Evaluation of DI Diesel Engine Performance on Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil at Different Load Conditions

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS90076

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Evaluation of DI Diesel Engine Performance on Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil at Different Load Conditions

Rajinder Kumar Moom1, Om Parkasp, Nimo Singh Khundrakpam3, Dr. S.K. Mahla4

1,2Mechanical Engg. Deptt., KC College of Engg. & IT, Nawanshahr.

3 Mechanical Engg. Deptt, Rayat Institute of Engineering & IT, Railmajra

4Mechanical Engg. Deptt., Thapar University, Patiala.

Abstract

Biodiesel is more attractive than petroleum diesel because of its environmental benefits and the reality that it is made from renewable resources and has lower emissions. Present research work deals in the preparation of biodiesel from waste cooking oil, obtained from KC College of Engineering and IT, Nawanshahr, Punjab messes. The performance of a direct injection (DI) diesel engine has also been carried out when fuelled with blends of Diesel-biodiesel, biodiesel-ethanol and diesel-ethanol- ethyl acetate over the entire range of load on the engine.

The experimental results showed that the highest brake thermal efficiency (BTE) 31.12% was observed for D80/E13/EA7 at full load i.e. 7.26% higher than from D100 (28.86%). The higher BSFC for B100 (262.4 g/kWh) is about 14.9 % higher than diesel (223.2 g/kWh) at full load.

Keywords: Biodiesel, Waste Cooking Oil, Engine Performance. Ethanol, Transesterification,

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The demand of energy around the world is increasing at a faster rate as growing on new trends in industrialization and modernization. However, most of the energy consumed in today world is mostly depend on fossil fuel. With rapid increase in the population of vehicles, air quality problems in cities in are major warning to the biodiversity. The oil crisis of the 1970s generated a high interest in biofuels as a possible replacement for fossil liquid fuels used in transportation. Transportation consumes 30% of the global energy, 99% of which is supplied by petroleum [1].

    The global warming due to increased Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions, increasing air pollution, increasing in crude oil prices & depletion of fossil fuels are the major problems in the present century. However, a major challenge for a conventionally fuelled CI engine is the simultaneous reduction of NOx. The bio fuels can play an important role towards the switch to a lower carbon economy. Biodiesel can be used in diesel-fueled vehicles without any modification of the engine.

    The American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) defines biodiesel fuel as monoalkyl of long chain fatty acids derived from renewable lipid feedstock, such as vegetable oil or animal fat for use in diesel engines. Bio represents its renewable and biological source in and diesel refers to its use in diesel engines.

    CO2 produced by combustion of biodiesel can be recycled by photosynthesis, thereby minimizing the impact of biodiesel combustion on the greenhouse effect [2]. Also, biodiesel does not pose a threat to human health due to reduction in carbon dioxide emissions as compared to petroleum diesel fuels.

    Biodiesel has a relatively high flash point (1500 C), which

    makes it less volatile and safer to transport or handle than petroleum diesel [3]. It provides lubricating properties that can reduce engine wear and extend engine life [4]. In short, biodiesel is a good alternative to petroleum based fuel and have led to its use in many countries, especially in environmentally sensitive areas. At present, the high cost of biodiesel due to the cost of virgin vegetable oil [3] is the major blockage to its commercialization.

    The use of waste cooking oil instead of virgin oil to make biodiesel is an effective way to reduce the raw material cost because it is estimated to be about half the price of virgin oil [5]). In addition, the problem of waste oil disposal can also help to solve by using waste cooking oil [6].

    Vegetable oils cannot uses directly as a fuel due to higher viscosity 10-20 times higher than of petroleum fuel that can cause engine problems like injector fouling and has some drawbacks such as deposits at the injection system with consequent plugs or low atomization, hardening of seals, and low lubricating properties [7].

