Influence of the Lithostabilization of A Swelling Clay on its Plasticity and its CBR: the Case of Dabanga Karal Coupled with the Sand of Mayo Kaliao River in the Far North Region of Cameroon

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV12IS030082

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Influence of the Lithostabilization of A Swelling Clay on its Plasticity and its CBR: the Case of Dabanga Karal Coupled with the Sand of Mayo Kaliao River in the Far North Region of Cameroon

Limaleba Roger Blaise1

1Civil Engineering Laboratory, National Advanced School of Public Works Yaounde, Cameroon. (Corresponding author)

Madjadoumbaye Jeremie2, Ayina Ohandja Louis Max2

2 Civil Engineering Laboratory,

National School of Engineering, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaounde, Cameroon.

Abstract This article aims, from certain geotechnical characteristics of Dabanga Karal, to carry out tests to improve its plasticity and its CBR bearing capacity by litho-stabilizing it with sand taken from the Mayo Kaliao River in Maroua, situated in the Far North Region of Cameroon, following mixtures weights of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% sand. The work done is essentially experimental through tests carried out at the National Civil Engineering Laboratory (LABOGENIE) in Yaoundé, according to the relevant French standards. The results obtained show that after lithostabilization of Dabanga Karal with the sand of Mayo Kaliao River, the plasticity index and the linear swelling drop respectively while the CBR increases significantly. These results are compared with CEBTP specifications ([3]

&[4] relating to the dimensioning of low traffic roads in tropical areas. This research work made it possible to show that the Karal, although being a swelling clay with high plasticity, presents after lithostabilization a plasticity and a CBR which can allow its use in platform, in the construction or the maintenance of roads in the northern part of Cameroon, in accordance with CEBTP specifications.

Keywords: Karal; Dabanga; swelling clay; plasticity; CBR; lithostabilization.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The Karal is an abundant clay soil in the northern part of Cameroon, more precisely in the Far North Region where it covers about 73% of the soil [5]; to cope with the absence of lateritic materials in this Region, this clay is frequently used both in the construction of paved roads (in a platform or subgrade) and in the development and maintenance of roads in earth (as soil in place or in embankments). The Karal, resistant in the dry season, is very plastic and swells in the presence of water due to the presence of swelling clay minerals such as montmorillonite, kaolinite or illite [2] & [7]. This phenomenon of shrinkage-swelling of this clay and its high plasticity thus make dirt roads impassable during the rainy seasons due to sloughs and paved roads subject to significant degradation.

    Indeed, with a Liquidity Limit WL = 62.88% and a Plasticity Index IP = 39.58%, Karal de Dabanga is classified, in the plasticity chart of Casagrande among the mineral clays of high plasticity [9].

    The Karal of Dabanga, like most of the soils of the Far North Region of Cameroon, has a very heterogeneous character ([5], [6] & [8]) which requires that, for specific studies in a given area, the characterization should be done beforehand. The lithostabilization of the Karal can be an asset in improving its geotechnical characteristics with a view to its use in the construction of roads in the aforementioned region.

    The general objective of this article is to make a contribution to the good behavior of the roads in the northern part of Cameroon, through the improvement of certain geotechnical characteristics of Dabanga Karal, used as material for the construction and maintenance of roads. More specifically, it will be a question of showing how plasticity and CBR lift are influenced by lithostabilizing Dabanga Karal with a granular material, in this case the sand of Mayo Kaliao River in Maroua. The CEBTP specifications ([3] & [4]) relating to the dimensioning of low-traffic roads in tropical areas are used to check the conformity of the results obtained on the Karal-Sand mixtures with a view to their possible use in a platform or in foundation layers. of a roadway.

    The work is carried out through tests carried out at the National Civil Engineering Laboratory (LABOGENIE), in particular with regard to the determination of the Atterberg limits and the CBR after immersion, in accordance with the relevant French standards (NF P 94-051 and NF P 94-078). For this, five Karal samples were taken in Dabanga, a locality located 190 km from

    the city of Maroua on the Maroua-Kousseri axis; a sample of sand was also taken from the Mayo Kaliao, a River that meanders through the town of Maroua.

