Advancements in Topological Qubits: Microsoft’s Majorana Approach

Advancements in Topological Qubits: Microsofts Majorana Approach

Sairamakrishna Buchireddy Karri

Lead Software Developer

Systems Technology Group

Inc: Farmington, Michigan, USA

Fakhrun Jamal

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Shobhit University Meerut

Mohd Tajammul

Department of Computer Science & Applications

Sharda University Knowledge Park III, Greater Noida

Abstract Topological qubits, especially Majorana zero modes based qubits, possess the intrinsic error correction and stability, and thus have the potential to revolutionize computation. Majorana based topological qubits are the focus of Microsofts approach and they are different from traditional qubit technologies. In this study, we investigate the theoretical foundations of scalable, fault tolerant quantum computing, evaluate Microsofts progress towards this goal and identify key challenges toward this challenging goal. A study based on a survey methodology is performed, studying awareness and perception about topological qubits. Theoretical advantages of topological qubits are evident, but realization of them through material fabrication and integration is difficult, as found. The results of the survey show the knowledge gaps of respondents as well as perceived benefit of topological quantum computing. There are more advances to be made in qubit control and scalability, but the Majorana ISing process proposed by Microsoft is promising. It is needed to bridge the gap between practicability and theory, for future research should be about the increase of material stability as well as experimental validation.

Keywords Quantum Computing, Majorana Qubits, Microsoft, Fault Tolerance, PESTEL Analysis

1. INTRODUCTION

   Quantum computing is a paradigm shift in the information processing that harnesses the laws of quantum mechanics to process information orders and procedures, faster and more efficiently compared to a classical computer. Compared to classical bits that can be only in binary states (0 or 1), quantum bits (qubits) can be in superpositions and hence can represent multiple states at the same time [1]. This feature lets quantum computers process much more complicated calculations faster than its traditional computing counterpart [2]. Yet, despite these issues, the development of stable and scalable quantum computing has been a major challenge. Superconducting qubits, trapped ions, topological qubits and other promising approaches have been studied to fabricate reliable quantum system. Among these, one should mention topological qubits which are very promising candidates for scalable quantum computing solutions due to the inherent intrinsic error protection offered by such qubits [3].

   1. Background on Quantum Computing and Topological Qubits

      Quantum computing is just based on fundamental ideas of quantum mechanics like quantum superposition, quantum entanglement and quantum interference [4]. In principle, these properties make quantum computers excel at cryptography, optimization, and complex simulations and at processing vast amounts of information simultaneously [5]. But quantum coherence is one of the largest hurdles in quantum computing. Environmental disturbances cause errors of qubits and loss of information [6]. In order to resolve the issues in stability of these setups, researchers have looked into whether they can use the underlying characteristic properties of exotic quasiparticles, Majorana zero modes [7].

      Fig. 1. Topological qubits [13]

      Topological qubits work in a fundamentally difference way from conventional qubits, which are stored in isolated particles storing single bits of information, and are therefore naturally immune to local sources of noise and decoherence [8]. This topological protection enhances their stability and fault tolerance to a great extent, leading to a promising way for large scale quantum computing. Topological phases of matter provide the theoretical foundation for topological quantum computing, in which certain quantum states are robust against the physical parameters of the system due to their topology rather than specific physical parameters [9]. This aspect of the properties makes them, in totality, fundamentally robust against other qubit technologies [5].

   2. Overview of Microsofts Majorana Approach

      Although it is taking a different route than many other companies on quantum computing, Microsoft has placed its bets on the Majorana based topological quantum computing model [10]. This differs to other companies such as IBM and Google, whose understanding is based on superconducting qubits, and Microsofts research is to create topologically protected qubits, by employing Majorana zero modes [11]. These exotic quasiparticles emerge in specific conditions, particularly in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowires [12]. It will be shown that the presence of Majorana zero modes predicted to provide an intrinsic form of error correction should reduce the overhead necessary for leading to fault tolerant quantum computing [13].

      Instead, Microsoft turns its back on majorana fermions and relies on engineering topological superconductors materials in which majorana fermions can lurk at the edges of nanowires to get around any instability [14]. However, the company has developed an advanced platform for controlling and detecting Majorana zero modes using proximities superconductivity and strong spin orbit coupling [15]. Successful implementation of this method could permit qubits that exhibit less decoherence and operational errors [16]. Nevertheless, Majorana based qubits theoretically have great promise, but their experimental verification is not trivial. The existence and reproducibility of these quasiparticles is still being confirmed by researchers and done so in scalable systems [17].

