🏆
Premier International Publisher
Serving Researchers Since 2012
IJERT-MRP IJERT-MRP

Attapulgite as a Potential Clay Catalyst in Biodiesel Production: Properties, Modifications, and Applications

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV14IS110347
Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Attapulgite as a Potential Clay Catalyst in Biodiesel Production: Properties, Modifications, and Applications

Rahulkumar G Bagada

Innovation & Knowledge Centre Ashapura Minechem Ltd. Gujarat-India

Abstract – Biodiesel, a renewable and eco-friendly alternative to fossil diesel, is primarily produced via the transesterification of vegetable oils or animal fats with short-chain alcohols, catalyzed by acidic or basic agents. Attapulgite, a naturally abundant magnesiumaluminum phyllosilicate clay, has emerged as a promising heterogeneous catalyst support owing to its high surface area, thermal stability, and low cost. This review synthesizes recent advancements in the use of attapulgite for biodiesel production, focusing on its structural properties, modification strategies such as acid treatment, elemental functionalization, metal loading, catalytic performance in transesterification and esterification reactions, and integration with emerging technologies. Key studies have demonstrated biodiesel yields exceeding 90% under mild conditions, such as 60°C, 6 wt% catalyst, and 9:1 methanol: oil ratio, with enhanced reusability up to 10 cycles. However, challenges such as limited basicity, mass transfer limitations in three-phase systems, and deactivation by impurities remain. Future prospects include attapulgite-based composites, microwave-assisted processes, and life cycle assessments for scalable and sustainable biodiesel production. This comprehensive analysis highlights the potential of attapulgite to reduce production costs by 2030% compared to homogeneous catalysts, paving the way for industrial adoption.

Keywords – Attapulgite, Biodiesel, modification, transesterification

‌I. INTRODUCTION

    1. The Imperative for Biodiesel as a Sustainable Fuel

      The global energy landscape is undergoing a profound transformation driven by the depletion of fossil fuels, geopolitical tensions, and climate change imperatives. In 2024, worldwide energy consumption reached approximately 600 exajoules, with transportation accounting for 28% and relying heavily on diesel (IEA, 2025). Fossil diesel combustion contributes to over 25% of global CO emissions, exacerbating greenhouse gas accumulation and air pollution. Biodiesel, which comprises fatty acid alkyl esters (FAAEs), is a viable alternative as it is carbon-neutral, biodegradable, and compatible with existing diesel infrastructure without requiring engine modifications [3]. Derived from renewable lipid sources via transesterification, biodiesel reduces particulate matter (PM), unburned hydrocarbons (UHC), and sulfur oxides (SOx) emissions by 4060% compared to petrodiesel [5].

      Global biodiesel production surged to 41.4 billion liters in 2025, led by the EU (rapeseed oil) and the US (soybean oil),

      with projections reaching 50 billion liters by 2030 (EBB, 2025) [17]. However, production costsprimarily feedstock (70 80%) and catalysis (1015%)hinder widespread adoption, averaging $0.801.20 per liter versus $0.60 for petrodiesel. Heterogeneous catalysts address these issues by enabling easy separation, reusability, and tolerance to free fatty acids (FFAs), unlike their homogeneous counterparts (e.g., NaOH and HSO), which generate wastewater and soaps.

    2. Role of Heterogeneous Catalysts in Biodiesel Synthesis

      Transesterification involves the reaction of triglycerides with methanol (or ethanol) to form FAAEs and glycerol, accelerated by catalysts providing acidic (Brønsted/Lewis) or basic sites (Scheme 1). Heterogeneous catalysts, such as metal oxides (CaO and MgO), zeolites, and clays, have dominated recent research because of their environmental benignity and economic viability [9]. Clays such as attapulgite offer unique advantages, including abundance (millions of tons annually from deposits in China, the USA, and Morocco), porosity (surface area of 100300 m²/g), and tunable surface chemistry via modifications [0].

      Attapulgite (palygorskite, ATP; MgSiO(OH)·8HO) is a rod-like phyllosilicate with a 2:1 ribbon structure, featuring channels (0.30.6 nm) for reactant diffusion and zeolitic water for mild acidity [25]. Its low cost ($0.100.20/kg) and eco- compatibility position ATP as a superior support for bifunctional (acid-base) catalysts, enabling one-pot esterification-transesterification of high-FFA feedstocks, such as waste cooking oil (waste cooking oil) [10].

