 Open Access
 Authors : Mrs. Sri Latha Eti , Mrs. Swarupa Pinninti , Dr. N. Prema Kumar
 Paper ID : IJERTV8IS110278
 Volume & Issue : Volume 08, Issue 11 (November 2019)
 Published (First Online): 27112019
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
An Innovative Speed Controlling Technique for a BLDC motor using Fuzzy – PID Controller
Mrs. Sri Latha Eti Assistant Professor, EEE Department
WISTM Engineering College Visakhapatnam, A.P, India
Mrs. Swarupa Pinninti Associate Professor, EEE Department
WISTM Engineering College Visakhapatnam, A.P, India
Dr. N. Prema Kumar
Professor, EEE Department

College of Engineering Visakhapatnam, A.P, India
AbstractBrushless DC Motors are widely used for many industrial applications because of their high efficiency, high torque and low volume. BLDC motors have a long traditional use as adjustable speed machines and in these applications, the motor should be precisely controlled to give the desired performance. The conventional PID speed controller is implemented to meet various design specifications like rise time, settling time, peak overshoot and the steady state error of the system. It is difficult to tune the parameters and get satisfied control characteristics by using normal conventional PID controllers. This paper provides an overview of different tuning methods of PID Controller applied to control the speed of the transfer function model of the BLDC motor drive and then to the mathematical model of the BLDC motor drive. The nonlinear characteristics of a BLDC motor such as saturation and friction could degrade the performance of conventional controllers. To improve the performance of the PID controllers, several strategies have been proposed, such as adaptive control techniques. One of the most successful adaptive control techniques is the fuzzy set theory. The field of fuzzy application rose from consumer products such as cameras, camcorder, washing machines and microwave ovens to industrial process control, medical instrumentation, and decisionsupport system. But rather than applying only fuzzy, the combination of conventional PID and fuzzy controller gives better performance characteristics.
Keywords BLDC Motor, Modelling of Conventional PID Controller with TL tuning method, Modelling of Fuzzy Logic Controller.

INTRODUCTION
Speed and torque are the fundamental quantities used to describe the operation of rotating machinery. Speed is usually expressed in shaft revolutions per minute or RPM. In adjustable speed drive applications, performance is usually discussed in terms of the speed, torque and other parameters that apply to the shaft of the motor.
Speed Regulation is generally defined as the percentage speed change that results from a given load change. The speed regulating capability of any constant speed motor or adjustable speed drive is defined as the maximum speed change as a percentage of base speed that results from increasing the load from 5% of rated load (essentially no load) to full load while holding constant all other variables that might cause a speed change. When torque regulation is used, the drive supplies a set torque and operates at the maximum speed permitted by the characteristics of the load [13].
The closed loop speed regulator compensates for any changes in the characteristics of the drive caused by
changes in load or by outside influences such as line voltage and ambient temperature. With a closed loop speed regulator, the most important characteristic of the drive is its ability to rapidly respond to changes in requirements for torque. The relationship between torque regulation and speed regulation in a standard DC drive configuration illustrates the importance of torque response. Since the current in a motor directly determines torque, the torque controller is configured as a closed loop current regulator. The speed regulator then commands the current regulator to produce whatever torque is required to maintain the desired speed.

BLDC MOTORS

Comparing Brushed and Brushless DC Motors
A brushless dc motor (as shown in fig. 1) is a dc motor turned inside out, so that the field is on the rotor and the armature is on the stator. The brushless dc motor is actually a permanent magnet ac motor whose torquecurrent characteristics mimic the dc motor. Instead of commutating the armature current using brushes, electronic commutation is used. This eliminates the problems associated with the brush and the commutator arrangement, for example, sparking and wearing out of the commutatorbrush arrangement, thereby, making a BLDC more rugged as compared to a dc motor[3]. Having the armature on the stator makes it easy to conduct heat away from the windings, and if desired, having cooling arrangement for the armature windings is much easier as compared to a dc motor.
Fig.1 Brushed and Brushless DC motor

BLDC Motors
Brushless Direct Current (BLDC) motors are one of the motor types rapidly gaining popularity. BLDC motors are used in industries such as Appliances, Automotive, Aerospace, Consumer, Medical, Industrial Automation Equipment and Instrumentation. As the name implies, BLDC motors do not use brushes for commutation; instead, they are electronically commutated. BLDC motors have many
advantages over brushed DC motors and induction motors. A few of these are[1]:

Better speed versus torque characteristics

High dynamic response

High efficiency

Long operating life

Noiseless operation

Higher speed ranges
In addition, the ratio of torque delivered to the size of the motor is higher, making it useful in applications where space and weight are critical factors.


