Phenomenology in Architecture A Pedagogical Exploration

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV10IS03019

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Phenomenology in Architecture A Pedagogical Exploration

Ar. Kabir Fatema

PhD Scholar

Amity School Of Architecture And Planning Amity University Rajasthan

Jaipur, India

Dr. Anurag Varma


Amity School of Architecture and Planning, Amity University Rajasthan,

Jaipur, India

Ar. Jayashree Deshpande,

Director NIASA

Ar. Kabir Fatema

Asso. Prof

Aayojan School of Architecture and Design, Pune, India

Abstract In the early 19th cent; Philosopher Edmund Husserl introduced the term Phenomenology in the line of epistemology. With architects like Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor; who are influenced by literary works of theorists like Juhanni Pallasmaa; Phenomenology is opening a new door in Architecture. According to the French Philosopher; Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology is the study of essence of the existential environment as perceived by humans, in other words; experience of the lived-world around. Ponty also adds on to the definition by stating that knowing the essence is not the ultimate goal. Idea is to incorporate that knowledge into the perceivable environment as it exists in relation to human being and in the space-time context.

We do witness the incorporation of this knowledge of phenomenology in space-time and human context in various fields of representation painting, Sculpture and Architecture. Yet we are figuring out methods to study or analyze this phenomenon. This paper not only addresses the gravity of the situation but also demonstrates ideas that can lead to developing methods for the study of Architectural Experience. Elaboration of the methods is done through discussing processes and final products of Elective and workshops that were conducted on this subject. Learning from Films, studying experience through interviews and further making some attempts at understanding the idea of experience are dealt in detail here

Key Words: Architectural Experience, Phenomenology, Human and Space


    My perception is [therefore] not a sum of visual, tactile, and audible givens: I perceive in a total way with my whole being: I grasp a unique structure of the thing, a unique way of being, which speaks to all my senses at once(Merleau-Ponty, 2002). With this Merleau-Ponty1 establishes that experience is not unidimensional, there are multiple aspects involved. One is still in the process of understanding the multi-dimensional study of Architectural experience. The aspects and the process of architectural experience analysis are still vague due to a

    lot of un-explored ground. On the other hand, Neuroarchitecture has had major breakthroughs in tapping human mind, computationally understanding its emotions and argumentatively relating the same to the spatial structure. Since its not easily available, widely used or totally understood one is still trying to figure out tangible and available experiential analysis methods for daily use.

    Since Freudian theory of Space, a psychoanalytical aspect got attached to the realm of Architectural experience. It gave fodder to 19th cent; Philosopher Edmund Husserl for his phenomenology discussions. Maurice Merleau- Pontys Phenomenology philosophy came closest to Architecture discipline. Picking on Pontys thoughts, Juhani Pallasmaa2 developed his experience-based architecture design ideas. Pallasmaa connected the dots as left on the board by Edward Casey3 and Norberg Schulz4. Casey Says It is sensible, perhaps even irresistible to assume that human experience begins with space and time and then proceeds to place(Casey, 1996). Continuing from space-time, Norberg Schulz adds Spirit of The Place notion calling it Genius Loci in his book Genius Loci: Towards A Phenomenology of Architecture (Norberg- Schulz, 1979) to the discussion.

    These authors through their research have added many parameters to the study of Architectural Experience. No longer is it a matter of speaking about space and light, but of making space and light, which are there, speak to us. There is no end to this questioning, since the vision to which it is addressed is itself a question. All the inquiries we believed closed have been reopened. What is depth, what is light, [what is being]? (Merleau-Ponty, 1964). When this is the case one is ofcourse lost between the various elements of space, aspects of human mind and hence the understanding of experience. In this maze came about the workshops and electives on Architecture and Psychology or Architectural Experience. Learnings from these short courses led to a lot of realization and ground work for further research. This paper is constructed using

    the output from these short courses but is narrated as development the understanding of Experiential Analysis of Architecture.

  2. UNDERSTANDING THE FUNDAMENTALS The journey began with understanding the fundamental concepts around the study of Experiential analysis. Most courses began by addressing these simple ideas. Though in some cases the theoretical study was delved deeper into a philosophical inquiry.

    Fundamental ideas namely; Sensation, Perception, Experience were first defined as explained in the field of psychology then their relevance was observed in Architecture. Lot of literature reading was done to establish this base which was put on paper by students in form of quick notes as seen in

    Figure 1. Quick notes is a handy tool for penning down ones thoughts and understanding through info-graphics.