    To reduce the viscosity of vegetable oils, following four ways can be considered: dilusion, pyrolysis, microemulsion and transesterification. Transesterification is the most positive way of the fuel viscosity-reduction process. In presence of a catalyst, transesterification process transesterify vegetable oil with an alcohol to fatty acid alkyl esters. Transesterification can be alkali- catalyzed, acid-catalyzed or enzyme-catalyzed. Sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxides are the commonly used alkali catalysts; sulfuric acid is the typical acid catalyst; and lipase is used for the enzyme-catalyzed system. The transesterification process is as shown in Fig. I.

    FIG.1: TRANSESTERIFICATION REACTION [8]

    Therefore, one of the main tasks of researchers is to comply with the stricter vehicle emission regulations without compromising the economy, reliability and performance of engines. Due to recent advances of diesel engines, compression ignition (CI) direct injection engines show great promise for reducing fuel consumption. However, a major challenge for a conventionally fuelled CI engine is the simultaneous reduction of NOx and particulate emissions to meet the more stringent regulations in the near future.

    The oil crisis of the 1970s generated a high interest in biofuels as a possible replacement for fossil liquid fuels used in transportation. In the 1980s and 1990s, increased consciousness of climate change also contributed to the popularity of biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels. Biodiesel can become an excellent alternative fuel for diesel engine it is free from aromatic compounds and sulfur [9].

    Consequently, these countries have to spend their export income to buy petroleum products. The climate changes occurring due to increased Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions and global warming, increasing air pollution and depletion of fossil fuels are the major problems in the present century. Waste cooking oils, restaurant grease and animal fats are potential feedstocks for biodiesel [10]. However, many of these alternative feedstocks may contain high levels of free fatty acids (FFA), water, or insoluble matter, which affect biodiesel production [11]. Many researches have been carried out on biodiesel from waste cooking oil [12-16].

    The objective of this study is to produce biodiesel from waste cooking oil obtained from KC College of Engineering and IT, Nawanshahr, Punjab messes. Also performance of DI Diesel engine has been evaluated by conducting various tests when fuelled with blends of Diesel-biodiesel, biodiesel-ethanol and diesel-ethanol-ethyl acetate over the entire range of load on the engine.

  2. MATERIALS & EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

    Waste cooking oil is collected from KC College of Engineering and IT, Nawanshahr, Punjab messes. It is

    expressed chemically as triglyceride (or triacylglycerol). The biodiesel or Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) is produced by transesterification process using methanol as alcohol, sodium hydroxide as catalyst with a by-product of Glycerol. The fuel supply to the engine is measured by graduated glass cylinder having stopcock at the bottom. The glass cylinder is connected to engine by Polyvinylchloride pipe. The properties of diesel, waste cooking oil and biodiesel are given in Table I.

    TABLE I

    PROPERTIES OF DIESEL, WASTE COOKING OIL AND

    BIODIESEL

    td>

    Diesel fuel

    Property parameters

    Waste cooking Oil

    Biodiesel

    Density at 20 0C, g/cm3

    0.88

    0.936

    0.83

    Viscocity at 40

    0C,

    mm3/s

    2.8

    46.4

    4.2

    Calorific value (kJ/kg)

    42000

    34500

    35600

    Flash Point, 0C

    68

    165

    22

    Auto-ignition temperature, 0C

    210

    320

    460

    Pour Point, 0C

    1

    3

    6

    Cetane number

    45

    56.2

    10

    The fuels are with blends of conventional biodiesel and ethanol, diesel ethanol and ethyl acetate over the entire range of load on the engine.

    A Kiloskar make, single cylinder four strokes DI diesel engine is selected for the present work. The specification of the diesel engine is given in Table II.

    TABLE II

    SPECIFICATIONS OF THE DIESEL ENGINE

    Make

    Kirloskar model AV1

    No. of Strokes per cycle

    4

    Type

    DI

    Output

    4.8/6.5 KW/bhp

    No. of Cylinders

    Single

    Combustion chamber position

    Vertical

    Cooling method

    Water cooled

    Starting condition

    Cold start

    Ignition technique

    Compression Ignition

    Bore Diameter (D)

    85 mm

    Stroke Length(L)

    110 mm

    Rated speed

    1500 rpm

    Rated power

    5 hp (3.72 kW)

    Compression ratio

    16.5 : 1

    A single-phase synchronous generator of 2 kVA rating directly coupled to diesel engine. The schematic diagram of the engine test rig is shown in Fig. II.

