Assessment of Cutting Parameters for Optimization of Material Removal Rate In Face Milling Operation: Taguchi Method and Regression Analysis

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS60449

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Assessment of Cutting Parameters for Optimization of Material Removal Rate In Face Milling Operation: Taguchi Method and Regression Analysis

Vishal Francis1, Ashutosh Dubey2

1-2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, SHIATS, Allahabad

Abstract

The present research work discusses about the application of Taguchi method and Regression Analysis for optimization of Material Removal Rate in machining of Gun metal with a HSS tool. The experiment was designed using Taguchis experimental design technique. The cutting parameters selected are spindle speed, feed and depth of cut. The effect of cutting parameters on Material Removal Rate is investigated and the optimum cutting conditions for maximizing the Material Removal Rate is determined. Linear regression equation is developed with an objective to establish a correlation between the selected cutting parameters and Material Removal Rate. The predicted values are compared with experimental values and are found to be in good agreement. Depth of cut is found to be the most influencing factor affecting Material Removal Rate followed by spindle speed and feed.

Keywords: Taguchi method; Regression Analysis; Material Removal Rate, Gun Metal.

  1. Introduction

    Considering the current scenario of manufacturing industries, it has become vital for every firm to meet the demands in minimum span of time. It is worthwhile important to study the rate at which the material is being removed and at the same time achieving the quality requirements. The volume of material removed per minute in machining of a component is termed as material removal rate. The present work investigates the effect of cutting parameters on Material removal rate in face milling operation in a CNC machine, in order to find the optimum combination of the parameters to maximize the Material removal rate. The experiment was designed using Taguchi method. Dr. Taguchi employed design of experiments (DOE), which is one of the most important and efficient tools of total quality management (TQM) for designing high quality systems at reduced cost. Taguchi emphasizes on the fact that Quality provides robustness and immune to the uncontrollable factors in the manufacturing state. This approach helps to reduce the large number of experimental trials when the number

    of process parameters increases [1]. A L27 orthogonal array was selected and the three Process parameter viz. depth of cut, feed and spindle speeds were varied to analyze the results obtained. Regression analysis is applied to develop a linear regression equation.

  2. Taguchi Methodology

    Taguchi method is based on performing evaluation or experiments to test the sensitivity of a set of response variables to a set of control parameters (or independent variables) by considering experiments in orthogonal array with an aim to attain the optimum setting of the control parameters. Orthogonal arrays provide a best set of well balanced (minimum) experiments [2]. These experiments provide full information about all the factors that affect the response parameter [3]. Taguchi method stresses the importance of studying the response variation using the signal to noise (S/N) ratio, resulting in minimization of quality characteristic variation due to uncontrollable parameter. Larger the better characteristic is used for calculation of S/N ratio for Material Removal Rate.

    Where n is the number of measurement in a trail/row and Yi is the measured value in the run/row.

  3. Materials and Methods

    The work material used in the present investigation is a gun metal rectangular block of 80 X 80 X 40 mm. The chemical composition

    consists of (88%) copper, (10%) tin and (2%) zinc. Figure 1 shows the experimental set up for face milling operation. A L27 orthogonal array is employed for conducting the experimental runs and MRR is calculated for each run. Taguchis method is used to design the experiment. The three cutting parameters selected for the present research work are spindle speed (S), feed (f) and depth of cut (d), with three level tests for each factor. Table 1 represents the machining parameters used and their levels chosen.

    Figure 1: Experimental set up for milling operation

    Ex p.

    No.

    spee d (rp

    m)

    feed (mm/r ev)

    doc (m

    m)

    MRR

    (mm3/m in)

