A Review of Solar-Powered Automated Railway Track Fault Detection Systems with Real-Time GPS Tracking

A Review of Solar-Powered Automated Railway Track Fault Detection Systems with Real-Time GPS Tracking

Prajyot Devidas Ingle (Author)

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic Wagholi, Pune, India

Aaditya Prabhakar Gund (Author)

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic Wagholi, Pune, India

Saksham Kumar Almel (Author)

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic Wagholi, Pune, India

Prof. Waghmode M. N. (Guide)

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic Wagholi, Pune, India

Shreyash Manohar Chitragar (Author)

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic Wagholi, Pune, India

Abstract – Railway infrastructure is essential for safe and efficient transportation. Traditional track inspection relies on manual observation, which is slow, labor-intensive, and can expose inspection staff to operational and environmental hazards. This review paper surveys existing approaches to automated railway track fault detection, concentrating on solar-powered monitoring and real-time GPS tracking. Technologies reported in earlier studies, namely ultrasonic sensors, mechanical limit switches, embedded microcontrollers, GPS modules, GSM communication, and photovoltaic power systems, are examined for their use in track monitoring. The paper explains how these technologies can be combined to detect track-related abnormalities, determine where they occur, and send fault information so that maintenance can be carried out on time. The approaches are also compared in terms of detection capability, communication, power requirements, reliability, and practical deployment challenges. In addition, the paper points out current limitations and discusses future possibilities involving IoT, artificial intelligence, computer vision, and predictive maintenance. Overall, the review shows that combining automated fault detection, renewable energy, and real-time location tracking can improve the reliability, efficiency, and safety of railway track monitoring systems.

KeywordsRailway Track Monitoring, Automated Fault Detection, Solar-Powered Systems, GPS Tracking, GSM Communication, IoT, Railway Safety.

1. INTRODUCTION

   Railways are a key part of modern passenger and freight transport, offering high carrying capacity, operational efficiency, and the ability to link distant regions. A railway track is under constant stress from mechanical loads, vibrations, temperature changes, and weather, and these factors can slowly degrade its structural condition. Defects such as rail cracks, surface irregularities, joint-related problems, and loose or missing fastening components lower the reliability of the track and can become serious safety hazards if they are not found and corrected early.

   Conventional track inspection generally relies on manual observation and scheduled maintenance. These methods are common, but they consume time and effort, especially across large networks and remote sections. The accuracy of a manual inspection can also vary with the experience and working conditions of the inspector. For this reason, automated inspection has attracted growing interest as a way to make track monitoring faster, more consistent, and safer. Advanced inspection systems, however, can involve high equipment cost, complex infrastructure, and heavy power and communication demands, which makes deployment in remote locations difficult.

   Progress in embedded systems, sensors, wireless communication, Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, and renewable energy has opened new options for automated railway monitoring. Several studies have examined sensor- based methods for detecting track abnormalities, and GPS and GSM-based communication have been used to report the location and status of detected faults. Solar-powered systems have also been considered as an independent energy source where grid electricity is not easily available.

   This review paper surveys existing research on automated railway track fault detection systems, with special attention to the integration of solar power generation and real-time GPS- based location tracking. The reviewed approaches are analyzed in terms of sensing techniques, processing units, communication methods, power requirements, detection capabilities, and practical limitations. The paper also considers how renewable energy, IoT-based communication, and automated sensing can be combined for track monitoring. Finally, it discusses current challenges and future research directions, including artificial intelligence, computer vision, cloud-based monitoring, and predictive maintenance, to highlight opportunities for building more reliable and efficient inspection systems.

2. ‌LITERATURE SURVEY

   Recent work on railway monitoring has aimed to improve track inspection through automation, wireless sensor networks,

   renewable energy sources, and location-based communication. Each approach brings its own benefits for fault detection, remote monitoring, power efficiency, and maintenance, but each also has limitations related to cost, power availability, communication coverage, and reliability. Table I gives a comparative overview of the main approaches used for track monitoring, along with their key features, advantages, and limitations.

   Table I

   Comparative Overview of Railway Track Monitoring Approaches

   td>

   monitoring unit.