  2. THE CAMEROONIAN KARAL

    Karal is a more or less dark gray clay that soil scientists call tropical black clay and found in the northern part of Cameroon. Most of the Cameroonian Karal is found in the Far North Region where Ekodek [5] places it between the 14th and 16th degree of longitude East, then the 10th and 13th of latitude North; he estimates the area occupied by the Karal at approximately 25,000 km2, or nearly 73% of the soils of this Region.

    The Karal, made up of a mixture of montmorillonite, kaolinite, illite and a few other minerals, is presented as a material whose ability to shrink-swell would be linked to the quantity of montmorillonite and the importance of the fraction clay (< 2m) it contains [10].

    When a sample of Karal is sieved, it is found that it is essentially made up of fine elements. With a liquidity limit sometimes approaching 70%, the Karal has a plasticity index close to 40% which means that in the rainy season it is practically impossible to travel on a dirt road; Indeed, this clay becomes subject to significant deformations due to traffic, giving rise to deep ruts that make traffic almost impossible [8].

    Another characteristic of Karal, a consequence of its high plasticity, is its ability to shrink-swell. In the dry season, the Karal shrinks and cracks that can reach 1 m deep and 4 to 8 cm wide form on the surface [8]. During the rains, these cracks are filled with water which the Karal absorbs and begins to swell.

    All these properties make Karal a material whose mechanical characteristics are quite mediocre: [8] & [10] show that a CBR test on Karal soaked at 4 days will rarely give a result higher than 5%.

  3. PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DABANGA KARAL

      1. Location of the Karal sampling site in Dabanga

        Dabanga is a border locality of Cameroon with the Republic of Nigeria, located in the Department of Logone-et-Chari, on the Maroua-Kousseri road, in the Far North Region. It is at a distance of about 190 km from Maroua, 70 km from Kousseri and 1,500 km from Yaoundé, the capital of Cameroon. Geographically, and as shown in Figure 1, Dabanga is located between the 10th and 13th degree of North latitude, then between the 14th and 16th degree of East Longitude ([5] & [6]). A GPS point has been surveyed for a more precise location of the sampling location; its UTM coordinates are as follows: X = 0 461 546 m; Y = 1 317 650 m; Z = 297 m.

        DABANGA

        Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Geographical location of Dabanga

      2. Some known results on the characterization of the Dabanga Karal [9]

    It appears from the particle size analysis that the clay fraction (< 2) contained in the Karal of Dabanga is 61.2%, that of the sands is 24.5% and the silts 14.3%; the percentage of fine elements (passing at 80) of the Karal is 81.8%. The other geotechnical characteristics of Karal of Dabanga are recorded in Table 1.

    Table 1. Some geotechnical characteristics of Karal de Dabanga [9]

    N°

    Designtion of parameters

    Samples results

    G1

    G2

    G3

    G4

    G5

    Average

    1

    Natural water content (%)

    18

    13

    14

    13

    11

    13,80

    2

    Liquidity Limit (%)

    64,1

    66,2

    62,5

    57,6

    64,0

    62,88

    3

    Plasticity Limit (%)

    26,1

    21,3

    22

    21,1

    26,0

    23,30

    4

    Plasticity Index (%)

    38

    44,9

    40,5

    36,5

    38,0

    39,58

    5

    Consistency index (%)

    1,213

    1,185

    1,198

    1,222

    1,395

    1,24

    6

    Linear Swelling (%)

    3,8

    3,07

    4,17

    3,15

    4,13

    3,66

    7

    Immediate CBR (%)

    10,71

    7,857

    8,571

    10,57

    10,79

    9,70

    8

    CBR after 4 days of immersion (%)

    6,60

    4,50

    5,00

    6,00

    6,50

    5,72

    9

    Saturation water content (%)

    22,4

    17,6

    23,5

    18,4

    22,4

    20,86

    10

    Maximum dry Density (kN/m3)

    17,47

    17,79

    17,59

    18,59

    17,40

    17,77

    11

    Optimum water content (%)

    17,3

    15,0

    19,0

    14,6

    17,6

    16,7

  4. KARAL LITHOSTABILIZATION TESTS PERFORMED (KARAL-SAND MIXTURES KS)

    For the realization of the lithostabilisation tests of Karal, (mixtures KS), it is necessary on the one hand, to make combinations in weight of the two materials from where the choice to vary the percentage of sand from 10 to 30% and that of the Karal from 90 to 70%, following in steps of 5%. On the other hand, these combinations apply to each of the five samples from Karal. Hence the matrix of combinations of each test shown in Table 2.