    Figure 1: Quick Notes made during Architectural Experience study readings.‌

    Source: Kadambari Aute, Urban Psychology Elective, UD – ASAD, Pune, 2019-20


    To apply the understanding achieved from readings, analysis of an existing site would be undertaken. It could be a building or an interior space, we took up a film set analysis. There were a few conditions to selecting the film. The film-set should be designed to display the emotional conditions of their actors. It should provoke the user or viewers senses and hence the emotions. Story line of the film (Historic context, Political scenario, social condition) should correspond with the set design and simultaneously convey the message through sensory and emotional evocation. Since the dialogue came into being the spatial and facial expressions lost their charm, hence the films to be chosen may be silent ones.

    Chosen film was studied based on its impact on human psychology through set design. Yet the challenge was how to break down this study. Through readings one had understood that emotions and senses play a role in experience which is evoked by the elements of a given space. Based on this understanding the space was broken into single or groups of elements which may have

    provoked certain emotions. Establishing the relation of the element with the emotion was mainly intuitive except at places where some readings may have provided guidance. As seen in Figure 2 the student has grouped certain elements a led them to secondary emotions that further tie multiple secondary emotions into single primary emotion.


    From the film study one has intuitively related some elements of design with particular emotions. Yet this is not a full-proof idea so one begins to test it. In this exercise the students designed and built life size, single activity spaces on campus. Elements were chosen based on learnings from previous exercises. These elements would correspond to particular emotions as hypothesized by the students for the space. Figure 3 is one ofthe student groups study sheet of above stated experiment. They wished to achieve Sadness and fear. Hence a dark hollow with spikes at the outside was designed and built. Its scale was small to constrict the user and evoke seclusion and sadness. Low height entry was also a forced succumb and awe creating. Internal space had only 1 stool and rest was empty. It was also noted what the participants did in the time they were required to stay in the space, were they relaxed and sitting or anxious and waiting to step out. Some participants could not stay in the space for long and requested to step out early; signifying the impact of negativity as meant to be projected by the space.

    Data gathering from the participants after the experiment was based on MCQ type questionnaire as seen in

    Figure 4. These were also planned based on elements and emotions they would evoke. So for each element four options of emotions were given.

    Experiment was indeed fun and successful to quite an extent. Most projected emotions were realized to be correct. Yet a question continued, weather the elements could and should be separated and studied as such? Also is experience only about emotions, or is there more to the story? Further elective attempts clarified more queries as we explored.

    Figure 2: Architecture based experiential analysis of 'Nightmare Before Christmas'.

    Source: Ketan Avhad, Architecture and Psychology Elective, 5th yr B.Arch – ASAD, Pune, 2018-19‌

    Figure 3: Study sheet of space designed and built by the students on campus. Purposeful elements of design are also highlighted.

    Source: Ila K, Pratiksha U, Akash J, Radhika S, Rutuja M, Architecture & Psychology elective, 4th Yr – ASAD, Pune, 2019-2020

    Figure 4: Interview data of the experiment.

    Source: Ila K, Pratiksha U, Akash J, Radhika S, Rutuja M, Architecture & Psychology elective, 4th Yr – ASAD, Pune, 2019-20


    the question of weather an element can be separately studied in experiential analysis and is experience only about emotions were delved further in this exercise. The quote below by Pallasmaa; begins to elaborate on our quest. In this quote he not only discusses the various elements in relation with each other as creating the experience but also talks about the intangible elements of the space too which contribute towards the experience. Too add on if one reads between the lines, you realize that the whole experience has various emotions but is leading to a single understanding of what one may call as TIME or NOSTALAGIA.

    "But the walls themselves were the most unforgettable. The stubborn life of these rooms had not allowed itself to

    be trampled out. It was still there; it clung to the nails that had been left in the walls; it found a resting-place on the remaining handbreadth of flooring; it squatted beneath the corner beams where a little bit of space remained. One could see it in the colors which it had slowly changed, year by year: blue into a moldy green, green into grey, and yellow into a stale, drab, weary white. But it was also in the places that had kept fresher, behind the mirrors, the pictures, and the wardrobes; for it bad outlined their contours over and over again, and had been with cobwebs and dust even in these hidden retreats that now lay uncovered. It was in every bare, flayed streak of surface, it was in the blisters the dampness had raised at the edges of the wallpapers; it floated in the torn-off shreds, and sweated out of the longstanding spots of filth. And from these walls once blue, and green and yellow, framed by the tracks of the disturbed partitions, the breath of these lives came forth – the clammy, sluggish, fusty breath, which no wind had yet scattered. There were the midday meals and the sicknesses and the exhalations and the smoke of years, and the stale breath of mouths, and the oily odour of perspiring feet. There were the pungent tang of urine and the stench of burning soot and the grey reek on potatoes, and the heavy, sickly fumes of rancid grease. The sweetish, lingering smell of neglected infants was there, and the smell of frightened children who go to school, and the stuffiness of the beds of nubile youths (Pallasmaa, 1992).

