Experimental Study to Check the Effect of Egg Shell Powder and Rice Husk Ash on the Property of Concrete

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV4IS33002

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Experimental Study to Check the Effect of Egg Shell Powder and Rice Husk Ash on the Property of Concrete

Soumyan K Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering Vadakara

Kozhikkode, Kerala, India

Aswathi Viswanath K Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering Vadakara Kozhikkode, Kerala, India

AbstractNowadays the conventional concrete construction industry is not sustainable due to huge consumption of natural materials and environmental pollution created during its production. The use of waste product as a cementitious material in concrete will reduce the use of cement and ultimately the construction cost. In the present investigation Rice Hush Ash and Egg Shell Powder are used as a replacement of cement. The compressive strength, spit tensile strength and flexural strength of these mixes are tested and compared with the normal concrete by using the mix 1:1.5:3 at the end of 7 and 28 days. From the results it is found that repacement of cement with Rice Hush Ash and Egg Shell Powder in concrete upto an optimum amount gives better strength than conventional concrete.

Keywords Concrete, cemrnt, rice husk ash, egg shell powder, compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strengt

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Concrete is being widely used for the construction of structures due to its structural stability and strength. It is the back bone of infrastructure development of a nation. At present, for a variety of reasons, concrete industry is not sustainable. Firstly, it consumes huge amount of natural resource due to which no virgin material will be left for future generation. Secondly the major component of concrete is cement and large amount of green house gas is being emitted in the manufacturing process of cement. It can be said that 7% of world carbon dioxide emission is attributable to Portland cement industry. Almost 900Kg of CO2 is produced during 1000Kg of cement production. Thirdly, concrete structure suffers from durability problem due to which natural resources are wasted. In this experiment, Rice husk ash and Egg shell powder are used as a supplementary cementitious material in concrete. Rice husk ash consists of non-crystalline silicon dioxide with high specific surface area and high pozzolanic reactivity. Also, calcium rich egg shell is a poultry waste with chemical composition nearly same as that of lime stone. Hence, the use of these materials in concrete can have benefits like minimizing the use of cement, conserving natural lime and utilization of waste materials.

    Rice husk ash is one of the most widely available agricultural wastes in many rice producing countries around the world. Rice husk ash is unusually high in ash. The ash is 87-97% silica, highly porous and light weight, with a very high external surface area. Presence of high amount of silica makes it a valuable material for use in industrial applications. Other constituents of RHA , such as K2O, Al2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O, Fe2O3 are available in less than 1%. Various factors

    which influence ash properties are incinerating conditions (temperature and duration),rate of heating, burning technique, crop variety and fertilizer used. The silica in the ash undergoes structural transformation depending on the conditions of combustion such as time and temperature. The production of chicken eggs on an industrial level leads to a considerable quantity of shell residue, which is considered as a waste or is used as a compliment in agriculture. In general, egg shells are considered to have no economic value, even though they are rich in minerals and amino acids that could form the basis of several industries.

  2. PREVIOUS RESEARCHES ON CONCRETES USING EGG SHELL AND RICE HUSK ASH ASE OF USE

    Praveen kumar R & Vijayasarathy R[2010] used a combination of egg shell with silica fumes to find out the feasibility of egg shell as an alternative to cement. Egg shell powder replaces 10% ,20% & 30% in addition with the silica fume by 5%, 10% & 15% of weight of cement. M30 concrete was casted and the compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength test as 7 & 28 days were done. Based on the experimental results they found out that the compressive strength with egg shell powder as cement replacement material increases upto 15 % without silica fume. Addition of silica fume also enhances the strength but in economical point of view only the egg shell powder replacement is sufficient enough for getting higher strength.

    1. Sivakumar & Dr. N Mahedran [2005] centered on the growth of strength and permeability attributes of concrete by optimal substitution of cement with joint ratio of fly ash and RHA with synthesis egg shell powder. Fly ash and RHA with 4 distinct content of 5% , 20% & 30% in terms of weight were performed for substitution of cement and addition of a persistent 5% egg shell powder in every substitution. The restraints considered for analysis included compressive strength , split tensile strength , water permeability and sorptivity. The compressive and tensile strength of concrete increased with increased percentage of fly ash and RHA upto substitution with addition of egg shell powder of 7,14,28 and 56 days of curing . Their study has exposed the fact that15% fly ash + 15% RHA+ 5% ESP may be treated as a finest creation in view of developed value of compressive strength , water permeability, reduced chlorine penetration and desirable functionability.

      Mtallib and Rabiu (2009) carried out the investigation on properties of ESP as a admixture in concrete. They conducted consistency test on ESP. It was observed that higher the contents of ESP in the cement , the faster the setting of cement. The decreased setting time of OPC was due to addition of ESP as an accelerator.

  3. EGG SHELL POWDER

    Egg shell consists of several mutually growing layers of CaCO3; the innermost layer-maxillary 3 layer grows on the outermost egg membrane and creates the base on which palisade layer constitutes the thickest part of the eggshell. The top layer is a vertical layer covered by the organic cuticle. The main ingredient in eggshells is calcium carbonate. The shell itself is about 95% CaCO3. The remaining 5% includes Magnesium, Aluminium, phosphorous, Sodium, Potassium, zinc, Iron, Copper, Ironic acid and Silica acid. The quality of lime in eggshell waste is influenced greatly by the extent of exposure to sunlight, raw water and harsh weather conditions.

    It is estimated that roughly 90 million tons of hen egg are generated throughout the world every year. In India 77.7 billion eggs are produced a year and about 190000 tones per annum of egg shell is generated.egg shell waste can be used as fertilizer, animal feed ingredient and other such uses. However, majority of Egg shells are thrown away as a waste. The egg shells create some allergies when kept for a longer time in garbage. It also creates undesirable smell which can cause irritation. Hence its Disposal is a great problem. This can be solved by using egg shell waste as a replacement to cement in concrete.

    TABLE I. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ESP

    Contents

    ESP (%)

    CaO

    50.7

    SiO2

    .09

    Al2O3

    .03

    Fe2O3

    0.02

    MgO

    0.01-0.04

    SO3

    0.5-1.3

  4. RICE HUSK ASH

    Rice husks are shells produced during the de-husking of paddy rice.1000 Kg of paddy ric can produce about 200 Kg of husk, which on combustion produces about 40 Kg of ash. Rice husk constitute about 1/5th of the 300 million metric tons of rice produced annually in the world. The current yearly production of paddy rice is approximately 500 million tons that give about 100 million tons of rice husks as a waste product from the milling. Rice husk is also not used for feeding animals since it is less nutritional properties and its irregular abrasive surface is not naturally degraded and can cause serious accumulation problems. Research in India and the United States has found that if the hulls or straw are burned at a controlled low temperature, the ash collected can be ground to produce a Pozzolana very similar to (and in some ways superior to) silica fume and heat produced during burning can beneficially use in power production, by doing so not only crop waste can effectively disposed, but also can provide high quality cement. Pozzolanic activity of rice husk ash (RHA) depends on (i) silica content, (ii) silica crystallization phase, and (iii) size and surface area of ash

    particles. The typical rice husk produce in India has organic amorphous silica (made of rice husk ash) with silica content of above 85%.

    TABLE II. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RHA

    Sl.no

    Contents

    RHA (%)

    1

    CaO

    0.3-2.2

    2

    SiO2

    85-90

    3

    Al2O3

    0.2

    4

    Fe2O3

    0.1

    5

    MgO

    0.2-0.6

    6

    SO3

    0.25

  5. TESTS ON ESP & RHA CONCRETE

    Cubes of size 150x150mm, cylinders of size 150x300mm and beams of size 500x100x100mm were casted to check the compressive, split and flexural strength of concrete respectively. At first control mix without any addition of RHA and ESP was prepared. Then concrete specimens were made using different percentages of egg shell powder(2.5,5,7.5&10%). After testing these specimens the optimum egg shell powder content in concrete was found. and By keeping this ESP content constant the specimens with varying percentage of RHA (5,7.5,10,15,&20%) was made and tested .Three to six numbers of specimens of each combination were made for testing. Mix proportion of 1:1.5:3 with water cement ratio 0.45 was used for making concrete. But the water cement ratio was increased for increasing percentage of RHA due to low workability. The cement (also RHA,ESP) and fine aggregate was mixed dry until the mixture is thoroughly blended and is uniform in color. The coarse aggregate was then added and mixed with the cement and fine aggregate until the coarse aggregate is uniformly distributed throughout the batch, and Then water is added and the entire batch is mixed until the concrete appears to be homogenous and has the desired consistency. The curing of specimen for 7 and 28 days testing was done by immersing the specimen in water.