Controlling Methods
BLDC motors have a long traditional use as adjustable speed machines and a wide range of options have evolved for this purpose. In these applications, the motor should be precisely controlled to give the desired performance. The speed controllers that are designed to control the speed of BLDC motor used several conventional and numeric controller types, the controllers can be: proportional integral (PI), proportional derivative (PD), proportional integral derivative (PID). Because of its simplicity PID control is widely used in industrial applications. To improve the performance of the PID controllers, different tuning methods have been proposed[12]. PID controllers provide robust and reliable performance for most systems if the PID parameters are tuned properly.
The major problems in applying a conventional control algorithm (PI, PD, and PID) in a speed controller is the non linearity of BLDC motor. The nonlinear characteristics of a BLDC motor such as saturation and friction could degrade the performance of conventional controllers [9]. To achieve desired level of performance the motor requires suitable speed controllers. In case of permanent magnet motors, usually speed control is achieved by using proportional integral (PI) controller. Although conventional PI controllers are widely used in the industry due to their simple control structure and ease of implementation, these controllers pose difficulties due to nonlinearity, load disturbances and parametric variations. Moreover PI controllers require precise linear mathematical models. As the PMBLDC machine has nonlinear model, the linear PI controller may no longer be suitable.
The Fuzzy Logic (FL) approach applied to speed control leads to an improved dynamic behaviour of the motor drive system and motor becomes immune to load perturbations and parameter variations. . Fuzzy logic control (FLC) is one of the most successful applications of fuzzy set theory, introduced by L.A Zadeh in 1973 and applied (Mamdani 1974) in an attempt to control system that are structurally dificult to model.
In the last three decades, FLC has evolved as an alternative or complementary to the conventional control strategies in various engineering areas. Fuzzy control theory usually provides nonlinear controllers that are capable of performing different complex nonlinear control action, even for uncertain nonlinear systems. Unlike conventional control, designing a FLC does not require precise knowledge of the system model. Imitating the human way of learning, the tracking error and the rate of change of the error are two crucial inputs for the design of such a fuzzy control system
[10]. Fuzzy logic control offers an improvement in the quality of the speed response. Most of these controllers use mathematical models and are sensitive to parametric variations. These controllers are inherently robust to load disturbances. Besides, fuzzy logic controllers can be easily implemented.


MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF BLDC MOTOR
The BLDC motor is supplied from battery through the inverter. The dynamic model of this system is shown in Fig. 2. It is derived under the following assumptions:

All the elements of the motor are linear and core losses are neglected.

Induced currents in the rotor due to stator harmonic fields are neglected.

The electromotive force ea varies sinusoidal with the rotational electric angle e.

The cogging torque of the motor is negligible.

Due to the surface mounted permanent magnets, winding inductance is constant (doesnt change with the electric angle e).

Voltage drop across the diodes, thyristors and the connecting wires are ignored.
All above mentioned assumptions are practically satisfied. The magnetic and electric circuit is linear within the range of operation. Power losses in the inverter are practically negligible since the switching frequency of this low speed motor is low. Also the cogging torque doesnt exist since there is coreless winding.
Fig. 2 Circuit diagram of supplyinvertermotor system
The equations that describe the model are as follows: Voltage equations:
Voltage equation at the source side:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Where:
Eb and Rb voltage and resistance of the source (battery)
Rc resistance in the capacitor circuit is source circuit current
isk converter input current Vc voltage across capacitor
(4)
Charge in the capacitor C Capacitance
ic – Current flowing through the capacitor
(5)
Voltage equations at the motor side (fig. 4) are:
(6)
Where:
Vsa, Vsb, Vsc are the inverter output voltages that supply the 3 winding.
Va, Vb, Vc are the voltages across the motor armature winding.
Vn voltage at the neutral point
Fig. 4 Position of the rotor with respect to the phase A
The electromotive force induced in the phase A winding (see Fig. 4):
(15)
Where
Constant
rotor angular speed
– Electrical angle (from fig. 4) P Number of pole pairs
(16)
Fig. 3 Scheme to voltage equation at motor side
The equation across the motor winding
Equation that links the supply and motor sides:
(17)
This is derived from the equality of the powers at input
0 0
and output of the inverter. Supply voltages for the phases
= 0 0 +
+
(Vsa, Vsb and Vsc) results from the operation of converter.
0 0
(7)
Motion equation:
(18)
Or in shorter version
Since the resistances of all the phases are equal
(8)
(9)
Where,
Torque due to Inertia, where, J Moment of inertia,
Torque due to viscous friction, where, B Friction coefficient,
Torque due to Coulomb Friction,
Since the self and mutual inductances are constant for surface mounted permanent magnets and the winding is symmetrical:
and, load torque, TL
Electromagnetic torque for 3phase motor
(19)
(10)
Substituting equations (8) and (9) in equation (7) gives the PMBDCM model as