   Sr. No.	Research Approach	Description	Advantages	Limitations
   1	Conventional	Manual patrolling	Simple to	Time-consuming,
   	Track	and periodic	implement; direct	labor-intensive,
   	Inspection	physical	physical	and potentially
   		examination of	observation.	affected by human
   		railway tracks.		error.
   2	Automated	Electronic sensors	Can improve	System cost,
   	Track	and monitoring	inspection speed	sensor selection,
   	Inspection	systems are used to	and support early	and field
   		identify abnormal	fault	reliability may be
   		track conditions.	identification.	challenging.
   3	Wireless	Distributed sensor	Reduces extensive	Battery life,
   	Sensor	nodes collect track-	wiring and	maintenance, and
   	Networks	related data and	supports remote	reliable power
   	(WSN)	transmit it to a	monitoring.	supply are
   			concerns.
   4	Solar-	Solar panels and	Can reduce	Depends on solar
   	Powered IoT	rechargeable	dependence on	availability,
   	Monitoring	batteries supply	grid power and	battery capacity,
   		power to sensor-	support remote	power
   		based monitoring	monitoring.	management, and
   		systems, while IoT		communication
   		supports remote		coverage.
   		data
   		communication.
   5	GPS and	GPS provides	Supports location-	GPS reception,
   	GSM-Based	location	based alerts and	cellular coverage,
   	Monitoring	information, while	remote fault	and power
   		GSM transmits	reporting.	consumption can
   		fault alerts and		affect
   		status data through		performance.
   		cellular networks.
   6	Integrated	Combines fault	Offers the	Integration, cost,
   	Railway	detection,	potential for	detection
   	Monitoring	renewable energy,	coordinated	reliability, and
   		wireless	monitoring and	field validation
   		communication,	location-specific	require further
   		and GPS-based	fault reporting.	investigation.
   		location tracking.

   The comparison in Table I shows that automated inspection, wireless sensor networks, solar-powered IoT, and GPS/GSM communication can each help improve track monitoring. Even so, reliable fault detection, a continuous power supply, communication availability, and the integration of several technologies remain important concerns. These points show the need for further research on integrated monitoring approaches that combine automated fault detection, solar-powered operation, and real-time GPS-based location tracking, especially for remote railway sections.

3. ‌CHALLENGES IN RAILWAY TRACK MONITORING

   Even though monitoring technologies have advanced considerably, reliable and continuous monitoring of railway tracks still faces several practical challenges. The main

   challenges identified in the reviewed studies are described below.

   1. ‌Safety Risks and Human Limitations

      Traditional railway inspection depends mainly on manual patrolling and periodic visual checks, which demand a lot of time and effort. Inspectors may be exposed to moving trains, bad weather, and hard-to-reach locations. The results can also differ with the experience and physical condition of the inspector. Reducing reliance on manual inspection is therefore an important requirement for improving railway safety.

   2. ‌Early Detection of Track and Component Faults

      Railway tracks are exposed all the time to mechanical loads, vibrations, temperature variations, and environmental conditions. Over time these factors can lead to cracks, loose fasteners, damaged joints, and missing track components. Small defects can be missed during periodic manual inspection and may become more serious if repairs are delayed. An effective monitoring system should therefore be able to detect abnormal conditions at an early stage.

   3. ‌Communication and Response Delay

      Another major challenge is the delay between a fault being detected and the responsible authority being informed. Conventional inspection often cannot supply immediate information about where a fault is and what condition it is in. Without real-time communication and location data, maintenance teams may need extra time to find the affected section of track. Combining wireless communication with GPS-based location tracking can therefore help send fault information quickly and support a faster response.

   4. ‌Power Availability in Remote Locations

      Many railway lines run through remote areas where a continuous electrical supply may be unavailable. Battery- powered monitoring devices need regular replacement or charging, which adds to maintenance work. A reliable and sustainable power source for monitoring equipment is therefore another major challenge, and solar energy with rechargeable battery storage is a suitable option for such locations.

   5. ‌Integration of Multiple Technologies

   A practical monitoring system may need several technologies, including sensors, a microcontroller, wireless communication, GPS, and a power management system. Combining these into a compact, low-cost, and reliable unit that keeps running continuously is difficult. The system should also deliver accurate fault information without creating excessive maintenance demands.

