Strengthening Studies of Self Compacting Concrete at Elevated Temperatures

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV6IS050537

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Strengthening Studies of Self Compacting Concrete at Elevated Temperatures

Miss. Veeravalli. Nandini1,

P.G student, Department of Civil Engineering,

DNR College of Engineering and Technology, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Mr. M. Sandeep2

Asst. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,

Mallareddy Institute of Technology, Telangana, India

Abstract: In the present research, the experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the strength propertiesand permeability (rapid chloride permeability) studies of SCC mixes at elevated temperatures up to 300ºC. Cement was replaced with three percentages (0%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) of fly ash and fine aggregate was replaced with 10% of foundry sand by weight. A total of four SCC mixes (SCC1, SCC2, SCC3, and SCC4) were developed. The control mix (SCC1) was developed without fly ash and foundry sand. Mix SCC2 was with 30% fly ash and 10% foundry sand, mix SCC3 was developed with 40% fly ash and 10% foundry sand, and the mix SCC4 was with 50% fly ash and 10% foundry sand. The specimens of each SCC mixture were heated up to different temperatures (100°C, 200°C, and 300°C). In order to ensure a uniform temperature throughout the specimens, the temperature was held constant at the maximum value for one hour before cooling. Tests were performed for compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, after curing periods of 28, 91 days.

Key Words: Compressive Strength, Splitting Tensile Strength.

  1. INTRODUCTION:

    Cement-based materials are the most abundant of all man- made materials and are among the most important construction materials, and it is most likely that they will continue to have the same importance in the future. However, these construction and engineering materials must meet new and higher demands.

    It is the most widely use construction material because of its ability that allows moulding into any required structural form and shape due to its fluid behaviour at early ages. However, there is a limit to the fluid behaviour of normal fresh concrete.

    Under water-concreting, filling of congested sections and inaccessible areas are some of the several situations where concrete has to be placed in conditions in which compaction is extremely difficult. Thorough compaction, using vibration, is normally essential for achieving workability, the required strength and durability of concrete. Inadequate compaction of concrete.

    1.2aim&Objectives:

    To achieve the required fresh properties of deformability, segregation resistance and passing ability (or no blocking),

    To create multileveled equations, it may be necessary to treat the equation as a graphic and insert it into the text after your paper is styled.

    Number equations consecutively. Equation numbers, within parentheses, are to position flush right, as in (1),

    Using a right tab stop. To make your equations more compact, you may use the solidus ( / ), the exp function, or appropriate exponents. Italicize Roman symbols for quantities and variables, but not Greek symbols. Use a long dash rather than a hyphen for a minus sign.

    Punctuate equations with commas or periods when they are part of a sentence, as in

    SCC often uses a combination of greater number of constituent materials than in normal concrete. For example, the paste can contain one or more cement replacement materials, inert fine fillers, super plasticizers, and viscosity agents. A combination of powder materials is also used to control the hardened properties, such as strength. The workability and workability retention properties are of prime importance, and studies have shown that these are influenced by the properties of individual each constituent and the physical and chemical interaction between themThe template is designed so that author affiliations are not repeated each time for multiple authors of the same affiliation. Please keep your affiliations as succinct as possible (for example, do not differentiate among departments of the same organization). This template was designed for two affiliations.

  2. METHODOLOGY:

    Stage 1:

    • Introduces about self-compacting concrete, elevated temperatures effects onconcrete, fly ash, foundry sand and applications of self-compacting concrete at elevated temperatures.

    • Gives the details of experimental programme, materials used, techniques adopted forcasting, curing, heating and testing of the specimens

      Stage 2:

    • Deals with the mathematical model of the experimental programme using supportvector machine approach.

    • Deals with the discussion of results obtained from experimental data. The results arepresented both in tabular as well as graphical form.

