fbpx

Feed-forward and Feedback Timing Recovery Algorithms for MSK


Call for Papers Engineering Journal, May 2019

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Feed-forward and Feedback Timing Recovery Algorithms for MSK

1Supriya V

2M Desanna

3 Prof. K N Pushpalatha

1,3 Department of Electronics and Communication, Dayanandasagar College of Engineering, Bangalore

3 Sr. Research Staff, Central Research Laboratory, BEL, Bangalore

Abstract – This research paper addresses feed-forward and feedback timing recovery algorithms for MSK. Both the algorithms do not require previous or simultaneous acquisition of carrier phase. Timing error estimation is done over AWGN channel. Performance analysis is made based on the simulation results.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    MSK modulation is kind of continuous phase modulation which has attractive properties such as continuous phase at bit transitions, constant envelope. MSK also makes use of the available bandwidth efficiently which is one of the main reasons why MSK has attained considerable attention in the modern wireless communication.

    Timing recovery is the first synchronization operation processed by the digital receiver and so is a vital part of any synchronous receiver [1].To demodulate the signal correctly in the receiver, knowledge of carrier phase, symbol timing, and frequency offset are required [2].One of the global synchronization approaches such as maximum-likelihood approach is not very practical due to its computational complexity. There are other data-aided algorithms which are proposed to extract the timing

    information in [3].The timing information in [3] is extracted by the argument difference between every

  2. FEED-FORWARD METHOD FOR TIMING RECOVERY

    The feed-forward algorithm presented in this section is a data-aided algorithm based on two statistical variables. The signal model for MSK system is shown in Fig 1.

    Anti-aliasing filter

    Delay

    MSK

    baseband modulator

    n(t)

    { }

    T

    Interpolation and decimation (symbol timing adjustment

    o the demodulator

    Feed-forward timing estimation

    Fig 1. Signal Model for MSK System

    The received signal is oversampled at the time + is

    written as,

    , =

    symbol. This algorithm however works well at high SNR cases but degrades dramatically at low SNRs.

    (+ +2 + + +

    ,

    (1)

    In this paper feed-forward and feedback methods for timing recovery has been presented. Feed-forward structure can quickly capture the information, suitable for emergency communication but feedback structure can more accurately restore the signal [4]. The feed-forward method proposed is computationally less complex and shows a better performance at lower SNRs when compared to the algorithm proposed in [3]. The feedback method presented in this paper is a simple structure which is suited for digital implementation. Both feed-forward and feedback

    algorithms proposed in this paper do not require previous

    where (-0.5,0.5) is the fraction of symbol duration by which received signal is time shifted w.r.t the original signal. is the frequency offset between transmitter and receiver, is the initial offset and is the information bearing phase.

    Timing Error Estimation

    To estimate the timing error, the m-lag fourth order non- linear transformation is chosen:

    = , , (2)

    or simultaneous acquisition of carrier phase. From the

    1,

    1,

    simulation results it is seen that feedback method shows better performance than feed-forward method over AWGN channel.

    Due to the limited length of pilot symbols, the fourth order expectation is obtained by averaging the samples,

    The paper is organized as follows. In Section II the feed-forward timing synchronization is presented. In

    1

    =

    (, ) , (3)

    Section III feedback timing synchronization technique is presented. In

    1

    = +2

    1,

    1,

    section IV simulation results are presented .In Section V conclusions are drawn.

    The estimated timing error is obtained by ,

    1

    = 1 () (4) 2

    correct set of signal samples is identified by the base point index and correct set of filter samples is identified by

    where,

    =0

    1 = 1

    the fractional interval [5].Here we interpolate the

    resulting signal from the resampler by the scheme pointed

    = 1 = 1

    0

    is the discrete fourier transformation of .

    by M.Moeneclaey where the use of NCO is eliminated. Two successive interpolations are performed for time instants

  3. FEEDBACK METHOD FOR TIMING RECOVERY In this section a data-aided simple feedback structure is presented. The block diagram of the structure is shown in figure 2.

