Physical and Sensory Evaluation of Cookies Incorporated with Oats and Honey

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS080395

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Physical and Sensory Evaluation of Cookies Incorporated with Oats and Honey

Prof. D. T. Bornare Khan Safiya Ajaz Khan

Department of Agricultural Engineering. Department of Agricultural Engineering

Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Maharashtra institute of Technology

Aurangabad, Maharashtra- 431010.(India) Aurangabad, Maharashtra- 431010.(India)

Abstract – Cookies were developed by incorporating wheat flour with rolled oats at the level of 0, 25, 50 and 75 percent and in the standardized wheat and rolled oats blend, sugar was replaced with honey at the level of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent. The study was conducted to determine the acceptability limit of rolled oats and honey in cookies through sensory and physical evaluation. In the physical evaluation it was found that rolled oats increases the spread ratio from

    1. to 40.34 and hardness from 18.88N to 29.26 N, while in case of honey incorporated cookies it was found that honey decreases the spread ratio from 35.70 to 25.13 and hardness from 27.13N to 13.59N. The sensory results revealed that increasing level of rolled oats lowered the overall acceptability of cookies from 4.54 to 2.94 and increasing level of honey lowered the overall acceptability from 4.42 to 2.67. The sensory results showed that the maximum of 50 percent rolled oats and 50 percent honey can be incorporated to prepare acceptable quality cookies.

      Key words: Cookies, Rolled oats, Honey, Physical, Sensory

      1. INTRODUCTION

        Baking Industry is considered as one of the major segments of food processing in India. Baked products are gaining popularity because of their availability, ready to eat convenience and reasonably good shelf life. Cookies are ideal for nutrient availability, palatability, compactness and convenience [1].

        Treatment

        Rolled oats (%)

        Wheat flour (%)

        A0

        00

        100

        A1

        25

        75

        A2

        50

        50

        A3

        75

        25

        New developments are taking place, given the benefits of new knowledge in nutrition science, new process technologies and the modern consumers demand for foods with multiple health benefits. Also, the focus is on disease prevention and optimizing health by the use of functional food ingredients. Functional foods have been defined as foods and food components that provide a health benefit beyond basic nutrition (for the intended population). Examples may include conventional foods; fortified, enriched or enhanced foods; and dietary supplements [2].

        hormonal activity. Oatmeal cuts the risk of strokes and heart attacks from blocked arteries, stabilizes blood sugar and increases the bodys ability to fight off infectious disease [3].

        Honey is known for its effectiveness in instantly boosting the performance, endurance and reduces fatigue in muscle [4].Beyond many health claims and ability to mask any taste deficiency that may have resulted from ingredient interactions, inclusion of honey into bread formulation is reported to offer functional benefits, improve water-binding capacity of dough, provide increased volumes and improves shelf life of bake products. [5]

        The objective of the study was to prepare the cookies from the composite flour and their sensory evaluation to assess the suitable level of rolled oats and honey incorporation and to determine the physical properties of the cookies, so as to check the effect of incorporation.

      2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

        1. Procurement of raw materials

          Rolled oats and honey and the other ingredients used in cookies preparation viz. fat, baking powder, sugar etc were procured from local market of Aurangabad.

        2. Treatment combination

          The Rolled oats were mixed with wheat flour at the substitution levels of 0, 25, 50, and 75 % (w/w). In the standardized wheat: Rolled oats blends the refined sugar was replaced with liquid honey at the substitution levels of 0, 25, 50, 75% and 100%.

          Table 1: Different combination of oat meal and wheat flour for cookies

          Oats are rich source of dietary fiber but more importantly, oats are high in fiber, specifically, – glucan. Oatmeal is a tonic for general debility, treats anorexia, is good for convalescence and fatigue, lowers blood cholesterol levels and helps to control

          Table 2: Different combination honey and refined sugar for the developed oat cookies

          Treatment

          Honey (%)

          Sugar (%)

          B0

          00

          100

          B1

          25

          75

          B2

          50

          50

          B3

          75

          25

          B4

          00

          100

        3. Preparation of cookies

          The cookies were prepared according to the method described by [6].Two types of cookies were developed namely oat cookies and honey cookies. For development of oat cookies, rolled oats at the levels of 25, 50 and 75 per cent was taken and one basic cookie with 100 per cent wheat flour was prepared. In the oat cookies sugar (25g), fat (25g), egg (10g) and baking powder (1g) were kept constant. For development of honey cookies, honey at the levels of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 per cent was taken. In the honey cookies 25g wheat flour, 25g rolled oats, sugar (25g), fat (25g), egg (10g) and baking powder (1g) were kept constant.