      Fig. 2. Majorana 1 [12]

   3. Problem Statement: Challenges in Achieving Stable and Scalable Quantum Computing

      The Majorana based qubits are proposed theoretically but the practical implementation of such qubits faces a few hurdles: Experimental confirmation of Majorana zero modes is still difficult [18].

      • Topological superconducting materials have not yet been fabricated at scale [19].

      • Behavior of quasiparticles must be precisely controllable to achieve robust quantum operations [20].

      • Its yet to be demonstrated how the topological qubits can be integrated into a scalable quantum system [21].

   4. Objectives of the Study This study aims to:

      1. Analyze the theoretical foundations of topological qubits and Majorana fermions.

      2. Examine Microsofts approach to leveraging Majorana zero modes for quantum computing.

      3. Evaluate the current experimental progress and remaining technical challenges.

      4. Discuss the feasibility of achieving fault-tolerant quantum computing using topological qubits.

   5. Research Questions

      1. What are the fundamental principles behind topological qubits and Majorana fermions?

      2. How does Microsofts Majorana-based approach differ from other quantum computing paradigms?

   6. Significance of the Study

   This study is significant ince it helps to understand the feasibility and the impact of Majorana-based topological quantum computing. Presently, quantum computing is evolving; however, no fault tolerant and scalable solution has been achieved yet. A successful version of Microsofts approach could revolutionize the field by achieving more robust and scalable quantum processors [22]. In this research, theoretical basis of topological qubits is systematically studied, experimental development so far is analyzed, and remaining problems should be resolved before implementation of topological qubits becomes practical.

   In addition, it will analyze whether topological qubits would be advantageous when compared to current models of quantum computing. The findings could guide future research directions and technological development of quantum hardware, by valuing the feasibility of Microsofts Majorana approach. Knowing the breakthroughs and limits of this approach is important for policymakers, researchers and industry leaders to chart a path forward for quantum technology.

2. METHODOLOGY

   This study employs a survey-based methodology to gather data on the awareness, perceptions, and opinions related to topological qubits and Microsofts Majorana-based quantum computing approach. The survey was designed to explore key aspects, including respondents familiarity with quantum computing, understanding of topological qubits, awareness of Majorana fermions, and views on the potential advantages and challenges of topological qubits. The questionnaire included both closed-ended questions (e.g., Likert scale, multiple-choice) to quantify responses and open-ended questions to capture qualitative insights.

   The target population consists of individuals with varying levels of familiarity with quantum computing, ensuring a diverse set of perspectives. Data was collected anonymously, and the responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with charts such as bar graphs and pie charts used to visualize trends and distributions. This approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the perceived significance, challenges, and future potential of topological qubits in the quantum computing landscape.

   Fig. 3. Familiarity with Topological Qubits and Majorana Fermions

   This fig evaluates how much people know about quantum computing, both as a base understanding. The data is visualized as a bar chart with response options on the X axis (Very familiar, somewhat familiar, Not familar) and respondent counts on the Y axis. This chart can also be used as a way to determine how well the audience informed is as it pertains to concepts of quantum computing, and which topics would be better explained in greater detail, like topological qubits.

   Fig. 4. Ever studied about Topological qubits

   This fig probes respondents awareness of topological qubits, a concept for the most advanced quantum computing. The responses are related to a bar chart The proportion of those familiar with the topic are then visualized as "no" (")(no). For a sense of the experience level among respondents with some familiarity of or exposure to topological qubits, this chart shows how many prior to Microsofts Majorana approach.

   Fig. 5. Understanding of Topological quantum computing

   This fig attempts to measure how confident the respondents are about their knowledge of topological quantum computing. The distribution of responses is visualized by a pie chart in which each of the numbers run from 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Very confident). This chart provides a general gauge for the degree of confidence among the group vis a vis learning resources to further their understanding of topological quantum concepts.

   Fig. 6. Advantage of Topological Qubits over other types of Qubits

   This fig tries to understand which topological qubit advantages were most recognized by the respondents. The responses are visualized as a bar chart where the advantage categories are along the X axis (e.g., Error resistance, Stability, Increased speed, Unsure) and the number of respondents on the Y axis. This chart shows the perceived areas of topological qubits relative strength compared to other qubit types, which can aid in common areas of understanding and gaps in understanding as to why one type might be favored over others.