    FIG II: Schematic Diagram of Engine Test Rig.

    All the experiment is conducted at a speed of 1400 rpm without any change in fuel injection. The full load is run at 5kW. The engine can be loaded up to 5 kW using luminescent bulbs of 100W each. For the experiment engine is loaded by 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% (Full Load) of 5kW.

  3. OBSERVATION AND RESULTS

    The engine was subjected to a pilot runs to find no knocking and trouble on different selected fuel blends of biodiesel-Diesel blends, Biodeisel-ethanol blends and Diesel-ethanol-Ethyl acetate. It is experimentally observed that fuel blends of D50/E27/E23, B70/E40 and higher substitution of diesel (or biodiesel) with ethanol and ethyl acetate produced knocking and unstable engine operations due to lower cetane number and lower calorific values. But all Diesel-Biodiesel blends ran engine smoothly. From the above pilot test some fuel blend is selected to investigate the performance of engine for different load conditions. The selected blends are shown in Table. II

    TABLE II SELECTED FUEL BLENDS

    Type of Blend

    Code

    Biodiesel-diesel Blends

    B100

    B40/D60

    B20/D80

    D100

    Biodiesel-Ethanol Blends

    B60/E40

    B75/E25

    B90/E10

    Diesel-Ethanol-Ethyl Acetate blends

    D70/E17/EA13

    D80/E13/EA7

    Brake thermal efficiency (BTE):

    The Brake thermal efficiency is defined as the ratio of output energy available at the engine shaft to the input energy given to the engine. Fig. III shows the variations of Brake thermal Efficiency (BTE) for different load conditions. The brake thermal efficiency (BTE) is increased with the increase of load and dropped abruptly for higher loads for pure diesel and for all of its blends.

    FIG. III: LOAD VS BTE(%)

    It is found that value of BTE of pure diesel (D100) is closer to D80/E13/EA7, D70/E17/EA1, B20/D80, B40/D60 and B75/E25. Besides, ethanol has lower viscosity which helps in reducing the viscosity, thus improving the atomization of fuels. Maximum BTE is

    31.12 % for D80/E13/EA7 at full load i.e. 7.26% higher than from D100 (28.86%).

    Brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC):

    Fuel consumed by engine in gm for per kW per hour known as Brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) at different load is shown in Fig IV. It is obtained that BSFC decreases as the load increases for all type of fuel blends. This result is due to increase in cylinder wall temperature by increasing load reduces the ignition delay.

    FIG. IV: LOAD VS BSFC

    From the Fig. IV, it is found that value of BSFC of pure diesel (D100) is closer to D80/E13/EA7 and B60/E40. The higher BSFC for B100 (262.4 g/kWh) is about 14.9 % higher than diesel (223.2 g/kWh) at full load.

    Brake specific energy consumption (BSEC):

    FIG. V: LOAD VS BSEC

    Fig. V shows the variations of Brake specific energy consumption (BSEC) for different load conditions. It is found that value of BSEC of pure diesel (D100) is almost

    lower and closer to all blends of fuels except B100 blend. It is also obtained that at higher at higher load the difference in BSEC is less pronounced which is due to deterioration in the combustion quality of ethanol at higher loads. BSEC of B100 (14458 kJ/kW-h) is about 10% higher than diesel (12868 kJ/kW-h) at full load.

    Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BSEP):

    Brake Mean Effective Pressure is the average (mean) pressure which, if imposed on the pistons uniformly from the top to the bottom of each power stroke, would produce the measured (brake) power output. The Brake Mean Effective Pressure for different fuel at different load is reported in Fig. VI. It is found that value of BSEP of pure diesel (D100) is closer to D80/E13/EA7, D70/E17/EA13 and B60/E40. B20/D80 has maximum BSEP.

