🔒
Global Research Press
Serving Researchers Since 2012

Some Results on Fuzzy Signed Labeling Graphs

DOI : 10.5281/zenodo.23938774
Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Some Results on Fuzzy Signed Labeling Graphs

Dr. N. Sarala (1) and G. Vidhya (2) , K. Nirmaladevi (3)

(1) Associate professor, (2,3) Research Scholar

(1,2,3) Department of Mathematics, A.D.M. College for Women (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Nagappattinam, Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract – In this study, we introduce and analyze the concept of fuzzy signed labeling graphs. In this paper we establish necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of fuzzy signed labeling graphs and also examine Cycle graph, wheel graph , Petersen graph satisfy the FSL conditions.

Key words: Fuzzy Labeling, Signed Labeling, fuzzy signed Labeling, linear graph, Cycle graph, wheel graph and petersen graph.

INTRODUCTION

In graph theory, graph labeling is a crucial field that, under specific circumstances, gives values to a graph’s vertices and/or edges. A variety of labeling styles, including graceful, harmonious, and signed labeling, have been developed over time to simulate relationship and interaction issues in the actual world. Signed graphs are particularly helpful in depicting systems with cooperative or antagonistic interactions because they include the idea of positive and negative links.

To simulate uncertainty and ambiguity in the actual world, fuzzy labeling gives soft, graded membership values between 0 and 1 to system elements, such as vertices and edges in a graph.

Under certain balancing or counting criteria, signed labeling (also known as signed graph labeling) gives positive and negative values to the vertices or edges of a graph, usually from the set {-1, +1}.

Fuzzy signed labeling models ambiguity, uncertainty, and positive or negative relationships in networks by combining fuzzy set theory, signed structures, and graph labeling.

  1. PRELIMINARIES

    Definition.2. 1

    Let C* = (V, E) be a simple graph. Then C* = (, ) is called a fuzzy graph on C*, if : V [0, 1] and : E [0, 1] and for all x, y E, (x, y) min [(x), (y)].A fuzzy graph C= (, )) on C* is called a fuzzy labeling graph if and one to one maps for all x, y .

    Definition. 2.2

    A fuzzy graph G (, ) is said to be a fuzzy signed graph if there is a mapping : E {+, } such that each edge signed to {+, } or all nodes and edges assigned to {+, } based on the fuzzy labeling conditions .When we assign {+ o r } to each edge representing the relationship between the two vertices like trust or distrust etc.

    Definition. 2.3

    Let C* = (V, E) be a simple graph. Then C* = (, ,s) is called a fuzzy signed graph on C*, if : V [0, 1] and : E [0, 1] and S {-1, 1} for all x, y E. Then the signed values of edges are + (x, y) max [(x), (y)] and – (x, y) min [(x), (y)] given by the edge relationship. A fuzzy graph C= (, ,s) on C* is called a fuzzy signed labeling graph if and one to one maps for all x, y .

    Example1:

    For n=4

    Consider a graph G(V,E,).The vertices and edges are denoted by and – . Let G( , -,S) be a signed fuzzy labeling graph , if : V [0, 1] and : E [0, 1] and S {-1, 1} .Let us label the vertices and edges are as follows

    1 = 0.10, 2 = 0.06, 3 = 0.08, 4 = 0.04: 1 2 = +0.07, 1 3 = +0.09

    1 4 = 0.01, 2 3 = 0.05, 2 4 = 0.02, 3 4 = 0.03.Here the product of all edge signs are positive. Hence it is a balanced fuzzy signed graph.

    For n=5

    1 = 0.13, 2 = 0.11, 3 = 0.09, 4 = 0.07; 5 = 0.05: 1 2 = 0.10, 1 3 = +0.12, 1 4 =

    +0.08, 2 3 = 0.06, 2 4 = 0.04, 3 4 = 0.03, 3 5 = 0.02, 4 5 = 0.01

    1 4 = 0.01, 2 3 = 0.05, 2 4 = 0.02, 3 4 = 0.03

    Here the product of all edge signs are positive. Hence it is a balanced fuzzy signed graph.