    Samples

    Combinations (%)

    G1

    G2

    G3

    G4

    G5

    Averages

    90K + 10S

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    85K + 15S

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    80K + 20S

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    75K + 25S

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    70K + 30S

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    Table 2. Matrix of the combinations of each test

    With :

    • 90% Karal + 10% Sand, abbreviated 90K + 10S;

    • 85% Karal + 15% Sand, abbreviated 85K + 15S;

    • 80% Karal + 20% Sand, abbreviated 80K + 20S;

    • 75% Karal + 25% Sand, abbreviated 75K + 25S;

    • 70% Karal + 30% Sand, abbreviated 70K + 30S.

    Thus, for a given test, each of the five samples is analyzed five times according to the five combinations defined in table 2.

    The tests described below were carried out on the Karal-Sand (KS) mixtures in the context of this article.

      1. Atterberg limits, NF P 94-051 standard

        The Atterberg limits are geotechnical parameters used to identify a soil and to characterize its state of consistency. The test, which is very important for determining the plasticity of the soil, consists in determining two Atterberg limits: the liquid limit at the cup WL and the plasticity limit of the roller WP for the fraction of soil passing through the 400 m sieve.

        The Atterberg limits are water contents by weight corresponding to particular states of a soil:

        – The liquid limit at the cup WL is the water content of a reworked soil at the transition point between the liquid state and the plastic state. Figure 2 illustrates the equipment used in the laboratory for the determination of this limit.

        Coupelle

        Outil à rainure

        Fig. 2. Equipment for determining the liquid limit in the laboratory

        – The WP roller plasticity limit is the water content of a reworked soil at the point of transition between the plastic state and the solid state.

        The plasticity index IP, which is the difference between the liquid and plasticity limits, defines the extent of the plastic domain of a soil (IP = WL-WP).

      2. Immediate and after 4 days of immersion CBR tests, Standard NF P 94-078

        The CBR tests was carried out according to the French Standard NF P 94-078 for lithostabilization. The general principle of this tests consists in measuring the forces to be applied to a cylindrical punch with a section of 19.35cm2 to make it penetrate at constant speed into a specimen of compacted material. The particular values of the two forces which caused two

        conventional depressions (2.5 and 5 mm) are respectively related to the values of the forces 13.35 and 19.93 kN observed on a reference material for the same depressions.

        The desired index called Californian lift index is conventionally defined for two states (immediate CBR index and CBR index after immersion) as being the greater value, expressed as a percentage, of the two ratios thus calculated. We then have the desired index ICBR given, according to the energy of compaction (at 10, 25 or 55 blows), by the relation:

        penetration force at 2.5 mm penetration (in kN)

        100

        I max

        13,35

        CBR

        penetration force at 5.0 mm penetration (in kN)100

        19,93

        The values of the following parameters are normalized: section of the punch, driving speed, conventional driving and forces observed on the material.

        In the context of this work, the immediate CBR index, the CBR index after 04 days of immersion and the linear swelling were determined at a compaction water content of 95% of the OPM according to standard NF P 94- 078 Karal-Sand mixtures (KS).

        Figure 3 presents a punching session, after 04 days of immersion, of a specimen of the Karal-Sand mixture on the press in the laboratory.

        Fig. 3. Punching a CBR specimen in the laboratory

      3. Linear swelling test conducted concomitantly with the CBR test after immersion, Standard NF P 94-078

    The linear swelling g is determined by the relation:

    g h h0 .100

    h

    Where h0 is the height of the specimen before immersion and h the final height after immersion. In practice, the value of the relative elongation h = h-h0 of the specimen is determined using a comparator carefully installed on the latter before its immersion as shown in the figure 4.

    Fig. 4. Linear swelling measurement device on a CBR mold in the laboratory

  5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      1. Characterization of the sand from Mayo Kaliao River

        The Mayo-Kaliao is a river that winds through the town of Maroua and which was selected for the sampling of sand forthis study. The sand of this river, like that of other Mayos in the Far North Region, is quite clean, very abundant and accessible during the dry seasons due to the drying up of these rivers.

        Table 3 and Figure 5 present respectively the analysis sheet and the granulometric curve of the Mayo-Kaliao sand.

