Perception of Employees on Various Aspects for Escalating Industrial Productivity – A Case Study

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV1IS3225

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Perception of Employees on Various Aspects for Escalating Industrial Productivity – A Case Study

T.B.Pankhania*

Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering and Head Work shop, B.V.M.Engineering College, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Dr. H.J.Jani

Director and Professor, G.H.Patel Institute of Business Studies, M.B.A.Programme, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, India.

V.K.Modi

Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering Department, B.&B. Institute of Technology, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Abstract

In the present age of cut-throat competition, it becomes highly necessary for an organization to be dynamic in the globalizat ion era. This is possible only when the emp loyees, employers and organizations are capable enough to cope up with the changing world scenario. In the rapidly changing environment human being is the most important and valuable resource to play vital role in every organization has in the form of its employees. The case was considered to know the employees perception about motivational and mora le aspects which ult imately help to improve industrial productivity. Statistical analysis gives very useful insights of the study for emp loyers to consider for better performance of the organization. It is concluded that respondents are divided about the various aspects of productivity improve ment – means and measures considered in this analysis. Overall perception is positive and they believe that the aspects considered, are going to help imp roving productivity.

Index Terms – Co mpetition, e mp loyee, e mployer globalization, organizations, perception, and productivity

  1. Introduction

    The objective of the motivation is to create conducive environment in which people are willing to work and happy working with zea l, in itiat ive and belongingness with enhanced self-esteem and satisfaction, with sense of responsibility, loyalty and discipline and with the pride and confidence in a most

    coherent manner so that the goals of an organization are achieved effic iently and effect ively. The mora le is synthesis of an employees diverse reactions to and feeling for his job satisfaction. Feelings, emotions, sentiments, attitudes and motives -all these combine and lead to a particula r type of behaviour on the part of an individual or group referred to as employees morale [1-6].

  2. The Case

    The present case study was conducted in an industry of the estate at Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand district of Guja rat, India. The estate was established some times in 1965. At present 1000 odd units are functioning and about 25000 e mp loy ments are generated. The paint making co mpany was selected for this study. A structured questionnaire was used to know the perceptions of the employees. Questionnaires were distributed to know the present status of the industrial scenario. SPSS Soft ware was used to carry out various statistical analysis to uncover the factor responsible for the health of the estate in general and industries in particular.

  3. Objectives of the Study

    The prima ry objective is to study the effects of emp loyees motivation, mo rale and job satisfaction in a public limited co mpany at Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand district of Gujarat state, India and various aspects leading to higher productivity. The specific objectives of this research are:

    To assess employees perception about motivation, mora le, Job satisfaction.

    To suggest the areas of improve ment leading to higher industrial p roductivity

  4. Scope of the study

    The research carried out in XYZ Co mpany at Vitthal Udyognagar, the outcomes may not be applicable to other units of the XYZ Paints Co mpany elsewhere or to the other companies. The survey was carried out for the lowe r, midd le and top levels emp loyees, but views may differ fro m level to level. The researcher aims at assessing the employees perception for motivation, morale , and job satisfaction of the organization considered for the research study. The same is e xtended for further study and /or in other industries.

  5. Limitations of the study

    The research work was carried out successfully and desired results were on hand at the end of the research. There were certain limitations pertaining to research study conducted in the organization. The proble ms and limitat ions during this research study were listed as under:

    Non-availab ility of some secondary data / past data records.

    Responses with reservation caused limited co – operation from e mp loyees. Top, middle, and lo wer levels emp loyees responded differently and might have added little o r more bias.

    The postponements of the responses were time consuming and tiresome due to busy schedule or unwillingness to disclose certain information by the respondents.

    The investigator was thought to be industry – agent or government authority in spite of avowal was given, so extracting informat ion was difficult initia lly.

    The time factors, poor awareness of some respondents were other limitat ions.

    The supervisors and technicians were scared about the disclosing problems facing at workplace .

    Lowe r education, language problem and lack of freedom to disclose the facts were ma jor constraints to the most of the bottom level emp loyees.

  6. Research Methodologies

    The explo ratory type research was conducted. This type of research allowed e xploring a new area and so the data related to the study had to be collected fro m the respondents within the organization. The results of an exp loratory research provided significant insight into a given situation. The main activ ity of the company is manufacturing water based paints, enamel paints, protective coatings and synthetic resins. Presently, the company under study has employed 5 Managers, 7 Executives, 29 Officers, 42 Technica l staff and 126 Worke rs, thus 209 persons are on roll.