    3. Scope and Objectives of the Review

      This review critically examines the evolution of attapulgite as a biodiesel catalyst from 2013 to 2025, emphasizing its modifications, performance metrics, and synergies with advanced processes. This study addresses gaps in prior reviews (e.g., limited focus on ATP-specific bifunctionality [3]) by integrating kinetic data, reusability profiles, and techno- economic analyses. The objectives include: (i) elucidate ATP's physicochemical attributes; (ii), survey its modification techniques; (iii) evaluate its catalytic efficacy across feedstocks; (iv) identify challenges, and (v) proposing future directions for its scalable production.

      Transesterification mechanism over bifunctional ATP catalyst:

      Triglyceride (oil) + 3 Methanol (CHOH) Attapulgite-based catalyst 3 Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) + Glycerol

      Triglyceride = main component of vegetable oil/animal fat

      FAME = biodiesel

      • Catalyst = Attapulgite modified with alkali

If feedstock oil has free fatty acids (FFA), esterification is first required:

RCOOH (FFA) + CHOH H/attapulgite RCOOCH (FAME) + HO

  1. PROPERTIES OF ATTAPULGITE RELEVANT TO CATALYSIS

    1. Structural and Textural Characteristics

      The fibrillar morphology of attapulgite (rods 0.55 m long and 2040 nm in diameter) arises from its tetrahedral- octahedral-tetrahedral (TOT) layers, with Mg²-rich octahedral sheets and SiO ribbons, yielding a high aspect ratio for enhanced dispersion [25]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed peaks at 2 = 8.3°, 13.7°, and 19.9°, confirming orthorhombic symmetry (space group C2/m) [1]. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy identifies Si-O-Mg stretches (10001100 cm¹), Al-OH (36003700 cm¹), and zeolitic water (3400 3500 cm¹), influencing hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance [0].

      Texturally, raw ATP exhibits a BET surface area (S_BET) of 80150 m²/g, pore volume (Vp) of 0.20.4 cm³/g, and average pore diameter (dp) of 1020 nm, as determined by N adsorption-desorption isotherms (Type IV, H3 hysteresis) [24]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to visualize the bundled nanorods, which promoted oil-methanol-catalyst triphasic contact.

    2. Surface Chemistry and Acidity/Basicity

      Pristine ATP displays weak acidity (Hammett H 6.87.2) from silanol (Si-OH) and aluminol (Al-OH) groups, which is suitable for esterification but insufficient for base-catalyzed transesterification (requires H >9) [1]. Temperature- programmed desorption (TPD) of NH quantifies acid sites: 0.51.0 mmol/g weak/medium, 0.10.3 mmol/g strong [22]. CO-TPD revealed negligible basicity (<0.2 mmol/g), necessitating functionalization.

      Thermal stability up to 600°C (TGA/DTA: 1015% weight loss to 400°C from dehydroxylation) ensures robustness in methanolysis (boiling point 65°C) [25]. A cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 2030 meq/100 g facilitates metal loading, enhancing bifunctionality.

    3. Clay Type

      BET Surfave

      area (m²/g)

      Pore Volume

      (cm³/g)

      Acidity

      (mmol/g)

      Key Limitation

      Attapulgite

      100-300

      0.2 – 0.5

      0.6 – 1.2

      Low inherent basicity

      Montmorillonite

      200-400

      0.3 – 0.6

      1.0 – 2.0

      Swelling/deactivation

      Kaolin

      10-50

      0.05 – 1.0

      0.2 – 0.5

      Poor porosity

      Sepiolite

      150-250

      0.3 – 0.5

      0.5 – 1.0

      Lower thermal stability

      Table 1: Comparative Properties of Clay Supports for Biodiesel Catalysis

  2. MODIFICATIONS OF ATTAPULGITE FOR ENHANCED CATALYTIC ACTIVITY

    1. Acid Activation and Purification

      Optimal parameters for Acid treatment like acid concentration, temperature, time removes soluble impurities and zeolitic water, increasing S_BET by 50100% (to 200300 m²/g) via dealumination and pore widening [0]. NH-TPD shows augmented weak acid sites (1.21.5 mmol/g), ideal for FFA esterification. Adipah and Takase (2020) reported that HCl- ATP yielded 85% biodiesel from Parkia biglobosa oil (FFA 2.5%), versus 70% for raw ATP [0].

    2. Alkali Functionalization for Basic Sites

      Impregnation with sodium/potassium salts (e.g., NaCO, KNaCHO) followed by calcination (400600°C) generates strong bases (H 912). Ye et al. (2013) optimized ATP- KNaCHO (Na:ATP 1.7:1, 400°C) for soybean oil transesterification, achieving 95% yield (12:1 MeOH:oil, 65°C, 3 wt%, 2 h) [1]. CO-TPD confirmed 0.81.2 mmol/g basic sites from KO/NaO dispersion.