        Table 3. Particle size analysis sheet for the Mayo-Kaliao sand

        Dry initial weight (grs)

        2000,0

        Sieve openings (mm)

        Weight of cumulative refusals

        %

        Cumulative Refusals

        % of passers-by

        12,5

        0

        0,000

        100,000

        10

        3,3

        0,165

        99,835

        8

        9,2

        0,460

        99,540

        6,3

        18,8

        0,940

        99,060

        5

        45,6

        2,280

        97,720

        4

        96,4

        4,820

        95,180

        2

        546,4

        27,320

        72,680

        1

        1111,1

        55,555

        44,445

        0,63

        1511,3

        75,565

        24,435

        0,315

        1826,0

        91,300

        8,700

        0,25

        1923,4

        96,170

        3,830

        0,16

        1979,4

        98,970

        1,030

        0,08

        1993,9

        99,695

        0,305

        0,063

        1997,0

        99,850

        0,150

        The particle size analysis of the Mayo-Kaliao sand shows that this sand is coarse and contains very few fine elements (0.31%). On the other hand, with a uniformity coefficient Cu of 4.69 and a curvature coefficient Cc of 1.13, this sand is a well- graded material (1 < Cc < 3) with a spread granulometry (Cu > 4).

        As a reminder, the coefficients of uniformity and curvature are respectively given by the relations below:

        D D 2

        Cu 60

        D10

        et Cc 30

        D60 .D10

        Where Dx represents the opening of the sieve letting through x% of the weight of the grains.

        Granulometric curve of Mayo Kaliao sand

        Sieve openings in mm

        % of Tamisats

        100

        80

        63 90

        50

        40

        80

        31,5

        25

        70

        20

        16

        12,5 100,00 60

        10 99,84

        8 99,54

        50

        6,3 99,06

        5 97,72

        40

        4 95,18

        2 72,68

        1 44,45 30

        0,63 24,44

        0,315 8,70

        20

        0,25 3,83

        0,16 1,03

        10

        0,08 0,31

        0,063 0,25

        D10 0,32

        D30 0,74

        D60 1,50

        0

        100

        10 D60

        1 D30

        D10

        0,1

        0,01

        Cu 4,69

        Cc 1,14

        Sieve openings in mm

        Fig. 5. Granulometric curve of the Mayo-Kaliao sand

      2. Atterberg limits of KS mixtures

        The average values of the Atterberg limits of the five Karal samples litho-stabilized with Mayo Kaliao sand are presented in the table 4.

        Table 4. Average values of the Atterberg limits of the lithostabilized Karal with sand

        Parameters

        Karal-Sand mixtures (KS)

        100K+0S

        90K+10S

        85K+15S

        80K+20S

        75K+25S

        70K+30S

        Liquidity Limit

        62,90

        62,76

        60,10

        58,84

        59,12

        57,10

        Plasticity Limit

        23,32

        24,98

        23,18

        24,70

        26,28

        25,00

        Plasticity Index

        39,58

        37,78

        36,92

        34,14

        32,84

        32,10

        Fig. 6. Evolution of the Plasticity Index of KS mixtures

        By comparing the Plasticity indices of the above KS mixtures with that of Karal alone, the evolution curve of this plasticity index can be plotted as shown in Figure 6. Reading this graph shows that the addition of sand in the Karal decreases its plasticity; in fact, the plasticity index goes from 39.58% for the Karal alone to 32.10% for the 70K+30S combination, i.e. a decrease of 7.48%; but this value remains quite high for use in pavement layers according to CEBTP prescriptions.

        Moreover, this couple KS can be placed in the Casagrande plasticity chart as shown in figure 7; we can thus see that it remains in the field of mineral clays with high plasticity, but its position is below that of the Karal alone in this abacus.

        0

        10

        20

        Limite de Liquidité WL (%)

        30 40 50 60

        70

        80 90

        100

        70

        60

        WL=30

        WL=50

        Argiles minérales de forte plasticité

        50

        40

        Argiles

        minérales de faible plasticité

        Argiles minérales

        de moyenne plasticité

        30

        20

        Limons minéraux de haute

        compressibilité et argiles organiques

        10

        0

        Limons minéraux

        de faible compressibilité

        Limons minéraux 70%Karal+30%Sable : WL = 57,10 ; IP = 32,10

        de moyenne

        compressibilité et limons organiques

        Fig. 7. Position of the couple 70K+30S (orange point) in the Casagrande Plasticity Abacus

      3. CBR and Linear Swelling tests of Karal-Sand (KS) mixtures

        During these tests, the values of the CBR indices immediately and after 4 days of immersion were determined concomitantly with those of the Linear Swelling of the specimens. These values, which represent the means obtained on the five samples, are presented in table 5.