Voltage Source Inverter
Three phase bridge inverters are widely used for ac motor
0 0
drives and general purpose ac supplies. The input dc supply is
= 0 0 + +
usually obtained from a battery or from a single phase or
0 0
(11)
three phase utility power supply through diode bridge
The stator phase currents are constrained to be balanced i.e.
(12)
rectifier and LC or C filter as shown in Fig. 5. The capacitor tends to make the input dc voltage constant. This also suppresses the harmonics fed back to the dc source.
This leads to the simplifications of the inductances matrix in the models as the
(13)
Therefore in the state space form
0 0 0 0
= 0 0 +
0 0
+
0 0
0 0
(14)
Fig. 5 Configuration of BLDC motor and Three Phase VSI system
The output voltages are plotted as shown in Fig. 6 below.
Fig. 6 Three phase output voltages on a threephase VSI in 1800 mode

Current Controller
The commanded value of current is compared to the actual phase currents of the motor and the errors are processed through a current controller.
The current controller can be of two types:

PWM Current controller

Hysteresis current controller

PWM current controller:
The current error is fed into a controller, which could be proportional (P), proportional plus integral (PI) or proportional, integral and differential (PID). The most commonly used controller among them is the PI controller. The current error is amplified through this controller and emerges as a control voltage, Vc which is equivalent to the gating pulse of the inverter. Its realization is as follows:
The control voltage is compared with a ramp signal to generate on and off times, as shown in Fig. 7. On signal is produced if the control voltage is greater than the ramp signal; Off signal is generated when the control signal is less than the ramp signal.
Fig. 7 Generation of base drive signals from current error

Hysteresis current controller:
Instantaneous current control is not exercised in the PWM current controller; it acts only once a cycle. In between two consecutive switching, the current may exceed the maximum limit; if the PWM controller is sampled and held once a switching cycle, then the current is controlled on an average but not on an instantaneous basis. The Hysteresis controller overcomes such a drawback by converting a voltage source into a fast acting current source. The current is controlled within a narrow band of excursion from its desired value in the hysteresis controller. The hysteresis window determines the allowable or preset deviation of current , i. Commanded current and actual current are shown in Fig. 8 with the hysteresis windows. The voltage applied to the load is determined by the following logic:
Fig. 8 Hysteresis current controller
The window i can either be externally set as a constant. The chopping frequency is a varying quantity, unlike the constant frequency in PWM controller. This has the disadvantage of higher switching losses in the devices with increased switching frequency.
A qualitative comparison of the PWM and hysteresis controllers is summarized in the table 1 below.
TABLE 1: COMPARISON OF CURRENT CONTROLLERS
Characteristics
Current controllers
ysteresis
PWM
Switching Frequency
Varying
Fixed at carrier frequency
Speed of Response
Fastest
Fast
Ripple current
Adjustable
Fixed
Filter size
Dependent on i
Usually small
Switching losses
Usually high
Low



Overall Speed Controller
The closed loop speed regulator compensates for any changes in the characteristics of the drive caused by changes in load or by outside influences such as line voltage and ambient temperature. With a closed loop speed regulator, the most important characteristic of the drive is its ability to rapidly respond to changes in requirements for torque. The fig. 9 shows the overall closed loop speed controlled BLDC drive.
Fig. 9 Overall closed loop speed control of BLDC Motor
The speed controllers that are designed to control the speed of BLDC motor used several conventional and numeric controller types, the controllers can be: proportional integral (PI), proportional derivative (PD), proportional integral derivative (PID). Because of its simplicity PID control is widely used in industrial applications. Stability of PID controller can be guaranteed theoretically, and zero steady state tracking error can be achieved for linear plant in the steadystate region.


TYPES OF CONTROLLERS

Conventional PID Controller
The proportional integral derivative (PID) controller operates the majority of the control systems in the world. It has been reported that more than 95% of the controllers in the industrial process control applications are of PID type as no other controller match the simplicity, clear functionality, applicability and ease of use offered by the PID controller. PID controllers provide robust and reliable performance for most systems if the PID parameters are tuned properly. In ideal or noninteracting form, the PID controller as shown in the fig 10 is described by the following transfer function:
Where, – Proportional gain, – Integral time, – Derivative time
Fig. 10 Block diagram of a PID controller
With the PID controller, there are no oscillations with least settling time.

