sc*g-Homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS120389

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

sc*g-Homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces

A. Pushpalatha

Department of Mathematics, Government Arts College

Udumalpet-642 126, Tirupur District Tamil Nadu, India

R. Nithyakala

Department of Mathematics Vidyasagar College of Arts and Science Udumalpet-642 126, Tirupur District Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

In this paper, we introduced a new class sc*g- Homeomorphisms in Topological space.

Key words: Homeomorphism – strongly g-homeomorphism- sc*g – homeomorphism.

1. Introduction

Several mathematicians have generalized homeomorphisms in topological spaces. Biswas[18], Crossely and Hildebrand[19], Gentry and Hoyle[20] and Umehara and Maki[21] have introduced and investigated semi-homeomorphisms somewhat homeomorphisms and g-A- homeomorphisms Crossely and Hildebrand defined yet another semi-homeomorphism which is also a generalization of homeomorphisms. Sundaram[6] introduced g-homeomorphisms and gc- homeomorphisms in topological spaces.

In the section, we introduce the concept of sc*g- homeomorphisms and study some of their properties.

Definition: 2.7.1 A bijection f : (X, ) (Y, ) from a topological space X into a topological space Y is called a sc*generalized homeomorphism (sc*g- homeomorphism) if f is both sc*g-open and sc*g-continuous.

Theorem: 2.7.2 Every homeomorphism is a sc*g-homeomorphism.

Proof : Since every continuous function is sc*g- continuous and every open map is sc*g-open, the proof follows.

The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.

Example: 2.7.3 Consider the topological spaces X = Y= {a, b, c} with topologies ={ ,X,{a, b}} and = { ,Y,{a}, {a, b}}. Then the identity

map f : (X, ) (Y, ) is a sc*g- homeomorphism but not a homeomorphism. Since for the open set {a} in Y is not open in X.

Theorem:2.7.4 Everystrongly g- homeomorphism is a sc*g-homeomorphism but not conversely.

Proof : Let f : X Y be a strongly g- homeomorphism. Then f is strongly g -continuous and strongly g -open. Since every strongly g – continuous function is sc*g-continuous and every strongly g -open map is sc*g-open, f is sc*g- continuous and sc*g-open. Hence f is a sc*g- homeomorphism.

The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.

Example : 2.7.5 Let X=Y={a, b, c} with

={ ,X,{a}}and = { ,Y,{a, b}} respectively.

Then the identity map f : (X, ) (Y, ) is sc*g-homeomorphism but not a strongly g- homeomorphism. Since for the open set {a, b} in Y is not a strongly g-open set in X.

Next we shall characterize the sc*g- homeomorphism and sc*g-open maps.

Theorem : 2.7.6 For any bijection f : X Y the following statements are equivalent.

(a)f -1: Y X is sc*g-continuous. (b)f is a sc*g-open map.

(c)f is a sc*g-closed map.

Proof : (a) (b) Let G be any open set in X. Since f -1 is sc*g-continuous, the inverse image of G under f -1, namely f(G) is sc*g-open in Y and so f

is sc*g-open map.

  1. (c) Let f be any closed set in X. Then Fc is open in X. Since f is sc*g-open, f(Fc) is

    sc*g-open in Y. But f(Fc) = Y- f(F) and so f(F) is

    sc*g-closed in Y. Therefore f is a sc*g-closed map.

  2. (a) Let F be any closed set in X. Then

(f -1)-1(F) = f(F) is sc*g-closed in Y . Since f is a sc*g-closed map. Therefore f -1 is sc*g-continuous.

Theorem : 2.7.7 Let f : (X, ) (Y, ) be a bijective and sc*g-continuous map, the following statements are equivalent.

(a)f is a sc*g-open map.

  1. f is a sc*g-homeomorphism.

  2. f is a sc*g-closed map.

Proof : (a)(b) By assumption, f is bijective and sc*g-continuous and sc*g-open. Then by definition, f is sc*g- homeomorphism.

(b)(c) By assumption, f is sc*g-open and bijective. By theorem 2.7.4 f is sc*g-closed map. (c)(a) By assumption, f is sc*g-closed and bijective. By theorem 2.7.4 f is sc*g-open map.

The following example shows that the composition of two sc*g-homeomorphisms need not be sc*g- homeomorphism.

