub via a cable. The central hub functions as the core node, interconnecting all other nodes with it. This hub can either be passive, like simple broadcasting devices, or active, as in active hubs. Active hubs often contain repeaters. The primary computer is known as the server, while the devices linked to it are referred to as clients. The connection between devices is established using either coaxial cable or RJ- 45 connections.[4]

    3. Bus topology

      In bus network topology, multiple clients are linked via a common communication channel called a bus. Because of its ease of deployment and setup, this configuration is perfect for small or temporary networks that don't require high speeds, resulting in faster network construction. It makes cable problem detection simple and is reasonably priced. Furthermore, bus networks provide an easy way to connect several clients, but they may have problems if several clients try to send data at the same time on the same bus. Switched Ethernet, for example, can be regarded as a logical bus network even though it is not a physical bus network. Other active architectures can also function similarly to a bus and provide corresponding logical capabilities to a passive bus.

    4. Ring topology

      Devices in a ring network architecture are linked in a circle and communicate with one another according to the nodes that are next to them in the ring. A ring topology, in contrast to a bus architecture, is very efficient and able to handle larger data loads. Ring topologies are typically classified as one-way unidirectional ring networks due to the fact that data packets only flow in one direction. Ring topologies come in two primary varieties: unidirectional and bidirectional. Ring topologies function differently depending on the particular devices being connected to create the network, each with its own method of network communication.[5]

    5. Hybrid topology

      A hybrid topology combines various connection types between nodes and links to enable data exchange and communication between them. Rather of being restricted to a single topology type, this method combines several topologies to produce a new topology that inherits the advantages and disadvantages of each of its constituent parts. The requirements of the organization are taken into consideration when combining topologies. A hybrid topology would be created by merging two configurations, such as within a workplace where one division employs a ring topology and a star topology.[6]

  3. Literature Review

    Distributed computer systems have grown in importance and popularity in the computing field in recent years. It offers excellent performance at a reasonable price. In a distributed computing environment, autonomous computers are connected via a communication network that is set up in a certain geometric configuration known as network topology.

    The communication subnetwork's design is a component of the data transfer problem within a network setting. Technology has advanced significantly in recent times, Then we look at the analysis, design, and modeling ofthese network for computer communicationin this article. Although the ideas apply to a broader network, the majority of the design technique describedwas created using the ARPANET, or Advanced Research Projects Agency Network., a packet-switched network in mind. The basic design problem is stated, broken down into more manageable sub problems, and their solutions are discussed. Finally, a topological design heuristic technique is proposed as a fix for the first issue.

    One aspect of the transmission data issue in network configuration is the construction of asubnetwork for communication. In this study, we examinethe design, modeling, and analysis of these computer-communication systems, despite the recent considerable advancements in the field. Most of the design technique presented was developed with the packet-switched Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET) in mind, while the concepts apply to more general networks as well. The fundamental design difficulty is outlined, divided into smaller, more doable issues, and their fixes are talked about. Ultimately, a heuristic topological design method is put out to address the initial issue.[7]

    Any excellent network design must have the essential quality of not having its performance significantly degraded in the event that some of its components fail. Given the current level of technology, nontrivial downtimes occur in both communication lines and nodes. As a result, the network design needs to account for these failures by including enough backup routes to meet time- delay and flow requirements..[8]

    There are two facets to the network reliability issue: analysis and design. It is common practice to analyze reliability for centralized networks. It has gotten to the point in distributed networks where big networks can be managed. Based on preliminary research, dependability could be the primary design restriction for big networks


    Every node in a dispersed computer network needs to know regarding the network's topology in order for the nodes to communicate with one another. An updating mechanism is required for this data because nodes and links can crash occasionally. The possibility of a topological information scheme lacking a central controller is one of its main limitations. This section presents and explainsthe Protocol for Topology Information, which was put into placewithin the MERIT Computer Network. This protocol is very generic and may be put into place on any computer network. Baran's "Hot Potato Heuristic Routing Doctrine" serves as its foundation. Additionally, a demonstration of correctness for this Topology Information Protocol is provided..[9]

