Effect of Local Materials on Self Compacting Concrete

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS100047

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Effect of Local Materials on Self Compacting Concrete

Rajeswari A

Teaching Assistant Department of Civil Engineering

RGUKT, RK Valley, Kadapa

Ram Bhupal Reddy A

Lecturer & Head Department of Civil Engineering

RGUKT, RK Valley, Kadapa

Abstract In civil engineering structures, concrete is a main construction material. Its ingredients are cement, fine aggregate (sand) and coarse aggregate. In todays world cost of cement and sand is increasing day by day. Many are unable to purchase because of their economic situation. To provide a solution, in this paper, we partially replaced Rice Husk Ash (RHA) with cement, and Quarry Dust with sand, because they are local and cheap materials. The Advantages of these materials are low cost and easy availability. Actually, Paddy is being cultivated more in India, so we can get large amount of RHA and QD is an industrial waste product. In this paper 5- 20% of cement is replaced by RHA and from the above results 40% sand was replaced by QD. Compared the compressive strength of self compacting concrete mix (with RHA and QD) with self-compacting concrete mix (SCM) without the local materials experimentally.

Keywords Concrete, Rice Husk Ash, Quarry Dust, Compressive Strength, And Self-Compacting Concrete Mix

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Due to high strength, malleability and durability, concrete is most widely used construction material in civil engineering world. Large amount of concrete is being consumed every year in Indian construction. The main ingredients of concrete are cement, sand and coarse aggregate. For the past 10 years in some constructions local materials like RHA and QD are being replaced partially by cement and sand respectively. In this developing world, we are trying to use solid waste materials as concrete supplementary cementitious materials. By this we can reduce the solid waste disposal problems. One of the advantages of these local material is reduction in cost of concrete and also easy availability. RHA is obtained from Paddy. In India major crop is paddy. So we can get RHA easily. The cost of high quality sand is increasing day by day and also non available compared with QD. In this paper we partially replace cement and sand with RHA and QD respectively (with and without RHA and QD). Super plasticizer (SP) and Viscosity modifying agent (VMA) are used to make concrete self-compacting.

  2. PRESENT WORK

      1. Quarry Dust

        Quarry Dust is a by-product in production of concrete aggregate by crushing of rocks. Because of its high fineness nature it is used in concrete in a limited amount. By adding QD to the concrete it increases the water demand and by this cement content will be analyzed for required workability and strength. Advantage of QD is, it is a cost saving product, and

        it depends on type of material we used as a source. Previous studies shows that by comparing mortar paste and concrete mix with the limestone powder had confirmed that the incorporation of granite fines requires high dosage of super plasticizer for the similar yield stresses and rheological properties. Self compacting concrete requires high powder contents or the addition of suitable viscosity modifying agent (VMA) to increase the segregation.

      2. Rice husk Ash

        Rice Husk Ash is produced after burning of Rice husks, has high reactivity and pozzolanic property. Rice husks is highly available in rice producing countries like India. These are the shells produced during the de-husking of paddy rice. Approximately 1000kg of rice can produce 200kg of husk, which on combustion produces approximately 40kg of ash. But according to Mehta the yearly world production of rice is approximately 500 million tons, which produces approximately 100 million tons of rice husks as a waste product from the milling. Rice husks are used for power generation in industries and as a fuel in boilers. Actually rice husk has ash content varying from 18-20%. RHA used as a supplementary cementing material in developing countries like India because supply of Portland cement is low and cost is high, but rice production is abundant. According to previous studies India produces 18 million tons of rice husks annually and approximately 12 million tons are readily available for the disposal from the rice mills (Bhanumatidas and Kalidas).