    Interpolator

    x(kTs)

    i/p

    = + (4)

    + 1 = +1

    + +1 (5)

    Subtracting these two expressions and rearranging slightly gives recursion

    +1 =

    Resampler

    y(n)

    Loop filter

    e(k)

    + +

    Timing error detector

    +1

    (6)

    Fig (1):Feedback structure

    The MSK signal model is

    = (2 0+ ) 2 , (1)

    We assume that the sampling time is = + +

    where T is the symbol period, is the sampling period and

    = , = , = and is the timing

    +1 is an integer, Then since 0 +1 1,

    + = + +

    +1 +1

    < +2 (7)

    Hence the increment in the sample count from one interpolation to the next is

    +1 =

    + (8)

    To compute the fractional interval , recognize that the fractional part of the increment is zero i.e.,

    +1 = 0

    error. We take the samples one step before and after the generic symbol interval, + which gives,

    = 1 +1 2 + 1 2 + 1

    (1)+1 2 + + 2 + +

    (2)

    D is the design parameter taking integer and positive values. D=1 is good choice for MSK. The error signal from the timing error detector is sent to the loop filter. The error signal generated by the error detector is the noisy estimate of phase error. The loop filter processes e(k) in order to generate useful error by suppressing the effect of noise as much as possible. Loop filter design is done by taking the ideal filter points, the discrete time domain loop filter of the recursive equation:

    y(n) = y(n-1) + c2*[e(n)-e(n-1)]+c1*e(n) (3)

    = + +1 (9)

    From which we get,

    = +

    +1

    1 (10)

  4. Simulation Results

    Feed-forward and feedback methods are simulated using Matlab. We take the oversampling factor as 8 with the length of pilot symbols L as 16.Symbol period is taken as 107.Here the algorithm accuracy is measured in terms of variance and variance of the estimated timing error is given by,

    where 1 =

    2

    2

    , 2 = , denotes loop bandwidth,

    = { 2}

    denotes damping and K is the loop gain. Now we resample the resulting signal at time instants = where is synchronized with the signal symbols. Now the

    1 2 2

  5. CONCLUSION

where

2

2

In this paper novel feed-forward and feedback methods for timing error estimation for MSK are proposed. Timing error for both the methods at different SNRs have been

=

(, ) ,

plotted and analyzed. From the simulation results it is seen

=

=+

,

,

that feedback method shows a better performance than

Figure(1) shows the timing estimation of feed-forward scheme at different SNRs.

Fig (1). Standard Deviation of estimated timing error vs SNR

In the feedback method the sampling frequency is taken as 64MHz with loop bandwidth is taken as 0.05. Figure(2) shows the timing error estimation of feedback loop over AWGN channel.

Fig (2). Estimated timing error vs SNR

From the simulation results we can infer that feedback method can more accurately restore the information in the presence of AWGN channel when compared to feed- forward method. After a certain period it is possible to make the error almost zero in feedback method so that accuracy of getting back the original signal is more when compared to feed-forward. Thus feedback method shows a better performance when compared to feed-forward scheme.

feed-forward scheme and feedback technique can more accurately restore the information when compared to feed- forward scheme.

REFERENCES

[1]. Eynard, Goulven, and Christophe Laot. "Non data aided timing recovery algorithm for digital underwater communications." In OCEANS 2007-Europe, pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2007.

[2]. Yao, Yao, and Tung-Sang Ng. "Feed-forward carrier frequency and timing synchronization for MSK modulation." In Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Conference of the Fourth International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, and the Fourth Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia, vol. 1, pp. 549-553. 2003.

[3]. Lambrette, Uwe, and Heinrich Meyr. "Two timing recovery algorithms for MSK." In Communications, 1994. ICC'94, SUPERCOMM/ICC'94, Conference Record,'Serving Humanity Through Communications.'IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1155-1159. IEEE, 1994.

[4]. Mi, Zhang, Yan Xiao, and Kaiyu Qin. "MSK signal timing recovery technology research." In Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS), 2010 International Conference on, pp. 141-143. IEEE, 2010.

[5]. Gardner, Floyd M. "Interpolation in digital modems-Part I: Fundamentals." IEEE Transactions on communications 41, no. 3 (1993): 501.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *