Clustering based on user Movement Similarity Measures

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV3IS18010

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Clustering based on user Movement Similarity Measures

R. Muni Latha

M.Tech Student, Department of CSE KMM Institute of Technology and Sciences

Tirupati, India

Dr. K. Venkata Ramana

Associate Professor, HOD, Department of CSE KMM Institute of Technology and Sciences Tirupati, India

Abstract In real life different users are performing different varieties of tasks. In this paper, users are clustered based on user tasks details. Multi-way sequential probability trees are constructed for representing user movement pattern details. For each user, tasks details are represented in one sequential probability tree data structure. Once all the tree data structures are constructed, then users are clustered based on the similarity measurement details among the users. We propose a new technique to cluster user tasks details. Proposed framework for clustering tasks details of users is very easy and very simple. A special and very simple similarity measurement technique is proposed and used in measuring the similarity details among the users. Proposed clustering based techniques are very useful in many real life applications. Example application are- trends of studies, bank loan issuing patterns, location based services, share market trend change details.

Positioning System), finding the specific tower to forward a phone call, Identifying the location of a specific object, Trajectory ranking, Finding a service centre at a particular place and at a particular time.

  1. SEQUENTIAL PATTERNS OF USERS

    root

    A B C

    0.75 0.75 1

    B C C

    Keywords Similarity measures, clustering, machine learning, normalized similarity measure

    1. INTRODUCTION

      Clustering is one of the best techniques in both machine learning and data mining. Sequential location movement details of vehicles, cell phones, users etc are nowadays are most import and must be needed and useful in many real life applications. To solve many of such problems we have proposed new similarity measurement techniques among the users, vehicles, cell phones, studies trends etc and then this new technique is used to cluster the user movement details based on similarity measures. In many real life applications finding sequential location pattern details of users is very useful for decision making.

      T1: <A, B, C> T2: <A, B, C> T3: <B, C> T4: <A, C>

      User U1s trajectories and SP-tree (SPT1)

      0.5

      C

      0.5

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.67

      C

      0.33

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.67

      C

      0.33

      root

      RID

      C.prob

      A

      0.3

      B

      0.3

      C

      0.4

      root

      RID

      C.prob

      A

      0.3

      B

      0.3

      C

      0.4

      A

      0.75

      0.75

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      1

      AB

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      1

      Assume that n users are there. For each user a sequential probability tree data structure is constructed based on the trajectory profile of each user. Time complexity of tree data structure is O(logn). After constructing n tree data structures all user details are clustered based on the new similarity measurement technique,

      Some applications of movement-based communities are given below:

      Trajectory ranking, Community-based traffic sharing services, and Friend communication [1]. In retrieving user trajectories trajectory ranking is useful. Traffic sharing services have become very useful. For example, users can download the mobile application to share traffic information by using navigational services [1]. Users are grouped into clustered based on the similarity behaviors of users. To capture movement behaviors we can use sequential pattern methods [1].

      Movement based communities are very useful in managing many applications such as GPS (Global

      Fig. 1. User U1s trajectories and SP-tree SPT1

      root

      NCACI-2015 Conference Proceedings

      A B C

      AB AC BC

      ABC

      Nodes of SPTree1are named as shown above

      root

      RID

      C.prob

      A

      0.3

      B

      0.3

      C

      0.4

      RID

      C.prob

      A

      0.3

      B

      0.3

      C

      0.4

      root

      A B C

      0.75 0.75 1

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      1

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      1

      C B A

      root root

      A A

      B C C D

      Fig.5 SPT5 Fig 6 SPT6

      Movement behaviors are characterized using movement sequential patterns and transition probabilities [1]. We propose a special and new similarity measure finding algorithm for grouping users into clusters. This new similarity uses a simple normalized measure for comparing two users. Based on the minimum threshold value clusters are created. Clustering process stops when all users are checked.

