Assessment of Ambient Air Quality in Chinnavedampatti Industrial Cluster, Coimbatore, During 2011 – 2012

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS031761

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Assessment of Ambient Air Quality in Chinnavedampatti Industrial Cluster, Coimbatore, During 2011 – 2012

Veerasekar N.1 , Mekala L.2, Parameswari S.3

1,2,3Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,

Erode Sengunthar Engineering College

Abstract -In this study, the Chinnavedampatti Industrial Cluster, Coimbatore, was assessed for its ambient air quality status. In this cluster, majority of the industries are Engineering Industries. In the present study, two locations within the Industrial cluster have been chosen with respect to the prevailing wind pattern, for monitoring the air quality. The sampling was conducted to determine the concentration of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx and Lead (Pb) present in the air samples using Respirable Dust Sampler (RDS) and Ambient Fine Dust Sampler (AFDS). The results were compared with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to check whether the pollutants are within the prescribed limits. The Air Pollution Index (API) was calculated to conclude the air quality status during the current sampling period (November 2011 April 2012).

Key words: Wind pattern, PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, NAAQS.

  1. INTRODUCTION:

    Air pollution is defined as the addition of various hazardous chemicals, particulate matter, toxic substances and biological organisms into the Earth's atmosphere. There are various factors causing air pollution, but what comes from industries and factories is often considered as prime factors in air pollution.

    Millions of tons of harmful gases and pollutants are released into the air each year by various industries. Once inhaled, polluted air weakens the lungs natural defense against harmful contaminants. In fact, lung tissue has no reliable defense against air pollution, and therefore, is gradually destroyed by invasive pollutants. There are many health effects of air pollution including irritation of the eyes, nose, mouth, and throat; chest pain; labored breathing; and increased susceptibility to lung infection. At its least severe levels, air pollution is a nuisance to healthy individuals and a burden to those with respiratory diseases.

      1. Particulate Matter (Pm)

        Airborne particulate matter (PM) includes coarse and fine particles such as dust, dirt, soot, smoke, and liquid droplets emitted into the air. They are small enough to get freely suspended in the

        atmosphere, and can travel over longer distances through air.

      2. Gaseous Pollutants Gaseous pollutants are the pollutants which are present in the form of gas [e.g., Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Oxides of nitrogen (NOX), Hydro Carbon (HC), etc.,

      3. LEAD (Pb)

        Lead is a toxic metal that was used for many years in products found in and around our homes. Lead also can be emitted into the air from industrial sources and leaded aviation gasoline, and lead can enter drinking water from plumbing materials. Lead may cause a range of health effects, from behavioral problems and learning disabilities, to seizures and death. Children six years old and under are most at risk.

      4. Microscale Meteorology

        Particulates emitted from a source are diluted with the environmental air on their path to the site where they can effect damage. The dilution depends on the distance and the prevailing wind and weather conditions.

        Microscale meteorology is the study of short- lived atmospheric phenomena smaller than mesoscale, about 1 km or less.

        Microscale meteorology controls the most important mixing and dilution processes in the atmosphere. Meteorological parameters decide the fate of particulates once they are released to the atmosphere. The factors that effects the dispersion of particulates in the air are

        • Wind Speed and Direction

        • Ambient air temperature

        • Barometric pressure

        1. Wind Speed And Direction

          The time taken for the particulate matter to reach the receptors from a source depends on magnitude of the wind. Wind speed is measured in Km/h. Wind rose plots are used to represent the wind speed and direction.

        2. Ambient Air Temperature

    Temperature gradient affects the vertical mixing of pollutants in the air. This vertical temperature gradient is termed as the lapse rate. The amount of vertical motion of the atmosphere depends to an important extent on how the temperature varies with altitude. Near the ground, air temperature normally decreases with height. When the rate of decrease is rapid, there is a pronounced tendency toward

    vertical air mixing. On the other hand, when the air temperature increases with height, vertical air motions are suppressed. This temperature structure is called a temperature inversion because it is inverted from the normal condition of temperature decreasing with height.

