🌏
Global Knowledge Platform
Serving Researchers Since 2012
IJERT-MRP IJERT-MRP

Improving Visible Light Driven Photocatalytic Performance of ZnWO4/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for RhB Dye Degradation

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV14IS100064

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Improving Visible Light Driven Photocatalytic Performance of ZnWO4/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for RhB Dye Degradation

T. Prabhuraj

Advanced Nanomaterials and Energy Research Laboratory, Department of Energy Science and Technology, Periyar University, Salem 636011, Tamil Nadu

A. Gomathi

Department of Physics, School of Maritime Studies, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, Thalambur, Chennai 600 130, Tamil Nadu,

P. Maadeswaran

Advanced Nanomaterials and Energy Research Laboratory, Department of Energy Science and Technology, Periyar University, Salem – 636011, Tamil Nadu

AbstractThis study attempts to break down Rhodamine dye with ZnWO4@CN nanocomposites for environmental use. The nanocomposites were made using a simple hydrothermal process and examined for optical, structural, and morphological properties. XPS, SEM-EDX, UV-DRS, and PL are examples. RhB dye degradation in water was employed to test photocatalytic activity. The study found that ZnWO4@0.5 % CN has superior photocatalytic performance compared to pure ZnWO4, ZnWO@0.1% CN, and ZnWO4@1.0 % CN nanocomposites. The synergistic effect results from efficient photoinduced electron-hole pair separation and transfer. As an excellent electron conductor, activated carbon increases charge separation and extends charge carrier life. Photocatalytic experiments indicated ZnWO4@0.5 % CN nanocomposites destroyed 97% RhB dye in 150 minutes. Quenching investigations confirmed that the degradation kinetics followed a pseudo-first-order model, indicating that reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed efficiently and abundantly caused dye degradation.

KeywordsReactive oxygen species, Kinetics, Charge separation, Synergistic effect, Rhodamine dye

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Industrialization and population growth have contributed to environmental pollution and energy shortages caused by organic pollutants, which have become major barriers to economic and social progress [1, 2]. The adoption of pollution-free technologies and the identification of clean energy sources are crucial for achieving sustainable development [3, 4]. In contrast, organic dyes used widely in sectors like food, cosmetics, and paint industries are thought of as a significant source of water pollution [5]. Rhodamine B (RhB) is a yellow anthracene dye that is very soluble, has excellent brightness, and finds widespread use in biological applications and industrial production processes [6, 7]. Several health problems, including nausea, skin irritation, and vomiting, can be caused by exposure to high concentrations of RhB [8, 9]. Chemically durable, hardly biodegradable, and extremely toxic even at low

    concentrationsRhB is a synthetic organic dye. They are extremely dangerous for people and the environment [10]. So, to degrade organic contaminants, we need an effective, inexpensive method. Due to its capacity to fully mineralize the organic contaminants, semiconductor photocatalyst have garnered tremendous interest among researchers [11]. A wide band gap and a fast electron-hole (e-h) pair recombination rate are two limitations of the widely used semiconductor photocatalyst that contribute to its poor efficiency in converting light into energy [12]. Developing photo catalytical technology currently hinges on perfecting the synthesis of photocatalysts, which must possess attributes including low production costs, wide light absorption ranges, high cycle stability, and outstanding catalytic activity [13]. Consequently, it is of the utmost importance to develop an environmentally friendly and exceptionally effective photocatalyst through the use of standard techniques such as elemental doping, morphological control, and the creation of an appropriate heterojunction structure. A number of parameters determine how well they work, including dimensions, surface charge, shape, thermal characteristics, and optical characteristics [14]. Since narrow band gap oxides absorb a greater amount of visible light and are thought to be better photocatalysts owing to their wide solar light area, researchers are concentrating on employing these materials for photocatalysis [15]. Zinc tungstate (ZnWO4) stands out among narrow band gap semiconductors due to its exceptional optical, electrical, structural, and physiochemical characteristics; these qualities make it a great candidate for use in composites and open up new avenues for environmental applications [16].Research on ZnWO4, a wolframite tungstate metal oxide with a d10s2- d10 electronic configuration, has been conducted because of its potential uses in water splitting and the breakdown of organic pollutants in water when exposed to UV light [17, 18]. The photocatalytic activity of ZnWO4 is inefficient because it does not absorb visible light [19]. There have been numerous

    attempts to increase ZnWO4s photocatalytic activity by harvesting visible light [20, 21].

    Under visible light irradiation, g-C3N4 may efficiently catalyze photochemical processes because to its low bandgap of about

    2.8 eV [22, 23]. Attaching Co nanoclusters to g-C3N4 allowed Shang et al. to investigate their potential for CO2 reduction with great success [24, 25]. By adding nitrogen vacancies to g- C3N4, Dong et al. were able to attain high activity in photocatalytic nitrogen fixation [26]. The issue that single- component ZnWO4 can only use ultraviolet energy is solved when g-C3N4 and ZnWO4 are combined because the light absorption range of ZnWO4 is broadened. And since their energy band structures are so similar, g-C3N4 is an excellent material for creating heterojunctions with ZnWO4 [27]. The photogenerated carriers will be efficiently segregated and transported under the action of an internal electric field that forms at the composite interface after the composition of g- C3N4 and ZnWO4 [28]. Furthermore, a great deal of reducing gases, including NH3, are produced during the annealing process in a controlled atmosphere when g-C3N4 is synthesized using melamine as the precursor. There are a lot of oxygen vacancies in this atmosphere because the oxidation status of W atoms fluctuates [29]. These vacancies can protonate water molecules. Consequently, the combination of g-C3N4 and ZnWO4 is able to facilitate effective deprotonation of water molecules, increase the separation of photogenerated carriers, and prolong the light absorption of single-component ZnWO4 [30].

    At this time Zinc oxide/graphene oxide heterojunction nanofibers for highly effective photocatalytic nitrogen fixation: Deprotonation of water molecules and photogenerated electrons work in tandem to produce a synergistic impact.

    Our goal is to create a composite material by combining ZnWO4 with two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitrate using a hydrothermal process. This approach is heavily influenced by the literature stated earlier. Various analytical techniques were used to thoroughly investigate the proposed catalyst ZnWO4@0.5%CN. Under visible light irradiation, our catalyst ZnWO4/ g-C3N4 continuously degraded 97% RhB dye in 150 minutes. The purpose of the scavenger trapping study was to determine whether reactive species were involved in the degradation of the dye. The ZnWO4/ g-C3N4 photocatalyst is highly effective in degrading RhB dye in water samples, thanks to its high catalytic efficiency.

  2. XRD ANALSYSIS

    The 2theta range of 5 to 80 was used to record the XRD profiles of the nanocomposites in figure 1. These profiles include ZnWO4, g-C3N4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, and ZnWO4 @1.0%CN. On planes (100) and (002), respectively, the two diffraction patterns of grapitic carbon nitrate are located at 13 and 27.7. The JCPDS (03- 0401) was entirely in agreement with it [13]. One phase of monoclinic wolframite from the JCPDS (15-0774) has the sharp diffraction peaks of ZnWO4 [23]. The diffraction pattern of the nanocomposite made of ZnWO4 at different mass ratios (0.10% CN, 0.5% CN, and 1.0% CN) shows peaks for ZnWO4, whereas the planes (100), (002), that belong to graphitic carbon nitrate, are absent. We validate the g-C3N4 interacts with composite material production in subsequent characterizations.

    The broadening of the diffraction peaks, caused by loading activated carbon with ZnWO4 at concentrations of 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1%, reveals the interaction of graphitic carbon nitrate with ZnWO4. The two phases and high crystallinity of ZnWO4@CN nanocomposites were shown by the conspicuous and well- reflected images. Additionally, the absence of any other peaks that are not shown serves as confirmation of the processed materials' purity.