    FIG.IV: LOAD VS BMEP

  4. CONCLUSION

The present study effect of various parameters on engine loading was evaluated from waste fried oil obtained from KC College of Engineering and IT, Nawanshahr, Punjab messes. Based on the experimental results, the following conclusion can be concluding:

  1. BTE of pure diesel (D100) is closer to D80/E13/EA7, D70/E17/EA1, B20/D80, B40/D60 and B75/E25. Maximum BTE is 31.12 % for D80/E13/EA7 at full load i.e. 7.26% higher than from D100 (28.86%).

  2. BSFC of pure diesel (D100) is closer to D80/E13/EA7 and B60/E40. The higher BSFC for B100 (262.4 g/kWh) is about 14.9 % higher than diesel (223.2 g/kWh) at full load.

  3. BSEC of B100 (14458 kJ/kW-h) is about 10% higher than diesel (12868 kJ/kW-h) at full load.

  4. The biodiesel produced from waste cooking oil obtained from KC College of Engineering and IT, Nawanshahr messes will be 102.5 liters per month. That can be used to run the Diesel generator Set to supply electricity during power shade hours.

  5. The emission performance can be studied for the future work.

    References

    1. EIA. US Energy Information Administration World Outlook, Report #:DOE/EIA-0484, 2007.

    2. Agarwal, A.K., Das, L.M., Biodiesel development and characterization for use as a fuel in compression ignition engines, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 123, (2001), pp. 440 447.

    3. Krawczyk, T.,Biodiesel. INFORM 7 (8), (1996), pp. 801 822.

    4. Von Wedel, R., Technical handbook for marine biodiesel in recreational boats, Prepared for National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Deprtment of Energy, Subcontract No. ACG-7-16688-01 under Prime Contract No. DE-AC36- 83CH10093, 32

    5. Supple, B., Howard-Hildige, R., Gonzalez-Gomez, E., Leahy, J.J., The effect of steam treating waste cooking oil on the yield of methyl ester". J. Am. Oil Soc. Chem. 79 (2), (1999), pp. 175178.

    6. Wiltsee, G., Waste grease resource in 30 US metropolitan areas In: The Proceedings of Bioenergy 98 Conference, Wisconsin, (1998), pp. 956963.

    7. Raheman H. Diesel engine emissions and performance from blends of karanja methyl ester and diesel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, (2004), pp. 393-397.

    8. Dias J. M.; Alvim-Ferraz M. C. M.; Almeida M. F. Comparison of the performance of different homogenous alkali catalysts during transesterification of waste and virgin

      oils and evaluation of biodiesel quality Fuel , 87, (2008), pp.35723578.

    9. Orhan AS, Dulger KN, Veziroglu TN., Internal combustion engines fuelled by natural gas-hydrogen mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, (2004), pp. 1527-39.

    10. Mustafa Canakci, The potential of restaurant waste lipids as biodiesel feedstocks, Journal of Bioresource Technology, 98 (1), (2007), pp. 183-190.

    11. B.R. Moser, Biodiesel production, properties, and feedstocks, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology Plant, 45 (3), (2009), pp. 229-266.

    12. Supple, B., Howard-Hildige, R., Gonzalez-Gomez, E., Leahy, J.J., The effect of steam treating waste cooking oil on the yield of methyl ester, J. Am. Oil Soc. Chem., 79 (2), (1999), pp. 175178.

    13. Meng X.; Chen G.; Wang Y., Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via alkali catalyst and its engine test, Fuel Process Technol. 89, (2008), pp. 851857.

    14. Phan A. N.; Phan T. M., Biodiesel production from waste cooking oils, Fuel, 87, (2008), pp. 34903496.

    15. Predojevic Z. J., The production of biodiesel from waste frying oils: a comparison of different purification steps, Fuel 87, (2008), pp. 35223528.

    16. Zhang Y.; Dube M. A.; McLean D. D., Kates M. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via two-step catalyzed process. Energ. Convers. Manage, 48, (2003), pp. 184188.

Leave a Reply