Fabrication of TiO2 Reinforced Aluminum Matal Matrix Composites Through P/M Process

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV3IS17046

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Fabrication of TiO2 Reinforced Aluminum Matal Matrix Composites Through P/M Process

Mahesh L

Mechanical Engineering Department REVA Institute of Technology and Management

Bangalore, India

J Sudheer Reddy

Mechanical Engineering Department Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology Bangalore, India

Abstract TiO2 reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites with 5 to 15 weight percentage of TiO2 were fabricated by using powder metallurgy process with pressure less sintering. The effect of reinforcement on the density, porosity, hardness, strength and microstructure of composites was investigated. The density, porosity, hardness and compressive strength of Al-TiO2 composites were found to increase with increase in the weight % TiO2 from 5 to 15 weight percent. The microstructure show that the uniform distribution of reinforcement particles.

KeywordsAl-TiO2; Powder Metallurgy; Sintering; Hardness;

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Nowadays, Aluminum is being used extensively as a matrix in most of the Metal Matrix Composites [MMCs], owing to its highest prominence in applications where a combination of corrosion resistance, low density and high mechanical performance are required such as light weight automotive structures, forgings for suspensions, chassis and aerospace industry [1]. Among the various matrix materials such as titanium, magnesium and copper, aluminum cast alloys are the most widely used ones owing to low density and excellent strength, toughness and resistance to corrosion. Reinforcements for MMCs can be in the form of continuous fibers, whiskers, particulates (including platelets) and wires. The most widely used ones are metal carbides (SiC, TiC, WC, B4C), metal oxides (ZrO2, Al2O3, TiO2) metal nitrides (AlN, Si3N4, TiN, TaN, ZrN) and metal borides (TaB2, ZrB2, WB) [2].

    The tensile strength, hardness, abrasive and sliding wear resistance of aluminum is improved appreciably by the incorporation of TiC particles in it. [3]. Al-TiN composites developed through powder metallurgy process signifies a better densification enhancement, increased wear resistance and improvement in mechanical properties due to the presence of TiN particles at the grain boundaries when compared with aluminum matrix. Above 7200C the SiC particles react with aluminum matrix resulting in Al4C3, which has poor mechanical properties [4].

    The wear properties of Al-TiO2 indicate that the TiO2 particles provide an excellent combination of mechanical and wear-resisting properties [5]. The apparent density, tap density and theoretical density increase with the addition of TiO2 reinforcement to the pure Al matrix. The reason for the density increase is the filling with fine powders of TiO2 of the pores formed in the matrix by large irregular Al particles [6].

    TiO2 can be used as a wear resistance material and can act as an effective toughening phase [7-8]. The green or sintered compact subjected to hot forging/pressing exhibited the largest densities and strengths and the relative density of the hot pressed compacts was about 90% [9]. In the present work the fabrication and characterization of TiO2 reinforced Al metal matrix composites by a powder metallurgy (P/M) process is discussed.

  2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

    1. Materials

      The details of pure aluminum and titanium oxide powders used in this study are as shown Table I and Table II.

      Table I. Chemical composition of Al powder

      Purity

      As

      Pb

      Fe

      99.5 %

      0.0005 %

      0.03 %

      0.5 %

      Table II. Chemical composition of Tio2 powder

      Purity

      As

      Pb

      Fe

      99 %

      0.0005 %

      0.003 %

      0.02 %

      The aluminum powder used is fine, uniform, smooth, metallic powder free from aggregates and its particle size is

      -200 mesh.

    2. Mixing

      Different composition of Al-TiO2 composites with varying volume fraction of 5, 10 and 15 % were prepared. Powders were mixed using a horizontal ball mill for an about 30 minutes with a power to ball ratio 1:2 to prepare each blends. In order to eliminate agglomeration and cold welding of powder particles a control agent was used.

    3. Compaction and Sintering

    The Al-TiO2 green specimens were compacted with a hardened steel die using a pressure of 250 MPa. Such a high pressure was used to obtain the integrity of the specimen. For each composition, approximately 35 g of powder was used. A uniaxial hydraulic press was used to obtain a green compacts. The hardened steel die cavity and punch were lubricated in order to reduce the friction resistance and easy ejection of specimen. The mixed powders are compacted to obtain a green compact of 25 mm in diameter and 25-27 mm in

    height. The specimens were de-lubricated in a muffle furnace at temperature of 2500C for duration of 30 min. Sintering was done under a nitrogen atmosphere in a tube furnace at a temperature of 4500C for a sintering time of 4 hours. The green density and sintered density were obtained by measuring the dimensions & weight of specimen accurately to 0.01mm and 0.001g respectively.

  3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    1. Microstructure

      The microstructure examination was done to analyze the grain size and distribution of titanium oxide particles. The microstructure of Al-TiO2 composites were studied using optical microscope. Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 show the optical microstructure of sintered Al-TiO2 composites at magnification of 20X. Microstructure indicates uniform distribution of reinforcement particles with the matrix, also indicates the bonding has been formed between each other and there is some amount of porosity is present.

      Fig.1 Microstructure of Al Fig.2 Microstructure of Al-5TiO2

      Fig.3 Microstructure of Al-10TiO2 Fig.4 Microstructure of Al-10TiO2

    2. Hardness

      Brinell Hardness (BHN)

      Brinell Hardness (BHN)

      The hardness of the Al-TiO2 samples for each TiO2 content sintered at 4500C for a sintering time of 4 hours, were measured by Brinell hardness tester. The average Brinell hardness measurement was done on the polished surfaces of the un-sintered and sintered specimen with indenting load of 250 Kgf using 5 mm ball indenter. The hardness result shows that there is an increase in the hardness of Al-TiO2 composite material with increase in weight % of TiO2 from 0 to 15 wt % of TiO2. The results were shown in Figure 5.

