 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 767
 Authors : J. N. Chandrasekhar, S. Rakesh
 Paper ID : IJERTV2IS70782
 Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 07 (July 2013)
 Published (First Online): 01082013
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Using Fuzzy Control Method
J. N. Chandrasekhar, S. Rakesh
1Assistant Professor, Department of EEE, SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Department of EEE, SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
Photovoltaic cells has emerged as a important consideration for meeting the energy demand. The power available at the output of PV cells is not constant because PV cells exhibit a nonlinear VI characteristics. So, PV cells maximum power point varies with solar isolation and ambient temperature recent developments in the power electronic converters. It is now possible to operate PV cell at its maximum power point. In this paper a simulation based PV cell is designed using MATLAB software. The fuzzy control algorithm shows that efficiency is improved when compared to the conventional method.

Introduction
Solar energy is one of the most important renewable energy sources. Compared to conventional non renewable resources such as gasoline, coal etc. Solar energy is clean in exhaustible and free. Photovoltaic has emerged as a major candidate for meeting the energy demand. It offers an option for clean energy source, with almost no running and maintenance cost.
Due to the Convenience and robustness of the solar energy, photovoltaic power system is gaining its importance. Solar power systems have the following advantages overall other alternatives. Robustness, convenience and availability, environmental friendly, renewable.
The power output from a photovoltaic array relies on many environmental conditions such as temperature of the cells, intensity of the sunlight as well as cell area. In order to obtain a higher power output we need some sort of regulating system which can ensure the output power is of the maximum possible value, power generated by PV cells depends on the operating voltage of the array. Its VI curves specify a unique operating point at which maximum possible power is delivered. At the maximum PowerPoint the PV cell operates at its highest efficiency. The MPPT varies with solar insolation and temperature. So, the MPP is difficult to solve analytically, and therefore number of techniques have been proposed to realize MPPT. Those MPPT methods vary in complexity, sensors required, convergence speed, cost, range of effectiveness, implementation hardware and in other respects. Some methods applied in PV system are the constant voltage method, Perturbandobserve method. the incremental conductance method and so on.
From the power Vs voltage characteristic curve of PV cell, it can be observed that the MPP is in the neighborhood of a constant Voltage when solar illumination is changing and temperatures change is omitted. So the MPPs voltage Vm can
be designed to be constant. This is the Constant Voltage method (CVT). Although the CVT method is very simple, however, the constant Voltage cant track MPP when temperature changes, so the constant Voltage method is not often used in the true MPPT strategy from the characteristic curves of PV Cell, it can be seen that incrementing (decrementing) the Voltage increases (decreases) the power when operating on the left of the Mpp and decreases (increase) the power when on the right of the MPP. Therefore, if there is an increase in power, the subsequent perturbation should be kept the same to reach the Mpp and if theres a decrease in power, the perturbation should be reversed [5]. Small perturbations are introduced in the system in order to vary the operating point such that the Mpp is achieved. However, this method has several drawbacks such as slow tracking speed and oscillations about Mpp, making it less favorable for rapidly changing environmental conditions and this method can appear fallacious tracking when there is a sudden change in irradiance. The incremental conductance (INC) method is based on the fact that the slope of the PV array power curve is zero at the MPP, +Ve on the left of the Mpp, negative on the light.
dp/dv = 0 at Mpp dp/dv > 0 left of Mpp
dp/dv < 0 right of Mpp .. (1)