    S/N Ratio

    1

    600

    40

    0.2

    241152

    107.6

    46

    2

    600

    40

    0.4

    482304

    113.6

    66

    3

    600

    40

    0.6

    723456

    117.1

    88

    4

    600

    50

    0.2

    301440

    109.5

    84

    5

    600

    50

    0.4

    602880

    115.6

    05

    6

    600

    50

    0.6

    904320

    119.1

    26

    7

    600

    60

    0.2

    361728

    111.1

    68

    8

    600

    60

    0.4

    723456

    117.1

    88

    9

    600

    60

    0.6

    1085184

    120.7

    10

    10

    800

    40

    0.2

    321536

    110.1

    45

    11

    800

    40

    0.4

    643072

    116.1

    65

    12

    800

    40

    0.6

    964608

    119.6

    87

    13

    800

    50

    0.2

    401920

    112.0

    83

    14

    800

    50

    0.4

    803840

    118.1

    03

    15

    800

    50

    0.6

    1205760

    121.6

    25

    16

    800

    60

    0.2

    482304

    113.6

    66

    17

    800

    60

    0.4

    964608

    119.6

    87

    18

    800

    60

    0.6

    1446912

    123.2

    09

    19

    100

    0

    60

    0.2

    602880

    115.6

    05

    20

    100

    0

    60

    0.4

    1205760

    121.6

    25

    21

    100

    0

    60

    0.6

    1808640

    125.1

    47

    22

    100

    50

    0.2

    502400

    114.0

    Ex p.

    No.

    spee d (rp

    m)

    feed (mm/r ev)

    doc (m

    m)

    MRR

    (mm3/m in)

    S/N Ratio

    1

    600

    40

    0.2

    241152

    107.6

    46

    2

    600

    40

    0.4

    482304

    113.6

    66

    3

    600

    40

    0.6

    723456

    117.1

    88

    4

    600

    50

    0.2

    301440

    109.5

    84

    5

    600

    50

    0.4

    602880

    115.6

    05

    6

    600

    50

    0.6

    904320

    119.1

    26

    7

    600

    60

    0.2

    361728

    111.1

    68

    8

    600

    60

    0.4

    723456

    117.1

    88

    9

    600

    60

    0.6

    1085184

    120.7

    10

    10

    800

    40

    0.2

    321536

    110.1

    45

    11

    800

    40

    0.4

    643072

    116.1

    65

    12

    800

    40

    0.6

    964608

    119.6

    87

    13

    800

    50

    0.2

    401920

    112.0

    83

    14

    800

    50

    0.4

    803840

    118.1

    03

    15

    800

    50

    0.6

    1205760

    121.6

    25

    16

    800

    60

    0.2

    482304

    113.6

    66

    17

    800

    60

    0.4

    964608

    119.6

    87

    18

    800

    60

    0.6

    1446912

    123.2

    09

    19

    100

    0

    60

    0.2

    602880

    115.6

    05

    20

    100

    0

    60

    0.4

    1205760

    121.6

    25

    21

    100

    0

    60

    0.6

    1808640

    125.1

    47

    22

    100

    50

    0.2

    502400

    114.0

    Table 1: Machining parameters and their levels

    Parameters

    Level1

    Level2

    Level3

    Spindle speed (rpm)

    600

    800

    1000

    Feed (mm/rev)

    40

    50

    60

    Depth of cut (mm)

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    All the experiments were done with a HSS tool on a CNC XL mill with following specifications: Machine dimensions L x B x H (1000 x 575 x 650) mm, programmable feed rate

    from 0 1200 mm/min, spindle speed 150 4000 rpm, table size 360 x 132mm, and axis motor capacity 0.8 Nm.

  4. Results and Discussion

    1. Effect of machining parameters on Material removal Rate

      Experiments were conducted with three parameters at three different levels. Table 2 shows the results obtained for Material Removal Rate and the corresponding S/N ratios.

      Table 2: Experiment results for Surface roughness

      0

      21

      23

      100

      0

      50

      0.4

      1004800

      120.0

      42

      24

      100

      0

      50

      0.6

      1507200

      123.5

      63

      25

      100

      0

      40

      0.2

      401920

      112.0

      83

      26

      100

      0

      40

      0.4

      803840

      118.1

      03

      27

      100

      0

      40

      0.6

      1205760

      121.6

      25

      Main Effects Plot for SN ratios

      Data Means

      speed (rpm) feed (mm/rev)

      0

      21

      23

      100

      0

      50

      0.4

      1004800

      120.0

      42

      24

      100

      0

      50

      0.6

      1507200

      123.5

      63

      25

      100

      0

      40

      0.2

      401920

      112.0

      83

      26

      100

      0

      40

      0.4

      803840

      118.1

      03

      27

      100

      0

      40

      0.6

      1205760

      121.6

      25

      Main Effects Plot for SN ratios

      Data Means

      speed (rpm) feed (mm/rev)

      600

      800

      doc (mm)