      Unsintered

      Sintered

      Unsintered

      Sintered

      55

      50

      45

      40

      35

      30

      0

      5

      10

      Weight % of TiO2

      20

      55

      50

      45

      40

      35

      30

      0

      5

      10

      Weight % of TiO2

      20

      15

      15

      Fig.5 Brinell hardness of Al-TiO2 composites

    3. Density

      Density (g/cc)

      Density (g/cc)

      Specimens are prepared by applying 250 MPa compacting pressure, the average green (un-sintered) density and sintered density of composites increases with increase in content of TiO2. The density of Al-TiO2 composites in un-sintered and sintered condition are show in figure 6 and 7 respectively. The theoretical density of compacts increases with increase in weight % of TiO2 since the density of TiO2 is greater than the density of aluminum. The measured density does not show same kind of nature due presence of porosity. The sintered densty of compact is less than the un-sintered one because during sintering the control agent used during mixing of powders is burned off.

      Measured density

      Theoretical density

      Measured density

      Theoretical density

      4

      3

      2

      1

      4

      3

      2

      1

      0

      5

      10

      Weight % TiO2

      15

      20

      0

      5

      10

      Weight % TiO2

      15

      20

      Density (g/cc)

      Density (g/cc)

      Fig.6 Density of un-sintered Al-TiO2 composites

      Measured density

      Theoreitical density

      Measured density

      Theoreitical density

      4

      3.5

      3

      2.5

      2

      1.5

      1

      4

      3.5

      3

      2.5

      2

      1.5

      1

      0

      5

      10

      15

      20

      0

      5

      10

      15

      20

      Weight % of TiO2

      Weight % of TiO2

      Fig.7 Density of sintered Al-TiO2 composites

    4. Compressive strength

    For measuring the compressive strength for each composition of Al-TiO2 four samples tested. Figure 8 show the effect of TiO2 particulate reinforcement content on the composite strength of the composite. It is observed that the compressive strength of composite increases significantly as the content of reinforcement increases from 0 to 15 weight percent. This increase in compressive strength may be due to presence of hard reinforcement particles and the particles are distributed in different orientations which results in significant difference in stress-strain relationship.

    120

    110

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    0

    5

    10

    Weight % TiO2

    15

    20

    120

    110

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    0

    5

    10

    Weight % TiO2

    15

    20

    Compressive Strenghth (MPa)

    Compressive Strenghth (MPa)

    Fig.8 Compressive strength of sintered Al-TiO2 composites

  4. CONCLUSION

In preparation of test specimen through powder metallurgy process, the manual compact play a vital role on shape and quality of final component. Mechanical alloying of powders result uniform distribution of reinforcement particles in a matrix phase and increase in surface area of aluminum powders helps in improving the bonding with reinforcement particles. Uniaxial compaction at 250 MPa followed by

REFERENCES

  1. L. A. Falcon, E. Bedolla B., J. Lemus, C. Leon, I. Rosales and J. G., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Corrosion Behavior of Mg-Al/TiC Composites in NaCl Solution, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, International Journal of Corrosion, Volume 2011, Article ID 896845, 7 pages, doi:10.1155/2011/896845

  2. Jeevan.V, C.S.P Rao and N.Selvaraj, Compaction, Sintering And

    Mechanical Properties Of Al-SiCp Composites, International Journal Of Mechanical Engineering And Technology, Volume 3, Issue 3, September – December (2012), pp.565-573.

  3. R.F. Shyu , C.T. Ho, In situ reacted titanium carbide-reinforced

    aluminum alloys composite, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 171 (2006) 411416

  4. Ajoy Kumar Ray, K. Venkateswarlu, S.K. Chaudhury, S.K. Das, B.

    Ravi Kumar,L.C. Pathak, Fabrication of TiN reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites through a powder metallurgical route, Materials Science and Engineering A338 (2002) 160_ 165.

  5. Gopalakrishnan Elango, Busuna Kuppuswamy Raghunath,

    Kayaroganam Palanikumar, Experimental Analysis Of The Wear Behavior Of Hybrid Metal-Matrix Composites Of LM25Al With Equal Volumes Of SiC + TiO2, Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 48 (2014) 6, 803810, ISSN 1580-2949.

  6. Bhaskar Raju S A, A R K Swamy and A Ramesh, Mechanical and

    Tribological Behaviour of Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites, A Review, Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. , ISSN 2278 0149, Vol. 3,

    sintering at 450oC has been used to develop Al-TiO2 composites. Brinell hardness, density and compressive strength increases with increase in reinforcement content from 0 to 15 weight percent of TiO2.

  7. No. 4, October 2014.

    Dr. Muna Khethier Abbass, Mohammed Jabber Fouad, Study of Wear Behavior of Aluminum Alloy Matrix Nanocomposites Fabricated by Powder Technology, Eng.& Tech. Journal, Vol.32, Part(A), No.7, 2014.

    A.I.Y. Tok, F.Y.C. Boey, X.L Zhao, Novel Synthesis of Al2O3 nano- particles by flamespray pyrolysis, Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol.178, pp. 270273, (2006).

  8. Sayed Moustafa, Walid Daoush, Ahmed Ibrahim, Erich Neubauer,

Hot Forging and Hot Pressing of AlSi Powder Compared to Conventional Powder Metallurgy Route, Materials Sciences and Application, 2011, 2, 1127-1133.

Leave a Reply