        RHA may be in black, grey, or pinkish white in color depending on the combustion process. If the percentage of unburnt carbon increases, ash will be in dark color. Higher temperatures and longer durations of controlled burning produce RHA with higher pozzolanic properties. To avoid the formation of inactive crystals from rice husk silica, we have to burn the rice husk at temperature below 8000c. It is also necessary to burn the rice husk for long enough that all the cellulose burns and leaves a white or grey colored ash. Normally RHA contains silica with small amounts of alkalis and other trace elements. Depending on the temperature range and duration of incineration, crystalline and amorphous forms of silica are obtained. Actually, crystalline and amorphous forms of silica have different properties, so it is important to produce ash with the correct specification of use. Maedeetal designed a furnace for the incineration process of rice husk. To obtain the high quality RHA incineration temperature must be below 5500c . Duration of incineration

        must be sufficiently long to burn out fixed carbon in RHA. One of the advantage of RHA is, it has high pozzolanic index (108%) compared to fly ash (class F). Composition of rice husk and the ranges of physical-chemical characteristics of RHA from various sources in the literature are shown in Table 1:

        Rice Husk

        Physical characteristics

        Range

        Element

        Mass fraction

        Density(g/cm3)

        2.06-2.15

        Carbon

        41.44

        Average particle

        size(µm)

        5.85-6.86

        Hydrogen

        3.94

        Specific surface area (according to Blaines air entraining

        test)(m2/g)

        32.4-112.1

        Oxygen

        37.32

        Mineralogy

        Noncrystalline

        Nitrogen

        0.57

        Shape and texture

        Irregular and cellular

        Silicon

        14.66

        Chemical characteristics

        Potassium

        0.59

        Silicon dioxide

        87-97%

        Sodium

        0.035

        Aluminum oxide

        0.2%

        Sulfur

        0.3

        Iron oxide

        0.1%

        Phosphorous

        0.07

        Calcium oxide

        0.3-2.2%

        Calcium

        0.06

        Magnesium oxide

        0.2-0.6%

        Iron

        0.006

        Sodium oxide

        0.1-0.8%

        Magnesium

        0.003

        Potassium oxide

        0.21-2.3%

        Ignition loss

        0.31-4.4%

        . Table 1: Composition of Rice Husk; Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Rice Husk Ash

      3. RHA for Cement and Construction

        Current construction industries expect to produce strong and durable building materials to the increasing needs, oppoing harmful forces and a polluted environment. For example blended cements are in the forefront of such durable building materials. Blending reactive rice husk ash (rRHA) in cements is almost recommended by all international building codes. When RHA is added to the cement, secondary hydration products will form by combined reaction of calcium hydroxide in cement systems and rRHA. Once this reaction starts calcium hydroxide depletion will occur. By the way permeability of concrete is highly reduced and also resistance to acid attack will be increased considerably. RHA is porous in nature with a very high surface area and average size. Thats why RHA increases the water demand. Actually RHA is an active pozzolana, so it has capability of giving high strength at both early and later ages, particularly when water- reducing agents are added. When RHA is added to Portland cement it reacts faster than the flyash with the lime released in Portland cement hydration. It helps to increase the early age strength and formation of calcium hydrate silicate (CSH) gel which forms around the cement particles that is highly dense and porous. This CSH gel alters the microstructure of the concrete with the discontinuous pores. The densification of the pores reduces the permeability of concrete and improves its resistance against the chloride penetration. However physical and chemical characteristics of RHA may vary depending on geographical location and climatic condition.

      4. Mechanism for Strength Development

        The significance of pozzolana cements is primarily derived from three features of pozzolanic reaction. First one is, the rate of heat of liberation and strength development are slow because the reaction is slow. Second, the reaction is lime consuming instead of lime producing, due to this phenomenon which increases the durability of hydrated paste by resisting the acid attack. Third the efficiency of filling the capillary spaces is high so that the improvement of strength and impermeability of the system will increase.

        Two physical effects result from the chemical reaction between pozzolanic particles and calcium hydroxide. They are pore size refinement and grain size refinement. Both will occur to ensure solid formation of concrete from that more strength and high permeability are achieved. The chemistry of RHA involves the chemical reaction of the amorphous silica in the ash with lime to form calcium silicate hydrates. In a mixture of ordinary Portland cement and RHA, the silica reacts with the extra lime in Portland cement which in some times as high as 60%. According to James and Rao(1986) the silicates formed are of two kinds, CSHI and CSHII . The reactions are as follows:

        Ca(OH)2+SiO2=CSHI+CSHII whereCSHI=CaO0.81.5SiO2(H2O)1.02.5CS HII=CaO1.52.0SiO22(H2O)

      5. Characteristics of Materials used

        Here our objective is to study the characteristics of basic materials of mortar i.e, cement, sand, QD, and RHA used as per Indian Standard Specifications. The material properties obtained are presented in Table 2-6

        Table 2: Properties of Cement

        Tests conducted

        Results

        Fineness(cm2/g)

        2,280

        Specific gravity

        3.1

        Normal consistency (%)

        3.1

        Setting time (min)

        Initial

        80

        Final

        210

        Compressive strength(MPa)

        3 days

        19.40

        7 days

        34.69

        21 days

        38.70

        28 days

        45.00

        Tests conducted

        Result

        Specific gravity

        2.65

        Water absorption

        0.18%

        Fineness modulus

        2.44

        Gradation

        Conforms to Zone II per IS:383- 1970

        Table 3: Properties of Sand

        Table 4: Properties of Quarry Dust

        Tests conducted

        Result

        Specific gravity

        2.56

        Fineness modulus

        2.32

        Water absorption(%)

        9.0

        Material finer than 75 m

        16.8

        Organic impurities

        Chloride(% by weight)

        0.0085

        Sulphate(% by weight)

        0.058

        PH

        7.65

        Soundness(%)

        Sodium sulphate

        6.64

        Magnesium sulphate

        7.48

        Table 5: Results of Sieve Analysis of Quarry Dust

        Cumulative percent

        Specification per IS: 383-1970 for fine aggregate (percent passing)

        (Bureau of Indian Standards 1970)

        IS Sieve

        designation

        Retained

        Passing

        Zone

        I

        Zone

        II

        Zone

        III

        Zone

        IV

        4.75mm

        0

        100

        90-

        100

        90-

        100

        90-

        100

        95-

        100

        2.36mm

        0.3

        99.7

        60-95

        75-

        100

        85-

        100

        95-

        100

        1.18mm

        20.0

        80.0

        30-70

        55-90

        75-90

        90-

        100

        600 m

        36.5

        63.5

        15-34

        35-59

        60-79

        80-

        100

        300 m

        55.0

        45.0

        5-20

        8-30

        12-40

        15-50

        150 m

        71.7

        28.3

        0-10

        0-10

        0-10

        0-15

        The tested sample does not satisfy the requirements of any grading zone of IS: 383-1970

        Tests

        Results

        Description

        Gray powder

        Specific surface area(m2/kg)

        448

        Specific gravity

        2.00

        Aluminum oxide(%)

        2.17

        Iron oxide(%)

        0.89

        Calcium oxide(%)

        11.31

        Magnesium oxide(%)

        0.23

        Silica oxide(%)

        54.65

        Sodium oxide(%)

        0.59

        Potassium oxide(%)

        1.15

        Density(g/cc)

        1.9311

        Loss on ignition(%)

        27.84

        Material passing through

        75 m(%)

        98.73

        100 m(%)

        99.85

        Table 6: Properties of Rice Husk Ash

        RHA Manufacturing

        In this paper RHA used is produced by burning the rice husk from the local rice mills in lime burning kilns shown in fig.1. A local kiln is fully filled with rice husk and covered at the top and sealed, fired using charcoal and firewood for a period of more than 24hours in normal condition and cooled. After that burnt husk ash is collected and finely ground in commercial flour mills. Whatever ash is grounded in flour mills that is now passin through 90 µm sieves. The material passing through 90 µm sieve is used in the self compacting mortar (SCM ) mixes. The properties of RHA is used in this paper is shown in Table 6. From that table, whatever RHA obtained from the burning process is with moderate fineness and high loss of ignition. These characteristics would certainly affect the SCM mixes. Actually local burning technology is unsophisticated and cheap. Dimensions of the local burning kilns is as follows:

        Top diameter(external): 1.2m; bottom diameter(external): 1.5m; height: 2.0m; wall thickness: 0.23m.