Adaptive Control Techniques
Adaptive control use to change the control algorithm coefficients in real time to compensate for variations in environment or in the system itself. In drives, electrical and
mechanical parameters do not remain constant. A sudden increase of Tl or J reduces speed. These effects can be reduced by high gain negative feedback loop [5]. But this may cause under damping or instability. Therefore real time adaptation of the controller is required. Different adaptive control techniques are:

Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC)

Sliding mode control

Fuzzy control

Neural network control
One of the most successful expert system techniques applied to a wide range of control applications has been the Fuzzy Set Theory, which has made possible the establishment of "intelligent control".


Fuzzy Controller
Fuzzy logic has rapidly become one of the most successful of todays technology for developing sophisticated control system. In industrial electronics the FLC control has become an attractive solution in controlling the electrical motor drives with large parameter variations like machine tools and robots [5]. Fuzzy logic controllers are designed particularly for non linear dynamic systems with many inputs and outputs which are so complex, that it is very difficult or even impossible to build exact mathematical model. The basic structure of a fuzzy logic controller is shown in Fig. 11. Its fundamental components are Fuzzification, control rule base, inference mechanism and defuzzification.
Fig. 11 The structure of a fuzzy logic controller


FUZZY CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR BLDC DRIVE
In the system block diagram shown in fig. 12, the fuzzy controller is directly connected to the process of the system and the feedback signal is sent to the fuzzy controller directly.
Fig. 12 Fuzzy controller design for BLDC Drive
By considering BLDC drive as the process, the fuzzy speed controller is designed as follows.
The speed of the motor is compared with its reference value and the speed error is processed in Fuzzy logic speed controller.
Where, ref Reference speed r – Speed of the motor
The change in error is obtained from the derivative of error as e= de/dt
The output variable is the torque component of the reference iref. The controller observes the pattern of the speed loop error signal and correspondingly updates the output so that the actual speed r matches the command speed ref.
The input variable speed error and change in speed error is defined in the range from
1e +1
1e+1
and the output variable torque reference current iref is defined in the range from
1i_ref+1
The overall block diagram of the drive with fuzzy controller is shown in the fig. 13 below.
Fig. 14 Simulink model of the BLDC Motor Drive
For PID Controller, with Tyerus Luben Tuning method, the controller parameters are chosen as
kp=ku/2.2=1.70455 i=2.2u=9.9Ã—104 d=u/6.3=7.14286Ã—105
ki=kp/i =1721.76263 kd=kp d=1.2175Ã—104
With the above parameters, the speed response obtained from
simulation are shown in fig. 15 below.
With TL PID Controller
80
70
60
50
Fig. 13 Fuzzy speed control block diagram of the BLDC motor

SIMULINK MODELS AND RESULTS
For a BLDC motor with the following specifications, the overall closed loop block diagram of the drive is obtained as shown in fig. 14
P=4; Motor rating=0.5HP; Ra=0.7/ph; L=0.0272H; M=0.015H; Kb=0.5128V/ rad/ sec; Kt=0.49Nm/A;
J=0.0002kgm/s2; B=0.02Nm/ rad /sec; Vdc=160V; fc=2KHz; N=700rpm; Vcm=10V
40
speed (rad/sec)
speed (rad/sec)
30
20
10
0
10
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
time (sec)
Fig. 15 Response with Conventional PID Controller
Rise time = 0.003sec Settling time = 0.004sec
Peak Overshoot = 0.124 rad/sec Steady state error = 0.507rad/sec
When the simulations are carried out using Fuzzy Controller instead of PID, the following speed response is obtained as shown in fig. 16 below.
70
60
50
speed (rad/sec)
speed (rad/sec)
40
30
20
10
0
10
Fuzzy Controller
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
time (sec)
Fig. 16 Response with Fuzzy Controller
Rise time = 0.02sec Settling time = 0.03sec Peak Overshoot = 0
Steady state error = 2.633 rad/sec
Fig. 18 Three phase Trapezoidal back emf
When the simulations are carried out using Fuzzy +PID Controller using TyerusLuben PID Tuning Method, the controller parameters are chosen as below.
kp=ku/2.2=1.8182 i=2.2u=0.0176 d=u/6.3=1.26984Ã—103
ki=kp/i =103.3058
kd=kp d=2.3088Ã—103
The speed response obtained from Fuzzy + PID Controlled BLDC Motor drive is as shown in fig. 17 below.
Fuzzy + TL PI Tuning Method
80
70
60
50
speed (rad/sec)
speed (rad/sec)
40
30
20
10
0
10
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
time (sec)
Fig. 17 Response with Fuzzy + PID Controller
Rise time = 0.0125sec Settling time = 0.034sec Peak Overshoot = 0
Steady state error = 1.2355rad/sec
Fig. 19 phase currents developed in the motor