          The ingredients were weighed accurately. Then creaming of shortening and sugar was done, followed by the addition of eggs. The flour and baking powder were added to the creamy mass and mixed to a homogenous mass by mixer for 3 min. The batter was then rolled out with rolling pin to a thickness of 3 inches having 1 inch diameter cut with the help of a biscuit cutter. Cookies were placed on a baking tray inch distance and were baked at 175°C in a baking oven for 10-15 min. After cooling at ambient temperature, cookies were packed in a LDPE bags and stored for 90 days at ambient temperature.

        4. Sensory evaluation

          The sensory evaluation of cookies was carried out by a 10 member semi-trained panel comprised of postgraduate students and academic staff members of the faculty. The panel members were requested in measuring the terms identifying sensory characteristics and in use of the score. The assessment procedure of scoring was based on assessment of representative quality attributes chosen by [7]. A score list with 5 points was applied. The sensory score was given as per Table 3.

        5. Physical analysis

          Physical characteristics of cookies like weight width, thickness and spread factor were measured according to the methods described in [6].

          Weight (W): Weight was determined using electronic weighing balance

          Diameter (D): Diameter of cookies was measured by placing six cookies horizontally (edge to edge) and rotated at 90o angle for duplicate reading.

          Thickness (T): The thickness of cookies was measured by placing six cookies on one another and the duplicate reading was recorded.

          Spread Ratio (SR): The spread ratio is defined as a ratio of diameter and thickness and was calculated according to the formula

          SR = (Diameter/Thickness x CF) x 10

          Where,

          CF=Correction factor at constant atmospheric pressure (1.0 in this case).

        6. Texture analysis of cookies

        7. Parameters

          Value

          Pre-test speed

          2.0 mm/s

          Test speed

          1.0 mm/s

          Post-test speed

          10.0 mm/s

          Distance

          5.0 mm

          Trigger type

          Auto

          Texture of cookies was measured according to [8] by using texture analyzer CT3 settings for comparison of hardness, of different cookies within 24 hours after baking by three point bend rig probe with a 10 kg load cell. The parameter used was indicated below,

          Table 3: Sensory attribute scored in sensory assessment of cookies

          Sr. No

          SENSORY TRAIT

          DEFINITION

          A

          COLOR

          Light brown to very dark brown. ( 4.9 to 1 )

          1)Light Brown

          Give uniform light brown color.

          2)Medium Brown

          Give patches of light and dark brown.

          3)Brown

          Brown Uniform brown color.

          4)Dark Brown

          Very dark brown color.

          B

          APPEAREANCE

          Even surface to serious damage (4.9 to 1)

          1)Even Surface

          No breakages, regular shape, without damage.

          2)Slightly Un Even Surface

          Hardly visible breakages, shape irregularities, without damage.

          3)Uneven

          Visible breakages, irregular shape, serious damage

          C

          TEXTURE

          Crisp to hard. (4.9 to 1)

          1)Crisp

          Cookie suddenly breaks when a small amount of force is applied

          2)Crumbly

          The cookie breaks easily, forming loose fragment in the mouth.

          3)Tender

          The cookie is easily broken down upon chewing.

          4)Hard Cookie

          Withstands substantial force on initial bite

          D

          MOUTH FEEL

          Crunchy to teeth clogging ( 4.9 to 1 )

          1)Crunchy

          Require repeated chewing to break cookie down, Crunchy sound is heard.

          2)Granular

          Small particles are detectable when the cookie is chewed.

          3)Flaky

          On chewing a rough paste is formed, containing large irregular pieces.

          4)Teeth clogging

          Particles stick in the mouth after the paste is swallowed.

          E

          TASTE

          Very pleasant to off taste (4.9 to 1)

          1)Very pleasant

          Very pleasant taste characteristic of cookies

          2)Pleasant

          pleasant taste characteristic of cookies

          3) un pleasant

          Taste uncharacteristic to cookies

          4) Off taste

          Giving off taste after eaten

          F

          OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY

          Outstanding to Unacceptable ( 4.9 to 1 )

          1)Outstanding

          4.0-4.9

          2)Acceptable

          3.0-3.9

          3) Marginal

          2.0-2.9

          4)Unacceptable

          1.0-1.9

        8. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

          Table 4: Sensory evaluation of oat and honey supplemented cookies

          Treatment

          Color

          Appearance

          Texture

          Mouth feel

          Taste

          Overall Acceptability

          A0

          4.68

          4.45

          4.41

          4.47

          4.69

          4.54

          A1

          4.44

          4.25

          4.37

          4.44

          4.6

          4.42

          A2

          4.38

          4.25

          4.23

          4.26

          4.43

          4.31

          A3

          2.73

          3.27

          3.15

          3.06

          2.53

          2.94

          B0

          4.7

          4.27

          4.42

          4.03

          4.68

          4.42

          B1

          4.32

          4.48

          4.26

          4.32

          4.52

          4.38

          B2

          4.1

          4.6

          4.12

          4.43

          4.33

          4.31

          B3

          3.62

          3.62

          3.41

          3.61

          3.49

          3.55

          B4

          2.73

          2.98

          2.92

          2.42

          2.3

          2.67

          A0- 0% Rolled oats, A1-25% Rolled oats, A2-50% Rolled oats, A3- 75% Rolled oats.