    Now keeping the idea of experiencing TIME through various tangible and intangible elements constant and emotional variety open ended one begins to develop a test for the same. Students once again design spaces with elements that they believe would evoke the experience of TIME. This understanding comes from readings as quoted above. Yet the elemental choosing is an assumption and not conclusive. The student group built a walk-in back box.

    Figure 5: Likert scale-based questionnaire for analysing experience of TIME.‌

    Source: Parth B, Karan K, Rutuja M, Architecture and Psychology Elective, 4th Yr – ASAD Pune – 2019-20

    Participant would enter that empty dark box, a music would begin to play in the background. Participant would be expected to stay in there for few minutes. On stepping out their feedback would be taken using a Likert scale questionnaire as seen in

    Figure 5. Analysis of the data was done using pie charts as seen in Figure 6, which displayed the impact of various elements at the recollection of past memory or future thoughts hence a realization of TIME.


    One may have not totally understood yet has observed that there are two characters at play here, the space and the user. The interweaving between the Knowing subject and the Knowable object is a Phenomenological Dialogue according to Buber. Therefor phenomenological dialogue may be defined as an exploration and description of phenomena, where phenomena refers to things or experiences as human beings experience them. Any object, event, situation or experience that a person can see, hear, touch, smell, taste, feel, intuit, know, understand, or live through (Seamon, 2000) (Kabir et al., 2020). This notion is proposed and now open for further research.

    The other criterion as discussion was about the emotions being the only outcome of experience. We moved from there into another idea of generalizing experience. Experience may have types and TIME could be one of them. (Kabir & Singh, 2020) in their research to quite an extent establish the idea of TIME as a type of experience. The paper says Time is hence a cyclic phenomenon that dwells within the Memories of the User and the spatial elements. To experience Time one should tap on the memories within them and /or within the spatial elements around. This process emphasizes that only when the user and the Architectural Space have a dialogue with each other; can the user perceive the Nature of Architectural Experiential; in this case Time(Kabir & Singh, 2020). Further research continues into digging if there are more experience types and how does one study an experience type to then be able to analyse its impact on human.

    These two questions raised in this paper open up a huge realm of inquiry and research that is missing in the discipline as yet.

    Figure 6: Data analysis of TIME Experience questionnaire. Source: Parth B, Karan K, Rutuja M, Architecture and Psychology Elective, 4th Yr – ASAD Pune – 2019-20


Special thanks to Aayojan School of Architecture for giving me the opportunity to conduct the elective as discussed in the paper. Thanks to the Students also whose work has been displayed and analysed for further implementation here.

I also acknowledge and thank my PhD guide Dr. Anurag Varma and my Mentor Ar. Jayashree Deshpande for their consistent support and guidance through my on-going PhD.

IX. TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Quick Notes made during Architectural

Experience study readings 2

Figure 2: Architecture based experiential analysis of 'Nightmare Before Christmas' 3

Figure 3: Study sheet of space designed and built by the students on campus. Purposefl elements of design are also highlighted 3

Figure 4: Interview data of the experiment. 3

Figure 5: Likert scale-based questionnaire for analysing experience of TIME 4

Figure 6: Data analysis of TIME Experience questionnaire. 5


  1. Casey, E. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. In Senses of place (pp. 1352). School of American Research advanced seminar series.

  2. Kabir, F., Singh, J., Garg, N., & Deshpande, J. (2020). Experience of architecture. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6 Special Issue), 25092516.

  3. Kabir, F., & Singh, P. J. (2020). Time: A Nature of Architectural Experience. Solid Stat Tchnology, 62(2), 5472 5480.

  4. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classics.

  5. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Eye and The Mind . In J. M. Edie (Ed.), The Primacy of Perception, (pp. -). Evanston: Northwestern University Pres.

  6. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius Loci Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture (1st ed.). Rizzoli.

  7. Pallasmaa, J. (1992). Identity, Intimacy and Domicile – Notes on the Phenomenology of Home. The Concept of Home: An Interdisciplinary View, August, 2123.

  8. Seamon, D. (2000). A Way of Seeing People and Place: Phenomenology in Environment-Behavior Research. In J. D. S. Wapner (Ed.), Theoretical Perspectives in Environment- Behavior Research (pp. 157-78). New York: Plenum.

Leave a Reply