    1.4.3 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE:

    Barometric pressure or the atmospheric pressure is the pressure exerted on us by the atmosphere. As we go to higher altitudes or elevations, the barometric pressure drops. However, the rate at which it drops is not constant; it drops less per thousand feet at higher altitudes.

  2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

      1. The Study Area Chinnavedampatti

      2. DESCRIPTION

        Chinnavedampatti is located at 11° 53" N and 76° 58' 52" E, at about 338 metres above mean sea level. Chinnavedampatti is located within Coimbatore corporation limit. Coimbatore is located at the foothills of the Western ghats. Due to unregulated population growth and industrial development, Coimbatore experiences an exponential growth in the vehicular usage and fuel consumption, which results in an increased concentration of particulate matter in the surrounding air. Coimbatore due to its geological arrangement, is stirred by continuous change of atmospheric air and thus also favours dispersion of particulates.

      3. Sampling Location

        Based on wind direction, two sampling locations are selected in Chinnavedampatti.

        Location 1: S.B.S INDUSTRIES.

        This location was chosen as it falls under the upstream side of the wind direction. The sampling instrument was set at the terrace of the office building at S.B.S INDUSTRIES

        Location 2 : DYNAMIC ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENTS.

        This location was chosen as it falls under the downstream side of the wind direction. The sampling instrument was set at the terrace of the office building at DYNAMIC ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENTS.

        Fig 3.1 : Location map of CHINNAVEDAMPATTI in Coimbatore corporation.

      4. Pm10 Sampling

        The particulates in the ambient air are collected using a Respirable dust sampler. Air is drawn through the sample filter at a controlled flow rate by a pump located downstream of the sample filter. The instruments are continuously operated for 24 hours for a period of two days. The mass concentration is calculated by measuring the weight of collected matter in known volume of air sampled.

        Glass fiber filter must be conditioned in an oven at 105°C and weighed prior to sampling. They are fixed in the sampler and covered. Similarly, a pre-weighed cup was attached to the bottom of cyclone separator to collect the coarser particles. Initial and final manometer readings must be noted. After the sampling is done, the filter paper and the cup were removed and labelled. The final weight of the samples are noted.

        The mass concentration is calculated using the equation Mass concentration (g/m3) =

        W f W i x 106

        Vs

        Where

        Wf = Final weght of filter paper (grams) Wi = Initial weight of filter paper (grams) Vs = Volume of air sampled (m3)

      5. Pm2.5 Sampling

        The finer particulates in the ambient air are collected using an Ambient Fine Dust Sampler. Air is drawn through the sample filter at a controlled flow rate by a pump located downstream of the sample filter. The flow of air through the sampler must be at a flow rate to ensure that the size cutoff at 2.5 microns occurs. The instruments are continuously operated for 24 hours for a period of two days.

        The coarser particles get trapped in the impactor and the fine particles are collected on the PTFE filter. The mass concentration is calculated by measuring the weight of collected matter in known volume of air sampled. Parameters such as temperature, barometric pressure, and other meteorological parameters are recorded simultaneously.

      6. Gaseous Sampling

        The gas inlet should be kept on the pipe after the cast minimum aluminum hopper but before the blower. There can be three inlets for different gases or one inlet through a manifold. A calibrated rotameter (0 to 3 lpm) shall be provided for checking the flow rate.

      7. Air Pollution Index:

        1. Definition

          An air pollution index is defined as a scheme that transforms the values of individual air pollution related parameters into a single number or set of numbers.

        2. Determination Of Air Pollution Index:

    There are several methods and equations available for determining the air pollution index

    For these, the following equation was used.

  3. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS

    3.1. Microscale Meteorology

    Microscale meteorological parameters are recorded and are presented in Table 2.

    Based on the geographical pattern of Coimbatore city, the predominant wind direction is towards North North East (NNE), during the North East monsoon season and towards South South West during the South west monsoon.