  7. The Instrument

    The research is based on the prima ry data. A structured questionnaire was used for the purpose of research. The questionnaire consisting of 15 questions were designed keeping in mind the population characteristics. A five point Like rt type scale from strongly agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), disagree (2) and strongly disagree (1) was used. The total 12 8 questionnaires were distributed among the employees of the organization. The questionnaires were checked for inco mp leteness, inconsistent, and ambiguous responses. The questionnaires were discarded with unsatisfactory responses; these questionnaires were not included in the sample. Finally 66 questionnaires found usable for analysis and have resulted in the sample size. The responses were 66/128=51.56 percent, which are considered acceptable for the research study [1-6].

  8. Statistical Analyses

SPSS software was used to carry out statistical analyses to evaluate the various aspects which are influencing industrial productivity. Frequency distribution was carried out to know the demographic details. In research survey, there may be a large nu mber of variables, most of which are correlated and which must be reduced to a manageable level. Re lationships among sets of many interrelated variables are exa mined and represented in terms of a few underly ing interpretable factors. The question wise analysis and overall analysis of all the 15 statements gives the overview as shown in table1 and figure1 show that 42.53% respondents are strongly agree + 31.62% f respondents agree, of total respondents strongly disagree to the statements of this analysis. Hence, it is concluded that responses are divided.

Table 1 – Question wise Analysis

Sr.

No.

State ment

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

Total

1

Employees feel proud to be associated with this organization.

53

13

0

0

0

66

2

Emp loyees feel that their job is secured.

48

07

11

0

0

66

3

Emp loyees are satisfied with past and present rewards.

16

2

21

21

6

66

4

Emp loyees get enough co-operations fro m the

supervisors and managers

15

24

13

14

0

66

5

Emp loyees are not involved in decision making process.

2

23

6

18

17

66

6

Emp loyee is satisfied with working conditions in own

department

17

29

3

15

2

66

7

Emp loyee is awa re about housekeeping needs in their workp lace.

33

31

1

1

0

66

8

Emp loyee thinks that housekeeping is a mora l

responsibility.

41

24

1

0

0

66

9

Emp loyee thinks that team work is prevailing in the

department.

16

29

14

6

1

66

10

Emp loyee thinks that training is necessary.

34

32

0

0

0

66

11

Emp loyee thinks that job rotation is necessary.

29

30

7

0

0

66

12

Employees think that productivity should be increased.

45

20

1

0

0

66

13

Emp loyees are satisfied with manage ment polic ies and rules.

13

16

15

20

2

66

14

Emp loyee is satisfied with organizat ional culture.

12

14

17

21

2

66

15

Train ing and Development progra mme arranged in organization which helps e mployees productivity.

47

19

0

0

0

66

Total Responses

421

313

110

116

30

990

Over all Percentage

42.53

31.62

11.11

11.72

3.03

100.00

Table 2 Overall Analyses

Sr.

no.

Details

Strongly agree

Agree

Not sure

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Total

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1

Responses

421

313

110

116

30

990

2

Percentage

42.53

31.62

11.11

11.72

3.03

100.00

Figure 1 Overall Analysis

Hence, it is concluded that respondents are divided about the various aspects of productivity improve ment

means and measures considered in this analysis. Even though majority respondents are in favour with positive response: 42.53%+31.62% =74.15%

An Index of Reliability: An effective tool for measuring re liab ility is Cronbachs alpha, which is a numerical coeffic ient of reliability. Alpha coeffic ient ranges in value fro m 0 to 1 and may be used to describe the reliability of factors extracted from dichotomous (that is, questions with two possible answers) and/or mu lti-point formatted questionnaires or scales (i.e., rating scale: 1 = poor, 5 = e xce llent). The h igher the score, the more re liab le the generated scale, alpha value

0.7 to be an acceptable reliability coeffic ient but lower thresholds are sometimes used in the literature. If the scale shows poor reliability, then individual ite ms within the scale must be re-e xa mined and modified or complete ly changed as needed. Here, the value of cronbachs alpha = 0.784 indicates acceptable reliability [20].

Table 5: The values of communalit ies are more than 0.50, e xcept for variable nu mber 3. Otherwise, it is considered as good explanation of variable reduced most widely used interdependency techniques for data reduction is factor analysis [1-6]

Factor anal ysis allows us to look at groups of variables that tend to be correlated to each other and identify underlying dimension that explain the correlations. Relat ionships among sets of many interre lated variables are e xa mined and represented in The numbers of factors are three when eigenvalue is one or more, all together expla ined 71.654 percent. The scree plot also confirms that there are three factors e xpla in 15 variab les in to three factors up to 71.654 percent. The data reduction in to three factors and they are interpretable.