        Fig.1: Local lime-burning kilns

        Chemical admixtures

        Actually admixtures first affect the flow behavior of SCM mixes. The superplasticiser(SP) uses Glenium 51and VMA uses Glenium Stream 2, both are in liquid form. These chemicals are classified as chloride free.

      6. Normal and Self Compacting mortar mixes Normal concrete mixes

        Normal mortar cubes are cast per Indian standard specification to find the compressive strength of cement mortar cubes with cement and sand in a 1:3 ratio and water content equal to P/4+3% of combined weight of cement and sand. Here P is the normal consistency of cement paste. The cubes are cast and cured as usual and tested for compressive strength in the compression testing machine at different ages: 3,7, 21 and 28 days. The compressive strength results are shown in table 7.

        Table 7: Compressive Strength of Normal Mortar Mixes

        Normal mortar mix compressive strength(MPa)

        3days

        7 days

        21 days

        28 days

        16.20

        24.60

        33.50

        41.50

        Self Compacting mortar mixes

        The main objective of this paper is to understand the rheological and strength characteristics of the SCM mixes with and without RHA and QD. The rheological properties can be obtained from the results of two simple tests: one is mini slump cone test and second is mini V-funnels test. In fig-2 a number of trail mixes (1-21) with different proportions of cement and sand without RHA and QD, but suitable SP and VMA are prepared and flow properties are estimated. This process is continuous until the trial mix satisfies the desired requirements

        Fig.2: Different trials for achieving the desired self-compacting mortar mix

        Further to study the characteristics of SCM mix with RHA and QD by partial replacement of sand and cement, i.e, replacement level of sand by QD at 40% and the percentage of RHA are varying in the range of 5-20%. These mixes are tested for their rheological properties and compressive strength at 3, 7, 21 and 28 days.

      7. Test methods for Developing Self Compacting Mortar Mixes

        To know the rheological properties of SCM mixes, there are two tests, mini slump cone and mini V-funnel test and their dimensions are shown in fig-3

        Fig.3: Dimensions of the mini slump cone and mini V-funnel apparatuses

        Mini Slump Cone Test

        The flowability of mortar mix can be known from the results of mortar flow test. Actually ultimate spread diameter is recorded 2 minutes after lifting. The acceptable value of spread diameter is in the range of 240-260mm

        Mini V-funnel Test

        This test is used to estimate the viscosity of SCM mix. The acceptable value of flow time of SCM mix should be between 7-11 s.

      8. Developing Self Compacting Mortar Mixes by Trial and Error

    The rheological and flow properties of SCM mixes estimated by using mini slump cone and mini v-funnel tests and their values are shown in fig-2 and Table-6. Total quantity of ingredients (cement and sand) maintained as 800g in all mixes, initially in the proportion of 1:3. The results of these tests depending on the water to powder ratio which is in the range between 0.8-0.9.

    Mortar mix designation

    Desired SCM

    mix

    Mix 1

    Mix 2

    Mix 3

    Mix 4

    Proportions achieved

    1:1.96

    1:2

    1:2

    1:2

    1:2

    Sand replaced by QD (%)

    0

    40

    40

    40

    40

    Quantity of QD (g)

    0

    212

    Cement replaced by RHA (%)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Quantity of RHA (g)

    0

    13.5

    27

    40.5

    54

    Water-powder ratio

    0.75

    0.80

    0.81

    0.83

    0.84

    VMA (%) weight of water

    0.03

    0.03

    0.04

    0.04

    0.05

    Superplasticizer (%) weight of

    cement

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    Quantity of cement (g)

    270

    256.5

    243

    229.5

    216

    Quantity of sand (g)

    530

    318

    Quantity of water (g)

    202.5

    385.60

    390.42

    400.06

    404.88

    Flow time (s) of mini V-funnel

    test

    8

    9

    10

    9.5

    11

    Spread diameter (mm) of mini slump cone test

    250

    240

    250

    245

    255

    Table 8: V-Funnel Test Results of Trial Mixes

    Table 10: Proportions and Flow Properties of SCM Mixes

    SI.No.of mix

    V-funnel

    flow time(s)

