Performance Analysis on SNR, BW, SSP, UBF, LBF to Get Acceptable Bit Error Rate To Improve Power Efficiency and Channel Capacity

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS3502

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Performance Analysis on SNR, BW, SSP, UBF, LBF to Get Acceptable Bit Error Rate To Improve Power Efficiency and Channel Capacity

Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, JNTUK College of Engineering, Vizianagaram

———————————————————————————————————————————————————-

  1. ABSTRACT

    This paper describes the concepts of acceptable bit error rate, power efficiency(energy efficiency), band width efficiency, (SNR)Input, (SNR)output, significant side band pair(SSP), upper bound frequency(UBF), lower bound frequency(LBF).This paper also presents relation between SNR and band width in frequency modulation. Frequency modulation is frequently used modulation technique and is known as angle modulation. Angle modulation varies carrier(sinusoidal signal) signal in such a way that the angle of the carrier signal varies in according to the amplitude of the baseband modulating signal. In this method , the amplitude of the carrier wave is kept constant but in this paper I am changing the amplitude of the carrier and observed the what type of changes takes place in order to improve the understanding capability of the reader, two important classifications of angle modulation are i)frequency modulation ii) phase modulation.

    There are different modulating techniques but some techniques are better in terms of bit error rate performance, some methods are better for band width efficiency. Here my intention is to make these methods good at both i.e acceptable bit error rate and band width efficiency.

    Key words:, Efficiency(, Channel capacity Peak frequency deviation, Frequency modulation index, Modulation frequency,(SNR)in, (SNR)output, bit error rate,

  2. INTRODUCTION

    In a digital communications signal received at the receiver is the very important criteria if channel capacity is more signal will be very strength it will be possible only by maintaining proper signal to noise ratio, proper band width efficiency, low bit error rate,

    proper significant side band pair, upper bound frequency, lower bound frequency, audio band width. By maintaining all the parameters above said then we will improve band width efficiency, power efficiency(energy efficiency) which leads to increase in channel capacity and throughput(2).

    The signal-to-noise ratio, the bandwidth, and the channel capacity of a communication channel are connected by the ShannonHartley theorem. Assumes thermal noise only C/BW measures the efficiency of a digital transmission, BW, S and N are not independent: (1)The noise N increases with the bandwidth of W (2) Inter modulation noise increases with the signal strength S. The bit error rate or bit error ratio (BER) is the number of bit errors divided by the total number of transferred bits during a studied time interval. BER is a performance measure, often expressed as a percentage (2). The BER may be improved by choosing a strong signal strength (unless this causes cross-talk and more bit errors), by choosing a slow and robust modulation.

  3. SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO (SNRatio)

    Signal-to-noise ratio is a measure used in science and engineering that compares the level of a desired signal to the level of background noise(3). It is defined as the ratio of signal power to the noise power. A ratio higher than 1:1 indicates more signal than noise. While SNR is commonly quoted for electrical signals, it can be applied to any form of signal (such as isotope levels in an ice core or biochemical signaling between cells).

    Signal to noise ratio:

    (S/N)Db=10log (signal power/noise power.)

    Typically measured at the receiver, because it is the point where the noise is to be removed from the signal.

    The signal-to-noise ratio, the bandwidth, and the channel capacity of a communication channel are connected by the ShannonHartley theorem.

    Signal-to-noise ratio is sometimes used informally to refer to the ratio of useful information to false or irrelevant data in a conversation or exchange. The theoretical maximum SNR assumes a perfect input signal. If the input signal is already noisy (as is usually the case), the signal's noise may be larger than the quantization noise. Real analog-to-digital converters also have other sources of noise that further decrease the SNR compared to the theoretical maximum from the idealized quantization noise, including the intentional addition of dither(6).

    Although noise levels in a digital system can be expressed using SNR, it is more common to use Eb/No, the energy per bit per noise power spectral density. The modulation error ratio (MER) is a measure of the SNR in a digitally modulated signal.