          B0- 0% Honey, B1- 25% Honey, B2- 50% Honey, B3- 75% Honey, B4- 100% Honey.

          Fig 1. Sensory evaluation of oat and honey supplemented cookies.

          A0- 0% Rolled oats, A1-25% Rolled oats, A2-50% Rolled oats, A3- 75% Rolled oats. B0- 0% Honey, B1- 25% Honey, B2- 50% Honey, B3- 75% Honey, B4- 100% Honey

          1. Sensory evaluation of oats and honey supplemented cookies

            The effect of oats and honey incorporation on the sensory properties of cookies, such as color, appearance, texture, mouth feel, taste and overall acceptability are given in the table 4. The cookies formed with addition of 50% rolled oats got overall acceptability score of 4.3, which is very much acceptable to consumer Table 4. Sensory evaluation shows that the cookies made from 75% rolled oats was marginal acceptable with an overall score of 2.9. The score of taste reduced significantly to 2.53. However the color and taste of cookies made from 50% rolled oats was good and acceptable. The sensory score shows that rolled oats at the rate of 50% are acceptable with reference to taste mouth feel, color and texture. So A2 was selected for the further substitution of sugar with honey at different levels 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. However in case of honey supplemented cookies the cookies formed by the addition of 50% of honey got the overall acceptability score of 4.3 which is very much acceptable to consumer. More darkness of color of the cookies was observed in cookies and decrease in the crispiness and hardness of the cookies as the level of the supplementation of the honey was increased in cookies. So the score for the texture of cookies decreases from 4.6 to 2.3 as the level of honey

            Fig. 2. Physical evaluation of cookies incorporated with oats and honey A0- 0% Rolled oats, A1-25% Rolled oats, A2-50% Rolled oats, A3- 75% Rolled oats.

            B0- 0% Honey, B1- 25% Honey, B2- 50% Honey, B3- 75%

            Honey, B4- 100% Honey

            increases. The results of the sensory evaluation of the cookies prepared from the different treatments of the composite flour are according to the findings of [9] who reported increasing the level of flaxseed flour, in the cookies resulted in the significant decrease in the sensory attributes of the cookies.

            Table 5:Physical evaluation of cookies incorporated with oats and honey

            Treatment

            Weight (g)

            Diameter (cm)

            Thickness (cm)

            Spread ratio

            Hardness (N)

            A0

            18.62

            5.08

            1.79

            28.37

            18.88

            A1

            17.89

            5.35

            1.58

            33.86

            24.51

            A2

            17.65

            5.64

            1.52

            37.10

            28.17

            A3

            17.38

            5.93

            1.47

            40.34

            29.26

            B0

            17.28

            5.82

            1.63

            35.70

            27.13

            B1

            17.69

            5.58

            1.7

            32.82

            24.62

            B2

            17.83

            5.36

            1.82

            29.45

            20.88

            B3

            18.12

            5.14

            1.93

            26.63

            16.5

            B4

            18.43

            4.17

            1.98

            25.13

            13.59

            A0- 0% Rolled oats, A1-25% Rolled oats, A2-50% Rolled oats, A3- 75% Rolled oats.B0- 0% Honey, B1- 25% Honey, B2- 50% Honey, B3- 75% Honey, B4- 100% Honey

          2. Physical evaluation of cookies

            Physical evaluation such as thickness, width and spread ratio was affected with the increase in the level of rolled oats Table 4. The average weight of control (wheat flour) cookies A0 was 18.62 g whereas that of the supplemented cookies varied from 17.89 to 17.28 g. the average diameter of control cookies A0 was 5.49 cm whereas that of rolled oats incorporated cookies varies from 5.7 cm to 5.93 cm. The average thickness of A0 was

            1.79 cm, and for the other supplemented level cookies,

            varied from 1.79 to 2.47 cm. The changes in the diameter and thickness are reflected in spread ratio which was calculated by dividing diameter by thickness of the cookies. Spread ratio of the A0 cookies was 28.37 and increased as the level of supplementation increases, the range varied from 23.86 to 40.34. Thus the result indicated that as the level of rolled oats increases in the cookies there

            was gradual decrease in the weight and thickness, while increase in the diameter of cookies and thus, spread ratio of the cookies. Cookies having higher spread ratio are consider as more desirable cookies [10]. Results regarding the physical evaluation of the oat incorporated cookies are in line with [2] who reported that fortified wheat flour with fructioligosaccharide flour isolate up to the level of 60% increased spread ratio and decrease cookie thickness.