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      1

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      1

      For each sequential probability tree the nodes are named as follows:

      0.75

      B

      0.5

      0.5

      C

      Node names of SPT1 = {root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, ABC} Node names of SPT2 = {root, A, B, C, AC, CB, ACB} Node names of SPT3 = {root, B, BC, BD}

      Node names of SPT4 = {root, B, C, D, BC, BD, CD} Node names of SPT5 = {root, A, AB, AC}

      Node names of SPT6 = {root, A, AC, AD}

      RID C.prob

      B 1

      1 2= {root, A, B, C, AC}

      AC

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      1

      AC

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      1

      Fig. 2. User U2s trajectories and SP-tree SPT2

      1 2= {root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, ABC, CB, ACB}

      Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      0.67

      D

      0.33

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      0.67

      D

      0.33

      root

      root

      SPT2 = 12 = 5 = 0.5

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.33

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.33

      12 10

      B

      1 3= {root, B, BC}

      1 1 3= {root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, ABC, BD}

      BC

      RID

      C.prob

      D

      1

      BC

      RID

      C.prob

      D

      1

      Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and

      C D SPT3 = 13 = 3 = 0.33

      0.5 0.5

      13 9

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      0.67

      D

      0.33

      B

      RID

      C.prob

      C

      0.67

      D

      0.33

      root

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.4

      C

      0.3

      D

      0.3

      root

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.4

      C

      0.3

      D

      0.3

      Fig. 3. User U3s trajectories and SP-tree SPT3

      root

      1 4= {root, B, C, BC}

      1 4= {root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, ABC, D, BD, CD}

      Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and

      SPT = 14 = 4 =0.363

      B C D

      4 14 11

      1 0.75 0.75

      C D D

      1 5= {root, A, AB, AC}

      C

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.5

      D

      0.5

      C

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      0.5

      D

      0.5

      1 5= {root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, ABC} Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT5 = 15 = 4 =0.5

      15 8

      0.5 0.5 0.5

      D

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      1

      D

      RID

      C.prob

      B

      1

      1 6= {root, A, AC}

      BC

      RID

      C.prob

      D

      1

      BC

      RID

      C.prob

      D

      1

      1 6= {root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, ABC, AD} Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and

      SPT = 16 = 3 =0.33

      6 16 9

      Fig. 4. User U4s trajectories and SP-tree SPT4

      2 3= {root, B}

      2 3 = {root, A, B, C, AC, CB, ACB} Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT2 and SPT3 = 23 = 2 =0.285

      23 7

      2 4= {root, B, C}

      2 4 = {root, A, B, C, AC, CB, ACB, D, BC, BD, CD}

      Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT2 and SPT4 = 24 = 3 =0.272

      24 11

      2 5= {root, A, AC}

      2 5 = {root, A, B, C, AC, CB, ACB, D, BC, BD, CD}

      Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT2 and SPT4 = 25 = 3 = 0.272

      25 11

      2 6 = {root, A, AC}

      2 6 = {root, A, B, C, AC, CB, ACB, AD} Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 26 = 3 =0.37

      26 8

      3 4 = {root, B, BC, BD}

      3 4 = { root, B, C, D, BC, BD, CD } Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 34 = 4 =0.57

      34 7

      3 5 = {root}

      3 5 = { root, B, BC, BD, A, AB, AC } Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 35 = 1 =0.15

      35 7

      3 6 = {root}

      3 6 = { root, B, BC, BD, A, AC, AD } Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 36 = 1 = 0.15

      36 7

      4 5 = {root}

      4 5 = { root, B, C, D, BC, BD, CD, A, AB, AC} Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 45 = 1 =0.1

      45 10

      4 6 = {root}

      4 6 = { root, B, C, D, BC, BD, CD, A, AC, AD } Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 46 = 1 =0.1

      46 10

      5 6 = {root, A, AC}

      5 6 = { root, A, AB, AC, AD}

      Normalized similarity measure between trees SPT1 and SPT2 = 56 = 3 = 0.6

      56 5

      Based on the highest similarity measure values sequential probability tree T5 are clustered, and the SPT3 and SPT4 are finally SPT1 and SPT2 are clustered. Among all these formal clusters we repeat the same process to construct larger clusters.

  2. PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Trajectory of the user is represented by a sequence < l1, l2, l3, .. , ln >, where li denotes the locations, 1 I n [1]. Initially trajectory contains many raw data locations. Processing of raw data locations is closely in terms of computations. Trajectories containing raw data locations are converted into trajectories containing hot regions. Frequently visiting raw data locations are called hot regions. Many methods exist to find hot regions from raw data locations. Grid-based method is one of the best techniques to find hot regions [1].

