Junction Improvement by Implementing Traffic Signals and Road Widening At Thirumala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV6IS06008

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Junction Improvement by Implementing Traffic Signals and Road Widening At Thirumala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

Lijin Rajeev Vinitha O S, Krishna S Nair, Anisha, Mathai, Nisha K T, Shibina N

Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Students, LBS Institute of Technology for Women LBS Institute of Technology for Women

Poojappura, Trivandrum Poojappura,Trivandrum

Abstract: Industrial development in India induces huge increase in the number of vehicles .The development of any country depends upon the ability of its transporting system. Intersections are integral part of any road network. Intersections represent potentially dangerous locations from point view of traffic safety. This paper examines the traffic problems that occurs at road intersection at Thirumala, Kerala. The vehicular traffic count were taken by manual method and the existing features of the road intersections are determined. Absence of traffic signals, insufficient width of road and wrongful parking of vehicles leads to the congestion at the intersection. Sufficient safety measures such as proposal of road widening and implementing traffic signals are to be proposed for the junction improvement.

Keywords: Thirumala, Intersection, congestion, vehicular traffic, traffic signal, junction improvement

I. INTRODUCTION

India is a fast developing country .Transporting system is a major factor for the development of any country. The speed of mobilization and intensity of traffic has been increasing day by day. For minimizing the economic loss due to fuel wastage and loss in valuable man hours, the functioning of the transporting network should be very efficient and flexible. When we consider our state the land area is very low and cost is very high. Intersections are major part of any regional road network from the efficiency of operations, safety, speed, cost of operation and capacity are directly governed by the intersections. At-grade intersections are the major cause of delay and hence result in valuable time and economical loss. The efficiency of an intersection is determined on the basis of how well an intersection accommodates the demands of all road users.

SITE SELECTION-THIRUMALA

Thirumala junction is a major junction comes under Thiruvananthapuram corporation in Thiruvananthapuram- Neyyar Dam road. Following datas were collected from the reconnaissance survey. Roads leading to Kattakada, Mangattukadavu and Pangode are originating from this junction. Establishments like Pangode Military Campus, Pareeksha Bhavan, Hospitals, Educational Institutions, Police station, Village office, Mosque, religious buildings, market, etc. are located near this junction. Hence the bottlenecked areas of different roads at the junction need to be improved.

The junction causes substantial vehicular traffic throughout the day especially during peak hour. Also considerable pedestrian traffic is observed throughout the day. The bus- stops are located close to the junction and on street parking, auto stands and taxi stands close to the junction adding traffic congestion and hampering the smooth flow of traffic. Utility services such as electric poles and telephone poles are located within Right of Way(ROW) and close to carriage way. Land use on the either side comprises of commercial establishments, Educational Institutions, Banks, Hospitals, Market, residences, etc.This paper aims to estimate the need for improvement of Thirumala junction and to determine the traffic improvement schemes by optimal utilization of existing as well as upgradation facilities and also whether one of the junctions demands a fully fledged signal system.

DATA COLLECTED

Traffic volume study

Traffic volume is the number of vehicles crossing a section of a road per unit time at any selected period. Traffic volume studies were conducted on major routes such as Pangode- Thirumala,Kattakada-Thirumala and Mangattukadavu- Thirumala.

Passenger Car Unit(PCU)

Different classes of vehicles are found to use the common road way facilities. To estimate the traffic flow the different vehicle classes are converted to one common standard vehicle unit. It is a common practice to consider the passenger car as a standard vehicle unit to convert the other vehicle classes and the unit is called PCU.

Table 1: As per IRC:70-1977 Recommended PCU Factors for Various Types of Vehicles in Urban Road

Sl.No

Type of Vehicle

PCU Equivalent

for Urban Roads

1

Heavy or medium goods

vehicle

1.75

2

Light goods vehicle

1.00

3

Bus

2.25

4

Motor cycle, Moped or

Scooter

0.33

5

Pedal cycle

0.2

Hourly Variation of Traffic

To establish the traffic flow characteristics such as hourly variation, composition and peak hour flow at junctions studies were conducted at Thirumala junction. Hourly traffic volume by vehicle type and direction was added separately determine the peak hour traffic at each intersection. The hourly variation of traffic is taken by manual methods and the data are collected for every directions.