Table 5 Communalities

Vari able

Initial

Extr acte d

Factor Loadi ngs

1

1.00

0.86

0.896

2

1.00

0.84

0.763

3

1.00

0.46

0.617

4

1.00

0.73

0.831

5

1.00

0.69

-0.702

6

1.00

0.85

0.920

7

1.00

0.55

0.730

8

1.00

0.56

0.727

9

1.00

0.75

0.856

10

1.00

0.73

0.839

11

1.00

0.66

0.670

12

1.00

0.80

0.880

13

1.00

0.88

0.863

14

1.00

0.87

0.871

15

1.00

0.53

0.702

Table 3 Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Al pha

Cronbach's Al pha

Based on Standar dize d Ite ms

N of Ite ms

0.784

0.820

15

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of

Sa mpling Adequacy.

0.761

Bart lett's Test of

Sphericity

Approx. Ch i-

Square

803.717

df

105

Sig.

0.000

Table 4 KMO and B artlett's Test

KMO va lue is more than 0.60, hence, can be carried out factor analysis for good interpretation. The factor analysis is appropriate for data reduction in this case and the value of significance is less than 0.05, shows that variable are uncorrelated in nature. The null hypothesis is rejected.

Extraction Method: Principa l Co mponent Analysis.

The values of communalit ies are more than 0.5 0, e xcept for variable nu mber 3, but very near to 0.50. Otherwise, it is considered as good explanation of variable reduced to factors. The absolute factor loadings are more than 0.60and all variables included in the analysis and they are contributing in increasing l productivity.

Table 6 Total Variance Explained

Factor

Initial Eigen values

Extr action Sums of S quare d

Loadi ngs

Rotation Sums of S quare d

Loadi ngs

Total

% of

Vari ance

Cumulat

ive %

Total

% of

Vari ance

Cumulat

ive %

Total

% of

Vari ance

Cumula

ti ve %

1

6.197

41.311

41.311

6.197

41.311

41.311

5.086

33.905

33.905

2

3.253

21.688

63.000

3.253

21.688

63.000

3.670

24.467

58.372

3

1.298

8.655

71.654

1.298

8.655

71.654

1.992

13.282

71.654

4

0.996

6.637

78.291

Table 7 Groupings of the variables and their corresponding factor loadings.

Vari ables

State ments

Factors

1

2

3

06

You a re satisfied working conditions in your department

0.920

14

You a re satisfied with organizational cu lture

0.871

13

You a re satisfied with manage ment polices and rules

0.863

09

You thin k that teamwork is prevailing in your depart ment

0.856

04

You get enough cooperation fro m your supervisors/managers

0.831

05

You a re not involved in decision ma king process

-0.702

03

You a re satisfied with past and present rewards

0.617

12

You thin k that productivity should be increased

0.880

10

You thin k that tra ining is necessary

0.839

07

You a re fu lly a ware about housekeeping needs in your workplace

0.730

08

You thin k that housekeeping is moral responsibility of e mp loyee

0.727

15

You thin k that T&D arranged in the organizat ion helps employees

productivity.

0.702

11

You thin k that job rotation is necessary

0.670

01

You feel proud to be associated with this organization(Fee l good)

0.896

02

You feel that job is secured in the organization(Job Security)

0.763

Extraction Method: Principa l Co mponent Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varima x with Kaiser Norma lization. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.

Table 6 shows that total 15 variables are reducible to three factors, which expla in total variance up to 71.654 percent. The scree plot also confirmed total 15 variables can be reduced to three factors that are interpretable. Table7 Shows the groping of variables as per factors . All 15 factors are included and associated with three factors.

Table 8 Naming factors and associated variables with factors

Factor

Factor Descripti on

Vari ables associate d with Factors

1

Job Satisfaction

Working condition, wo rk culture, policy and rules, Tea m wo rk, Cooperation, involvement, rewa rds.

2

Productivity Tools

Productivity, Tra ining, housekeeping, responsibility, e mployees productivity.

3

Job security

Feel proud and job security

Table 9 Component Transformation Matrix

Factor

Factors

1

2

3

1

Job Satisfaction

0.858

0.425

0.288

2

Productivity Tools

-0.303

0.872

-0.384

3

Job security

-0.414

0.243

0.877

Extraction Method: Principa l Co mponent Analysis. Rotation Method: Va rima x- Ka iser Norma lization.

Table9: The component Transformation matrix shows that the three factors loading are 0.858 shows that model fit is good and three factors are good representatives of 15 variables have expla ined correctly.

9 Conclusions

The study mainly focused to uncover factors which help increasing industrial productivity. Th ree factors uncover the associations of the 15 attributes. These factors contribute to higher productivity of the organization. Job security, Job rotation, Job satisfaction, Job Training, Housekeeping, Working conditions, Recognition, Involvements and Empowe rments are all important aspects for higher productivity to satisfy the human wants and satisfaction by increasing industrial productivity by raising living standard of the people.