    In the modified new procedure each trajectory is represented as a sequence of hot regions. Authors have proposed a new procedure to develop a data list of trajectory profiles of users to capture movement based behaviors of user communities. In this new procedure trajectory profiles of users are represented as a set of sequential patterns. Sequential pattern contains frequent sequences of hot regions. Number of sequential patters in many real life applications is very large and also very difficult to capture all the transition probabilities of hot regions. Transitions probabilities associated with profiles of user trajectories are very large and may not be possible to capture from a set of sequential patterns. Authors have proposed a new tree structure called sequential probability tree (SP-tree) to represent trajectory profile of a user.

    A sequential probability tree (sp-tree) is a special prefix multi-way tree that contains one root node (root) and a set of tree nodes. Each hot region is represented by an edge of sp-tree. Each node of a sp-tree is labeled by a special systematic string s1, s2, s3 .. , sk labeling starts from root to all other tree nodes. K is the length of the string from root to any other node s. si where represents th set of hot regions. T represents the set of user trajectory profiles. The K-length trajectory is represented by a string s1, s2, s3 .. , sk. Each nodes stores support(s) and a conditional table. Support(s) represents proportion of its present count from a set of total trajectories and its value is support(s) [0, 1].

    Support(s) =

    Number of trajectories that contian string in s as subsequencies

    Total number of trajectories

    The conditional table contains two attributes-Row id, C.Prob conditional probability table at a node s represents user next move probability corresponding to the traversal sequences from the node root to s.

    Breadth-First algorithm for constructing sequential probability tree:

    Breadth first sequential probability tree (BFSPT) accepts three inputs: A set of trajectories of a single user, minimum support and minimum probability. Each sequential probability tree (SPT) stores and manages trajectory details of one particular user profiles. Sequential

    probability tree is constructed in a level by level manner in breadth first approach.

    At the very beginning sequential probability tree contains only one root node with the conditional probability table (CPT). CPT stores the probabilities of hot regions such that the probability of each hot region is greater than a minimum probability threshold (Minimum- Probability). Minimum-support and minimum probabilities are context dependent and are specified by experts. In the second level a new node is created corresponding to the node whose support value of a hot region at the root. After all the nodes in the second are created same process is repeated to create all possible nodes in the third level, fourth level, etc. In each level of the sequential probability three first find frequent hot regions and construct conditional probability table for each node. The find and create child nodes in the (i+1) th level corresponding to each node in the ith level whose minimum support is greater than the minimum-support.

    1

    1

    Sequential probability tree construction procedure for a single user, u1 in the fig-1 with minimum-support is 0.4 and minimum-probability is 0.3. Initially, in the very beginning, the root node contains empty sequential patterns. It is represented as S0 = {root}. Conditional probability table of root represents three frequent hot regions A, B and C of U1 s trajectories. Support values of hot regions A, B and C are 3/4, 3/4 and 4/4 respectively.

    Number of trajectories in which A present Support of A =

    Number of trajectories in which A presents =3/4 = 0.75

    Total number of trajectories

    Support of B =

    probability table of root or not. Conditional probability table of root nodes has three hot regions, whose conditional probability table of root node has three hot regions, whose conditional probability is greater than the minimum- probability value, hence three children of the root node will be created. That is S1 = {A, B, C}. S2 will be created from S1 and S3 will be created from S2 and so on.

    The frequent hot region of node A are B and C and the corresponding projected trajectory profile data sets are {(B, C), (B, C), (C)}. Conditional probability table of node A contains 2 entries because conditional probability of both B and C is greater than minimum conditional probability is (0.3). Two children for node A will be created because support values of both B and C are also greater than minimum-support (0.4). Children of A are labeled as AB and AC. Hence S3 = {AB, AC} corresponding to A.

    In the same fashion conditional probability table of B in level 1 contains only one hot region in (C), whose conditional probability and support are greater than minimum conditional probability and minimum support projected trajectory data set for B are {(C), (C), (C)}. A new node, BC, will be created for the node B at level 1. Nodes in the level 3 are S2 = {AB, AC, and BC}. At level 1, projected trajectory for node C is empty as there are no hot regions starting from C.