        Table 5. Mean values of CBR and linear swelling of Karal-Sand mixtures (KS)

        Parameters

        Mixtures of KS

        Karal elone

        90K+10S

        85K+15S

        80K+20S

        75K+25S

        70K+30S

        Immediat CBR (%)

        9,70

        11,55

        12,73

        13,82

        14,22

        14,95

        CBR after immersion (%)

        5,72

        6,92

        8,08

        10,20

        11,20

        12,88

        Linear Swelling (%)

        3,66

        2,98

        2,48

        2,07

        1,86

        1,25

        Figures 8 and 9 represent respectively the evolution curves of the CBR indices immediately and after immersion at 95% of the OPM and that of the linear swelling of the different combinations of the KS mixture.

        Fig. 8. CBR evolution curves of KS mixtures

        Fig. 9. Evolution curve of linear swelling of KS mixtures

        The interpretation of Figure 8 shows that the value of the immediate CBR ranges from 9.70% for the Karal alone to 14.95% for the 70K+30S combination, i.e. an increase of 5.26%; similarly, that of CBR after 4 days of immersion goes from 5.72% for the Karal alone to 12.88% for the 70K+30S combination, i.e. a substantial increase of more than double the value of the Karal alone. On the other hand, figure 9 shows that the linear swelling decreases from the value of 3.66% for the Karal alone to 1.25% for the 70K+30S combination, i.e. a decrease of more than half of the swelling of the Karal only.

      4. Discussion

    The improvement of the Karal has to date been the subject of a number of works through lithostabilization with sand ([1] &

    [11]). Table 6 presents the main results obtained by these authors.

    Table 6. Comparison of the main results of the lithostabilization studies of the Karal

    Parameters

    BAANA (2018)

    MBESSA & al. (2019)

    Karal of Maroua

    Karal + 30%sand

    Karal of Maroua

    Karal + 30%sand

    Liquidity Limit WL

    56,84

    *

    41,50

    *

    Plasticity Limit WP

    31,64

    *

    17,31

    *

    Plasticity Index IP

    25,20

    *

    24,19

    *

    CBR after immersion

    4,30

    5,31

    *

    *

    Linear swelling

    10,26

    4,36

    2,35

    1,13

    It appears that lithostabilization was used by Baana [1] and Mbessa [11] to improve the Karal of Maroua with sand from the Sanaga River, but the two authors did not determine the plasticity of the Karal-Sand mixtures; the CBR lift of the Karal and mixtures was also not determined by Mbessa. The linear swelling of 10.26% found by Baana on the Karal de Maroua is almost 5 times higher than that of 2.35% found by Mbessa; after lithostabilization of 30% sand, these swellings increase to 4.36% and 1.13% respectively. These significant differences can further explain the heterogeneous character of the Karal de Maroua; however, the Plasticity Indices found by these two authors on the Karal alone do not show a significant difference, respectively 25.20% for Baana and 24.19% for Mbessa. In addition, after lithostabilization, Baana finds a very low CBR value of 5.35% which is satisfactory for use in a platform but not in a foundation layer or base layer according to CEBTP specifications.

    The lithostabilization of the Karal of Dabanga with the sand of Mayo Kaliao made it possible to show that the geotechnical characteristics of the Karal are improved. Indeed, the Atterberg limits, the CBR after imbibition and the linear swelling are the tests that were carried out on the five samples from Karal, each coupled to five percentages of sand. The results obtained show that the geotechnical characteristics subjected to the study are much improved: the plasticity index goes from 39.58% for the Karal alone to 32.10% for the 70K+30S combination, i.e. a decrease 7.48%; the CBR after 4 days of immersion increases from 5.72% for Karal alone to 12.88% for the 70K+30S combination, an increase of more than double the value of Karal alone, just as the linear swelling decreases from the value of 3.66% for the Karal alone to 1.25% for the 70K+30S combination, i.e. a decrease of more than half of the swelling of the Karal alone. But these lithostabilization results simply allow use on a platform according to CEBTP specifications for roads with low traffic in tropical areas (see Table 7).