Example : 2.7.8 Consider the topological spaces X = Y= Z= {a, b, c} with topologies

1={ , X, {a}, {a, b}}, 2={ , Y, {a}}and

3={ , Z, {b, c}} respectively. Let f and g identity maps such that f : X Y and g : Y Z. Then f and g are sc*g-homeomorphisms but their

composition g f : X Z is not a sc*g-

homeomorphism. For the open set {a, b} in X, g(f{a, b}) = {a, b} is not sc*g-open set in Z. Definition :2.7.9 A bijection f : (X, ) (Y, ) is said to be a (sc*g)*-homeomorphism if f and its inverse f -1are sc*g-irresolute maps. Notation : Let family of all (sc*g)*- homeomorphisms from (X, ) onto itself be denoted by (sc*g)*h(X, ) and family of all sc*g- homeomorphisms from (X, ) onto itself be

denoted by sc*g h(X, ). The family of all homeomorphisms form from (X, ) onto itself be denoted by h(X, ).

Theorem :2.7.10 Let X be a Topological space.

Then

  1. The set (sc*g)*h(X) is a group under composition of maps.

    (ii)h(X) is a subgroup of (sc*g)*h(X). (iii)(sc*g)*h(X) sc*g h(X).

    Proof: (i) Let f, g (sc*g)*h(X). Then g h (sc*g)*h(X) and so (sc*g)*h(X) is closed under the composition of maps. The composition of maps is associative. The identity map i : xx is a (sc*g)*- homeomorphism and so i (sc*g)*h(X). Also f . i =

    i. f = f for every f (sc*g)*h(X). If f (sc*g)*h(X),

    then f -1 (sc*g)*h(X) and f. f -1 = f -1. f = i. Hence (sc*g)*h(X) is a group under the

    composition of maps.

  2. Let f : X Y be a homeomorphism. Then by theorem 2.6.5 both f and f -1 are

    (sc*g)*-irresolute and so f is a (sc*g)*- homeomorphism. Therefore every homeomorphism is a (sc*g)*-homeomorphism and so h(X) is a subset of (sc*g)*h(X). Also h(X) is a group under the composition of maps. Therefore h(X) is a subgroup of the group (sc*g)*h(X).

  3. Since every (sc*g)*-irresolute map is sc*g- continuous, (sc*g)*h(X) is a subset of sc*gh(X).

From the above observations we get the following diagram:

Homeomorphism strongly g-homeomorphism sc*g – homeomorphism

References

  1. Levine , N., Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topologicalspaces, Amer.Math.Monthly,70(1963),36- 41.

  2. Levine ,N.,Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 19(1970),89-96.

  3. Maki., Devi, R., and Balachandran, K., Generalized -closed sets in topology, Bull. Fukuoka Univ. Ed. Part III, 42(1993), 13-21.

  4. Hatir, E., Noiri, T., and Yuksel, S., A decomposition of continuity, ActaMath. Hungar.,70(1996),145-150.

  5. Rajamani, M., Studies on decompositions of generalized continuous maps in topological spaces, Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,(2001).

  6. Sundaram, P., Studies on generalizations of continuous maps in topological spaces, Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,(1991).

  7. Sundaram, P., On C-continuous maps in topological spaces, Proc. of 82nd session of the Indian Science Congress, Calcutta (1995),48-49.

  8. Tong, J., On decomposition of continuity in topological spaces, ActaMath.Hungar.,54(1989),51-55.

  9. Bhattachraya and Lahiri, B.K., Semi-generalized closed sets in topology, Indian J.Math., 29(3)375- 382(1987)

  10. Nagaveni, N., Studies on Generalizations of Homeomorphisms in Topological spaces,Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,(1999).

  11. Andrijevic,D., Semi-preopen sets, Mat. Vesnik,38(1986),24-32.

  12. Dontchev, J., On generalizing semi-pre open sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math., 16(1995), 35- 48.

  13. Nithyakala, R., scg, sc*g, sc(s)g-closed sets in Topological spaces, Proc. Of 99th Indian Science Congress, Bhubaneswar(2012), 89.

  14. Balachandran, K., Sundaram, P., and Maki, H., On generalized continuous maps in Topological spaces, Mem. Fac. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math., 12(1991), 5-13.

  15. Maki, H., Devi, R., and Balachandran, K., Associated topologies of generalized – closed sets and – generalized closed sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math., 15 (1994), 51-63.

  16. Crossley, S.G., and Hildebrand, S.K., Semi- closure, Texas J. Sci., 22 (1971), 99-112.

  17. Malghan, S.R., Generalized closed maps, J.Karnataka Univ.Sci., 27(1982), 82-88.

  18. Biswas,N., On some mappings in Topological spaces, Bull.Cal.Math.Soc., 61(1969),127-135

  19. Crossley, S. G. and Hildebrand, S.K., Semi- topological properties, Fund.Math., 74(1972), 233-254.

  20. Gentry, K. R. And Hoyle, H. G., Somewhat continuous functions, Czechoslovak Math. J., 21(1971), 5-12.

  21. Umehara, J. and Maki, H., A note on the homeomorphic image of a T v- space, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. (Math)., 10(1989), 39-45

Leave a Reply