    In the level 2 only AB contains one hot region with both conditional probability and support greater than minimum support and minimum conditional probability values hence a new node {A, B, C} will be created as a child node for AB, and S3 ={A, B, C}.

    For the given example-1 the sequential probability

    is shown in Fig-2. Nodes of the sp-tree are represented as

    Number of trajectories in which B presents

    Total number of trajectories

    Support of C =

    =3/4 = 0.75

    root, A, B, C, AB, AC, BC and ABC. Final tree has four levels S0= {root}, S1 = {A, B, C}, S2 = {AB, AC, BC} and

    Number of trajectories in which C presents = 4/4 = 1.0

    Total number of trajectories

    Conditional probability of root node are calculated as follows: U1

    1

    1

    Total number of hot regions of U 1 s trajectories at the root node = 10

    Conditional probability of hot region A=

    Number of times hot region A appears in all the trajectories of U1 =

    Total number of trajectories of user U1

    3/10

    = 0.3

    Conditional probability of hot region B =

    Number of times hot region B appears in the trajectories of user U1 =

    Total number of trajectories U1

    3/10 = 0.3

    Conditional probability of hot region C =

    Number of times hot region C appears in the trajectories of user U1 =

    Total number of trajectories U1

    4/10 = 0.4

    Conditional probability values of hot regions conditional probability table of root are {0.3, 0.3, 0.4}.

    Conditional probability table of root node contains three hot regions (A, B and C) because conditional probabilities of A, B and C are greater than minimum-probability. Root is in the first level and we must create three child nodes to root node. That is, for each frequent hot region, text whether the frequent hot region is in the conditional

    S3= {ABC}.

    Clustering of users based on the movement based community details:

    Users are clustered based on their trajectory profiles. Trajectory profiles of each user is represented by one sequential probability tree [1]. A trajectory profile of n- users is represented by n sequential probability trees. Once all sequential probability trees are constructed, then the next goal is to cluster all these users into groups such that users in the same group have certain types of similarity movement features and users between the two different groups have certain types of (many) dissimilar features. Verities of similarity measure details are presented and these similarity measures are used in clustering users.

    Different types of similarity functions considered in sequential probability trees:

    Movement details of users are represented in sequential probability trees. Each sequential probability tree represents on user profile. That is, each sequential probability tree stores and maintaining sequential patterns as well as transition probabilities. In framing different types of similarity measures of users, many structured information details of sequential probability trees are considered. Most important similarity measures that are considered are:

    1. Number of common tree nodes in sequential probability trees:

      Every node in a sequential probability tree represents a full or partial frequent sequence of hot regions of the users trajectories. The similarity measure strength increases as the number of common nodes between two sequential probability trees increases and it results the increase in movement behavior of the two respective users.

    2. The number of total nodes of sequential probability trees :

      Total number of nodes in the sequential probability trees is also considered as one of the important similarity measure between two movement details of users. Similarity measure between two parts of the two different sequential probability trees increases as the total number of nodes with the same sequence of patterns increase. The length of sequential patterns increases as he total number of nodes in the sequential probability trees increases.

    3. Number of distinct nodes of sequential probability trees:

      Every node in the sequential probability tree from top to bottom represents a specific sequential movement pattern of a particular user. Similarity function can also be taken as a function of different nodes of sequential probability trees. Also note that two users may have the same common nodes but with different movement coverage ranges. Assume that the user U1 may have a set of different movement coverage ranges with larger path length. Also, assume that the user U2 also have other set of different movement coverage ranges with small path lengths. Due to the difference in many path lengths, movement coverage ranges also differ between two different users.

    4. Support values of sequential probability trees :

      Every node in the sequential probability tree is assigned a support value, which indicates the frequency of frequent sequential pattern that appears in the trajectory profile of the user. Movement behaviour of the user changes as the support values of nodes changes. The movement behaviours of the two different users come close to near when the corresponding support values of two common nodes approach very close to each other. Support value is directly proportional to the sequential pattern. The length of sequential pattern increases as the support value increases. The importance of sequential pattern increases when the support value increases. Support is the most important similarity measure and it is popularity used in many applications of movement based related tasks. Support is the most important and most frequently used similarity measure in many movement based applications that are mainly based on trajectory profiles of users. We can formulate many similarity measurements in many number of ways using support values. Different support usage formulas will give different ways of measuring similarity strength between users.

    5. Conditional probability details of nodes in the sequential probability trees :

    Each node in the sequential probability tree is associated with a conditional set of probability table. The conditional probability table represent s set of probability such that each probability indicates the frequency of the movement from the current node to one of its childrens. These probabilities are called transition probabilities. Transitional probabilities explain how the next movement occurs from the current node. Transitional probabilities represent more detailed movement based details of users. It may be possible that the same type of two sequential patterns may have different sequential probability table are one of the most important and frequently used popular similarity measure used to compare two different user profiles or trajectories. Comparing two sequential probability trees gives more accurate result when conditional probabilities in the conditional probability tables are used.

    Detailed explanation of computing similarity measurements:

    Similarity measurement values are computed for each pair of common tree nodes of two different sequential probability trees based on their support and conditional probability values. Most popular and most important two similarity measurement functions or techniques are similarityN and similarityT. The similarity function similaritySP (.) is obtained by summarizing the similarity scores and then normalizing the similarity scores based on the number of nodes of respective sequential probability trees. To make the all comparisons very easy between any two sequential all comparisons very easy between any two sequential probability trees all the similarity measurement scores are normalized and this normalization helps us to manipulate and maintain all the desired results in a systematic and in a convenient way.

    s

    s

    s

    s

    s

    s

    s s s

    s s s

    Let us consider SPTi and SPTj are two sequential probability trees of two different users. Nodes in the ith tree with the sequential pattern s are represented by Ni . Similarity the nodes in jth sequential probability tree are represented by Nj . For any given two nodes Ni and Nj in the different sequential probability trees, the similarity measure is defined by the equation (1) SimilarityN (Ni ,

    Nj ) =

    1, =

    {(1 |() ()|) ()+(),

    2

    otherwise (1)

    For two distinct sequential probability trees consider the two distinct nodes each node taken from a separate sequential probability tree and also consider the common sequential pattern. The first term explains the closeness of their support values. If support values of these nodes are very close to each other, then the difference between them becomes very smaller. When the first term is very large it indicates that the two support values are very close to each other. The second term in the equation (1) represents the weights of their support values. Clearly, the nodes with the

    large support values are very important and they are considered first in calculating the similarity measurements. Also, this particular measure is very useful and very important it actually tells us how important the average support of these selected nodes. Usually, the nodes with the larger support values are more important in finding similarity scores.

    i

    i

    j

    j

    3

    3

    Consider the two nodes N s=N1BC and N s =N BC in

    1. Create a new trajectory set of s

    2. S is a child of s , so add node s into Sk+1

    3. End if

    4. End for

    5. End for

    15. k = k + 1

    16. End while

    Depth First Algorithm for constructing sequential

    1 3

    1 3

    SPT1 and SPT3 sequential probability trees. Similarity measure, SimilarityN (N BC , N BC) = (1-|0.75-0.5|)*0.75+0.5

    2

    i

    i

    = 0.47. The conditional probability table of a node N s is

    j

    j

    i i j

    i i j

    used to store all the probability corresponding to the next movements from the current node to its children nodes where s is the sequential pattern of the current node. When two common node are considered from two different sequential probability trees and when the differences between these two conditional probability tables is very less then it is the indication that these two common nodes are more similar in terms similarity measurement scores and hence corresponding user movement are similar. Next movement details of children nodes are provided only to the nodes whose minimum probability condition is satisfied. Each conditional probability table satisfies probability distribution rules. Probability distribution rules or formulas applicable to evaluate the similarity measurement score values between two conditional tables. We assume that the conditional probability table of a node N s is C s and the conditional probability table of a node N s is C s .The similarity measurement score of these two conditional probability tables is defined as:

    i j

    i j

    SimilarityT (C s, C s) =

    | s s | Pr(Cs())Pr(Cs())|

    probability tree:

    Algorithm 2: Depth First Method (DFM) Input:

    1. A set of user profiles, T, represented as transformed trajectories.

    2. A minimum conditional Probability threshold (minimum probability )

    3. A minimum support threshold (minimum support)

    Output: A sequential probability tree that stores all the profile details of a single user.