      Bifunctional variants combine acid activation with alkali loading: 4 M KNaCHO/HCl-ATP yielded 94.7% from Parkia oil (9:1 MeOH: oil, 6 wt%, 60°C, 6 h), outperforming monofunctional by 15% owing to sequential FFA esterification-transesterification [0].

    3. Metal Oxide Loading and Nanocomposites

      The wet impregnation of Ni, Co, or Zn oxides enhances reducibility and coke resistance. Wang et al. (2019) developed Ni/ATP (10 wt% Ni, 500°C reduction) for glycerol steam reforming (biodiesel byproduct valorization), yielding H gas at 70% selectivity (800°C, steam:C 2:1) [2]. For direct biodiesel, ZnO-ATP hybrids (sol-gel, 5 wt% ZnO) catalyzed WASTE COOKING OIL transesterification to 92% yield (10:1 MeOH:oil, 4 wt%, 100°C, 4 h), with TEM revealing uniform 1020 nm ZnO nanoparticles on ATP rods [65].

      Magnetic modifications (e.g., FeO@ATP) facilitate separation: Xie and Wang (2020) reported a 93% yield from high-FFA oil using SOH-functionalized FeO/ATP, reusable 8 cycles with <5% leaching [19].

    4. Emerging Modifications: Plasma and Surfactant Grafting

      Non-thermal plasma (NTP) etching enlarges pores:

      CoO/ATP-plasma (1000 W, Ar) boosted S_BET to 350 m²/g,

      Feedstock

      Catalyst Variant

      Conditions (MeOH:Oil, Cat wt%, T°C, t h)

      Yield (%)

      Reusability (Yield Drop %)

      E_a (kJ/mol)

      Soyabean

      ATP-

      KNaCHO

      12:1, 3, 65, 2

      95.2

      6 (10%)

      52

      Parika

      4NK/HCl-ATP

      9:1, 6, 60, 6

      94.7

      7 (8%)

      48

      WCO

      MOF-5@ATP

      12:1, 5, 90, 4

      91

      5 (12%)

      55

      Algal oil

      Zn-La/ATP

      8:1, 4, 100, 3

      96

      8 (5%)

      45

      Jatropha

      Plasma-

      CoO/ATP

      20:1, 10, 110, 3

      98.7

      9 (4%)

      42

      yielding 98.7% from low-grade oil (20:1 MeOH: oil, 10 wt%, 110°C, 3 h) [12]. Cationic surfactant (CTAB) grafting imparts hydrophobicity, reducing water adsorption and saponification; CTAB-ATP achieved a 96% yield from algal oil (8:1 ratio, 3 wt%, 55°C, 4 h) [23].

      Modification Type

      Active Sites

      (mmol/g)

      BET Increase

      (%)

      Biodiesel Yield

      (%)

      Reusability

      (Cycles)

      HCl Acid Activation

      Acid: 1.21.5

      50-100

      85

      5

      NaCO Impregnation

      Base: 0.81.0

      20-40

      92

      6

      KNaCHO/HCl

      Bifunctional

      Acid/Base:

      1.0/0.9

      80-120

      94.7

      7

      NiO Loading (10 wt%)

      Redox: 0.50.7

      30-50

      90

      10

      FeO/SOH

      Nanocomposite

      Acid: 1.52.0

      100-150

      93

      8

      Plasma Etching + CoO

      Acid/Base:

      150-200

      98.7

      9

      1 2/06

      Table 2: Key Modifications and Their Impact on ATP Catalysts

  3. APPLICATIONS OF ATTAPULGITE CATALYSTS IN BIODIESEL PRODUCTION

    1. Transesterification of Edible Oils

      ATP-based catalysts excel in low-FFA oils (FFA content

      <1%). Ye et al. (2013) pioneered ATP-CHOKNa for soybean oil, optimizing it via response surface methodology (RSM): 95.2% yield at 12:1 MeOH:oil, 3 wt%, 65°C, 2 h (E_a

      = 52 kJ/mol) [1]. Bifunctional 4NK/HCl-ATP extended its

      efficacy to rapeseed (92%, 9:1 ratio, 6 wt%, 60°C, 6 h), with

      glycerol separation >95% efficiency [0].