4. ‌REVIEWED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

   1. ‌Reviewed System

      The reviewed system monitors railway tracks by integrating sensor-based fault detection, embedded processing, solar power generation, and GPS-based location tracking. It is designed to identify possible abnormalities in the track and in selected fastening components, and to pass fault-related information to designated personnel. The system consists of sensors, a NodeMCU ESP8266 microcontroller, a solar-powered supply unit, a GPS module, and a GSM communication module. Together, these components offer a way to monitor railway

      infrastructure, particularly in remote locations where continuous manual inspection may be difficult.

      Ultrasonic sensors and mechanical limit switches collect information about track conditions and selected components. The NodeMCU processes the sensor signals to identify possible abnormal conditions. When a fault is detected, the GPS module supplies the geographical coordinates and the GSM module sends the alert and location information by SMS. A photovoltaic panel, a charge-control circuit, and a rechargeable battery provide the power needed to operate the system.

   2. ‌System Architecture

      The overall block diagram of the reviewed system is shown in Fig. 1.

      Fig. 1. Hardware block diagram of the reviewed system.

      Fig. 1 presents the hardware block diagram of the reviewed solar-powered railway track fault detection robot. A solar panel charges a rechargeable battery, and an LM2596 DC-DC converter supplies regulated voltage to all modules. The NodeMCU ESP8266 serves as the main controller. It receives data from the HC-SR04 ultrasonic sensor and the limit switches, which detect gaps or irregularities in the track. The NEO-6M GPS module gives the fault location, and the SIM800L GSM module sends this information to the designated user as an SMS alert. The L298N motor driver controls the DC geared motors that move the inspection unit, while the 16×2 I2C LCD and LEDs show the system status.

5. ‌HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION

   The system uses cost-effective, high-reliability commercial components chosen for low power consumption and harsh outdoor environments.

   1. ‌Hardware Architecture and Component Selection

      1. ‌NodeMCU ESP8266 Microcontroller

         The NodeMCU ESP8266 is the main processing and control unit of the reviewed railway monitoring system. It reads the signals from the ultrasonic sensors and mechanical limit switches and processes them according to the programmed fault-detection logic. When a possible abnormal condition is found, the controller arranges the collection of GPS coordinates and the sending of a fault alert through the GSM module.

         Fig. 2. ESP8266 microcontroller.

      2. ‌HC-SR04 Ultrasonic Sensor

         The HC-SR04 measures distance by emitting ultrasonic waves and receiving their reflections. The controller computes the distance from the time the echo takes to return. In the reviewed model, it can help detect changes in distance or possible discontinuities when mounted at a suitable position relative to the monitored track.

         Fig. 3. HC-SR04 ultrasonic sensor.

      3. ‌Mechanical Limit Switch

         A mechanical limit switch is an electromechanical device whose electrical state changes when its actuator is pressed. In the reviewed model, it can be used to detect physical contact or movement linked to a selected component-monitoring mechanism. The controller reads the switch state and compares it with the programmed conditions to identify a possible abnormal event.

         Fig. 4. Mechanical limit switch.

      4. ‌NEO-6M GPS Module

         The NEO-6M GPS module determines the position of the monitoring unit by receiving signals from navigation satellites. When the NodeMCU identifies a possible fault, the current latitude and longitude can be attached to the fault report. This helps maintenance personnel find the approximate location of the event along the railway route.

         Fig. 5. NEO-6M GPS module.

      5. ‌SIM800L GSM Module

         The SIM800L GSM module provides cellular communication between the monitoring unit and a remote user. Once a possible fault is detected, the NodeMCU can prepare a message with the fault status and the available GPS coordinates. When it is properly configured and connected to a compatible cellular network, the SIM800L can send this information by SMS.

         Fig. 6. SIM800L GSM module.

      6. ‌Solar Panel

         The solar panel is the main renewable energy source in the reviewed model. The reviewed configuration specifies a 10

         16.5 V, 2 W photovoltaic panel that converts sunlight into electrical energy. A panel of this rating cannot directly meet peak loads such as SIM800L transmission bursts and motor operation, so the rechargeable battery acts as an energy buffer, and the overall power budget should be verified for the intended duty cycle.