    The Ambient temperature ranges from 29 °C in the month of November to 38°C in the month of April. The wind speed ranges from 5 Km/h to 10 Km/h.

    Table 2: Temperature, Pressure & Windspeed variation

    3

    API =

    1 SPM so2

    • NOx X 100

    SPM

    sso2

    S N

    o.

    Location

    Date of Sampling

    Ambient Air Temperature

    (oC)

    Barometric Pressure (mm of Hg)

    Average Wind Speed (Km/h)

    Min

    Max

    1

    SBS

    10.11.2011

    17

    29

    759.0

    7

    Industries

    11.11.2011

    18

    29

    759.8

    5

    19.12.2011

    18

    29

    759.8

    5

    20.12.2011

    20

    27

    759.8

    5

    18.01.2012

    15

    31

    757.5

    6

    19.01.2012

    16

    31

    757.5

    6

    14.02.2012

    19

    33

    759.8

    8

    15.02.2012

    20

    33

    759.8

    8

    20.03.2012

    23

    37

    758.3

    9

    21.03.2012

    23

    36

    757.5

    10

    19.04.2012

    25

    37

    755.3

    7

    20.04.2012

    25

    38

    756.8

    8

    2

    10.11.2011

    17

    29

    759.0

    7

    Dynamic

    11.11.2011

    18

    29

    759.8

    5

    Engineering

    19.12.2011

    18

    29

    759.8

    5

    and

    20.12.2011

    20

    27

    759.8

    5

    Equipments

    18.01.2012

    15

    31

    757.5

    6

    19.01.2012

    16

    31

    757.5

    6

    14.02.2012

    19

    33

    759.8

    8

    15.02.2012

    20

    33

    759.8

    8

    20.03.2012

    23

    37

    758.3

    9

    21.03.2012

    23

    36

    757.5

    10

    19.04.2012

    25

    37

    755.3

    7

    20.04.2012

    25

    38

    756.8

    8

    SNOX

    S

    Where SSPM, SSO2, SNOX represents the ambient air quality standards for particulars matter, Sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide respectively.

    2.7.3. Rating Scale For Indices:

    A typical rating scale used is given below:

    Table 1: Rating Scales for API

    Air pollution

    index

    Air pollution level

    Remarks

    0-25

    Clean air

    Good

    26-50

    Light air pollution

    acceptable

    51-75

    Moderate air

    pollution

    Unsatisfactory

    75-100

    Heavy air

    pollution

    Unhealthy

    Table 3: Pollutant Concentration At Location 1 Table 4: Pollutant Concentration at Location 2

    API

    S.

    N Date

    PM1

    12 20.03.

    o. g/

    m3

    g/ m3

    m3

    10.11. 43.2 11

    1 11.11. 42.1

    24.3

    09.2

    2 11 41.4

    22.8

    08.1

    3 19.12. 40.7

    11

    21.5

    08.0

    4 20.12. 52.5

    21.4

    07.2

    5 11 54.1

    33.0

    10.2

    6 18.01. 55.4

    12

    34.5

    11.1

    7 19.01. 60.1

    35.3

    10.6

    8 12 100.

    38.4

    11.8

    1

    9 14.02.

    58.8

    16.2

    12 100.

    10 15.02. 9

    60.5

    16.8

    11 12 102.

    61.2

    17.3

    0

    61.8

    17.6

    12 102.

    7

    21.03.

    Maximum 102.

    61.8

    17.6

    Concentrati 7

    Minimum 40.7

    21.4

    10.2

    Average

    66.3

    39.5

    12.1

    Threshold 100

    60

    80

    Limits

    0

    PM2

    .5

    SO2

    g/

    N O2

    g/ m3

    13.

    9

    12.

    7

    12.

    1

    11.

    5

    15.

    3

    18.