      1000

      40

      50

      60

      600

      800

      doc (mm)

      1000

      40

      50

      60

      120

      118

      116

      114

      112

      120

      118

      116

      114

      112

      Mean of SN ratios

      Mean of SN ratios

      Table 3 shows the S/N ratio obtained for different parameter levels. Depth of cut was found to be the most influencing parameter with highest delta value of 9.5 followed by Spindle speed and Feed with 4.4 and 3.5 delta values respectively. Figure 2 shows the main effect plot for S/N ratio. The greatest variation found on Material Removal Rate was due to Depth of cut. The optimum conditions for Material Removal Rate are spindle speed of 1000 rpm, depth of cut of 0.6 mm and feed of 60 mm/rev.

      Level

      Spindle Speed (rpm)

      Feed (mm/rev)

      Doc (mm)

      1

      114.7

      115.1

      111.8

      2

      117.2

      117.1

      117.8

      3

      119.1

      118.7

      121.3

      Delta

      4.4

      3.5

      9.5

      Rank

      2

      3

      1

      Level

      Spindle Speed (rpm)

      Feed (mm/rev)

      Doc (mm)

      1

      114.7

      115.1

      111.8

      2

      117.2

      117.1

      117.8

      3

      119.1

      118.7

      121.3

      Delta

      4.4

      3.5

      9.5

      Rank

      2

      3

      1

      Table 3: Response Table for Signal to Noise Ratios (Larger is better)

      120

      118

      116

      114

      112

      120

      118

      116

      114

      112

      0.2

      0.4

      0.6

      0.2

      0.4

      0.6

      Signal-to-nose: Larger is better

      Signal-to-noise: Larger is better

      Figure 2: Effect of spindle speed, feed and depth of cut on Material Removal Rate

    2. Regression Analysis

      The spindle speed, feed and depth of cut are considered in the development of mathematical model for Material Removal Rate. The correlation between the cutting parameters and MRR is obtained by linear regression; equation 1 shows the developed model.

      MRR = – 1875627 + 1172 speed (rpm) + 18756

      feed (mm/rev) + 2009600 doc (mm) (1)

      The predicted and the experimental values of Material Removal Rate are shown in figure 3. It is clear from the figure that most of the predicted values are in close agreement with the experimental values for Material Removal Rate.

      Comparision of Experimental Results & Predicted values

      Comparision of Experimental Results & Predicted values

      2000000

      Variable Experimental results Predicted values

      2000000

      Variable Experimental results Predicted values

      1500000

      1500000

      1000000

      1000000

      500000

      500000

      0

      0

      3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27

      Experimental runs

      3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27

      Experimental runs

      MRR

      MRR

      Figure 3: Comparison between experimental and predicted values

  5. Conclusion

The study discusses about the application of Taguchi method and Regression Analysis to investigate the effect of process parameters on Material Removal rate. From the analysis of the results obtained following conclusion can be drawn: –

  • Statistically designed experiments based on Taguchi method are performed using L27 orthogonal array to analyze Material Removal rate.

  • Optimal parameters for Material Removal rate are Depth of cut of 0.6mm, Feed rate of 60mm/rev and spindle speed of 1000 rpm.

  • Linear regression equation is developed to predict the values of Material Removal rate, and the predicted values are compared with the measured value.

References

  1. K.Krishnamurthy and J.Venkatesh (2013), Assessment of surface roughness and material removal rate on machining of TIB2 reinforced Aluminum 6063 composites: A Taguchis approach, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. Vol. 3, Issue 1.

  2. M. S. Phadke, Quality engineering using robust design, 2ndedition, Pearson, 2009.

  3. Gulhane U.D., et.al.(2013), Investigating the effect of machining parameters on surface roughness of 6061 Aluminum Alloy in end milling, International journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. Vol.4, issue 2, pp. 134-140.

  4. J.Pradeep Kumar and P.Packiaraj (2012), Effect of drilling parameters on surface roughness, Tool wear, Material removal Rate and hole diameter error in drilling of OHNS, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Studies. Vol. I/Issue III/April-June, 2012/150-154.

  5. K. Palanikumar (2008) Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for surface roughness in machining glass fiber reinforced plastics by PCD tooling International journal of Advance Manufacturing technology, 36: 19-27.

Leave a Reply