  4. Band width efficiency explains about the ability of modulation scheme to accommodate data with in a limited band width .Band width efficiency reflects how efficiently the allocated band width is utilized and is defined as the ratio of throughput data rate per hertz in a given band width(6).

    bandwidth Limitations arise from the physical properties of the transmission medium and from deliberate limitations at the transmitter to prevent interference from other resources.

    Band width efficiency ()BW=data rate in bits per second/BW occupied by RF signal=DRATE/(BW)RF(3)

  5. CHANNEL CAPACITTY(C)

    A given communication system has a maximum rate of information known as the channel capacity.

    If the information rate R is less than C, then one can approach arbitrarily small error probabilities by using intelligent coding techniques(8).

    To get lower error probabilities, the encoder has to work on longer blocks of signal data. This entails longer delays and higher computational requirements

    Nyquist's Law C = 2W log 2 M

    Assumption: noiseless channel bits per second

    BW = bandwidth

    M = number of encoding levels in the signal

    Binary signals can be reconstructed by taking 2W samples per second

    A 5 kHz channel with binary signals can transmit at most 10,000 bps

    The limitations is due to the effect of inter symbol interference, such as is produced by delay distortion.

    Shannon's Law C = 2W log 2 (1 + SNRatio) S = signal strength

    N = noise strength

    Assumes thermal noise only C/BW measures the efficiency of a digital transmission .BW, S, and N are not independent: (1)The noise N increases with the bandwidth of W (2) Inter modulation noise increases with the signal strength S.

    S.no

    (AM)C

    Peak frequency deviation

    f=(AM)C x

    1

    5

    50

    2

    10

    100

    3

    15

    150

    4

    20

    200

    5

    25

    250

    6

    30

    300

    7

    35

    350

    8

    40

    400

    30

    S.no

    (AM)C

    Peak frequency deviation

    f=(AM)C x

    1

    5

    50

    2

    10

    100

    3

    15

    150

    4

    20

    200

    5

    25

    250

    6

    300

    7

    35

    350

    8

    40

    400

  6. PEAK FREQUENCY DEVIATION AT CONSTANT GAIN 10KHZ/V. Let the gain is , peak frequency deviation f=(AM)CX (AM)C=Amplitude of carrier

    9

    45

    450

    10

    50

    500

    TABLE-

    The bit error probability pe is the expectation value of the BER. The BER can be considered as an approximate estimate of the bit error probability. This estimate is accurate for a long time interval and a high number of bit errors(10).

    Factors affecting the BER

    In a communication system, the receiver side BER may be affected by transmission channel noise, interference, distortion, bit synchronization problems, attenuation, wireless multipath fading, etc.

    The BER may be improved by choosing a strong signal strength (unless this causes cross-talk and more bit errors), by choosing a slow and robust modulation scheme or line coding scheme, and by applying channel coding schemes such as redundant forward error correction codes.

    Figure-1

    We observed that the graph between (AM)C frequency deviation(f) is linear.

  7. BIT ERROR RATE(BER)

&Peak

The transmission BER is the number of detected bits that are incorrect before error correction, divided by the total number of transferred bits (including redundant error codes). The information BER, approximately equal to the decoding error probability, is the number of decoded bits that remain incorrect after the error correction, divided by the total number of decoded bits (the useful information). Normally the transmission BER is larger than the information BER. The information BER is affected by the strength of the forward error correction code. The BER may be analyzed using stochastic computer simulations. If a

In digital transmission, the number of bit errors is the number of received bits of a data stream over a communication channel that have been altered due to noise, interference, distortion or bit synchronization errors.

The bit error rate or bit error ratio (BER) is the number of bit errors divided by the total number of transferred bits during a studied time interval. BER is a unit less performance measure, often expressed as a percentage(5).

simple transmission channel model and data source model is assumed, the BER may also be calculated analytically(7).