    Definition. 2.4

    A wheel graph is created by joining all of the vertices of a single cycle (the rim) to a single center vertex

    .

    Definition. 2.5

    In the field of graph theory Petersen graph is an undirected graph with 10 vertices and 15 edges.

    Definition. 2.6

    The fuzzy signed labeling graph H (, ,s) is called fuzzy labelling subgraph of G ( , -,S) if (x)

    (x) for all x V and (x,y) -(x ,y), for all x,y V.

  2. SOME PROPERTIES ON FUZZY SIGNED LABELING GRAPHS

    Properties:1

    If (, ,s) be a FSL subgraph of FSL of ( , -,S) then (x,y) (x,y) for x,y V. Proof:

    Let G ( , -,S) be a FSLG. And H(, ,s) be its subgraph. Let (x,y) be any path in G then its strength be (x,y). Since H is a sub graph, (x) (x) and ,(u,v) -(x,y). which implies (x,y) -(x,y)

    ,for all x,y V.

    Property: 2

    Edge Sign property of FSL Graph. Proof:

    Let Let G( , -,S) be a signed fuzzy labeling graph with vertices and – edges. The edge membership values are assigned by + (x, y) max [(x), (y)] ie) positive sign is assigned for truth or trust relationship and the membership values of the truth relationship is less than or equal to the maximum values of the two vertices or members. The negative sign is assigned by falsity or distrust of two members and the membership values of the falsity relations evaluated by – (x, y) min [(x), (y)].In a fuzzy signed labeling graph all edge membership values are distinct.

    Property :3

    Every fuzzy signed labeling cycle graph has balanced if the product of edges are positive. Proof:

    Let C ( , -,S) be a FSL of a cycle graph. Let us label the membership values of the edges of FSL graph is by the property 2.By the definition of signed labeling property the product of edge signs are positive ,the graph is balanced graph unless the graph is unbalanced. By using this property to FSL cycle graph the product of the negative edges are positive the FSL of cyclic graph is balanced.

  3. SOME RESULTS ON FUZZY SIGNED LABELING GRAPHS

    Preposition 4.1

    Any cycle graph admits a fuzzy signed labeling graph Proof:

    Consider a graph G(V,E,).The vertices and edges are denoted by and – . Let G( , -,S) be a signed fuzzy labeling graph , if : V [0, 1] and : E [0, 1] and S {-1, 1} .Let us label the vertices and edges are as follows

    = 0.20 0.02, , = 1,2. .

    i = +1 =0.20-0.01k, k is odd

    FSL of Cycle Graph C10

    The edge values are note as follows

    1 = 0.20, 2 = 0.16, 3 = 0.12, 4 = 0.08, 5 = 0.04, 6 = 0.02, 7 = 0.06, 7 = 0.10, 8 =

    0.10, 9 = 0.14, 10 = 0.18 ; 1 2 = +0.17, 2 3 = +0.15, 34 = +0.11, 4 5 = +0.07,

    5 6 = +0.03 , 6 7 = 0.01, 78 = 0.05, 8 9 = 0.09, 9 10 = 0.13, 10 1 =

    +0.19. In this graph the product of all edge signs are all positive. Hence the cycle graph C10 admits the fuzzy signed graph labeling and it also a balanced signed labeling graph.

    Preposition 4.2

    For n4 ,a wheel graph Wn admits fuzzy signed labeling graph. Proof:

    Consider a graph G(V,E,). The vertices and edges are denoted by and -. Let G( , -,S) be a signed fuzzy labeling graph, if : V [0, 1] and : E [0, 1] and S {-1, 1}. Let us label the vertices and edges are as follows ,

    Fix 1=0.08 and for n=7

    +1=(3n-2k)0.01 ; for i=2 to 6 and k=1,2,3

    1+1=-0.08-(0.01)k ; k=1,2,3 ; i=1,2,3..