    Characteristics

    Value

    Type

    Uncrushed (natural)

    Specific gravity

    2.65

    Moisture content (%)

    0.16

    Water absorption (%)

    0.98

    Fineness modulus

    2.51

    Grading zone

    III

  3. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM:

    3.1 Materials Used:

    3.1.1 Cement:

    Ordinary Portland cement (Grade 43) was used for all concrete mixes. The cement used was fresh and without any lumps. Testing of cement was done as per BIS: 8112- 1989

    Physical properties of Portlandcement

    3.1.2. Fly ash

    Investigations were made on Class F Fly ash procured from Guru Govind Singh Super Thermal Power Plant, Ropar and Punjab, India. It was tested for physical and chemical properties as per BIS:3812-2003. The physical and chemical properties of fly ash are given in the Table.

    3.1.5 Foundry sand

    Investigations were made on foundry sand procured from Janta Foundries, MandiGobindgarh, Punjab. The physical and chemical properties of foundry sand are given in gives the sieve analysis of 10% replacement level of sand with foundry sand.

    3.1.6. Water

    Potable tap water was used for casting and for curing ofconcrete specimens conforming to the requirements of BIS: 456-2000.

        1. Coarse Aggregates

          Locally available coarse aggregates having the maximum size of 10 mm were used in the present work. Aggregates used were first sieved through 10 mm sieve and than through 4.75 mm sieve. They were than washed to remove dust and dirt and dried to the saturated surface dry condition. The aggregates were tested as per Indian Standard Specifications BIS: 383-1970.

        2. Fine aggregates

    The sand used for the experimental programme was locally procured and conformed to grading zone III. The sand was first sieved through 4.75 mm sieve to remove any particles greater than 4.75 mm and then washed to remove the dust. The fine aggregates were tested as per Indian Standard Specifications BIS: 383-1970.

  4. TESTS

This chapter deals with the findings of experimental investigations. Various tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of elevated temperatures on compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, mass loss, porosity and rapid chloride permeability of the SCC designed mixes containing various percentages of fly ash (30%, 40%, and 50%) and 10% replacement of fine aggregate with foundry sand.

Mix

Temperature (°C )

Fly Ash (%)

Compressive strength( MPa)

28 days

91 days

SCC1

Normal

0

40.68

48.90

SCC1

100

0

39.26

47.65

SCC1

200

0

39.09

47.07

SCC1

300

0

41.24

48.25

SCC2

Normal

30

30.67

39.50

SCC2

100

30

29.56

38.00

SCC2

200

30

29.00

37.90

SCC2

300

30

31.45

39.00

SCC3

Normal

40

26.22

35.00

SCC3

100

40

25.13

33.91

SCC3

200

40

24.60

33.26

SCC3

300

40

25.98

34.85

SCC4

Normal

50

21.43

30.40

SCC4

100

50

19.96

29.25

SCC4

200

50

19.25

29.12

SCC4

300

50

21.20

30.20

    1. Compressive Strength

      Effect of temperature on compressive strength of the SCC mixes made with flyash and foundry sand

      Fig. : Compressive Strength verses Temperature (28 days)

      Fig .: Compressive Strength verses Temperature (91 days)

      Fig: Compressive Strength verses Temperature (without fly ash)

      Fig. : Compressive Strength verses Temperature (with 30% fly ash)

      Fig. Compressive Strength verses Temperature (with 40% fly ash)

      Fig.: Compressive Strength verses Temperature (with 50% fly ash)

      Fig: Compressive Strength verses Age (without fly ash)

      Fig: Compressive Strength verses Age (with 30% fly ash)

      Fig: Compressive Strength verses Age (with 40% fly ash)

      Fig: Compressive Strength verses Age (with 50% fly ash)

    2. Splitting Tensile Strength

      The results of splitting tensile strength test for different fly ash contents (0%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and foundry sand incorporating different temperatures (27oC, 100oC, 200oC, and 300oC) at the end of different curing periods (28, 91 days) are given in Table 4.2. The splitting tensile strength test results of SCC mixes at various temperatures have also been plotted in Figs.