  1. VARIATION BETWEEN PEAK FREQUEENCY DEVIATION(f) AND FREQUENCY MODULATION INDEX.

    S. no

    f(khz)

    fmod

    MINDEX= f/ fmod

    1

    50

    10

    5

    2

    100

    10

    10

    3

    150

    10

    15

    4

    200

    10

    20

    5

    250

    10

    25

    6

    300

    10

    30

    7

    350

    10

    35

    8

    400

    10

    40

    9

    450

    10

    45

    10

    500

    10

    50

    S. no

    f(khz)

    fmod

    MINDEX= f/ fmod

    1

    50

    10

    5

    2

    100

    10

    10

    3

    150

    10

    15

    4

    200

    10

    20

    5

    250

    10

    25

    6

    300

    10

    30

    7

    350

    10

    35

    8

    400

    10

    40

    9

    450

    10

    45

    10

    500

    10

    50

  2. VARIATION OF CHANNNEL CAPACITY (C) WITH BAND WIDTH(RF) AND ( SNRATIO )output

    C=(BW)RF LOG2(1+SNRATIO)

    S.no

    BW

    (SNRATIO)OUTPUT

    C

    1

    300hz

    5dB

    617.83

    2

    300hz

    10 dB

    1037.829

    3

    300hz

    15 Db

    1508.331

    4

    300hz

    20 dB

    1997.463

    5

    300hz

    25 dB

    2492.811

    6

    300hz

    30 dB

    2990.167

    Table-2

    Table-3

    Chart-2

    Observations: By increasing peak frequency deviation there is 1/10TH increase in Modulation index.

    Chart-3

  3. COMPARRISION BETWEEN f(KHZ), MINDEX(KHZ), SSP, UBF(KHZ), LBF(KHZ),Where( BW)AUDIO=15

Let f=peak frequency deviation, MINDEX=modulation index, SSP=significant side band pair, ,UBF=Upper bound frequency, LBF=Lower bound frequency

SSP=Mindex+1, ———————————————–

–(1)

UBF=2(MINDEX+1)(BW)AUDIO—————————————(2)

LBF=2Xf————————————————(3)

S. no

f

MINDEX

SSP

UBF

LBF

1

50

5

6

180

100

2

100

10

11

330

200

3

150

15

16

480

300

4

200

20

21

630

400

5

250

25

26

780

500

6

300

30

31

4930

600

7

350

35

36

1080

700

8

400

40

41

1230

800

9

450

45

46

1380

900

10

500

50

51

1530

1000

Table-4

Figure-4

Observation from this graph : For small audio band width there is large increase in Modulation index.

XIII. VARIATION OF CHANNNEL CAPACITY (C) WITH BAND WIDTH AT CONSTANT ( SNRATIO )output

C=(BW)RF LOG2(1+SNRATIO)

S.no

BW(KHZ)

(SNRATIO)OU

TPUT

C(kbps)

1

100KHZ

10 dB

345.9429

2

200KHZ

10 dB

691.886

3

300KHZ

10 dB

1037.829

4

100KHZ

20 dB

665.821

5

200KHZ

20 dB

1331.642

6

300KHZ

20 dB

1997.463

7

100KHZ

30 dB

996.722

8

200KHZ

30 dB

1.99mbps

9

300KHZ

30 dB

2.99mbps

Table-5

Figure-5

S. no

M

index

K

(SNRatio) input

1

5

8.334

41.67

2

10

8.334

83.34

3

15

8.334

125.01

4

20

8.334

166.68

5

25

8.334

208.35

6

30

8.334

250.02

7

35

8.334

291.69

8

40

8.334

333.36

9

45

8.334

375.03

10

50

8.334

416.7

S. no

M

index

K

(SNRatio) input

1

5

8.334

41.67

2

10

8.334

83.34

3

15

8.334

125.01

4

20

8.334

166.68

5

25

8.334

208.35

6

30

8.334

250.02

7

35

8.334

291.69

8

40

8.334

333.36

9

45

8.334

375.03

10

50

8.334

416.7

  1. VARIATION OF (SNRatio)index WITH FREQUENCY MODULATION INDEX (Mindex) AT CONSTANT(K)

    Where f =(AMP)carrier ——(1) M index= f/f mod——————————(2)