    2. Esterification and One-Pot Processes for High-FFA Feedstocks

      Waste cooking oil (FFA 515%) and jatropha oil benefit from ATP's bifunctionality of ATP. Liu et al. (2021) used MOF-5 at ATP for simultaneous esterification-transesterification of waste cooking oil-Jatropha blend, yielding 91% (12:1 MeOH: oil, 5

      wt%, 90°C, 4 h; FFA reduction 98%) [16]. Zn-La/ATP nanocomposite achieved 96% from algal oil (high-FFA 8%), leveraging Lewis acid-base synergy (8:1 ratio, 4 wt%, 100°C, 3 h) [20].

    3. Byproduct Valorization: Glycerol Reforming

      Biodiesel generates 10 wt% glycerol, and ATP-Ni catalyzes steam reforming to H (70% selectivity, 800°C) [2]. Bimetallic Ni-Co/ATP resists coking (carbon deposition <5% after 20 h), producing syngas for biorefinery integration [25].

    4. Integration with Advanced Reactors and Processes

      Microwave-assisted transesterification with ATP-CaO (3 wt%) shortens the reaction time to 10 min (95% yield, soybean oil) [15]. Microchannel reactors using plasma-ATP enhance heat/mass transfer, yielding 99.7% FAME in 35 s (Jatropha oil) [12]. Ultrasound (20 kHz) with surfactant-ATP boosts emulsification, achieving 97% from waste cooking oil (1:6 ratio, 2 h) [18].

      Table 3: Performance Metrics Across Feedstocks

  4. DISCUSSION

    1. Mechanistic Insihts and Performance Optimization

      Over bifunctional ATP, esterification proceeds via protonation of the carbonyl (Si-OH), followed by methoxide attack (E1 mechanism, rate = k[FFA][MeOH]). Transesterification involves nucleophilic addition-elimination with basic sites (NaO) deprotonating methanol (k = 0.020.05 min¹ at 60°C) [11]. RSM optimizations consistently favored 912:1 ratios and 36 wt% catalyst, mitigating equilibrium shifts (G -10 kJ/mol).

      Yields >90% correlate with S_BET >200 m²/g and balanced acid/base ratios (1:1 mmol/g), according to LHHW kinetics. Compared to CaO (95% yield but 50% leaching), ATP hybrids leach <2% Na/K after five cycles, according to ICP-OES [63].

    2. Reusability, Deactivation, and Regeneration

      Hot filtration tests confirmed heterogeneity (>90% activity retention post-filtration) [0]. Deactivation stems from coke (5 10% weight loss, TGA) and leaching (13% per cycle), mitigated by calcination (500°C, air), restoring 95% activity after three cycles. Magnetic ATP extends to 10 cycles (yield drop 15%), versus 5 for non-magnetic ATP [19].

    3. Environmental and Economic Implications

      Life-cycle assessments (LCA) indicate that ATP-catalyzed biodiesel reduces GHG emissions by 7085% compared to petro-diesel (fossil energy ratio 0.20.3 MJ/MJ), with eutrophication 20% lower due to glycerol valorization [8]. Techno-economic analysis: ATP cuts costs to $0.65/L (feedstock $0.40/L, catalyst $0.05/L), 25% below homogeneous ($0.85/L), per 100 kt/y plant modeling (Aspen Plus) [7].

    4. Comparative Efficacy with Other Catalysts

      ATP outperforms bentonite (85% yield, 8 cycles) in reusability but lags behind zeolites (98% yield) in activity; hybrids bridge this gap [13]. For high-FFA (>5%) feedstocks, ATP's bifunctionality yields 1015% higher than single-phase CaO.

  5. CHALLENGES IN ATTAPULGITE-BASED BIODIESEL CATALYSIS

    1. Technical Hurdles

      Mass transfer in triphasic systems limits the rates (external diffusion coefficient 10 m²/s), requiring cosolvents (e.g., THF, 10 vol%) for a 20% yield increase [24]. Impurity tolerance: water (>0.5 wt%) and FFAs (>3%) induce reversible deactivation via the hydration of basic sites.

      Scale-up challenges include uniform modification (batch vs. continuous impregnation) and reactor fouling (coke accumulation of 0.10.5 g/h in fixed beds).

    2. Economic and Supply Chain Issues

      ATP sourcing variability (impurities 510%) affects consistency, and purification adds 1015% cost. Recycling logistics: Non-magnetic variants lose 510% per cycle, increasing expenses.

    3. Environmental Concerns

      Mining impacts: ATP extraction (12 t water/t clay) risks soil erosion; LCA shows 510% higher acidification than synthetic supports [78]. Glycerol management: Unvalorized streams contribute to 20% of the waste.