      1. Effect of temperature on splitting tensile strength of the SCC mixes made with fly ash and foundry sand

        Fig. : Splitting Tensile Strength verses Temperature (91 days)

        Fig.: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Temperature (without fly ash)

        Fig.: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Temperature (with 30% fly ash

        Fig.: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Temperature (with 40% fly ash)

        Fig.: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Temperature (with 50% fly ash)

      2. Effect of age on splitting tensile strength of the SCC mixes made with fly ash and foundry sand at varying temperatures

        Fig: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Age (without fly ash)

        Fig: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Age (with 30% fly ash)

        Fig: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Age (with 40% fly ash)

        Fig: Splitting Tensile Strength verses Age (with 50% fly ash)

        Fig: Actual Compressive Strength verses Predicted Compressive Strength

        Fig.: Actual Splitting Tensile Strength verses Predicted Splitting Tensile Strength

  1. CONCLUSIONS

The present work investigated the influence of fly ash as replacement of cement, and influence of foundry sand as a partial replacement of fine aggregate on the various strength and permeability properties of SCC at elevated temperatures. On the basis of the results of present study, the following conclusions are drawn:

    1. Compressive Strength

      High volume replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement with fly ash generally leads to lower early age strength. However this strength decrease was minimized by carefully selecting the material i.e. by replacing 10% of fine aggregate with foundry sand.

      At the w/b ratio of 0.36 to 0.42, all the SCC mixes (SCC1- SCC4) can be produced with adequate fresh properties such as slump flow test and U-box test were found to be satisfactory, i.e. passing ability, filling ability and segregation resistance are within the specified range when sand is replaced with foundry sand and cement with high volume fly ash.

      Although fly ash reduces the strength, it is still possible to produce SCC with compressive strengths ranging from 30.67 to 19.25 MPa, 39.50 to 29.00 MPa, and 42.25 to 31.75 MPa

      at 28, 91 days respectively at elevated temperatures. High volume fly ash SCCs with different compressive strength can be selected for use in different applications.

    2. Splitting Tensile Strength

The splitting tensile strengths developed were from 0.94 to 2.00, 1.14 to 2.24 and 1.28 to 2.28 MPa at 28, 91 days respectively. The splitting tensile strength continued to decrease in a similar way as was observed between 27°C and 200°C, due to the departure of bound water, corresponding to a large mass loss.

Splitting tensile strength increased with a decrease in the percentage of the fly ash and the water-to-cementitious materials ratio at all ages.

Splitting tensile strengths of all SCC mixes was found to increase with increase in age.

At elevated temperatures, the rate of splitting tensile strength loss is higher than the rate of compressive strength loss. Thus it can be concluded that the splitting tensile strength is more sensitive to elevated temperatures.

REFERENCES

  1. EFNARC specifications and guide lines for self compacting concrete, Feb.2002.

  2. Concrete technology theory and practice by M.S.SHETTY, Reprint 2005.

  3. Okamura.h, self-compacting high performance concrete international Vol. 19,

[4] no 7,pp50-54, July 1997.

  1. Concrete technology, M.L.Gambhir, the MC graw-hill companies, civil engineering series, third edition.

  2. SP 23, 1982,Hand book on concrete mixes (Based on Indian standards), Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, Reprint in1999.

  3. IS 269-1958; Indian standard specification for ordinary, Rapid Hardening and low heat Portland cement, Revised and reprinted-Aug. 1965.

  4. IS 383-1970,Specifications for coarse and fine aggregate from Natural Resources for concrete (second revision), 9 th Reprint 1993.

  5. IS 4031 (Part1-15), Methods of physical tests for Hydraulic cements.

  6. IS 516-1959,Methods of test for strength of concrete, 16 th reprint, Jan-1976.

  7. 1 IS 2386-1963 (ALL PARTS), Methods of tests for aggregates for concrete.

Leave a Reply