         Fig. 8. L298N motor driver.

   2. ‌Software Design and Firmware Development

      The software coordinates sensor monitoring, fault identification, GPS data collection, and GSM-based notification.

      1. ‌Development Platform

         The firmware is written in Embedded C/C++ using the Arduino IDE. The ESP8266 board package is configured in the Arduino IDE so that the program can be compiled and uploaded to the NodeMCU.

      2. ‌Serial Communication

         Serial communication connects the ESP8266 to the GPS and GSM modules. Depending on the chosen communication arrangement and the available GPIO pins, software-based serial communication can be used to connect additional serial devices.

      3. ‌GPS Data Processing

         The TinyGPS++ library processes the GPS data received from the NEO-6M module and extracts useful information such as latitude and longitude.

      4. ‌Sensor Monitoring and Control

         Functions such as digitalRead() monitor the digital inputs from the limit switches, while pulseIn() can measure the echo pulse duration of the ultrasonic sensor. The controller processes these measured values to decide whether a possible abnormal condition exists.

      5. ‌GSM Alert Generation

   The SIM800L module is controlled through AT commands. Commands such as AT+CMGF=1 and AT+CMGS set up the SMS mode and send the alert message, which can contain the detected fault information and the corresponding GPS coordinates.

   Fig. 7. Solar panel.

   ‌G. L298N Motor Driver

   The L298N motor driver works as an interface between the NodeMCU and the DC geared motors of the mobile inspection platform. The controller sends control signals to the driver, which switches the motor supply to set the direction of rotation. Speed can also be adjusted with suitable pulse-width modulation (PWM) signals and compatible wiring.

6. ‌METHODOLOGY

   The reviewed system follows a sequential methodology that combines solar energy generation, railway track monitoring, fault detection, data processing, and wireless notification. The operation is divided into four major phases.

   ‌Phase 1: Solar Energy Generation and Power Management

   1. The system is meant for railway locations where a continuous external power supply may not be readily available.

   2. A 1016.5 V, 2 W photovoltaic solar panel converts available sunlight into electrical energy.

   3. A suitable solar charge controller manages the charging of the rechargeable battery and helps keep the monitoring system supplied with the required power.

   4. The stored battery energy is delivered to the electronic circuits through an LM2596 DC-DC converter, which provides a suitable voltage level for the connected modules.

   5. This power arrangement lowers the systems dependence on conventional electrical power and allows operation at remote locations.

   ‌Phase 2: Mobile Inspection and Sensor Data Collection

   DC geared motors, controlled through an L298N motor driver, move the inspection vehicle.

   1. While the vehicle moves, the HC-SR04 ultrasonic sensor measures the distance between the sensor and the monitored rail surface. Variations in this distance are used to identify possible gaps or irregularities.

   2. Mechanical limit switches are placed at selected track components to detect changes in their mechanical position, which may indicate a loose, displaced, or missing component.

   3. The sensor outputs are continuously fed to the NodeMCU for further processing.

   ‌Phase 3: Sensor Data Processing and Fault Identification

   1. The NodeMCU ESP8266 acts as the central controller of the system.

   2. Using embedded C/C++ firmware, it receives and processes the signals from the ultrasonic sensor and the limit switches.

   3. The controller compares the measured sensor values with predefined conditions or threshold values.

   4. When the data indicates a possible abnormal condition, the system classifies it as a potential track or component fault.

   5. The detected condition is then passed on to the communication section for further processing and notification.

   ‌Phase 4: GPS-Based Location and GSM Alert

   Once a possible faut is detected, the controller obtains location information from the NEO-6M GPS module.

   1. The GPS data from the module is processed with the TinyGPS++ library to obtain parameters such as latitude and longitude.

   2. The SIM800L GSM module then sends an SMS notification through the available cellular network.

   3. The alert message can include the detected fault condition and the corresponding GPS coordinates.

   4. This information helps maintenance personnel find the approximate location of the reported fault and take suitable action.

7. ‌ADVANTAGES

   The reviewed solar-powered automated railway track monitoring system offers several potential benefits in

   monitoring, communication, power management, cost, and railway safety. The major advantages are as follows:

   1. Automated Fault Detection: The system reduces reliance on manual inspection by using sensors to monitor selected track conditions and fastening components. This can help detect possible abnormalities at an early stage.