By derivation, it can be gained the relationship between the instantaneous conductance (I/V) and the incremental conductance (I/ V). The Mpp can be tracked by comparing (I/V) to I / V. It can be supposed that Vref equals to VMpp at the Mpp. Once the Maximum power point is reached, the operation of the PV array is maintained at this point unless a change in I is noted. The algorithm decrements (or) increments Vref to track the new Mpp when atmospheric condition change. However, from derivation of the INC method, it can be seen that the INC method has no consideration about change of temperature.
In fact, because changes in the environment have uncertainty, changes of load and o/p. Characteristic of PV cell have more nonlinear feature, so above conventional tracking methods have more difficult to track real Mpp.
Fuzzy control has adaptive characteristic in nature, and can achieve robust response of a system with uncertainty, parameter variation and load disturbance. It has been broadly used to control illdefined, nonlinear (or) imprecise system. Fuzzy logic controllers have the advantages of working with imprecise inputs, not needing on accurate mathematical model, and handling nonlinearly. Fuzzy control has been successfully applied in many fields.
Fuzzy control does not require accurate models of control object to overcome the limitation of the above conventional tracking methods, fuzzy control is applied to deal with MPPT of PV generation system in this paper, with this technique, not only can the real Mpp be readily tracked but also fast dynamic responses can be achieved.
Photovoltaic system
A photovoltaic system is a system which one or more solar panels to convert solar energy into electricity. It consists of multiple components, including the photovoltaic modules, mechanical and electrical connections and mountings and means of regulating and/or modifying the electrical output.
PV cells are made of semi conductor materials, such as silicon for solar cells, a thin semiconductor water is specially treated to form on electric field, positive on one side
when a collision with a photon occur. These electrons are free to move across the junction and create a current. This is modeled by the light generated current source (Iph). The intense PN junction characteristic is introduced a diode in the circuit equivalents.
The photo current Iph generated in the PV cell is proportional to level of solar illumination. I is the O/P current of photovoltaic cell. The current (Id) through the bypass diode varies with the junction voltage vj and the cell reverse saturation current IO. V is the output of the photovoltaic cell. Rsh and Rs are the parallel and series resistances, respectively. Parallel resistance when the number of cell in series is ns, and the number of cell in parallel is np. There are relevant mathematical equations expressing as following:
and negative on the other. When light energy strikes the solar
q v / ns IRs
V / ns IRs
cell, electrons are knocked loose from the atoms in the
I np Ish npIo e nkP
Rsh
(2)
semiconductor material. If electrical conductors are attached
to positive and negative sides, forming an electrical circuit, the
Iph IscC s CTT T
(3)
electrons can be captured in the form of an electric current that is electricity.
Photons of light with energy higher than the and gap
1000 ref
3 qq 1 1
T nK T T
19
energy of PV material can make electrons in the material break
Where I0
Ido e
T
ref
, q 1.602210 C
free from atoms that hold then and create holeelectron pairs. Phase electrons, however, will soon fall back into holes causing change carriers to disappear. If a nearby electric field is provided, those are the conduction band can be continuously swept away from holes toward a metallic contact where they will emerge as an electric current.
Photovoltaic module
Due to the low voltage generated in a PV cell, several PV cells are connected in series (for high voltage) and in parallel (for high current) to form a PV module for desired output. Separate diodes may be needed to avoid reverse currents, in case of partial or total shading, and at night. The pn junction of monocrystalline silicon cells may have adequate reverse current characteristics and these are not necessary. Reverse currents waste power and can also lead to overheating of shaded cells. Solar cells become less efficient at higher temperatures and installers try to provide good ventilation behind solar panels.
Photovoltaic array
The power that one module can produce is not sufficient to meet the requirements of home or business. Most PV arrays use an inverter to convert the DC power in to alternating current that can power the motors, loads, lights etc. The modules in a PV array are usually first connected in series to obtain the desired voltages; the individual modules are then connected in parallel to allow the systems to produce more current.