    Figure 1. XRD diffraction pattern of ZnWO4, g-C3N4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5% CN, ZnWO4@1.0% CN

    nanocomposite

  3. XPS ANALSYSIS

    The elemental composition and surface chemical bonding of the as-prepared ZnWO @ 1.0% AC crystalline material were shown by the XPS spectra. The survey spectra of the ZnWO4@1.0% CN nanocomposite are shown in Figure 2(a), which validates the presence of carbon, oxygen, zinc, and tungstate. The Zn 2p deconvoluted spectra are shown in

    Figure 2(b). Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p3/2 belong to the XPS peaks at 1044.5 eV and 1021.5 eV, respectively, according to references [31]. The two main peaks observed in the O1s XPS spectrum at

    531.4 eV and 530.4 eV, respectively, are hydroxyl groups, Zn- O-C links between graphitic carbon nitrogen surfaces and ZnWO4, and metal-oxygen-metal bonds, as shown in Figure 2(c) [32]. The high-resolution XPS doublet peaks, which are assigned to W(VI) in WO and can be seen in Figure 3(d) at around 37.1 eV for W 4f 5/2 and 35.2 eV for W 4f 7/2, are presented. At the binding energies of 398.2eV, 399.4 eV, and

    400.5 eV, the trinity peaks of N1s are situated [33]. The sp2 hybridized aromatic nitrogen atom bound into carbon (C=N-C) and characterized as Pyrrolilic -N is represented by the first peak. When the tertiary carbon atom forms a bond with the nitrogen atom, as shown by the second peak, the bond is N-

    (C)3 [34]. In Figure 3(e), the N-H groups in the graphitic carbon nitrate are shown by the third peak. 70 and 71Two prominent XPS peaks, C=O and C-C, having binding energies of 286.5 eV and 284.6 eV, respectively, make up a C1s spectra shown in Figure 3(f) [35]. In addition, our XPS study verifies that the produced ZnWO4@1.0% CN nanocomposite interacts with graphitic carbon nitrogen surfaces.

    Figure 2. (a) Survey spectra (b-e) Deconvoluted spectra of Zn 2p, O1s, W 4f, N1s, C1s of ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposite.

  4. UV-DRS

    The optical features of the ZnWO4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, and ZnWO4@1.0%CN nanocomposites were analyzed using UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. The absorption edge of ZnWO4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, and ZnWO4@1.0%CN nanocomposites is observed at 355 nm, 400 nm, 483 nm, 417 nm respectively. Figure 3(a, c, e, g) shows the absorption spectra of the photocatalyst. Furthermore, the band-gap values were determined utilizing Tauc's plot. The band-gap value for ZnWO4 is 3.5 eV, while the values for ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, and ZnWO4@1.0%CN nanocomposites are

    3.7 eV, 2.72 eV, 2.6 eV, 2.82 eV correspondingly [43,44]. The coupling of g-C3N4 diminishes the band gap of ZnWO4 yet enhances the visible light absorption of the ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposite which is shown in figure 3(b, d, f, h). The interaction contact between g-C3N4 and ZnWO4 facilitated the frequent and efficient separation of electrons and holes, attributed to the pronounced optical absorption of the ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposite. This leads to enhanced photocatalytic activity and more effective use of the solar spectrum's increased visible light absorption [35].

  5. SURFACE AREA ANALYSIS

    N2 adsorption-desorption experiments facilitated the analysis of the pore structure and specific surface area of the ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites. Figure 4(a-b) illustrates the pore size distributions and N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the synthesized photocatalysts. Figure 5a indicates that the samples exhibit ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites characteristics of a typical type-IV isotherm. Simultaneously, under IUPAC classifications, the materials exhibit mesoporous structures, evidenced by the isotherm displaying an H3-type hysteresis loop [36]. Moreover, multi-layer adsorption may transpire with increased pressure, while single-molecule

    Figure 3. (a-h) UV-DRS and Tauc plot of ZnWO4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, ZnWO4@ 1.0%CN

    nanocomposite

    adsorption occurs at lower relative pressures. Additionally, the isotherm-derived pore diameter, pore volume, and specific surface area are included. Research indicates that the ZnWO4@ 0.5%CN nanocomposite possesses a specific surface area of 94.956 m²/g, with pore diameters and volumes measuring

    3.368 nm and 0.079 cc/g, respectively. The mesoporous structure of ZnWO4 @ 0.5%CN nanocomposites enhances the adsorption capacity for organic pollutants in wastewater,

    accomplished by uniformly distributing ZnWO4 over g-C3N4 sheets [37].

    Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the surface morphology of the synthetic samples was analyzed, as illustrated in Figure 5 (a-i). In the pure ZnWO nanoparticles shown in figure 5 (a-d), the surface morphology is rough and porous, and the grains are agglomerated in an uneven shape. Due to the high surface energy of ZnWO, the particles show non-uniform distribution, suggesting random development and partial aggregation. On the other hand, the ZnWO/g-C3N composite is displayed in the figures 5(e-i), where ZnWO nanoparticles are interconnected with sheet-like g-C3N4 structures. With these thin stacked sheets present, the surface

    Figure 4. (a, b) Surface area and pore size distribution of ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites

    contact area is increased and the ZnWO particles are distributed evenly over the g-CN. The successful integration of ZnWO and g-C3N into a heterostructure is confirmed by the morphological alteration. The goal of designing this structure is to enhance photocatalytic activity and make charge separation more efficient.

  6. PHOTOCATALYTIC APPLICATIONS

    Using Rhodamine B dye molecules as a model pollutant, the photocatalytic degradation efficacy was investigated under visible light. The photodegradation of RhB by various photocatalysts under visible light irradiation from 0 to 150 minutes is illustrated in Figure 6(a-d). Before light irradiation, the dye solution and catalyst combination were placed in darkness for 30 minutes to achieve adsorption-desorption equilibrium. The photocatalysts, whether they were pure ZnWO4 exhibited very little photocatalytic activity during 150

    minutes of exposure to visible light. At 150 minutes of irradiation, however, the ZnWO4@0.5%CN photocatalyst demonstrated remarkable degradation efficiency. Based on these results, it seems that the heterojunction of ZnWO4 and g- C3N4 speeds up the breakdown of RhB. Figure 6(a-d) shows the photodegradation rate of RhB for ZnWO4, g-C3N4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, and ZnWO4@1.0%CN

    nanocomposites after 150 minutes of light irradiation; Figure 7 (a-b) shows the corresponding rate constant for the same nanocomposites under visible light illumination and figure 6(a- d) shows the photodegradation rate for ZnWO4, g-C3N4, ZnWO4@0.1%CN, ZnWO4@0.5%CN, and ZnWO4@1.0%CN

    nanocomposites.

    Figure 5. SEM images for (a-d) ZnWO4, (e-i) ZnWO4@0.5% CN nanocomposites

    After fitting the degradation data using a pseudo first order kinetic model, the following formula might be used to compute the degradation rates of the differentphotocatalysts: For every given value of C0/C, the rate constant kt + x = -ln (C0/C). A first-order kinetic model is shown in Figure 7b, which depicts the photocatalytic degradation of RhB, after which the relationship between irradiation time (t) and ln (C0/C) is determined. The kinetic parameter of the ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites was determined to be 0.0123 min-1 comparison to pure ZnWO4 (0.0059 min-1), ZnWO4@0.1%CN (0.0121 min-1) and ZnWO4@1.0%CN

    (0.0112min-1), the ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity (Figure7b).