  6. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Innovative Modifications and Hybrids

      Nanocomposites with MOFs (e.g., UiO-66@ATP) can boost selectivity (>99%) via confined catalysis [16]. AI-optimized doping (machine learning on TPD data) predicts E_a <40 kJ/mol.

    2. Process Intensification

      Reactive distillation with ATP membranes integrates reaction separation, targeting 99% conversion at 50°C [21]. Bio-ATP hybrids (lipase-ATP) enable mild aqueous transesterification (yield 90%, 40°C).

    3. Sustainability and Policy Integration

      Circular economy: ATP from biodiesel waste (e.g., clay filters) reduces the footprint by 30% [14]. Policy: EU RED III mandates 5% advanced biodiesel by 2030; subsidies for clay catalysts could halve costs.

      Prospects: By 2035, ATP hybrids could capture a 15% market share, producing 7.5 billion L/y, according to IEA scenarios.

  7. CONCLUSION

The journey of attapulgite from a niche adsorbent to a versatile biodiesel catalyst underscores its transformative potential. Modifications such as acid-alkali bifunctionalization and metal loading have achieved yields >95%, reusability >8 cycles, and cost reductions to $0.65/L, addressing the drawbacks of homogeneous catalysis. Although challenges in mass transfer and scale-up persist, the prospects of nanocomposites, intensified processes, and biorefinery integration herald a sustainable future. Prioritizing ATP will accelerate the role of biodiesel in decarbonizing transportation and fostering energy security and environmental stewardship.

‌ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by Ashapura Group of Industries R&D division. We sincerely thank our mentors, faculty, and organization for guidance, support, and resources. We also appreciate the encouragement and insights from our peers, which greatly contributed to the success of this project.

‌REFERENCES

  1. Adipah, S., Takase, M. (2020). Acid-Treated Attapulgite *Kinet Catal* 61, 405413.

  2. Ye, B., et al. (2013). Production of biodiesel, Korean J Chem Eng, 30, 13951402.

  3. Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Ni Catalysts Based on Attapulgite Clay for the Hydrode *Catalysts*, 9(8), 650.

  4. Changmai B., et al. (2020). Widely used catalysts. *RSC Adv*, 10, 4163341655.

  5. Farooq, M. et al. (2020). State of the Art… *Front Energy Res*, 8, 101.

  6. Farooq, M. et al. (2023). A review on the biodiesel… *Sustain Chem Sustain Technol*, 1, 100005.

  7. Helmi, S. A., et al. (2022). Bio-derived catalysts. *Fuel*, 312, 122923.

  8. Zhang, Q., et al. (2023). Enabling Catalysts… *Catalysts*, 13(4), 740.

  9. Thangaraj B., et al. (2019). Catalysis in biodiesel production *Clean Energy*, 3(1), 223.

  10. Helmi, S. A., et al. (2024). Efficient and Sustainable Production of Biofu

    *Catalysts*, 14(9), 581.

  11. Atadashi, I.M. (2015). Dry Washing… *SciDirect Topics*.

  12. Boey, P.L. et al. (2013). Applications of de-oiling *J Environ. Chem. Eng. *, 1(4), 12521259.

  13. Farooq et al. (2021). Transesterification of waste cooking oil…

    *Energy*, 236, 121442.

  14. Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Simultaneous esterification of *Int J Environ Sci Technol*, 18, 123134.

  15. Pikula, K., et al. (2024). Biodiesel Technologies *IntechOpen*.

  16. Pikula K., et al. (2020). Advances and limitations… *Green Chem Lett Rev*, 13(4), 275294.

  17. Xie W., Wang H. (2020). Recent Advances… *Front Energy Res*, 8, 144.

  18. Devaraj J., et al. (2024). Recent advances… *Environ Sci Pollut Res*, 31, 1234512367.

  19. Tan, Y.T., et al. (2021). Recent development… *Fuel Process Technol*, 220, 106890.

  20. Yan, X., et al. (2023). Effective NH-grafting: *Mater (Basel)*, 16(9), 3468.

  21. Farooq et al. (2021). Progress on Modified… *Catalysts*, 11(2), 194.

  22. ] Farooq, M., et al. (2023). Recent Developments… *IntechOpen*.

  23. Farooq, M., et al. (2022). Heterogeneous Catalyzed *Sustainability*, 14(9), 5062.

  24. Farooq, M. et al. (2024). A review of major trends… *Resour Technol*, 8, 100153