    1. Find frequent hot regions at the root node, s 2.Create conditional probability tale of root node, s 3.For each in frequent hot regions do

    1. If is in conditional probability table of a nodes s then

    2. s is a child of s

    3. Create transformed trajectory set T1

    4. Depth First Method (T , s, minimum probability, minimum support)

    5. End if

    6. End for

    This algorithm calls itself recursively at each level and at each node in that level.

    1- sCi Cj

    i j

    |CsCs|

    (2)

    i j Algorithm 3: New-Clustering :

  3. ALGORITHMS

Breadth First Algorithm for constructing Sequential Probability Tree:

Algorithm 1: Breadth First Method (BFM)

Input:

  1. A set of user profiles, T, represented as transformed trajectories.

  2. A minimum conditional Probability threshold (minimum probability ).

  3. A minimum support threshold (minimum support).

    Output:

    A sequential probability tree that represents profile details of a single user.

    1.Root = null //A root node with null entry

    2.So ={root} //At the very beginning only root is there 3.K=0

  4. While (Sk0) do //While the set Sk contains elements do

  5. Sk+1=0 // Sk+1 is to store node names in the next level

  6. For each node s in the set Sk do

  7. Find frequent hot regions and then create conditional table

    of node s

  8. For each in frequent hot regions do

  9. If is in conditional table of node is s then

Input:

1.A set of sequential probability trees {SP-tree1, SPtree2,

SP-tree3, SP-treen} 2.Minimum similarity bound,

Output: A set of clusters representing user communities. 1.Construct a new connection graph G = (V, E) by using SP-

tree1, SP-tree2, SP-tree3,, SP-treen and 2.Initially consider all nodes of U as separate clusters. 3.Previous cost= Total cost of cluster formation 4.Test=True

  1. While (Test=True) do

  2. Test =False

  3. Initialize two clusters Xi, Xj each to empty

  4. Minimum cost= Previous cost

  5. For each cluster Ci, Cj in the set c do

  6. Present cost= previous cost+| Ci * Cj| – 2* Intercost (Ci, Cj)

  7. If (present cost minimum cost) then

  8. Test =True

  9. Store Ci in Xi and Cj in Xj

  10. End if

  11. End for

  12. If (Test=True) then

  13. Combine Xi and Xj into a single cluster

  14. Previous cost = minimum cost

  15. End if

  16. End while

    Algorithm 4: Proposed-Clustering

    Input:

    1. A set of n sequential probability trees

    2. Minimum threshold to combine clusters

Output :

A set of clusters.

1.Initially traverse a set of n sequential probability trees. 2.Find all the names of nodes of each tree and store node names

of each tree separately. 3.Initialize each tree as one cluster. 4.While for each cluster id

  1. For each cluster j = (i+1) to n do

  2. Calculate similarity measures of clusters i and j

    and then store all these measures

    REFERENCES

    1. When-Yuan Zhu,, Wen-Chih Peng , Member, IEEE, C. C. Hung, P.R. Lei, and L.J. Chen, Senior Member, IEEE Exploring Sequential Probability Tree for Movement-Based Community Discovery IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Nov. 2014.

    2. J. Han, M. Kamber, and J. Pei, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, third ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2011.

  3. End for j

  4. End for i

  5. While (similarity measure is > minimum threshold) do Combine two clusters whose similarity measure is maximum

  6. End of while

  7. End of while

    VII. CONCLUSION

    A new algorithm is proposed to cluster movement based users based on trajectory profiles of different users. Movement based clustering procedure or method mainly consists of three steps.

    • Constructing sequential probability trees to store all the details of user trajectory profiles [1].

    • Based on the stored details of users in the sequential probability trees different similarity measurement scores are calculated [1].

    • Based on the calculated similarity measurement scores movement-based user details are clustered [1].

First sequential probability trees are constructed to store all the movement based details of users. Two special methods are used to construct sequential probability trees. The first method is called breadth first sequential probability tree construction and the second method is called depth first sequential probability tree construction. Different types of measurement scores such as support, conditional probability values, number of similar nodes and number of distinct nodes etc are used. Finally a new clustering method called Geo-cluster is used to cluster movement based details of users.

Leave a Reply