CONCLUSION
BLDC motor gained popularity rapidly in the market due to its advantage over the other motors. A BLDC motor drive is a system in which a permanent magnet excited synchronous motor is fed with a variable frequency inverter controlled by a shaft position sensor. BLDC motors have electronic commutator, instead of brushes, thus they have higher efficiency, long operating life, rugged construction and noiseless operation. BLDC motors find applications in every segment of the market such as home appliances, industrial control, automation, aviation etc. In these applications, the motor should be precisely controlled to give the desired performance. The speed controllers that are designed to control the speed of BLDC motor use several
The three phase trapezoidal back emf waveforms are obtained from the rotor position and the actual phase currents obtained from the hysteresis current controller are plotted in the fig. 18 and fig. 19 below.
conventional and numeric controller types, which include proportional integral (PI), proportional derivative (PD), proportional integral derivative (PID).
Conventional PID controllers with TyreusLuyben tuning method are used to control the speed of BLDC drive.
But, a disadvantage with the conventional PID Controller is the peak overshoot. In order to reduce the peak overshoot and improve the transient performance of the drive, a Fuzzy controller is implemented..
It is observed that the rise time is increased, peak overshoot is zero and settling time is reduced to more than half for fuzzy tuned PID controller when compared to conventional PID controller. Transient and steady state responses are improved by using fuzzy tuned controllers than using the conventional controllers.

FUTURE SCOPE

There are a large number of possible avenues for advancement of control of BLDC drives. A major research area is that of sensorless control. This typically means that measures have been taken to eliminate the expensive rotor position sensor, but not necessarily current or voltage sensors. In short, the BLDC motor drive is effective in high performance drive applications. Rapid torque response is readily achieved as vector control of BLDC drives is much more straight forward than it is for induction motor drives. The capital cost can be high, but the high efficiency can at least partially offset this in highpower applications. For these reasons, the BLDC drive is expected to continue to be
competitive for the near future.
For attaining better results, Work can be extended by adding NeuroFuzzy technique to the system. The field of Neuro Fuzzy technology plays a key role in controlling Motor drives. The present work is concluded with sophisticated applications of BLDC drive control.
REFERENCES

Padmaraja Yedamale, Brushless DC (BLDC) Motor Fundamentals, Microchip Technology Inc.

Mehmet Cunkas and Omer Aydogdu, Realization of fuzzy logic controlled brushless dc motor drives using Matlab / Simulink, Mathematical and Computational Applications, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 218229, 2010. Association for Scientific Research.

S.Rambabu and Dr. B. D. Subudhi, Modeling And Control Of A Brushless DC Motor, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.

R. Krishnan, Electric motor drives, modeling analysis and control, Prentice Hall publications.

B.K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and A.C Drives, Prentice Hall PTR publications.

Dennis Fewson, Introduction to Power Electronics, Essential Electronics Series.

Module 5, DC to AC Converters Version 2 EE IIT, Kharagpur

BLDC Motor Modelling and Control A Matlab/Simulink Implementation by Stefan Baldursson, International masters program in Electric Power Engineering, Chalmers University.

Madhusudan Singh and Archna Garg, Performance Evaluation of BLDC Motor with Conventional PI and Fuzzy Speed Controller, Electrical Engineering Department, Delhi Technological University.

Chuen Chien Lee, Fuzzy Logic in Control SystemsFuzzy Logic Controllers, Student Member, IEEE, IEEE Transcations on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.20, No.2, March/April 1990.

Pooja Agarwal and Arpita Bose, Brushless Dc Motor Speed Control Using ProportionalIntegral And Fuzzy Controller, IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSRJEEE) e ISSN: 22781676,pISSN: 23203331, Volume 5, Issue 5 (May. –
Jun. 2013), PP 6878

Jan Jantzen, Tuning Of Fuzzy PID Controllers, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Automation, Bldg 326, DK 2800 Lyngby, DENMARK. Tech. report no 98H 871 (fpid), April 16, 1999.

High Performance Drives — speed and torque regulation Technical Guide No.100, ABB Industrial Systems Inc., New Berlin, USA