🌏
Global Publishing Platform
Serving Researchers Since 2012
IJERT-MRP IJERT-MRP

AI-Based Farming Chatbot with Voice Assistance Support

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV13IS05028

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

AI-Based Farming Chatbot with Voice Assistance Support

Mr.S.Gobinath AP/CSE, R.Dharani,BE-CSE , S.Joshika,BE-CSE,, Swathi,BE CSE, Kamatchi,BE-CSE

Kangeyem Institute of Technlogy

Abstract

Most economies are based on agriculture, particularly those in developing nations. However, farmers do not have access to current and thorough information. The changing needs of modern agriculture cannot be adequately met by traditional support systems. To fill this gap, the current paper proposes an AI-based chatbot that offers quick, individualize agricultural solutions. Even users who are only partially literate can communicate with the system by text or voice through web or mobile interfaces. The goal is to improve farm decision-making and democratize access to agricultural information.

  1. Introduction

    Nearly half of the world's population depends on agriculture, especially in developing nations, making it a vital industry. However, farmers frequently struggle with erratic weather patterns, degrading soils, pest infestations, volatile market prices, and a lack of professional advice. Formal extension services might not always be available or arrive on schedule.

    Artificial Intelligence can be used to democratise agricultural knowledge as digital platforms and mobile connectivity grow. An AI-powered chatbot can serve as farmers' round-the-clock digital assistant, providing them with timely, reliable, and pertinent information. Even users who are illiterate can effectively interact with the system thanks to voice assistance. This project introduces a voice-activated, multilingual AI-based farming chatbot aimed at rural farming communities.

  2. Literature Review

    Numerous applications, such as IFFCO Kisan, Plantix, and Kisan Suvidha, are made to support agricultural practices. However, these websites typically lack conversational flexibility and use static menus. The concept of intelligent agents that can understand natural language and have interactive conversations with users has been introduced by recent work in conversational AI. Though they are common in consumer technology, voice- activated AI assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant are not yet used in agriculture. Combining this technology with agricultural expertise specific to a given farm creates the possibility of personalised,

  3. System Architecture

    The architecture of the AI-based farming chatbot includes the following modules:

    User Interface (UI): A mobile or web interface that allows for regional language voice and text communication.

    Module for Speech Processing:

    Speech-to-Text (STT): This technology uses APIs such as Google Cloud Speech or Mozilla DeepSpeech to convert voice commands into text.

    Text-to-Speech (TTS): Converts text messages into spoken language. – Natural Language Processing (NLP) Engine: Examines the user's query to identify entities and intent (e.g., location, crop name, pest).

    Crop manuals, weather APIs, pest control techniques, market rates, and scheme databases are all stored in the knowledge base.

    The machine learning module improves the precision and applicability of responses by learning from usage trends and user input.

    The backend server controls database queries, processing logic, and API requests.

  4. Features of the Chatbot

    The chatbot provides a variety of services, such as:

    1. Crop Suggestion: Based on region, season, and soil type.

    2. Weather Updates: Real-time forecasts via OpenWeatherMap and other APIs.

    3. Management of Pests and Diseases: Recognition and Intervention Strategies.

    4. Soil Health Advisory: Fertiliser recommendations and nutrient recommendations.

    5. Market Prices: Local mandis provide daily crop price notifications.

    6. Government Programs: Notifications of new grants or initiatives.

    7. Voice Input/Output: The chatbot sp3eaks back to the user during conversations in their native tongue.

    8. Offline Capability: Basic features can be

      locally cached and synchronized when the internet is available.

    9. Feedback Loop: In order to make future responses better, users can rate their responses.

  5. Implementation and Development Tools

    The chatbot was developed using the following technologies:

    • Dialog flow for NLP and conversation design

    • Firebase for backend and authentication

    • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and Speech- to-Text APIs

    • Python/Flask for backend API development

    • MongoDB for storing dynamic content

    • HTML/CSS/JS for the frontend interface

      A mobile-first approach was adopted to ensure accessibility for farmers who primarily use smartphones. The chatbot was trained with a dataset containing over 2,000 agricultural questions and responses in English and other two regional languages.

  6. Evaluation and Results

    The chatbot was pilot-tested with 40 users in a farming community for two months. Important results:

    • 87% of users reported that the chatbot assisted them in making improved decisions.

    • 90% of respondents thought that voice input more convenient than typing because of literacy issues.

    • 10-15% increase in crop yield was noticed for farmers who adhered to chatbot suggestions.

    • User Satisfaction: Rated almost 4.6/5 overall.

      Case Study: A Tamil Nadu farmer employed the chat bot to detect an infestation early and got precise advice, which helped save his chili crop.

  7. Benefits and Impact

    • Accessibility: Users with low literacy rate and few technical skills in mind. –

      Scalability: Can be rolled out over regions and languages.

    • Efficiency: Minimizes the necessity of personal visits by agricultural officers. – Empowerment: Farmers get facilitated to make autonomous decisions.

    • Sustainability: Encourages optimal water use practices, fertilizer usage, and pest management.

  8. Challenges and Limitations

    • Dialect Voice Recognition: Accuracy can decrease for regional accents. – Internet Connectivity: Offline mode has fewer features.

    • Accuracy of Data: Dependent upon external sources to collect market and weather information.

    • User Trust: Traditional advice is still favored by some farmers over electronic aids.

      Future development will include local dialect support, visual identification (e.g., diseases of leaves through camera), and real-time community forums.

  9. Conclusion and Future Work

    This paper introduces a way of AI-driven farming chatbot with voice assistance that can function as an individual digital advisor for farmers. The pilot trial confirmed the effectiveness of the system in improving decision-making, enhances productivity, and providing scalable solutions for rural based farming.

    In the future, the chatbot will have:

    • IoT device integration (soil sensors, weather stations)

    • AI image analysis for crop health diagnosis

    • Real-time voice interaction in multiple languages with neural translation – Collaboration with agricultural institutes for data verification

This solution is a promising step towards a digitally empowered and sustainable agri ecosystem.

References

1. Google Cloud, Speech-to-Text and Text- to-Speech APIs, 2023. 2. Ministry of Agriculture, India Agri-Data APIs, 2023.

  1. Singh, P. et al., Chatbots for Farming, IEEE Conference on ICT for Development, 2022.

  2. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), The State of Food and Agriculture, 2022.

  3. Ramesh, K. et al., AI in Agriculture: A Survey, International Journal of Computer Applications, 2021.

  4. Plantix App Review, Agricultural AI Forum, 2021.