References

  1. Goel, Bharat and Dewan, Bhushan (2011). Factors affecting consumer pre ferences of shopping at organized reta il stores in Punjab Journal of Engineering, Science and Management Education, NITTTR, Bhopal, pp 44-49.

  2. Jani, H. J., (2004). Ph.D. Thesis, Quality Management in Indian Companies through ISO 9000, Sardar Patel Un iversity. Va llabh Vidyanagar.

  3. Malhotra Naresh K., (2009). Marketing Research – an Applied Orientation, fifth edition, Pearson, New Delh i.

  4. Na rgundkar Rajendra (2005). Ma rket ing Research – Te xt and Cases, Tata Mc Gra w-Hill Pub., New

    Delh i.

  5. Pandya, K. J. (2010). Ph.D.Thesis, Consumer Behaviour in Two Wheeler Industry: A case study of Motorcycle users in the state of Guja rat, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar.

  6. Pan khania, T.B., (2011). Ph.D. Thesis, Industrial productivity s cenario and potentiality. In Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand district of Gujarat, India, Sardar Pate l University, Va llabh VidyanagarAnand, Guja rat, India. (Unpublished).

  7. Pankhania,T. B., Modi, V. K.,(2011), Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction: A Case Study-A Survey Conducted in Industries at Vitthal Udyognagar of Anand district of Gu jarat State, International Conference on Industrial Engineering-2011, Sardar Vallabhbhai Nat ional Institute of Technology, Surat, India ,17-19 November 2011.

  8. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K. (2011), Quality Introspects and Productivity: A Survey Conducted at Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand district of Gujarat, India, International Conference on Industrial Engineering-2011,

    SardarVa llabhbhaiNationalInstitute of Technology, and Surat, India, 17-19 November 2011..

  9. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K. (2011), The ro le of

    infrastructure in the perception of industrial productivity – An empirical study, International Conference on industrial engineering-2011, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of technology, Surat, India , 17-19 Nove mber 2011.

  10. Pankhania , T. B., Modi, V. K., (2011), Ka izen

    improves Quality and Productivity: A case study, International conference on industrial engineering, Sardar vallabhbhai national institute of technology, Surat, India, 17-19 Nove mber 2011.

  11. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K., (2011), The Factors

    influencing Target Market criteria : A survey conducted in industries at Vitthal Udyognagar, in Anand District of Guja rat State, India,

    International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, Septe mber 2011,Vo lu me 22,Nu mber3, pp.213-220.

  12. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K., (2011), Impacts of Job Satisfaction on Productivity- A survey Conducted in Industries at Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand District of Gu jarat State, India, International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research (Unpublished).

  13. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K. (2011). The ro le of helping hands in Industrial develop ment fro m stake holders, perceptions: A survey conducted at Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand, district of Gu jarat state, India. International Journal IJIETAP, USA (Unpublished).

  14. Pankhania, T. B., Jani H.J. (2012), Impacts of Globalization on Industrial Productivity: A Survey Conducted in Industries at Vitthal Udyognagar of Anand District of Gu jarat,India,International Journal of Applied Operational Research,Vol.2,No.1,pp.13-22,Spring 2012.

  15. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K., (2011). Job satisfaction and Performance: A correlat ion analysis. Journal of industrial Engineering, Management, and science, National Institute of Technical Teachers Train ing and Research, Bhopal. .

  16. Pankhania , T. B., Modi, V. K. (2011). Impacts of Globalization and Job training on productivity: A survey conducted in Industries at Vitthal Udyognagar, Anand district of Guja rat, India. Journal of industrial Engineering, Management and science, National Institute of Technical Teachers Train ing and Research, Bhopal. (Unpublished).

  17. Pan khania, T. B., Modi, V. K. (2011). Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction Leading to Higher Productivity: A survey. International Conference on Information, Knowledge & Research in Engineering, Technology & Sciences -2012- ICIKR-ETS-2012,24-25MARCH,2012 at G.K.Bharad Institute of Engineering ,Ra jkot.

  18. Pankhania, T. B., Modi, V. K. (2011). Assessment of Productivity Scenario at Vitthal Udyognagar in Anand District, Guja rat. International Confe rence on Information, Knowledge & Research in Engineering, Technology & Sciences -2012- ICIKR-ETS-2012, 24-25, March 2012 at Shri

    G.K.Bharad Institute of Engineering, Ra jkot.

  19. Asthana, Hari Shankar, and Bra j Bhushan (2007), Statistics for Socia l Scinces, Prentice Ha ll of India, New De lhi.

  20. Joseph A. Glie m and Rosemary R.Glien(2003),Calcu lating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbachs Alpha Reliability Coeffic ient for Likert-Type Scales, Midwest Research ro Practice Conference in Adult,Continuing,and Community Education, The Ohio State University,USA.

Leave a Reply