   2. GPS-Based Fault Location and GSM Alert: Integrating the NEO-6M GPS and SIM800L GSM modules lets the system provide location information and send fault notifications to the concerned personnel. This can support faster identification of the affected railway section.

   3. Solar-Based Power Supply: A photovoltaic panel with a rechargeable battery gives the monitoring unit an alternative power source, making the system better suited to railway locations where conventional power is limited.

   4. Low-Cost Implementation: The system uses commercially available components such as the NodeMCU ESP8266, HC-SR04, GPS, GSM, and other standard modules. This can lower the overall hardware cost and make the system suitable for low-cost prototype development.

   5. Reduced Manual Inspection Effort: Automated monitoring can reduce how often manual checking is needed for the monitored parameters. It may also reduce the exposure of maintenance personnel to potentially hazardous track environments.

   6. Remote Monitoring Capability: Fault information can be sent remotely over GSM, so maintenance personnel can receive it without being physically present at the monitoring location.

   7. Modular and Expandable Design: The system is divided into sensing, processing, power, and communication sections, so additional sensors or monitoring features can be added later according to the needs of the railway application.

   8. Improved Railway Safety Support: Early identification and reporting of possible track or component abnormalities can help maintenance teams take corrective action before the condition worsens. In this way, the reviewed system can contribute to better infrastructure monitoring and safety.

8. ‌APPLICATIONS

   The reviewed railway monitoring system can be adapted to different railway environments that need regular inspection and remote monitoring. Its modular design allows it to be modified for the requirements of different applications. The major applications are as follows:

   1. Remote Railway Track Monitoring: The system can be used in remote railway sections such as forested, hilly, rural, or other hard-to-reach areas where regular manual inspection may be difficult. Its solar-powered design can support monitoring at locations with limited access to conventional power.

   2. Railway Track Inspection: The mobile monitoring unit can inspect selected track sections and identify possible gaps, irregularities, or component-related faults, helping maintenance personnel locate areas that need further physical inspection.

   3. Railway Bridges and Tunnel Sections: The system can be adapted to monitor track sections near bridges, tunnels, and other infrastructure where routine inspection access may be difficult. Additional sensors can be added according to environmental and structural requirements.

   4. Freight Railway Corridors: The system can be considered for railway sections with frequent or heavy train movement. Sensor-based monitoring can provide information about selected track conditions and fastening components for later maintenance assessment.

   5. Industrial and Private Railway Networks: The system can also be adapted for industrial railway tracks, private sidings, and other restricted railway networks where low- cost automated inspection and remote fault notification may be useful.

   6. Railway Maintenance Support: GPS-based location information and GSM alerts can help maintenance teams find the approximate location of a reported abnormality, which helps prioritize inspection and maintenance activities.

9. ‌FUTURE SCOPE AND ENHANCEMENTS

   The reviewed system offers a basic platform for automated monitoring of railway tracks and components. Its functionality can be extended by adding advanced sensing, communication, data analysis, and automation technologies. The possible future enhancements are as follows:

   1. Cloud-Based IoT Monitoring: The system can be linked to cloud platforms such as Firebase, Blynk, or ThingSpeak to store sensor readings and fault information. A web or mobile dashboard can then be built for remote monitoring and visualization of system data.

   2. Camera and AI-Based Fault Detection: A camera module such as the ESP32-CAM can be added to capture images of suspected defects. Image-processing and machine-learning techniques can then be explored to identify different types of track abnormalities.

   3. Advanced Inspection and Robotic Systems: The inspection unit can be developed into a more autonomous railway inspection platform. Additional navigation and obstacle-detection features could let the vehicle operate with less human intervention.

   4. Predictive Maintenance: Historical sensor readings and fault records can be collected and analyzed with machine- learning techniques. Such analysis may reveal patterns linked to component deterioration and support predictive maintenance planning.

   5. Additional Sensors: Future versions can add sensors for parameters such as vibration, temperature, rail alignment, and structural conditions. Combining several sensor inputs can improve the overall assessment of track health.