Table 2 Kattakada to Mangattukadavu(Morning)

TIME

TOTAL PCU

TIME

TOTAL PCU

6 – 6.15 am

7.89

8.30-8.45am

32.8

6.15-6.30am

7.56

8.45-9am

29.89

6.30-6.45am

5.97

9-9.15am

28.9

6.45-7 am

10.08

9.15-9.30am

17.92

7 – 7.15am

16.95

9.30-9.45am

19.25

7.15-7.30am

23.14

9.45-10am

19.27

7.30-7.45am

22.14

10-10.15am

20.7

7.45-8am

30.12

10.15-10.30am

18.57

8-8.15am

32.47

10.30-10.45am

12.62

8.15-8.30am

32.71

10.45-11.00am

10.71

Fig.1 Hourly Variation (Morning)

Table 3 Kattakada to Mangattukadavu(Evening)

TIME

TOTAL PCU

4-4.15 pm

79.34

4.15-4.30pm

78.41

4.30-4.45pm

89.81

4.45-5pm

96.93

5-5.15pm

96.37

5.15-5.30pm

109.24

5.30-5.45pm

110.93

5.45-6pm

110.47

6-6.15pm

97.69

6.15-6.30pm

85.75

6.30-6.45pm

85.04

6.45-7pm

74.85

Fig 2.Hourly Variation (Evening)

Table 4 Mangattukadavu to Pangode(Morning)

20.15

TIME

TOTAL PCU

TIME

TOTAL PCU

6 – 6.15 am

8.30-8.45am

167.07

6.15-6.30am

32.84

8.45-9am

206.54

6.30-6.45am

25.24

9 – 9.15 am

242.92

6.45-7am

36.51

9.15-9.30am

268.16

7-7.15am

78.49

9.30-9.45am

246.96

7.15-7.30am

101.31

9.45-10am

256.53

7.30-7.45am

96.87

10-10.15am

238.23

7.45-8am

139.21

10.15-10.30am

206.67

8 – 8.15 am

150.69

10.30-10.45am

166.71

8.15-8.30am

162

10.45-11am

167.85

TIME

TOTAL PCU

4- 4.15pm

158.69

4.15-4.30pm

168.81

4.30-4.45pm

161.57

4.45-5 pm

157.32

5-5.15 pm

181.67

5.15-5.30pm

187.79

5.30-5.45pm

196.91

5.45-6 pm

200.51

6-6.15 pm

204.13

6.15-6.30pm

194.29

6.30-6.45pm

130.14

6.45-7 pm

98.91

Fig.3 Hourly Variation (Morning) Table 5 Mangattukadavu to pangode(Evening)

Fig.4 Hourly Variation (Evening)

Similarly routes such as: Kattakada to Pangode, Mangattukadavu to Kattakada,

Pangode to Kattakada and Pangode to Mangattukadavu were also plotted.

Flow Diagram

Peak hour flow of each route was computed and flow diagram was drawn separately for morning and evening time.

Fig 5 Peak hour flow at Thirumala Junction during morning time

Fig 6 Peak hour flow at Thirumala Junction during evening time

SIGNAL DESIGN

The design is done as per Websters method.

The Websters formula for Optimum cycle time, Co = (1.5L+5)/(1-Y)

Y= y1+y2+y3+…..+yn

Yi= qi / si

L = (I-a) + l

where, L= total lost time per cycle in seconds Y= volume / saturation flow for critical approach in each phase

qi= flow

si= saturation flow

Three phase signal is to be designed as per Websters method.