    TABLE III. MIX COMBINATION

    Sl. No.

    Mix Design

    Cement (%)

    ESP (%)

    RHA (%)

    1

    M1

    100

    0

    2

    M2

    97.5

    2.5

    3

    M3

    95

    5

    4

    M4

    92.5

    7.5

    5

    M5

    90

    10

    6

    M6

    90

    5

    5

    7

    M7

    87.5

    5

    7.5

    8

    M8

    85

    5

    10

    9

    M9

    80

    5

    15

    10

    M10

    75

    5

    20

  6. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST

    The results of the compressive strength of cube specimens are present in table 5. The strength value reported for each mix is the average of strength of six cube specimens.fig 1 and fig 2 are the graphical representation of strength development of concrete cubes for various mixes. From the results it can be observed that the strength of the concrete increased with curing age for all mixes and the compressive strength of ESP

    concrete is higher than that of conventional concrete for every replacement levels. The maximum compressive strength of ESP concrete is obtained at 5% replacement of ESP for both 7 & 28 days of curing, this could be due to the chemical reaction between the ESP & alumina content in cement paste. When egg shell powder is increased beyond 5% there is gradual reduction in strength. This is due increase in Ca(OH)2 content in concrete mix, which further increases the porosity of concrete.

    Mix name

    7 days strength (N/mm2)

    28 days strength ( N/mm2)

    M1

    14.38

    20.26

    M2

    16.36

    24.49

    M3

    19.96

    27.38

    M4

    17.88

    25.53

    M5

    17.32

    24.70

    M6

    14.55

    21.58

    M7

    15.21

    22.70

    M8

    15.76

    23.48

    M9

    16.88

    24.53

    M10

    10.42

    17.35

    Mix name

    7 days strength (N/mm2)

    28 days strength ( N/mm2)

    M1

    14.38

    20.26

    M2

    16.36

    24.49

    M3

    19.96

    27.38

    M4

    17.88

    25.53

    M5

    17.32

    24.70

    M6

    14.55

    21.58

    M7

    15.21

    22.70

    M8

    15.76

    23.48

    M9

    16.88

    24.53

    M10

    10.42

    17.35

    TABLE IV. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

  7. SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH

    The split tensile strength of all concrete mixes is shown in table V and figure 12 & 13 are the graphical representation of tensile strength development of various mixes. From the results it can be observed that addition of ESP increased the split tensile strength for both 7 and 28 days curing. The maximum split tensile strength is obtained at 5% replacement of ESP. Among ESP concrete the least strength is obtained at 2.5% replacement.

    In the case of optimum ESP+RHA concrete, Up to 15% replacement of RHA, the split tensile strength is greater than control mix thereafter it has decreased. There is very less variation in results for different replacement levels in days testing. The reason for variation in result for different replacement levels is as said in the case of compressive strength.

    Compressive strength of

    ESP concrete

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Compressive strength of

    ESP concrete

    30

    20

    10

    0

    7days

    7days

    28days

    Age in days

    28days

    Age in days

    M1

    M2 M3 M4

    M5

    M1

    M2 M3 M4

    M5

    Compressive stregth of

    RHA concrete

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    7 days

    Compressive stregth of

    RHA concrete

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    7 days

    M1

    M6 M7 M8 M9

    M10

    M1

    M6 M7 M8 M9

    M10

    pressive strength(N/mm2)

    pressive strength(N/mm2)

    compressive strength (N/mm2)

    compressive strength (N/mm2)

    Fig 1 Compressive Strenth of ESP Concrete

    28 days

    28 days

    Age in days

    Age in days

    Fig 2 Compressive Strenth of RHA Concrete

    TABLE V. SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH

    Mix name

    7 day Strength (N/mm2)

    28 day strength (N/mm2)

    M1

    2.73

    3.34

    M2

    2.78

    3.47

    M3

    3.76

    4.26

    M4

    3.38

    3.84

    M5

    3.43

    3.98

    M6

    2.88

    3.27

    M7

    2.67

    3.81

    M8

    2.92

    4.12

    M9

    3.05

    4.23

    M10

    2.45

    3.48

    Split tensile strength of

    ESP concrete

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    7 days 28 days

    Split tensile strength of

    ESP concrete

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    7 days 28 days

    M1

    M2 M3 M4

    M5

    M1

    M2 M3 M4

    M5

    Age in days

    Age in days

    Split T Tensile Strength (N/mm2)