    Figure 6. Photocatalytic performance of (a) ZnWO4 (b) ZnWO4 @ 0.1 %CN (c) ZnWO4 @0.5%CN (d)

    ZnWO4@1.0%CN nanocomposite

    Figure 7. (a) C/Co plot for degradation (b) Kinetics rate constant of ZnWO4@0.5% CN nanocomposites

  7. DURABILITY TEST

    For real-world applications, the materials' durability in their prepared state was crucial. Gathering, washing, and drying the material followed the deterioration process. For the following five cycles, the material was exposed to visible light. Also displayed in figure 8 shows the deprivation efficacy, which was determined for the first through fifth cycles in the following order: 97%, 96.8%, 95.4%, 94.8%, and 94.2%. Regarding degrading efficiency, there is a notable disparity. The stability and reusability experiments showed promising results for the ZnWO4@1.0% AC nanocomposite, which might be used for energy recovery and wastewater treatment for environmental remediation [38].

  8. SCAVENGER TEST

    The impact of radical trapping agents on the photodegradation of RhB dyes is examined, as depicted in figure 9. The existence of scavengers in the RhB dye solution signifies the participation of reactive species, implying a progressive decline in degradation efficiency. The use of EDTA significantly diminished the removal effectiveness of the combined dyes from 97% to 26.4% for RhB. The photodegradation of RhB dye, with the inclusion of IPA, BQ and AgNO3, has diminished the degradation efficiency to 39.4% ,74.1% and 80.2%, and respectively. The findings indicate that h+ significantly contributed to the degradation of

    Figure 8. Durability test for ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites

    RhB dye solution. The contribution of active species to the removal of mixed dyes by the ZnWO4/ g-C3N4 photocatalyst is ranked as follows: h+>OH > O2 > e- [39].

    Figure 9. Scavenger test for ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposites

  9. STABILITY ANALYSIS

    The stability of the materials was assessed by examining the elemental composition and distinctive peaks of both fresh and used ZnWO4@0.5%CN before to and following the photocatalytic reaction. Figure 10 demonstrates that the distinctive peak remains mostly unaltered following cycling, indicating the stability of the material's structure and the absence of major modification [40].

    Figure 10. Structural stability test for ZnWO4@0.5% CN nanocomposites

  10. CONCLUSION

Photocatalytic materials including ZnWO4 and ZnWO4/g-C3N4 are synthesized in this study with composite ratios of 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1%. Compared to the pure ZnWO4 phase, the g- C3N4 loaded composite material has a lower prohibited

bandwidth and greater visible light absorption and utilization. When using a photocatalyst to break down RhB dye, ZnWO4@0.5%CN shows the highest catalytic activity. The consumption of the catalyst causes a modest decline in the catalytic effect after five cycles, demonstrating high stability. All of the active groups contribute to the degradation of pollutants, as O2-, OH, h+, and e- are the primary active species in the catalytic process. To sum up, our as-prepared ZnWO4@0.5%CN nanocomposite is environmentally friendly, contains suitable catalytic sites, is easily recyclable, and exhibits remarkable stability. This opens up a new avenue for practical research into the production of visible-light active materials and their potential use in antimicrobial and environmental remediation applications.

REFERENCES

  1. Parasuraman B, Shanmugam P, Barveen NR, et al (2025) Advanced engineering of smart nanomaterials: ZnWO4/CoWO4/g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts for environmental and biomedical application. J Alloys Compd 1010:178200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.178200

  2. Shetty SS, D D, S H, et al (2023) Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health. Heliyon 9:e19496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496

  3. Zhang C, Khorshidi H, Najafi E, Ghasemi M (2023) Fresh, mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated composites incorporating nanomaterials: A comprehensive review. J Clean Prod 384:135390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135390

  4. Kumar R, Raizada P, Verma N, et al (2021) Recent advances on water disinfection using bismuth based modified photocatalysts: Strategies and challenges. J Clean Prod 297:126617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126617

  5. Kumar M, Singh NK, Kumar RS, Singh R (2024) Production of Green Hydrogen through Photocatalysis. pp 124

  6. Fan Y, He C, Li Y (2022) Iron oxide clusters on g-C3N4 promote the electronhole separation in photo-Fenton reaction for efficient degradation of wastewater. Chemical Papers 76:75537563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02419-2