   Fig. 7. Term Majorana Fermions in Quantum Physics or Computing

   This fig asks about the awareness of Majorana fermions, the essential concept in topological quantum computing. The awareness levels are visualized in a bar chart with response options on the X axis ("Yes, I have a solid understanding", Yes, but not sure about details", "No") and the number of respondents on the Y axis. In this chart, it is shown that how familiar respondents are with Majorana fermions, the extent of knowledge or the area where it can be further learned.

   Fig. 8. Microsoft Approach to Quantum Computing and its focus to Topological Qubits

   This is a fig about responding to whether respondents know that Microsoft is focused on topological qubits in its approach to quantum computing. The awareness distribution is visualized in a bar chart with response options (on the X axies, e.g, Yes, familiar, Heard of it but unsure, No, not aware) and the number of respondents on the Y axis. This chart measures the strength of Microsofts Majorana approach based on how well surveyed group knows and understands this approach.

   Fig. 9. Microsoft Topological Qubits approach from other Quantum Computing Paradigms

   The fig draws on respondents perceptions of how Microsofts topological qubits differ from other quantum computing paradies. Such radar chart or pie chart can be used to compare categories such as "Error-correction capabilities", "Stability due to topological properties", and other features to distinguish the database. It helps to reveal which components are primarily identified by respondents, helping shed light on the thought that Microsoft has brought on its strength.

   Fig. 10. Potential of Topological Qubits

   This fig asks people how the concept of topological qubits could help with scalability issues in quantum computing. The data is visualized as a pie chart or bar chart where response options would be mapping on X axis, i.e. "Yes", "No", "Unsure" and the number of respondents mapping on Y axis. This chart allows us to gauge whether skepticism or uncertainty about the viability of topological qubits for increasing the scalability of quantum systems or not.

   Fig. 11. Tech Giants to explore alternative Quantum Computing like Topological Qubits

   This is a fig about where people stand on the idea of tech giants like Microsoft exploring other types of quantum computing, like topological qubits. Because we also have response options on our X axis, a bar chart would be great to visualize our data the number of respondents on our Y axis should be charted against response options on the X axis (extremely important, moderately important, not important). The perceived significance of moving the field forward in quantum is what this chart represents.

   Fig. 12. Adopting Topological Qubits for practical Quantum Computing

   This fig asks about how interviewed respondents perceived topological qubits as the main challenges in circumventing topological qubits from becoming practical quantum computing. It would be a bar chart over the x-axis (challenges: Engineering difficulties, Limited experimental evidence, High costs) and the number of respondents on the y axis that would correctly represent the distribution. This chart helps identify obstacles which should be considered most important for topological qubit adoption in the future and which challenges may inhibit this adoption.

   Below fig.3 provides an overview of different quantum computing hardware approaches, highlighting various qubit technologies developed by leading companies.

3. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

   1. Comparison with Other Quantum Computing Approaches

      Quantum computing approaches can be broadly categorized based on the qubit implementation strategy. The three leading methodologies include superconducting qubits (used by IBM and Google), trapped ions (used by IonQ and Honeywell), and topological qubits (pioneered by Microsoft). Each approach has distinct advantages and limitations:

      1. Superconducting Qubits:

         oCompanies like IBM and Google employ superconducting qubits, which rely on Josephson junctions to create quantum states [23].

         oThese qubits have demonstrated high-speed gate operations and are currently the most experimentally advanced quantum computing method.

         oHowever, superconducting qubits suffer from short coherence times and require complex error correction mechanisms.

      2. Trapped Ions:

         oThis approach leverages the quantum states of ions trapped in electromagnetic fields, with quantum operations performed using laser pulses.

         oTrapped ion qubits have longer coherence times and higher fidelity gate operations than superconducting qubits.

         oThe scalability of this method remains a challenge due to difficulties in integrating large numbers of ions.

      3. Topological Qubits (Microsofts Majorana Approach):

         • Unlike superconducting and trapped-ion qubits, topological qubits utilize Majorana zero modes, which offer intrinsic fault tolerance due to their non-local encoding of quantum information.

         • This topological protection makes them less susceptible to environmental noise, potentially reducing the need for extensive error correction.

         • The main drawback is that experimental evidence for stable, scalable Majorana-based qubits remains inconclusive, with fabrication challenges persisting.

           The comparison highlights that while topological qubits offer theoretical advantages in fault tolerance and stability, their experimental verification lags behind other qubit technologies. If successfully implemented, Microsoft's approach could surpass current methodologies in terms of error resistance and long-term scalability.