    2

    Lea d g/ m3

    0.02

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.03

    0.02

    0.03

    0.03

    API

    22.9

    1

    21.4

    2

    20.6

    7

    20.3

    2

    28.4

    7

    30.0

    Remar ks

    Lead g/m

    3

    PM10

    g/m

    3

    S.No

    . Date

    Remarks

    CA CA CA CA CA LAP LAP LAP

    1 10.11.11

    2 11.11.11

    3 19.12.11

    4 20.12.11

    5 18.01.12

    6 19.01.12

    7 14.02.12

    8 15.02.12

    9 20.03.12

    10 21.03.12

    11 19.04.12

    12 20.04.12

    85.7

    74.3

    72.7

    70.5

    85.3

    91.2

    95.1

    98.9

    62.1

    63.7

    68.0

    69.7

    PM2.

    5

    g/m

    3

    48.9

    47.3

    46.4

    45.1

    49.8

    50.3

    53.4

    54.1

    39.3

    43.2

    47.3

    50.1

    SO2

    11.1

    12.4

    09.6

    10.3

    13.7

    14.5

    15.3

    15.8

    12.4

    13.2

    14.1

    14.5

    NO2

    23.7

    24.1

    19.5

    21.2

    26.0

    26.9

    27.3

    27.9

    19.1

    20.4

    21.5

    22.3

    0.07

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.08

    0.03

    0.02

    0.03

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    43.54

    40.95

    38.68

    38.61

    45.18

    47.16

    48.07

    49.14

    33.99

    35.74

    38.67

    40.44

    LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP LAP

    LAP

    Concentrati Concentrati

    16.

    5

    17.

    1

    22.

    1

    23.

    27.

    1

    11.

    5

    18.

    1

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.08

    0.09

    0.01

    0.04

    5

    30.2

    2

    32.6

    5

    50.6

    0

    53.1

    6

    53.3

    8

    LAP MAP MAP MAP

    Maximum 98.9 54.1 14.5 23.7 0.09

    Concentration

    Minimum 62.1 39.3 09.6 19.1 0.01

    Concentration

    Average 78.1 47.9 13.1 23.3 0.05

    Concentration

    Threshold Limits 100 60 80 80 1

    LAP- Light Air Pollution, MAP- Moderate Air Pollution, CA- Clean Air

    80 1

    53.9

    2

    3.2. Analysis of Particulate Contaminants

    The mass concentrations of particulates were estimated from the difference of the final and initial weight

    LAP- Light Air Pollution, MAP- Moderate Air Pollution,

    CA- Clean Air

    of the filter paper used for air sampling. They are expressed as weight of particulates collected per cubic meter of air sampled (µg/m3). The particulate mass concentration PM10 and PM2.5 are tabulated in Table 3 and Table 4The value of PM10 ranges from 40.7 102.7 µg/m3 at Location 1 and

    62.1 98.9 µg/m3 at location 2.

    The value of PM2.5 ranges from 21.40 61..8

    µg/m3 at location 1 and 39.3 54.1 µg/m3 at location 2. The obtained values of mass concentration of particulates are compared with the standards prescribed by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

    The ambient concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 was found to exceed the permissible limit at location 1 with PM10 at 102.10 µg/m3 and PM2.5 at 61.80 µg/m3 with other seasons under the permissible range.

    4.2.3 Analysis of Gaseous Contaminants

    The concentration of the gaseous contaminants SO2 and NOX present in the ambient air were estimated using spectrophotometric analysis and is presented in Table 3 and Table 4. The ambient level of SO2 ranges from 7.2 –

    17.6 µg/m3 at location 1 and 9.6 15.80 µg/m3. The level of NO2 ranges from 11.50 27.1 µg/m3 at location 1 and

    19.50 27.30 µg/m3 at location 2. Comparing with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, it can be confirmed that the ambient level of both SO2 and NO2 lies with the prescribed limits.