    From equations 1&2 Mindex=(AMP)carrier /fmod———-(3) (AMP)carrier=( Mindexx fmod)/ —-(4)

    (or)

    = ( Mindex x fmod)/ (AMP)carrier———(5)

    Relation between (SNRatio)input and Mindex

    carrier W RF

    carrier W RF

    (SNRatio)input, AM=(AMP)2 /2N (BW)

    =[( Mindexx fmod)/ ]2/2NW(BW)RF——(6) (or)

    [( M index x f mod)]2/2 2 NW(BW)RF——–(7) where N w= white noise,( BW)RF=RF Band width (SN Ratio)input, AM M2 index——(8)

    (SN Ratio)input=K M2 index———-(9)

    Where K= [( f mod)]2/2 2 NW(BW)RF——(10)

    BY Substituting the values f mod=10 khz, =10

    N w=200hz, (BW)RF=300HZ (at front end of the receiver.)(author)

    Table-6

    Figure–6

  2. POWER EFFFICIEENCY ()POWER

Performing power analysis and sample size estimation is an important aspect of experimental design, because without these calculations, sample size may be too high or too low. If sample size is too low, the experiment will lack the precision to provide reliable answers to the questions it is investigating. If sample size is too large, time and resources will be wasted, often for minimal gain(2&8).

In some power analysis software programs, a number of graphical and analytical tools are available to enable precise evaluation of the factors affecting power and sample size in many of the most commonly encountered statistical analyses. This information can be crucial to the design of a study that is cost-effective and scientifically useful.

To ensure a statistical test will have adequate power, you usually must perform special analyses prior to running the experiment, to calculate how large an N is required.

Let's briefly examine the kind of statistical theory that lies at the foundation of the calculations used to estimate power and sample size. Return to the original example of the politician, contemplating how large an opinion poll should be taken to suit her purposes (11).

Statistical theory, of course, cannot tell us what will happen with any particular opinion poll. However, through the concept of a sampling distribution, it can tell us what will tend to happen in the long run, over many opinion polls of a particular size.

  1. CONCLUSION

    Now a days, an increasing demand of wireless& mobile communications it requires high quality of transmission with less price, it is possible only with high quality research .This paper may gives complete idea to minimize noise effects by maintain proper parameters by adopting the above numerical approximations, graphical representations and tabular forms.

  2. ACK NOWLEDGEMENT

The author would like to thank to Pro.CH.D.V.Paradesi Rao, Arora Engineering College, Bhongiri, Hyderabad for giving their valuable suggestions& guide lines.

  1. REFERENCES

    1. John D Kraus, Ronald J Marheka, Ahmad S Khan, Antennas and Wave propagation, 4thEdition(2010), Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.

    2. Theodore S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Principles and practice, second edition.

    3. Sanjay Sharma, Wireless& Cellular Communications, second edition.

    4. K.D. Prasad, Antenna and Wave propagation, 3rdEdition,New Delhi.

    5. Fock, V.A Electromagnetic Diffraction and Propagation Problems, pp 254-275, Pergamum Press, New York, 1965.

    6. Wait, J.R: Electromagnetic surface waves, Advances in Radio Research,1, New York, Academic press pp. 157-219,1964.Academic press

    7. Walker, J. Halliday, D., & Resnick, R. (2011). Fundamentals of physics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    8. Soundrya Rajan. V.: Antenna Theory and and Wave propagation, Scitech Publications(India) Pvt.Ltd,Chennai,2001. 3rdEdition, New Delhi. Anderson, Leland I. (2002).

    9. Dhar,p.c.: Electromagnetic Field Theory, Antenna Theory and Wave propagation, Dhanpat Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd, New Delhi

      ,2001.

    10. Gautam, A.K.: Antenna and Wave propagation, S.K. Kataria and Sons, Delhi, IIND Edition,2004.

    11. C. Balannis, Antenna Theory-Analysis and Design. .New York: Wiley, 1982.

Leave a Reply