Characteristics of photovoltaic cell
Photo voltaic cell consists of a silicon PN junction that when exposed to light releases electrons around a closed electrical client from this premise the circuit equivalent of a pv cell. It Can be modeled through the circuit shown in Fig.1 electronics from the cell are excited to higher energy levels
ref
is the electronic charge, n is the emission coefficient of diodes, K 1.38071023 JK1 is Boltzmans constant, T is ambient temperature in Kelvin, and Tref is reference absolute
temperature. Isc is the short current, S is the level of solar
illumination, Eg. Is the energy of the band gap for silicon which is (1 = 3)er, CT is the short circuit current temperature coefficient (= 0.0016A/K), Ido is the reverse current of diode.
And from equations (2) and (3), it is known that the characteristics of pv will be changed when S and T change. Change in these variables s and T cause the current voltage (IV) curves of photovoltaic array to change as well. As s variation from 250w/m2 to 1000w/m2 is reported and temperature t is constant at 400C.
Fig.1:VI curve and PV curve of pv array
Fig:3:VI and PV curve of PV cell influenced by solar illumination
The output power of a pv array is the product of current I and terminal voltage v, thus
q(V/ ns IRs )
V2 / n VIR
p np VIph np VIo e nkT
1 s s
.. (4)
Rsh
Fig:2:PV curve for PV cell
The solar illumination another important factor influencing the characteristics of a photovoltaic module is ambient temperature in fig (2), when solar illumination is constant 1000w/m2 and temperature changes from 200C to 1000C.
From above equation, it can be known that the solar illumination and ambient temperature will influence the output power of a pv module, the output power of a PV changes with the solar illuminations variation when temperature constant 400C shown in fig (3) and the characteristic of output power changes with the ambient temperature is variation when the solar illumination is constant 1000w/m2
Fig:4:PV curve of PV array
From fig 3 and fig 4 it can be seen that the output power of a pv module is influenced by the solar illumination and ambient temperature. So, the MPP will be change when peripheral condition is changed, especially, the solar illumination and temperature changes at the same time.

A New MPPT Method With Fuzzy Control
In recent years, fuzzy logic controllers have been widely used for industrial processes owing to their heuristic nature associated with simplicity and effectiveness for both linear and nonlinear systems [8]. A MPP search based on fuzzy heuristic rules, which does not need any parameter information, consists of a stepwise adaptive search, leads to fast convergence and is sensor less with respect to sunlight and temperature measurements [9]. The control objective is to track and extract maximum power from the PV arrays for a given solar insolation level. The maximum power corresponding to the optimum operating point is determined for a different solar insolation level and temperature. The fuzzy controller consists of three functional blocks: A) Fuzzification,
B) Fuzzy rule algorithm and C) Defuzzification. These functions are described as follows:
A. Fuzzification
The fuzzy control requires that variable used in describing the control rules has to be expressed in terms of fuzzy set notations with linguistic labels. In this paper, the fuzzy control MPPT method has three input variables, namely voltage .current and temperatureand one output variable power
The membership functions and their values are shown in figures
Fig. 5:Membership function of input voltage
Fig. 6:Membership functions of the input variable current
Fig.7:Membership function of input variable temperature
C. Defuzzification
After the rules have been evaluated, the last step to complete the fuzzy control algorithm is to calculate the crisp output of the fuzzy control with the process of defuzzification. The wellknown center of gravity method for defuzzification is used in this paper. It computes the center of gravity from the final fuzzy space, and yields a result which is highly related to all of the elements in the same fuzzy set [10]. The crisp value of control output
U(k+1) is computed by the following equation:
n W n
U=
n
n
i1
i Ui
(7)
i1Wi
Fig:8: Membership function of output variable power The rules are framed as shown below