            However in case of honey incorporated cookies, physical properties such as thickness, width and spread ratio were also affected with the increase in the level of honey Table 4. The average weight of control cookies B0 was 17.48 g whereas that of the supplemented cookies varied from 17.69 to 18.43 g. the average diameter of control cookies B0 was 5.82 cm whereas that of honey incorporated cookies varies from 5.68 cm to 5.17 cm. The average thickness of A0 was 1.63 cm, and for the honey supplemented cookies, varied from 1.70 to 1.98 cm. Spread ratio of the B0 cookies was 22.14 and decreased as the level of supplementation increases, the range varied from 24.74 to 20.70. Thus the result indicated that as the level of honey increases in the cookies there was gradual increase in the weight and thickness, while decrease in the diameter of cookies and thus, spread ratio of the cookies. Results regarding the physical evaluation of the honey incorporated cookies are in line with [11] who reported addition of defatted sesame flour to unripe plantain flour slightly increased the thickness and weight of the composite cookies while the diameter and spread factor decreased.

          3. Texture analysis

          The hardness of the cookies made from varying proportion of rolled oats, are given in Table 4. Varying the amount of rolled oats changed the textural characteristics of cookies significantly. The hardness increased significantly from 18.88 N to 29.26 N in cookies prepared from control sample to 75% rolled oats. A similar trend was observed for the cookies by [7]. While in case of honey supplemented cookies the hardness decreases as the level of honey increases. The hardness of honey supplemented cookies ranged from 27.12 N to 13.59 N. A similar trend was observed in [6] the hardness of the cookies decreases as the level of xylitol is increased in the cookies.

        9. CONCLUSION

    Results indicated that rolled oats can be incorporated in cookies as a partial replacement up to 50% of wheat flour and honey can be incorporated in cookies as a partial replacement up to 50% of refined sugar without negatively affecting the physical and sensory quality. This present study shows that there exists potential for rolled oats and honey incorporation of baked products. New formulations could therefore be tested aiming at the development and consumption of food fortified with higher proportions of functional and nutritious ingredients.

    REFERENCES

    1. Vijykumar .M. Chappalwar, Dayananda Peter H. Bobde and Steffi. M. John. Quality characteristics of cookies prepared from oats and finger millet based composite flour. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technolog.3 (4), pp. 2250-3498, 2013.

    2. C. Handa. S. Goomer and A. Siddhu. Physicochemical properties and sensory evaluation of fructoligosaccharide enriched cookies. J Food Sci Technol., 49(2), pp.192199, 2012.

    3. Ammar Ibne Anwar. A pivotal review of oats awesome health potential. Beverage and food world., 40, (9), pp. 51-53, 2013.

    4. Abidoye Christiana. Preference of honey to sugar in cake making. Wudpecker Journal of Food Technology., 2(4), pp.7-12, 2014.

    5. Babajide, J. M., Adeboye, A. S. and 1Shittu, T. A. Effect of honey substitute for sugar on rheological properties of dough and some physical properties of cassava-wheat bread. International Journal of Food Research., 21 (5), pp.1869-1875, 2014

    6. Zarina Mushtaq, Salim-Ur-Rehman And Tahir Zahoor. Impact of xylitol replacement on physicochemical, sensory and microbial quality of cookies. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 9 (6): 605-610, 2010.

    7. Sukhcharn Singh, C. S. Riar and D. C. Saxena. Effect of incorporating sweetpotato flour to wheat flour on the quality characteristics of cookies. African Journal of Food Science., Vol (2) pp. 065-072, 2008.

    8. Shahazad Hussuain, Faquir Shahzad Hussain, Faqir Muhammad Anjum, Masood Sadiq Butt, Muhammad Issa Khan, Ali Asghar. Physical and sensoric attributes of flaxseed flour supplemented cookies. Turk J Biol., 30, 87-92, 2006.

    9. Shazia Saeed, Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad, Humaira Kausar, Saima Parveen, Sharoon Masih and Abdus Salam. Effect of sweet potato flour on quality of cookies. J. Agric. Res., 50(4), pp.525-538, 2012.

    10. Shalini Hooda, Sudesh Jood.).Organoleptic and nutritional evaluation of wheat biscuits supplemented with treated and untreated fenugreek flour. Journal of Food Chemistry, 90, 427-435, 2004.

    11. C.E. Chinma, B.D. Igbabul and O.O. Omotayo.. Quality Characteristics of Cookies Prepared from Unripe Plantain and Defatted Sesame Flour Blends. American Journal of Food Technology. 7, 398-408, 2012.

Leave a Reply