    It is ideal to have connections in large computer network architecture that provide dependable and effective communication. Many elements need to be taken into account in such a designA brief

    exchange of words path any two computers is necessary, and (a) the number of connections that can be connected to a computer is limited are two of the criteria that seem to come up most frequently. As a result, it will have a big network that is limited by these factors. A graph can be used to model the computer network, with Each vertex represents a computer.and the link by an edge, between two computers.In this research, we make a comparison between computer networks' dependability and efficiency according to their graph topology model. The new topology was designed, the literature was reviewed, and a software simulator known as Graphical Network Simulator 3 (GNS3) was utilized for testing and simulation. The application of prism and petersen graph topologies in computer network topology is compared in the study's results.


    A computer communication network's topological design seeks to maximize performance while minimizing costs. Regretfully, there is no way to solve the issue. Creating a hypothetical network topology is an acceptable strategy. The work of Steiglitz, Weiner, and Kleitman is the source of one heuristic for creating a possible network topology. First, the nodes are randomly assigned numbers using this method. A methodical approach to numbering the nodes is presented in this study. A systematic numbering scheme for the nodes will result in a prospective network topology that requires less disturbance before a workable network is discovered.[11]

  4. Factors Affecting Data Transmission Speed

    A key component of network performance, data transmission speed affects the effectiveness and responsiveness of communication systems. Data transmission speed can be greatly impacted by a number of factors, which can also have an impact on the general quality of network operations and user experience. Comprehending these variables is crucial for enhancing network architecture, resolving performance problems, and guaranteeing dependable data transfer.

    1. Bandwidth

      The highest speed at which data can be sent via a network or communication channel is referred to as bandwidth. It is typically measured in bits per second (bps) or megabits per second (Mbps). Higher bandwidth allows for faster data transmission, as more data can be sent simultaneously.

    2. Latency

      The time it takes for data to get from its source to its destination is called latency, sometimes referred to as delay. It consists of factors such as processing delay, transmission delay (related to the physical distance and medium used), and propagation delay (related to the speed of light in the medium). Lower latency results in faster data transmission and better real-time communication.

    3. Packet Loss

      When data packets sent via a network are unable to arrive at their intended location, this is known as packet loss. Errors in the transmission medium, hardware malfunctions, or network congestion can all contribute to this. Due to retransmissions and delays, packet loss can affect the speed at which data is transmitted as well as the overall performance of the network


    4. Jitter

      Jitter describes the variance. in latency or delay experienced by data packets as they travel through a network. It can result from network congestion, routing changes, or fluctuations in the transmission

      medium's performance. Excessive jitter can lead to inconsistent data delivery and affect the quality of real-time applications such as the quality of real-time applications such as voice and video streaming.

      These factors are critical considerations in optimizing network performance and ensuring efficient data transmission. Network engineers and administrators often use various techniques, such as quality of service (QoS) mechanisms, traffic shaping, error correction protocols, and network monitoring tools, to mitigate the impact of these factors and improve overall data transmission speed and reliability.

  5. Impact of Network Topology on Data Transmission Speed

    1. Bus Topology

      Advantages of Bus Topology

      1. Simple to use and expand.

      2. Because less cable is needed to link the computers, it is less expensive.

      3. Ideal and simple to operate for small or transient networks

      4. Another option for extension is to utilize a repeater.

        Disadvantages of Bus Topology

        1. A bus may get slowed down by high network traffic.

        2. A correct termination is required.

        3. When a bus cable malfunctions, all communication is halted..

        4. Complicated to manage Data Transmission Speed

        Every device in a bus topology is linked to a single, central cable known as a bus. Information transmission speed can be affected by the length of the bus and the number of devices connected to it.

        As the number of devices increases or the bus length extends, data transmission speed may decrease due to signal degradation, collisions, and increased latency.