The three phases are following-

Fig 7 Phasing Diagram

  1. Design of signals at morning time

    Table 6 Computation of Y(Morning)

    From

    Kattakada

    Pangode

    Mangattukadavu

    To

    Pangode

    Mangattukadavu

    Kattakada

    Mangattukadavu

    Kattakada

    Pangode

    Flow PCU/Hour

    887

    128

    536

    435

    510

    1010

    Corrected Flow

    887

    160

    536

    762

    510

    1010

    Width (w) in m

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    Saturation Flow

    4200

    4200

    4200

    4200

    4200

    4200

    Phase 1

    X

    X

    y1

    0.25

    0.13

    0.24

    Phase 2

    X

    X

    y2

    0.04

    0.31

    0.24

    Phase 3

    X

    X

    y3

    0.04

    0.13

    0.36

    Y= 0.25+0.31+0.36=0.92

    L=3[(4-2)+2]=12 sec

    Optimum cycle time, Co=[(1.5×12)+5]

    (1- 0.92)

    =288 sec But max Co = 120 sec Effective green time ;-

    a)Phase 1=y1(Co-L)=0.25(120-12)

    Y 0.92

    =30 sec b)Phase 2=y2(Co-L)=0.31(120-12)

    Y 0.92

    =36 sec c)Phase 3=y3(Co-L)=0.36(120-12)

    Y 0.92

    =42 sec

    Fig 8 Timing Diagram (Morning)

  2. Design of signals at evening time

    Table 7 Computation of Y (Evening)

    From

    Kattakada

    Pangode

    Mangattukadavu

    To

    Pangode

    Mangattukadavu

    Kattakada

    Mangattukadavu

    Kattakada

    Pangode

    Flow PCU/Hour

    743

    429

    616

    536

    197

    796

    Corrected Flow

    743

    537

    616

    938

    197

    796

    Width (w) in m

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    Saturation Flow

    4200

    4200

    4200

    4200

    4200

    4200

    Phase 1

    X

    X

    y1

    0.3

    0.15

    0.19

    Phase 2

    X

    X

    y2

    0.13

    0.37

    0.19

    Phase 3

    X

    X

    y3

    0.13

    0.15

    0.23

    Y= 0.30+0.37+0.23=0.90

    L=3[(4-2)+2]=12 sec

    Optimum cycle time, Co=[(1.5×12)+5]

    (1- 0.90)

    =230 sec

    But max Co = 120 sec

    Effective green time ;-

    a) Phase 1=y1(Co-L)=0.30(120-12)

    Y 0.90

    =36 sec

    b) Phase 2=y2(Co-L)=0.37(120-12)

    Y 0.90

    =44 sec

    c) Phase 3=y3(Co-L)=0.23(120-12)

    Y 0.90

    =28 sec

    Fig 10 Existing Features of Thirumala Junction

    Fig 11 Proposed Layout of Thirumala Junction

    Fig 9 Timing Diagram(Evening)

    Total Station Survey

    Existing features of the junction was taken by total station survey. AutoCAD drawing was also made.

    CONCLUSIONS

    This paper examines about the congestion and delay problems that occurs at Thirumala. From the study conducted the following conclusions are deduced:

    • Design of three phase traffic signal is done so that traffic conflicts can be eliminated.

    • Proposal of road widening significantly reduces traffic congestion and delay.

    • Shifting of bus bays from the junction minimizes the interruptions that may occur.

    • Conflict points can be reduced to a greater extent.

REFERENCES

  1. Partha pratim dey, Satish chandra and Gangopadhyay, Simulation of mixed traffic flow on two-lane roads, journal of transportation engineering,vol.134,no.9, September1 2008

  2. Geethu lal, Divya lg, Nithin k j, Susan mathew, Bennet kuriakose , Sustainable traffic improvement for urban road intersections of developing countries -2016

  3. Aparijitha chakrabartty, Sudhakshina gupta. Estimation of congestion cost in the city of Kolkata. journal of transportation engineering,vol.3- May2015

  4. Sachin jat, Rohit gurjar et al. Controlling traffic by designing signal at intersection of Vidisha international journal for scientific research and development,vol.3,issue.5- 2015

  5. IRC 70-1977-Guidelines on regulation and control of mixed traffic in urban areas.

  6. Kadiyali.l.r,(2012),Traffic engineering and transportation planning, khanapulishers, New Delhi.

Leave a Reply