           Fig. 13. Quantum Computing Hardware

   2. Potential Industry-Wide Impact of Topological Qubits The adoption of topological qubits could significantly impact various industries by accelerating the practical realization of fault-tolerant quantum computing. Some key areas where topological qubits could make a substantial impact include:

      • Cryptography and Cybersecurity: Quantum computing poses a threat to classical cryptographic methods (e.g., RSA and ECC). However, topological qubits, if successfully realized, could enable quantum-resistant encryption methods that ensure secure communications in the quantum era [24].

      • Pharmaceuticals and Drug Discovery: The increased computational power of fault-tolerant quantum systems could revolutionize molecular simulations, enabling faster drug discovery and reducing the cost of developing new medicines [25].

      • Optimization Problems in Logistics and Finance: Industries relying on complex optimization problems, such as supply chain management, financial modeling, and portfolio optimization, could benefit from quantum speed-up enabled by topological qubits.

      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Quantum computing, when integrated with AI, could significantly enhance machine learning algorithms by enabling faster training of models and processing large datasets more efficiently.

      • Materials Science and Chemistry: Quantum simulations powered by topological qubits could help design novel materials with unique properties, impacting industries such as energy storage, semiconductors, and superconductors.

   3. Answer to Research Questions

   The initial research queries (RQ1) attempt to identify the roots of the topological qubits plus Majorana fermions and how the accompanying images assist in answering it. The bar chart of the amount of respondents that are familiar with quantum computing provides a baseline from which the amount of previous knowledge is understood and to interpret responses concerning topological qubits. Another bar chart shows how many respondents are aware of topological qubits, as a Ratio of the total respondents who are aware of it compared to the not. Further refinement of

   this assessment through a pie chart visual representation of confidence levels regarding understanding topological quantum computing is provided by pie chart that illustrates gaps in self reported confidence. Furthermore, a bar chart depicting the most prominent advantages of topological qubits (i.e. error resistance or stability) serves to highlight prominent perceived advantages for respondents. Finally, a bar chart that quantifies the level of awareness of the Majorana fermions contributes to understanding how much of this key aspect of Microsofts quantum computing agenda respondents are familiar with. By working together these visualizations give a large picture of participants familiarity and knowledge about topological quantum computing and help answer RQ1 respectively.

   The second research question (RQ2) of this research focuses on how Microsofts Majorana based approach is different from the other quantum computing paradigms and justify this with the help of many visualizations. In order to determine how well this quantum computing paradigm is recognized, a bar chart measuring respondents awareness of Microsofts approach to quantum computing sets a baseline. Moreover, radar chart or pie chart depicting other distinguishing features between Microsoft and other technologies, like error correction functionality and stability based upon topological characteristics, provides well-defined ideas about the peculiarity of Microsofts scheme. A second key visualization involves a pie chart or bar chart that evaluates whether respondents see topological qubits as an acceptable solution to scalability problems in quantum computing. The fact that this data exists gives us an indication of how Microsofts offering is perceived from a practical point of view. In addition, a bar chart displays respondents opinions on Microsofts strategy with respect to alternative quantum computing paradigms within the larger scope of quantum research. The last plot shows a bar chart illustrating the major challenges for topological qubit adoption (engineering issues and lack of experimental evidence) and shows the barriers that exist for Microsofts approach. Taken together these visualizations answer RQ2 in a detailed analysis of respondents views regarding Microsofts Majorana based topological qubits.

4. CONCLUSION

1. Summary of Key Insights

   It investigated the theoretical foundation and experimental progress and the implementation challenges of applying Majorana based topological qubits for quantum computing. Practical to realization of these qubits is, however, constrained by experimental limitations and material fabrication challenges. To contrast with traditional paradigms of quantum computing, Microsofts approach is based on topological protection to combat decoherence and operational erros. While there is theoretical advantage, it will be a long way away to have reproducible Majorana zero modes and engineer topological superconductors, the study showed. Furthermore, there is no other work to date that addresses the first part of this question, namely the feasibility of integrating topological qubits into scalable quantum architectures. In addition, it is important to develop stable quantum circuits that take advantge of topological qubits, which is a challenge that will only be

   realized through future advancesVoinl. 1m4 aIstesurieal0s5, sMciaeyn-c2e0,25 quantum control technics, and computational modeling. And it is also necessary to understand underlying physics responsible for Majorana states and their interaction with various environment factors. These findings have important theoretical physics implications but also carry over into experimental research direction and quantum hardware development strategy implications.