        1. Elemental Analysis

          Concentration of Pollutants (µg/m3)

          The concentration of Lead in the particulate matter fraction was estimated using AAS and tabulated in Table 3 and Table 4. The ambient level of lead in the air ranges from 0.01 0.09 µg/m3 at location 1 with an average concentration of 0.04 µg/m3. At location 2, the level ranges from 0.01 0.09 µg/m3 with an average concentration of 0.05 µg/m3

          200

          100

          0

          NAAQS AVG

          Parameters

          Figure 2: Pollutant Concentration at Location 1

          found to exist within the limits prescribed by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). It indicates a healthy condition at the sampling location. The level of particulates in the ambient air indicates the industrial expansion in the locality which may lead to increase of concentration of pollutants in future.

          The Air Pollution Index (API) was computed for the selected monitoring stations. From the results, it was found that the monitoring station S.B.S Industries recorded the maximum API value of 53.92, indicating moderate air pollution in the month of April, in which the sampling location 1 lies in the downstream part of the Wind direction. And the minimum API value of 20.32 indicating clean air in the month of December, in the sampling location 1 which lies in the upstream part of prevailing wind direction.

          The monitoring station Dynamic Engineering and Equipments recorded maximum API value of 49.14, indicating light air pollution in the month of February, in which the sampling location 2 lies in the downstream part of the prevailing wind direction. And a minimum API value of 33.99 recorded during the month of March, in which the sampling location 2 lies in the upstream part of the wind direction.

          Concentratio n of Pollutants (µg/m3)

          1

          0.5

          0

          Lead

          Parameter

          NAAQS

          Lead

          REFERENCES:

          1. Meenakshi, P., M. K. Saseetharan, September 2003, Analysis of Seasonal Variation of Suspended Particulate Matter and Oxides of Nitrogen with Reference to Wind Direction in Coimbatore City., IE

            1. Journal. EN Vol. 84

          2. Abhishek Gupta, K. W. David Cheong, Feb 2006, Physical characterization of particulate matter and ambient meteorological parameters at different indooroutdoor locations in Singapore.,

            Figure 3: Lead Concentration at Location 1

            200

            0

            Figure 4: Pollutant Concentration at Location 2

            Concentr ation of Pollutants (µg/m3)

            1

            0

            Lead

            Parameter

            Figure 5: Lead Concentration at Location 2

  4. DISCUSSION

NAAGS AVG

NAAQ

Lead

Department of Building, School of Design and Environment.

        1. Avnish Chauha, Mayank Pawar, 2010, Assessment Of Ambient Air Quality Status In Urbanization, Industrialization And Commercial Centers Of Uttarakhand (India)., New York Science Journal ;3(7).

        2. Tippayawong, P. Pengchai and A. LeeInt. J., 2006, Characterization of ambient aerosols in Northern Thailand and their probable sources, Environ. Sci. Tech., 3 (4): 359-369.

        3. Balachandran S., Meena B. R., Khillare P. S., Particle size distribution and its elemental composition in the ambient air of Delhi, Environ Int. 2000 Aug;26(1-2):49-54.

        4. Roy S., G. R. Adhikari, 2009, Seasonal variation in suspended particulte matter vis-a-vis meteorological parameters at Kolar Gold Fields, India, International Journal of Environmental Engineering Volume 1, Number 4, 432 445.

        5. Yan Cheng, Shun Cheng Lee, Junji Cao, Kin Fai Ho, Judith C. Chow, John G. Watson, Chio Hang Ao., 2009, Elemental composition of airborne aerosols at a traffic site and a suburban site in Hong Kong, International Journal of Environment and Pollution

          – Vol. 36, No.1/2/3 pp. 166 – 179

        6. Tecer L. H. , Süren P., Alagha O., Karaca F., Tuncel G., 2008 Effect of meteorological parameters on fine and coarse particulate matter mass concentration in a coal-mining area in Zonguldak, Turkey, J Air Waste Manag Assoc. Apr; 58(4): 543-52.

        7. W. Leithe, The Analysis of AIR Pollutants, ANN ARBOR

From the analysis of particulates and gaseous contaminants sampled in the industrial location, the mass concentration of the PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX and Lead was

SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, 1971.

Leave a Reply