    Split T Tensile Strength (N/mm2)

    Fig 3 Split Tensile Strenth of RHA Concrete

    Split tensile strength of

    RHA concrete

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    7 days 28 days

    M1

    M6 M7 M8 M9

    M10

    Flexural strength of ESP

    Concrete

    5.2

    5

    4.8

    4.6

    4.4

    4.2

    4

    3.8

    28 DAYS

    Age in days

    M1

    M2 M3 M4

    M5

    Split tensile strength of

    RHA concrete

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    7 days 28 days

    M1

    M6 M7 M8 M9

    M10

    Flexural strength of ESP

    Concrete

    5.2

    5

    4.8

    4.6

    4.4

    4.2

    4

    3.8

    28 DAYS

    Age in days

    M1

    M2 M3 M4

    M5

    Age in days

    Age in days

    split tensile strength(N/mm2)

    split tensile strength(N/mm2)

    Flexural strength(N/mm2)

    Flexural strength(N/mm2)

    Fig 4 Split Tensile Strenth of ESP Concrete

  8. FLEXURAL STRENGTH TEST

Mix name

28 day strength (N/mm2)

M1

4.35

M2

4.96

M3

5.06

M4

4.92

M5

4.82

M6

4.43

M7

4.54

M8

4.78

M9

4.76

M10

4.26

Mix name

28 day strength (N/mm2)

M1

4.35

M2

4.96

M3

5.06

M4

4.92

M5

4.82

M6

4.43

M7

4.54

M8

4.78

M9

4.76

M10

4.26

TABLE VI. FLEXURAL STRENGTH

The variation of flexural strength with respect to age and percentage of RHA and ESP is showed in table VI and it is graphically represented in fig 5 and 6.

It is seen that there is very less variation in flexural strength of concrete at various replacement levels. The maximum flexural strength is obtained at 5% replacement of ESP. the flexural strength of ESP and RHA concrete is obtained greater than conventional concrete except for 20% RHA replacement. Maximum flexural strength for optimum ESP+RHA concrete is attained at 10% replacement with RHA.

Fig 5 Flexural Strenth of ESP Concrete

Flexural strength of

RHA concrete

5

4.8

4.6

4.4

4.2

4

28 days

Age in days

M1

M6 M7 M8 M9

M10

Flexural strength of

RHA concrete

5

4.8

4.6

4.4

4.2

4

28 days

Age in days

M1

M6 M7 M8 M9

M10

Flexural strength(N/mm2)

Flexural strength(N/mm2)

Fig 6 Flexural Strenth of RHA Concrete

CONCLUSIONS

In this study an afford has been taken to enlighten the use of rice husk ash and egg shell powder in concrete in accordance to their proficiency. From the results of tests of compressive strengtht, split tensile strength and flexural strength the following conclusions are made.

    1. The quantity of water required to make a paste of standard consistency is more when cement is partially replaced with Rice husk ash and egg shell powder.

    2. The compressive, split tensile and flexural strength of every Rice husk ash and egg shell powder concrete mix is higher than that of the control mix except for 20% Rice husk ash replacement.

    3. The optimum percentage of egg shell powder content in concrete is obtained as 5%.

    4. The maximum split tensile and compressive strength obtained for ESP+RHA concrete is at 15% of RHA & 5% ESP replacement level.

    5. The flexural strength of Rice husk ash and egg shell powder concrete is obtained similar to conventional concrete.

    6. Comparing to Rice husk ash concrete, Egg shell powder concrete had slightly higher early strength gain.

    7. RHA in concrete increases water demand due to its cellular structure.

    8. The results obtained from present study shows that there is great potential for utilization of ESP and RHA as a replacement to cement

    9. By using this Rice husk ash and egg shell powder in concrete as replacement the emission of greenhouse gases can be decreased to a greater extent.

REFERENCES

  1. Amarnath Yerramala G. , Properties of concrete with egg shell powder as Cement replacement , The Indian concrete journal, October 2014.

  2. Jayasankar R, Mahindran N, Studies on Concrete Using Fly Ash, Rice Hush Ash and Egg Shell Powder,International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Vol.1, No.3, 2010.

  3. Shetty M.S, Concrete Technology,Sultan Chand Publications, 1982.

  4. Padma Rao P, A study of use of Rice Hush Ash in Concrete, International Journal of Education and Applied Reasearch, Vol.4, Issue 4, January 2014 .

Leave a Reply