if voltage is bad, current is bad ,temperature bad then, output power is bad

if voltage is good ,current is bad, temperature is bad then output power is bad
The rules are framed to track the maximum power point in fuzzy control method
RULE BASE TABLE FOR THE FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER
As a fuzzy inference method, Mamdanis method is used with max–min operation fuzzy combination law in this paper. To satisfy different conditions and gain better tracking performance, several possible combinations of the degree of supports are with varying strengths to the corresponding rules.
Fig. 9. A threedimensional view of the fuzzy surface for MPPT
Where n is the maximum number of effective rules, wi is the weighting factor, and Ui is the value corresponding to the membership function of U. Then, the final control voltage is obtained by adding this change to the previous value of the control voltage:
TABLE I
MPPT METHOD 
200 TO 1000W/m2 at 0.03s 
250c to 750c at 0.06s 
1000 to 2000w/m2 
VARIABLE INC METHOD 
0.34s 
0.003s 
0.0024s 
FUZZY CONTROL METHOD 
0.32s 
0.0005s 
0.0004s 
MPPT METHOD 
200 TO 1000W/m2 at 0.03s 
250c to 750c at 0.06s 
1000 to 2000w/m2 
VARIABLE INC METHOD 
0.34s 
0.003s 
0.0024s 
FUZZY CONTROL METHOD 
0.32s 
0.0005s 
0.0004s 
THE TRACKING PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIABLE STEP SIZE INC AND FUZZY CONTROL MPPT METHODS
Table I, compare to variable step size INC MPPT method, it can be known that fuzzy control MPPT algorithm can fast track MPP in voltage, current, and power sides. So the fuzzy control MPPT method is able to improve the dynamic and steady state performance of the PV system simultaneously. MPPT fuzzy logic controllers have been shown to perform well under varying atmospheric conditions both solar illumination and temperature.
4. CONCLUSION
A complete fuzzy logic solar array maximum power tracking controller has been designed and simulated in the software in this paper. Simulation results show fast convergence to the MPP and minimal fluctuation about it. Fuzzy controlled the maximum power point of a PV module at given atmospheric conditions very fast and efficiently. The sudden change in atmospheric conditions shifts the maximum power point abruptly which is tracked accurately by this controller. If practically implemented, this method can increase the efficiency of the PV system by quite a large scale. Since the proposed approach requires only the measurement of PV array output current and voltage, not the measurement of solar irradiation level and temperature, it decreases the number and cost of equipment as well as the design complexity. So the
proposed algorithm is simple and can be easily implemented on any fast controller such as the digital signal processor. The advantages of the fuzzy controller are that the control algorithm gives fast convergence and robust performance against parameter variation, and can accept noisy and inaccurate signals. The system was found to reliably stabilize the maximum power transfer in all operating conditions, and it is ready to be fitted in a larger installation.
REFERENCES

Vineeta Agarwal, and Alck Vishwakarma, "A Comparative Study of PWM Schemes for Grid Connected PV Cell," in Proc. 2007 IEEE The 7th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, pp. 17691775.

Cuauhtemoc Rodriguez, and Gehan A. J Amaratunga, "Analytic Solution to the Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Problem," IEEE Transactions on Circuit and Systems, Vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 20542060, September 2007.

J. Nelson, The Physics of Solar Cells. London, U.K.: Imperial College Press, 2003.

Z. M. Salameh, D, Fouad, and A. William, "Step down maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic systems," Solar Energy, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 279282, 1991.

Trishan Esram, and Patrick L. Chapman, "Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 439449, June. 2007.

TsaiFu Wu, ChienHsuan Chang, and YuKai Chen, "A FuzzyLogic Controlled SingleStage Converter for PVPowered Lighting System Application," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.287296, April 2000.

Nicola Femia, Giovanni Petrone, Giovanni Spagnuolo, and Massimo Vitelli, " Optimization of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Method," IEEE Trans. on Power Electronic, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.963 972, July 2005.

Mummadi Veerachary, Tomonobu Senjyu, and Katsumi Uezato, "Feedforward Maximum Power Point Tracking of PV Systems Using Fuzzy Controller," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic System, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 969981, July 2002.[

M.Godoy Simoes, and N.N.Franceschetti, "Fuzzy optimisation based control of a solar array system," IEEE Proc.Electr. Power Appl., Vol. 146, No. 5, pp.552558, Sepetember 1999.

Mummadi Veerachary, Tomonobu Senjyu, and Katsumi Uezato, "NeuralNetworkBased Maximum PowerPoint Tracking of Coupled Inductor InterleavedBoostConverterSupplied PV System Using Fuzzy Controller," IEEE Transactions on
Induetrial Electronics, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp.749758, August 2003.