2. Future Research Directions

   • Improve the experimental verification of Majorana zero modes.

   • Develop scalable fabrication techniques for topological superconductors.

   • Advance nanofabrication techniques and material science to create more stable topological qubit systems.

   • Integrate topological qubits into hybrid quantum systems to overcome existing technical barriers.

   • Investigate novel quantum error correction methods tailored to topological qubits to enhance their practical applicability.

   • Foster interdisciplinary collaboration between physicists, engineers, and computer scientists to bridge the gap between theoretical models and real-world implementation.

   • Evaluate the feasibility of deploying topological qubits in commercial quantum processors and integrating them with current quantum hardware architectures.

   • Assess the economic and energy efficiency aspects of topological qubits to ensure their viability for large- scale industrial applications.

   • Explore alternative materials and fabrication techniques that could enhance the stability and coherence of Majorana-based qubits.

   • Investigate the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in optimizing qubit design, error correction, and system scalability.

   • Establish standardized benchmarking protocols for evaluating topological qubits against other quantum computing models to determine their true potential in various computational domains.

3. Long-Term Implications for Quantum Computing and Commercial Applications

   • Topological qubits, if realized, may represent a paradigm shift in quantum computing, toward more stable and commercially viable quantum systems.

   • Since they are inherently error resistant and scalable, they could be a better choice than conventional qubit technologies.

   • Topological qubits, in the long term, can lead to breakthroughs in fields such as secure communications, quantum cryptography, and optimization problems, as well as complex molecular simulations and industries based on high performance computing.

   • Efforts to achieve such large scale quantum computations with low error rates would have

     revolutionary influence on other areas such as drug discovery, material science and artificial intelligence.

     • To realize this vision, continued research effort, interdisciplinary collaboration and progress in quantum hardware engineering will be required.

     • At the next level, government, other industry stakeholders, academic institutions and industry leaders collectively need to continue to invest in fundamental research, as well as workforce development and infrastructure to support the maturation of topological quantum technologies.

     • Since quantum computing solutions must be inherently accessible and reliable for widespread adoption, this will serve as a key determining factor in the quantum computing future landscape for computational sciences and technology.

     • To enable profitable application of topological quantum computing in commerce, issues of ethical and regulatory consideration are paramount.

     • With competition in the quantum industry on the rise, international cooperation as well as policy frameworks will have a crucial role in defining how topological quantum technologies will develop and converge to standards.

     • Secure long term strategic planning for quantum research and innovation will be needed to fully capitalize the power of Majorana based qubits in many fields.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Heading 5)

The preferred spelling of the word acknowledgment in America is without an e after the g. Avoid the stilted expression one of us (R. B. G.) thanks …. Instead, try R. B. G. thanks….Put sponsor acknowledgments in the unnumbered footnote on the first page.

REFERENCES

1. D. C. Youvan, Microsofts Majorana 1: A Paradigm Shift Toward Scalable and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Feb. 20, 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Douglas-

   Youvan/publication/389169814_Microsoft

2. Chohan, A Comparative Review of Quantum Bits: Superconducting, Topological, Spin, and Emerging Qubit Technologies, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4979773.

3. R. S. Souto and R. Aguado, Subgap States in Semiconductor- Superconductor Devices for Quantum Technologies: Andreev Qubits and Minimal Majorana Chains, Lecture notes in physics,

   pp. 133223, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 55657-9_3.

4. C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 10831159, Sep. 2008, doi:

   https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083.

5. Rizzo, Majorana Zero Modes in Microsoft Quantum Chips: The Fundamental Role of Spacetime Torsion, Feb. 28, 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alessandro-Rizzo- 19/publication/389418995_Majorana_Zero_Modes_in_Microsoft_ Quantum_Chips_The_Fundamental_Role_of_Spacetime_Torsion/l inks/67c453328311ce680c7a0c5a/Majorana-Zero-Modes-in- Microsoft-Quantum-Chips-The-Fundamental-Role-of-Spacetime-

   Torsion.pdf

6. M. Minissale, Paolo Bondavalli, M. S. Figueira, and G. L. Lay, Sequencing one-dimensional Majorana materials for topological quantum computing, Journal of Physics Materials, vol. 7, no. 3,

   pp. 031001031001, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515- 7639/ad5763.