    Table 7. Results obtained on the Karal of Dabanga and specifications of the CEBTP

    Mixtures and CEBTP specifications

    Ip (%)

    CBR (%)

    Linear swelling (%)

    Observations

    Platform or subgrade: specifications

    < 40

    > 5

    < 3%

    Base layer: specifications

    < 25

    > 25

    < 2,5%

    Base layer: specifications

    < 20

    > 60

    < 1%

    Karal of Dabanga: Measurement

    39,58

    5,72

    3,66

    Ok for limited use only in Platform, but not in foundation layer and neither in base layer for too high

    Ip and insufficient CBR.

    75% Karal + 25% Sand: Measurement

    32,84

    11,20

    1,86

    70% Karal + 30% Sand: Measurement

    32,10

    12,88

    1,25

  6. CONCLUSION

    The objective of this article was to show the influence of lithostabilization on the improvement of certain geotechnical characteristics of the Karal of Dabanga, used as road material. More specifically, it was a question of seeing how the plasticity, the CBR bearing capacity after immersion and the linear swelling of the Karal of Dabanga are improved when the latter is litho- stabilized with the sand of Mayo Kaliao in Maroua. The CEBTP specifications ([3] & [4]) relating to the dimensioning of low- traffic roads in the tropics were used as a tool for verifying the conformity of the results obtained on the Karal-Sand mixtures with a view to their use as a platform or in pavement body. The results obtained show that the Karal of Dabanga litho-stabilized with 30% of Mayo Kaliao sand is compliant for use only as a Platform, but not as a foundation layer or as a base layer because of a Plasticity Index that is too high and insufficient CBR in accordance with CEBTP specifications. It would then be necessary to foresee in perspective the addition of hydraulic binders to the litho-stabilized Karal for its eventual use in road layers.

  7. REFERENCES

[1] BAANA ABOUAR (2018), Lithostabilisation des sols gonflants cas du Karal de la Région de lExtrême-Nord du Cameroun, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Yaoundé I, Cameroun, 149 p ;

[2] BAKAIYANG L., MADJADOUMBAYE J., BOUSSAFIR Y., SZYMKIEWICZ F. et DUC M. (2021), Re-use in road construction of a Karal-type clay-rich soil from North Cameroon after a lime/cement mixed treatment using two different limes, Elsevier Ltd, 15 July 2021, pp. 1-16;

[3] CEBTP (1972), Manuel de dimensionnement des chaussées pour les pays tropicaux, Secrétariat dÉtat aux affaires étrangères chargé de la coopération, Paris (France) ;

[4] CEBTP (1984), Guide pratique de dimensionnement des chaussées pour les pays tropicaux, Secrétariat dÉtat aux affaires étrangères chargé de la coopération, Paris (France) ;

[5] EKODECK G. E. (1976), Contribution à l'étude de la nature et du comportement géotechnique des dépôts superficiels gonflants du nord Cameroun, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Grenoble, France ;

[6] KENGJUSU MUNDI E. (1985), Applied geotechnical engineering in highway construction in Cameroon, Yaoundé, Cameroun.

[7] LAROCHE C. (1973), étude de sol pour la route Waza Maltam sur argile gonflante, Revue Générale des Routes et Aérodromes N° 483 avril 1973, France ;

[8] LIAUTAUD G. A. et al. (1972), Les Argiles Gonflantes, Laboratoire des Travaux Publics du Cameroun, Yaoundé-Cameroun ;

[9] LIMALEBA R. B., AYINA O. L. M., MADJADOUMBAYE J. (2016), Physical and Mechanical Characterization of a Swelling Clay: The Case of Dabanga Karal in the Far North Region of Cameroon, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 5 Issue 1, pp. 910-913;

[10] LIVET Marc (1988), Sol argileux Gonflants ; site expérimental de Waza-Maltam, Rapport de synthèse, ISTED, France ;

[11] MBESSA M., DEODONNE K. & WANSI LMW (2019), Lithostabilisation of Karal: Case of Maroua at the Far North Region of Cameroon, Civil Engineering Research Journal, pp. 00113-00121;