  7. Barveen NR, Parasuraman B, Wang P-Y, et al (2024) Facile construction of ZnWO4/g-C3N4 heterojunction for the improved photocatalytic degradation of MB, RhB and mixed dyes. Surfaces and Interfaces 53:105039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.105039

  8. Ghorui UK, Mondal P, Satra J, et al (2022) In situ metallic copper incorporation into novel g-C3N4/ZnWO4 nanocomposite semiconductor for efficient thin film solar cell application. Mater Sci Semicond Process 143:106559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2022.106559

  9. Sun L, Zhao X, Jia C-J, et al (2012) Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4ZnWO4 by fabricating a heterojunction: investigation based on experimental and theoretical studies. J Mater Chem 22:23428. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm34965e

  10. Wang X, Lin S, Cui N, et al (2024) Synthesis of ZnWO4/NiWO4 photocatalysts and their application in tetracycline hydrochloride degradation and antibacterial activities. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 157:105408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2024.105408

  11. Mohamed MM, Khairy M, Eid S (2018) Polyethylene glycol assisted one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of NiWO4/WO3 heterojunction for direct Methanol fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 263:286298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.063

  12. Huang G, Zhang C, Zhu Y (2007) ZnWO4 photocatalyst with high activity for degradation of organic contaminants. J Alloys Compd 432:269276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.109

  13. Li Y, Wang J (2024) 2D/2D Z -scheme WO 3 /g-C 3 N 4 heterojunctions for photocatalytic organic pollutant degradation and nitrogen fixation.

    Mater Adv 5:749761. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MA00915G

  14. Zhu X, Wang L, Feng C, et al (2024) Z-scheme CoWO4/g-C3N4 heterojunction for enhanced ultraviolet-light-driven photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of tetracycline. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 35:2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-13809-5

  15. Wu Y, Zhou S, He T, et al (2019) Photocatalytic activities of ZnWO4 and Bi@ZnWO4 nanorods. Appl Surf Sci 484:409413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.116

  16. Li Y, Zhou F, Zhu Z, Wu F (2019) Inactivating marine microorganisms fo photoelectrocatalysis by ZnWO4 electrode obtained by surfactant- assisted synthesis. Appl Surf Sci 467468:819824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.186

  17. Pan Y-M, Zhang W, Hu Z-F, et al (2019) Synthesis of Ti4+-doped ZnWO4 phosphors for enhancing photocatalytic activity. J Lumin 206:267272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.10.054

  18. Li M, Zhu Q, Li J-G, Kim B-N (2020) Elongation of ZnWO4 nanocrystals for enhanced photocatalysis and the effects of Ag decoration. Appl Surf Sci 515:146011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146011

  19. Abubakar HL, Tijani JO, Abdulkareem SA, et al (2022) A review on the applications of zinc tungstate (ZnWO4) photocatalyst for wastewater treatment. Heliyon 8:e09964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09964

  20. Wu Y, Tie J, Chen C, et al (2019) Synthesis of LAS/ZnO/ZnWO4 3D rod-like heterojunctions with efficient photocatalytic performance: Synergistic effects of highly active site exposure and low carrier recombination. Ceram Int 45:1365613663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.027

  21. Neto NFA, Nunes TBO, Li M, et al (2020) Influence of microwave- assisted hydrothermal treatment time on the crystallinity, morphology and optical properties of ZnWO4 nanoparticles: Photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int 46:17661774.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.151

  22. Huang Y, Gao Y, Zhang Q, et al (2016) Hierarchical porous ZnWO4 microspheres synthesized by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis: Characterization, mechanistic and photocatalytic NO removal studies. Appl Catal A Gen 515:170178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.02.007

  23. Dai M, He Z, Zhang P, et al (2022) ZnWO4-ZnIn2S4 S-scheme heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. J Mater Sci Technol 122:231242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.02.014

  24. Zhuang H, Xu W, Lin L, et al (2019) Construction of one dimensional ZnWO4@SnWO4 core-shell heterostructure for boosted photocatalytic performance. J Mater Sci Technol 35:23122318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.05.036

