# Topology Optimization of an All-Terrain Vehicle Brake Pedal

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV8IS060446

Text Only Version

#### Topology Optimization of an All-Terrain Vehicle Brake Pedal

Pritesh Muralidhar Ingale

Department of Mechanical Engineering Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, Koparkhairane

Navi Mumbai, India

AbstractThis paper studies the topological optimization of All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) brake pedal for minimum mass without compromising Factor of Safety. The three dimensional solid model of a pedal is created using Solidworks 2019 and static structural analysis and Topology optimization, geometry modification is done using Ansys 18.1. The main objective of study is to minimize the weight without compromising the Factor of Safety.

KeywordsTopology, factor of safety, static analysis, All terrain vehicle

1. Design

To design a brake pedal having brake pedal ratio of more than 5:1, as it is suggested that manual braking system (with no power booster) should have a ratio greater than 5. The length of brake pedal should not be too short or too long that hinders the driving position of the drivers leg. The brake pedal ratio should be such that the driver would not feel fatigue while braking.

The brake pedal was designed using SolidWorks considering the design constraints and parameters. Figure 1 shows the 2D

1. Isketch of the pedal. The length of brake pedal was decided by

INTRODUCTION

Topology optimization (TO) is a mathematical method that optimizes material layout within a given design space, for a given set of loads, boundary conditions and constraints with the goal of maximizing the performance of the system. Topology Optimization is different from shape optimization and sizing optimization in the sense that the design can attain any shape within the design space, instead of dealing with predefined configurations.

The conventional Topology Optimization formulation uses a finite element method (FEM) to evaluate the design performance. The design is optimized using either gradient- based mathematical programming techniques such as the optimality criteria algorithm and the method of moving asymptotes or non-gradient-based algorithms such as genetic algorithms.

Topology Optimization has a wide range of applications in aerospace, mechanical, bio-chemical and civil engineering. Currently, engineers mostly use TO at the concept level of a design process. Due to the free forms that naturally occur, the result is often difficult to manufacture. For that reason, the result emerging from Topology Optimization.

2. DESIGN CONSIDERATION

The design of brake pedal plays a very crucial role as it is the deciding factor for the force available at master cylinder end. Since there is space constraint for driver while designing an ATV, the resting position of leg on brake pedal is such that it is quite difficult for the driver to produce exact amount of pedal force as compared to force produce by the leg in a regular vehicle. Based on the space constraint and resting position of the leg of the driver the brake pedal is needed to be designed so that the force produced is able to push in the master cylinder completely to its full-length stroke. The maximum force applied while sitting in an ATV can be supposed from human performance capabilities

calculating the brake pedal ratio. Brake pedal ratio is the ratio of the perpendicular distance from pivot point center to lower end of the brake pedal by the distance from pivot point center to pushrod mounting point center.

Figure 1: 2D Sketch of brake pedal

Figure 2: Dimensions of Brake Pedal

2. Material Selection for Pedal

Al-7075 and Al-6061 was chosen for comparison and various comparable properties are shown in Table1. Comparison of material is based on following factors

1. Strength to weight ratio

2. Cost

3. Physical and mechanical properties

4. Availability

Figure 3: Meshed view of Brake Pedal

Figure 4: Mesh check Aspect Ratio

Table1: Material properties

 Properties/ Material Al-7075 Al-6061 Yield Strength (MPa) 475.73 276 Elongation (%) 7.9 12 Density (g/cc) 2.81 2.7 Fatigue Strength (MPa) 159 96.5
1. STATIC ANALYSIS IN ANSYS WORKBENCH

Table2: Mesh Information

 Mesh type Solid mesh Element Size 2.00 mm Total Nodes 260423 Total Elements 127651 Maximum Aspect Ratio 7

Figure 5: Mesh check Jacobian Ratio

Load and Fixture for the Analysis

Fixture Name: Fixed Support

Figure 6: Fixed support at mounting point

Fixture details:

Entities: 1 face(s) Type: Fixed Geometry

Figure 7: Load acting on pedal surface

Entities: 1 face(s)

Type: Apply normal force Value: 500 N

Analysis Results:

Stress Generated: Max: 35.47 MPa

Min: 0 MPa

Figure 8: Stress contour in Pedal

Deformation Generated: Max: 0.52mm

Min: 0 mm

Figure 9: Deformation contour in Pedal

Hence the Static Structural Analysis is done in Ansys

Figure 10: Static Structural Layout

As the stress generated is lower than permissible limits. To minimize the weight by keeping the stiffness of model maximum We will perform Topology Optimization.

2. TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION

To perform Topology Optimization on the Static structural analysis. We will connect Engineering Data, Geometry and Model to the Topology Optimization Setup.

Figure 11: Static Structural Layout connected to Topology Optimization setup

Upload the Solution of Static Structural Analysis to Setup

Figure 12: Static Structural Solution connected to Topology Optimization setup

Design Region in Topology setup is the region where the mass will be reduced.

Exclusion region is the region which will not be change after the optimization.

Figure 13: Design and Exclusion Region

Run the solution the software will perform iterations on the Design region for maximum stiffness and minimum weight.

RESULT OF TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION:

The result of the optimization is geometry with minimum weight and the region with red color in result is removed material and grey color represents the marginal material as shown in Figure 14.

Figure 16: Design Validation system

Figure 14: Topology Optimization Result

Figure 15: Topology Optimization Final geometry

3. POST PROCESSING:

The result we obtain from the Topological Optimization is not preferable for manufacturing. We need to perform post processing on the geometry to make it suitable for Manufacturing.

Static structural analysis on optimized model is also necessary.

Therefore we can transfer the Optimization result to new static tructural study by Transfer to Design Validation System

After transferring results to the design Validation System we have to clean the geometry in space claim to get proper manufactural geometry.

The geometry cleaned in ansys space claim is given in figure 17.

Figure 17: Geometry obtained in results and modified geometry

Static Structural Analysis on modified geometry:

For Material Al-6061

Mesh Attributes has been already discussed above.

Figure 18: Mesh generated for new geometry

Load and Fixture for the Analysis

Load and fixed support conditions are same as the previous model.

Results of the Analysis: Stress Generated:

Max: 47.77 MPa

Min: 0 MPa

Figure 19: Stress generated in new geometry

Deformation Generated: Max:0.77mm

Min:0mm

Figure 20: Deformation generated in new geometry

For Material Al-7075

Mesh Attributes has been already discussed above.

Load and Fixture for the Analysis

Load and fixed support conditions are same as the previous model.

Results of the Analysis: Stress Generated:

Max: 47.77 MPa

Min: 0 MPa

Deformation Generated: Max:1.20mm

Min:0mm

Comparison of both the results before optimization and after optimization:

 Quantity Before Optimization After Optimization Stress (MPa) 35.47 47.77 Deformation (mm) 0.52 (Al-6061) 0.89 (Al-7075) 0.77 (Al-6061) 1.20 (Al-7075) FOS 6.99 (Al-6061) 12 (Al-7075) 5.19 (Al-6061) 9.29 (Al-7075) Weight (Kg) 0.521 (Al-6061) 0.562 (Al-7075) 0.384 (Al-6061) 0.370 (Al-7075)
4. CONCLUSION:

Stress generated in optimized design is close to previous design. Weight after Topology Optimization is approximately half of the original model.The larger factor of safety insures pedal will withstand higher force. Larger FOS is required due to uncertainity in the force.

REFERANCES

1. Brake technology Handbook

2. FMVSS135 section 7.11

3. Design and analysis of brake pedal : an ergonomic approach.