   6. Improved Communication Technologies: Future implementations can investigate technologies such as LoRa, NB-IoT, or 4G/5G communication for applications that need a longer communication range, better data transmission, or lower power consumption.

   7. Energy Optimization: The power subsystem can be optimized further by improving solar energy harvesting, battery management, and low-power operating modes. This

   can extend the operating duration of the monitoring unit under varying environmental conditions.

10. ‌CONCLUSION

The system reviewed in this paper is a solar-powered automated platform for railway track and component monitoring with GPS-based location tracking and GSM communication. It combines sensor-based fault detection, NodeMCU-based processing, solar power, GPS positioning, and wireless alert generation in a single monitoring platform.

Ultrasonic and mechanical sensing together offer a way to identify possible track irregularities and fastening-related abnormalities. The NEO-6M GPS module makes it possible to obtain the location of a detected condition, and the SIM800L GSM module can send the corresponding alert to maintenance personnel. The solar panel and rechargeable battery provide an alternative power arrangement for locations where the conventional electrical supply may be limited.

The architecture uses commercially available components, which can help in building a relatively low-cost prototype. Its modular structure also allows additional sensors, communication technologies, and data-processing techniques to be added in future versions.

Overall, the reviewed system shows the potential of combining automation, renewable energy, sensing, GPS, and wireless communication for railway infrastructure monitoring. With further field testing, sensor calibration, improved fault- classification techniques, and long-term performance evaluation, it can be developed into a more reliable railway inspection and maintenance-support solution.

REFERENCES

1. Z. Hu, A. Lau, R. Tao, Y. Liu, and Y. Pan, A comprehensive review of railway track condition monitoring: From sensor selection to data processing for defect-oriented, task-driven applications, Journal of Railway Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 128, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jrst.2026.05.005.

2. V. J. Hodge, S. OKeefe, M. Weeks, and A. Moulds, Wireless sensor networks for condition monitoring in the railway industry: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 3,

   pp. 10881106, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2366512.

3. C. Ngamkhanong, S. Kaewunruen, and B. J. A. Costa, State-of-the-art review of railway track resilience monitoring, Infrastructures, vol. 3, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures3010003.

4. C. Chellaswamy, T. S. Geetha, A. Vanathi, and K. Venkatachalam, An IoT based rail track condition monitoring and derailment prevention system, International Journal of RF Technologies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81107, 2020, doi: 10.3233/RFT-190210.

5. N. R. Gajanur, A. Singh, and A. Jain, Solar powered railway track monitoring system, in Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Power and Renewable Energy (ICPRE), 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICPRE.2016.7871198.

6. T. Jayananda Kumar, P. Kiran, R. Manohar, and S. S. V. S. Sarvarayudu, Railway track crack detection and alert system using GSM & GPS, International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 220224, 2022.

7. A. L. O. de Melo, S. Kaewunruen, M. Papaelias, L. Bernucci, and R. Motta, Methods to monitor and evaluate the deterioration of track and its components in a railway in-service: A systematic review, Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 6, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.00118.

8. Z. Li, Z. Zhao, and Y. Wang, A systematic literature review of defect detection in railways using machine vision-based inspection methods, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, vol. 18,

   pp. 207226, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2024.06.006.

9. Espressif Systems, ESP8266EX Datasheet, Version 7.1, 2025.

10. u-blox, NEO-6 u-blox 6 GPS Modules Data Sheet, u-blox AG, 2014.

11. SIMCom Wireless Solutions, SIM800 Series AT Command Manual, Version 1.10, 2016.

12. Texas Instruments, LM2596 SIMPLE SWITCHER 150-kHz 3-A Step- Down Voltage Regulator Datasheet, Rev. G, 2023.

‌BIOGRAPHIES

Prof. Waghmode M. N. (Guide) is a Lecturer in the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic, Wagholi, Pune, India.

Prajyot Devidas Ingle (Author) is a student in the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic, Wagholi, Pune, India.

Saksham Kumar Almel (Author) is a student in the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic, Wagholi, Pune, India.

Shreyash Manohar Chitragar (Author) is a student in the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic, Wagholi, Pune, India.

Aaditya Prabhakar Gund (Author) is a student in the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, JSPMs Bhivrabai Sawant Polytechnic, Wagholi, Pune, India.