  25. Yuan K, Cao Q, Li X, et al (2017) Synthesis of WO3@ZnWO4@ZnO- ZnO hierarchical nanocactus arrays for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 41:543551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.053

  26. Dutta DP, Raval P (2018) Effect of transition metal ion (Cr 3+ , Mn 2+ and Cu 2+ ) doping on the photocatalytic properties of ZnWO 4 nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 357:193200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.026

  27. Dutta DP, Ramakrishnan M, Roy M, Kumar A (2017) Effect of transition metal doping on the photocatalytic properties of FeVO4 nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 335:102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.11.022

  28. Wei L, Zhang H, Cao J (2019) Electrospinning of Ag/ZnWO4/WO3 composite nanofibers with high visible light photocatalytic activity.

    Mater Lett 236:171174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.088

  29. Ma D, Yang L, Sheng Z, Chen Y (2021) Photocatalytic degradation mechanism of benzene over ZnWO4: Revealing the synergistic effects of Na-doping and oxygen vacancies. Chemical Engineering Journal 405:126538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126538

  30. Wang X, Yu S, Li Z-H, et al (2021) Fabrication Z-scheme heterojunction of Ag2O/ZnWO4 with enhanced sonocatalytic performances for meloxicam decomposition: Increasing adsorption and generation of reactive species. Chemical Engineering Journal 405:126922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126922

  31. Selvamani M, Alsulmi A, Sundaramoorthy A, et al (2023) Synthesis of ZnWO4 nanorods: the photocatalytic effects on RhB dye degradation upon irradiation with sunlight light. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 34:2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023- 11513-4

  32. Kumar P, Verma S, Koroin N, et al (2022) Increasing the photocatalytic efficiency of ZnWO4 by synthesizing a Bi2WO6/ZnWO4 composite photocatalyst. Catal Today 397399:278285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2021.09.012

  33. Paul DR, Gautam S, Panchal P, et al (2020) ZnO-Modified g-C 3 N 4 : A Potential Photocatalyst for Environmental Application. ACS Omega 5:38283838. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02688

  34. Suhag MH, Khatun A, Tateishi I, et al (2023) One-Step Fabrication of the ZnO/g-C 3 N 4 Composite for Visible Light-Responsive Photocatalytic Degradation of Bisphenol E in Aqueous Solution. ACS Omega 8:1182411836. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06678

  35. Prabhuraj T, Gomathi A, Priyadharsan A, et al (2024) Design of a High- Performance WO3/g-C3N4 Z-Scheme Photocatalyst for Effective Phenol Degradation and Antibacterial Activity. J Clust Sci 35:2753 2768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-024-02692-z

  36. Thangavelu K, Abimannan G, Altaf M, Kumar YA (2025) Designing ZnBi2O4/g-C3N4 Hybrid Nanocomposite Decorated with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity for Malachite Green Dye Removal. J Clust Sci 36:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-025-02771-9

  37. Gomathi A, Ramesh Kumar KA, Maadeswaran P (2024) CeO2 nanospheres incorporated with Bi2MoO6/g-C3N4 enhanced photocatalysis towards environmental pollutant Rhodamine B removal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31:4810348121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34073-4

  38. Thangavelu K, Abimannan G, Rajendran R, Arumugam P (2024) Crafting high-performance CuZnO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposites: unleashing the power of dual-functional photocatalysis and antibacterial action. Ionics (Kiel) 30:48854899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-024- 05603-4

  39. Zhu B, Xia P, Li Y, et al (2017) Fabrication and photocatalytic activity enhanced mechanism of direct Z-scheme g-C 3 N 4 /Ag 2 WO 4 photocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci 391:175183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.104

  40. Farghaly A, Maher E, Gad A, El-Bery H (2024) Synergistic photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using TiO2 composites with activated carbon and reduced graphene oxide: a kinetic and mechanistic study. Appl Water Sci 14:228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02286-0