    +1+2=0.18-(0.02)k ; k=0,1,2,3,4; i=1,2,3 and 72=-0.01

    Wheel Graph W7

    1 = 0.08, 2 = 0.19, 3 = 0.17, 4 = 0.15, 5 = 0.13, 6 = 0.11, 7 = 0.09: 1 2 = 0.07,

    1 3 = 0.06,

    1 4 = 0.05, 1 5 = 0.04, 1 6 = 0.03, 1 7 = 0.02, 2 3 = +0.18. 3 4 = +0.16.

    4 5 = +0.4, 5 6 = +0.12, 6 7 = +0.10, 7 2 = 0.01. Here the product of all edge signs are negative. Hence wheel graph W7 admits a fuzzy signed labeling graph but it is a unbalanced fuzzy signed graph.

    Preposition 4.3

    Petersen graph admits a fuzzy signed labeling . Proof:

    Consider a graph G(V,E,) be a Petersen graph. The vertices and edges are denoted by and – . Let G( , -,S) be a signed fuzzy labeling graph, if : V [0, 1] and : E [0, 1] and S {-1, 1}. Let us label the vertices and

    =0.25+(n-1)0.01; n is odd; i=1,2,3..10

    +1=0.24 – 0.01n; n is even; i=1,2,3,4.

    +5=-0.12+(0.02) n; n=0,1,2,3; i=2,3,4,5

    +2=-0.01n; n=1,2,3; n=6,7,8.

    3=0.14-0.19n; n=0,1; i=9,10; 1 5=-0.16; 1 6=-0.04.

    1 = 0.25, 2 = 0.23, 3 = 0.21, 4 = 0.19, 5 = 0.17, 6 = 0.15, 7 = 0.13, 8 = 0.11, 8 =

    0.09, 9 = 0.09, 10 = 0.07: 1 2 = +0.24, 2 3 = +0.22,

    3 4 = +0.20, 4 5 = +0.18, 5 1 = 0.16, 1 6 = 0.04, 2 7 = 0.12. 3 8 = 0.10.

    4 9 = 0.08, 5 10 = 0.06, 6 8 = 0.01, 8 10 = 0.02, 10 7 = 0.05, 7 9 =

    0.03 , 9 6 = 0.14.The generalized Petersen graph attains afuzzy signed labeling graph and it also a balanced fuzzy signed labeling graph.

  4. CONCLUSION

    In this paper Fuzzy Signed Labeling of Cycle graph, Wheel graph and Petersen graph and some basic properties are examined.

  5. REFERENCE:

  1. 1.Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control 8 (3), 338-353 (1965)

  2. 2.Rosenfield. A, Fuzzy Graphs, Fuzzy sets and their applications, Academic Press, New York, 77 – 95 (1975).

  3. 3.A NagoorGani and V. T. Chandrasekaran, A first look at Fuzzy graph theory Allied publishers Pvt. Ltd., 2010.

  4. 4.A NagoorGani and D. Rajalakshmi (a) Subhashini, A note on Fuzzy labeling, International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematical Archive 2014.

  5. 5.A NagoorGani, D. Rajalakshmi & Subhashini, Properties of fuzzy labeling graph Applied Mathematical sciences, Vol.6 (2012), 3461 3466.

  6. 6. K Ameenal Bibi and M.Devi, Fuzzy Bi-Magic labeling on Cycle Graph and Star Graph, Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,

    Vol 13(2017), 0973-1768.

  7. 7.S. Sudha, M. Lathamaheswari, S. Broumi and F. Samarandache, Neutrosophic Fuzzy magic Labeling Graph with its Application in Academic performance of the Students, Neutrosophic sets and systems, Vol.60,2023.

  8. 8.D. Ajay and P. Chellamani, Fuzzy magic labeling of Neutrosophic path and star graph, Advances in Mathematics: Scientific Journal 9 (2020), no.8,6059-6070. ISSN:1857-8365(printed); 1857-8438(electronic)

  9. 9. Debanjan Banerjee, Anita Pal, Application Of Signed Graph In Decision Making, International journal of computers & technology, Vol.14, no.3, ISSN 2347-1921,2015.

  10. 10. Seema Mehra, Manjeet Singh, Single Valued Neutrosophic Signed graphs, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 8887) Volume 157 No 9, January 2017