7. M. Minissale, Paolo Bondavalli, M. S. Figueira, and G. L. Lay, Sequencing one-dimensional Majorana materials for topological quantum computing, Journal of Physics Materials, vol. 7, no. 3,

   pp. 031001031001, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515- 7639/ad5763.

8. M. Minissale, Paolo Bondavalli, M. S. Figueira, and G. L. Lay, Sequencing one-dimensional Majorana materials for topological quantum computing, Journal of Physics Materials, vol. 7, no. 3,

   pp. 031001031001, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515- 7639/ad5763.

9. N. R. Ayukaryana, M. H. Fauzi, and E. H. Hasdeo, The quest and hope of Majorana zero modes in topological superconductor for fault-tolerant quantum computing: An introductory overview, AIP conference proceedings, vol. 2382, pp. 020007020007, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0059974.

10. Y. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Liu, and X. X. C, Quantify the stability of Majorana qubits through Rabi beat, arXiv.org, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09062

11. J. R. Taylor and S. D. Sarma, Vision transformer based Deep Learning of Topological indicators in Majorana

    Nanowies, arXiv.org, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06768

12. Davide, Scientific American, Scientific American, 2018. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/microsoft-claims- quantum-computing-breakthrough-but-some-physicists-are/

13. M. Swayne, Research Team Achieves First-Ever Topological Qubit, A Step Along The Path Toward Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, The Quantum Insider, Nov. 26, 2024. https://thequantuminsider.com/2024/11/26/research-team-achieves- first-ever-topological-qubit-a-step-along-the-path-toward-fault- tolerant-quantum-computing/

14. Boretti, Technical, economic, and societal risks in the progress of artificial intelligence driven quantum technologies, Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 1, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00171-y.

15. L. Latorre, I. Cerrato, and L. D. Leo, Tech Report: Quantum Technology, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.18235/0013401.

16. V. Kumar, S. Gupta, and F. S. Gill, An overview on quantum computing for technology, CRC Press eBooks, pp. 696701, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003559092-120.

17. K. Ó. Klausen, Majorana zero modes in tubular nanowires, Opinvisindi.is, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/978-9935- 9655-7-8%20(eISBN).

18. J. Jung et al., Universal Platform for Scalable SemiconductorSuperconductor Nanowire Networks, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 38, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202103062.

19. J. D. Torres Luna, A. M. Bozkurt, M. Wimmer, and C.-X. Liu, Flux-tunable Kitaev chain in a quantum dot array, SciPost Physics Core, vol. 7, no. 3, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.3.065.

20. S. Razmkhah, A. Bozbey, and P. Febvre, Superconductor modulation circuits for Qubit control at microwave frequencies, arXiv.org, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06667

21. Sébastien Plissard, Low bandgap nanostructures and topological materials for quantum computing and spintronic applications, Hal.science, Nov. 2024, doi: https://laas.hal.science/tel-04914174.

22. Z.-H. Liu, W. Lou, K. Chang, and X. H. Q, Topological phase transition in a narrow bandgap semiconductor nanolayer, arXiv.org, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17243

23. H. Bombín, C. Dawson, R. V. Mishmash, N. Nickerson, F. Pastawski, and S. Roberts, Logical Blocks for Fault-Tolerant Topological Quantum Computation, PRX Quantum, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.4.020303.

24. A. Lele, Quantum Computers, Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, pp. 2538, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72721-5_3.

    M. Pendharkar et al., Parity-preserving and magnetic field resilient superconductivity in InSb nanowires with Sn shells, Science, vol. 372, no. 6541, pp. 508511, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba5211.

25. Karri, S. B., Penugonda, C. M., Karanam, S., Tajammul, M., Rayankula, S., & Vankadara, P. (2025). Enhancing Cloud-Native Applications: A Comparative Study of Java-To-Go Micro Services

    migration. International Transactions on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 4(1), 1-12.

26. Sairamakrishna Karri, Ravi Kumar Bojja, Vinod Kumar Devalla. An Architecture for Model Monitoring System with Automated Data Validation and Failure Handling. TechRxiv. January 04, 2025.

    DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.173602907.77692809/v1

27. Karri, S. B., Bojja, R. K., AnnapuReddy, N. R., Nutakki, S. K., Independent Researchers, Karri, S., Bojja, R., AnnapuReddy, N., & Nutakki, S. (2024). Cross-Domain expert in designing AI-Driven microservices. In International Journal of Novel Research and Development (Vol. 9, Issue 12, pp. c820c821) [Journal-article]. https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2412298.pdf