    2. Star Topology

      Advantages of Star Topology

      1. Simple to identify network issues.

      2. Excellent work.

      3. Easy to set up and expand, scalable.Using different kinds of cables inside the same network

      4. while using a hub

        Disadvantages of Star Topology

        1. Installing it costs a lot.

        2. entirely rely on one hub.

        Data Transmission Speed

        In a star topology, devices are connected to a central hub or switch. Each device has a dedicated connection to the hub, which can improve data transmission speed by reducing collisions and signal interference.

        However, the speed of data transmission in a star topology can be influenced by the capacity of the hub or switch and the overall network traffic.

          1. Ring Topology

            Advantages of Ring Topology

            1. It offers great performance for large networks or small groups of workstations with a comparable workload on each station..

            2. Simple to expand.

              Disadvantages of Ring Topology

              1. Removing and adding causes network disruption.

              2. Troubleshooting poses a challenge.

              Data Transmission Speed

              Devices connected in a circle and data flowing in a single path around the ring are referred to as ring topologies. Data transmission speed can be affected by the number of devices in the ring and the length of the ring.

              Longer rings or a large number of devices can introduce latency and reduce data transmission speed, especially if data packets encounter congestion or routing issues within the ring.

          2. Mesh Topology

            Advantages of Mesh Topology

            1. sturdy.

            2. It's simple to diagnose a fault

            3. Assure privacy and security. Let each link support its own weight.[12]

        Disadvantages of Mesh Topology

        1. The expense of cabling is higher.

        2. It is also more complicated to install and configure

        Data Transmission Speed

        Mesh topology offers high redundancy and multiple paths for data transmission, whichcan enhance data transmission speed by providing alternative routes and reducing congestion.

        However, managing a fully interconnected mesh network can be complex, and the number of connections and routing paths may impact overall network performance.[13]

  6. Conclusion

We have conducted an analytical analysis of several fundamental topologies in this research, giving us a general understanding of each topology and its characteristics. Every topology has pros and cons, as we have already covered. The solution is to mix two or more distinct topologies to create a new topology known as hybrid topology, which combines the best aspects of both original topologies.

Network topology has a big influence on how quickly data is transmitted. There are differences across topologies in terms of how they affect latency, bandwidth usage, and overall network performance. Data transmission speed can be increased by applying techniques like QoS and optimizing topology choices. To make even more advancements, future studies may examine cutting-edge routing algorithms and developing technology.


  1. J. Walker, Wi-Fi mesh networks, the path to mobile ad hoc. Available from: < Fi_Reports_and_Papers/Mesh_Networks_References.html>.

  2. X. Wang, W. Wang, M. Nova, A high performance single-channel IEEE 802.11 MAC with distributed TDMA, Technical Report of Kiyon, Inc. (submitted for patent application), October 2004.

  3. The Wi Media Alliance. Available from: http://www.




  7. M. Gerla and L. Kleinrock, "On the Topological Design of Distributed Computer Networks," in IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 48-60, January 1977, doi: 10.1109/TCOM.1977.1093709.

  8. H. Frank and Wushow Chou, "Topological optimization of computer networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1385-1397, Nov. 1972, doi: 10.1109/PROC.1972.8910.

  9. Tajibnapis, W. D. (1977). A correctness proof of a topology information maintenance protocol for a distributed computer network. Communications of the ACM, 20(7), 477485. doi:10.1145/359636.359701

  10. Q A A Ruhimat et al 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1211 012007DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012007\

  11. S.K. Srivatsa, P. Seshaiah, On the topological design of a Computer Network, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems,Volume 27, Issue 4,1995,

  12. Kartik Pandya, Network Structure or Topology, International journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies/ volume 1, Issue 2 , July 2013

  13. Santanu Santra, Pinaki Pratim Acharjya, A Study and Analysis on Computer Network Topology for Data Communication, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering/ volume 3, Issue 1 , January 2013