    1

    38

    2

    34

    3

    25

    4

    20

    5

    19

    6

    14

    7

    23

    8

    21

    9

    15

    10

    17

    22

    12

    19

    13

    23

    14

    20

    15

    14

    16

    15

    17

    11

    18

    10

    19

    9

    20

    8

    21

    8

    Mortar mix designation

    Compressive strength(MPa)

    3 days

    7 days

    21

    days

    28

    days

    56

    days

    90

    days

    Desired SCM mix

    14.00

    21.40

    31.60

    39.00

    Mix 1

    10.02

    15.40

    20.72

    32.50

    36.60

    38.45

    Mix 2

    7.60

    11.40

    21.00

    30.40

    33.50

    36.74

    Mix 3

    6.68

    10.70

    15.40

    19.00

    27.40

    30.08

    Mix 4

    4.68

    8.68

    13.40

    15.00

    20.72

    24.06

    Cement with RHA

    Sand with QD

    5%

    40%

    10%

    40%

    15%

    40%

    20%

    40%

  3. CONCLUSION

The main objective of this paper is to show the effect of local materials like RHA and QD in SCM mixes by partial replacement of cement and QD respectively. Actually by adding local materials, compressive strength decreases at early ages than the normal mix. Then at later ages difference in their strength will be less, thats why we use RHA and QD in normal practice. Also they are economical compared to cement and sand. Replacement level of cement by RHA should be between 5-10%, it will give SCM mix with good flow characteristics and comparable compressive strengths. Any way by this experiment we can achieve SCM mix with appropriate flow and strength characteristics by adding RHA and QD.

REFERENCES

  1. Bhanumathidas, N. , and Kalidas, N. (2000). CO2 abatement and conservation of natural resources through industrial byproduct utilization for cement and building materials. Workshop on Climate Change Mitigation Projects in the De-Centralized Energy Section and Building Material Sector: Developments, Alternatives and USAID , Pune, India.

  2. Boateng, A. A. , and Skeete, D. A. (1990). Incineration of rice hull for use as a cementitious material: The Guyana experience. Cem. Concr. Res. , 20 , 795802.

  3. Bouzoubaa, N. , and Fournier, B. (2001). Concrete incorporating rice husk ash on compressive strength and chloride ion penetrability , Materials Technology Laboratory, CANMET, Dept. of Natural Resources, Canada, 116.

  4. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1970). Specification for coarse and fine aggregate from material sources for concrete (2nd revision). IS: 383- 1970, New Delhi, India.

  5. Cuckookochar. (2001). Rice husk ash production or use in high performance concrete. 7th CANMET/ACI Int. Conf. on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolana in Concrete , Vol. 2 , Chennai, India, 740756.

  6. Ho, D. W. S. , Sheinn, A. M. M. , Ng, C. C. , and Tam, C. T. (2002). The use of quarry dust for SCC applications. Cem. Concr. Res. , 32 , 505511.

  7. Kumar, P. , Mehta, and Monteiro, P. J. M. (1997). Concrete Microstructure, properties and materials , Indian Ed., Indian Concrete Institute, Chennai, India, 23285.

  8. Maede, N. , Wada, I. , Kawakami, M. , Ueda, T. , and Pusphalal, G. K.

    D. (2001). Development of a new furnace for the production of rice husk ash. 7th CANMET/ACI Int. Conf. on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolana in Concrete , Vol. 2 , Chennai, India, 835852.

  9. Mehta, P. K. (1977). Properties of blended cements made from rice husk ash. J. Am. Concr. Inst. , 74 ( 9), 440442.

  10. Mehta, P. K. (1979). The chemistry and technology of cements made from rice husk ash. Proc., UNIDO/ESCAP/RCTT Workshop on Rice Husk Ash Cement , Pakistan, 113122.

  11. Mehta, P. K. (1986). Structure, properties, and materials , Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 382.

  12. Mehta, P. K. (1992). Rice husk ash: Aunique supplementary cementing material. Proc., Int. Symp. on Advances in Concrete Technology , Athens, Greece, 407430.

  13. Salas, J. (1988). Crucial curing of rice husk concrete. Build. Res. Pract. , 21(6), 367376.

Leave a Reply