 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 657
 Authors : Satish Kumar Ramoji, Bibhuti Bhusan Rath
 Paper ID : IJERTV3IS10768
 Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 01 (January 2014)
 Published (First Online): 24012014
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Optimal Design of A Hybrid PVWind Energy System Using Genetic Algorithm (GA)
Satish Kumar Ramoji1 , Bibhuti Bhusan Ratp
1(P.G. Student, Dept. of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, AITAM, Tekkali, Andhra Pradesh, India)
2(Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, AITAM, Tekkali, Andhra Pradesh, India)
ABSTRACT
In this paper, a new approach of optimum design for a Hybrid PV/Wind energy system is presented in order to assist the designers to take into consideration both the economic and ecological aspects. When the stand alone energy system having photovoltaic panels only or wind turbine only are compared with the hybrid PV/wind energy systems, the hybrid systems are more economical and reliable according to climate changes. This paper presents an optimization technique to design the hybrid PV/wind system. The hybrid system consists of photovoltaic panels, wind turbines and storage batteries. Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization technique is utilized to minimize the formulated objective function, i.e. total cost which includes initial costs, yearly replacement cost, yearly operating costs and maintenance costs and salvage value of the proposed hybrid system. A computer program is designed, using MATLAB code to formulate the optimization problem by computing the coefficients of the objective function. The method mentioned in this article is proved to be effective using an example of hybrid energy system. Finally, the optimal solution is received using Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization method.
Key Words: Genetic Algorithm, Optimization, Hybrid PV/Wind energy system, and Battery.

INTRODUCTION
Global environmental concerns and the everincreasing need for energy, coupled with a steady progress in renewable/green energy technologies, are opening up new opportunities for utilization of renewable energy resources. In particular, advances in wind and photovoltaic (PV) generation technologies have increased their use in windalone, PValone, and hybrid PVwind configurations. Moreover, the economic aspects of these renewable energy technologies are sufficiently promising at present to include the development of their market [1]. A hybrid energy system consists of two or more energy systems, energy storage system, power conditioning equipment, and a controller. Hybrid energy systems may or may not be connected to the grid. They are generally independent
of large centralized electric grids and are used in rural remote areas [24]. In many remote areas of the world, the availability, reliability, and cost of electricity supplies are major issues. The standard solution is typically to use diesel or petrol generators to meet power requirements in areas distant from established electricity grids (Sustainable Energy Development Office 2010). There can be a number of problems with running standalone diesel or petrol generation, including noise, pollution, and high running and maintenance costs. Generators can also be inconvenient to use. Due to the high running and maintenance costs, continuous operation of a generator may not be financially viable [5]. The use of hybrid energy systems, incorporating PV and wind resources, in remote locations can overcome or at least limit some of the problems associated with generator only systems. The use of these renewable energybased systems could help reduce the operating cost through the reduction in fuel consumption, increase system efficiency, and reduce noise and emissions [6]. But such PVwind hybrid systems are usually equipped with diesel generators to meet the peak load demand during the short periods when there is a deficit of available energy to cover the load demand [6, 7]. To eliminate the need of a diesel generator, a battery bank can be used. Battery life is enhanced when batteries are kept at near 100% of their capacity or returned to that state quickly after a partial or deep discharge [7]. The use of PV modules only does not protect batteries against deep discharges. During periods of little or no sunshine, the load draws more energy than the PVs can replace. A more dynamic source of energy is a wind turbine. Adding a wind turbine to a system would protect batteries against deep discharges and thus extend their life [79]. Many studies have been carried out in the area of sizing of PVwind hybrid energy systems. Generally, there are three main approaches to achieve the optimal configurations of such hybrid systems in terms of technical analysis and economic analysis. These approaches are the iteration approach [713], the probabilistic approach [14], and the tradeoff approach [15]. However, these approaches are timeconsuming and difficult to adjust if insolation, wind speed, load demand, rating of each generator, and initial cost of
each component are changed. In this paper, a genetic algorithm (GA) optimization technique is used to optimally size a proposed PVwind hybrid energy system, by minimizing the total cost of the proposed hybrid system.

HYBRID SYSTEM STRUCTURE
Figure 1 shows the proposed optimization procedure of the PVWind hybrid system based on high resolution solar irradiance including the cost analysis.
Figure 1: Flowchart of the proposed optimization procedure
The suggested approach employs a technical assessment in conjunction with costperwatt to select and size the PV panel, wind turbine, and battery storage in order to determine the system that would guarantee a reliable energy supply with the lowest investment.
Figure 2: Structure of PV/Wind Hybrid System

METEOROLOGICAL AND LOAD DATA
The proposed method is to optimally size a PVwind hybrid energy system to electrify a residential remote area household near to latitude is 39.74 N, Longitude 105.18 W, Time Zone: – GMT7, Elevation: 1829 m. MIDC/NREL Solar Radiation Research Laboratory (BMS) is a good source for the longterm monthly average daily solar radiation data (incident on both horizontal and southfacing PV array tilted by the latitude angle of the site) and wind speed data (measured at 42 feet/12.8 m height in the site). The proposed method requires a recorded longterm wind speed data and global insolation data (incident on a southfacing PV array tilted by the site latitude angle ) for every day of each month in a period of 1 year. Figures 3 and 4 show these data (i.e., the global solar insolation and wind Speed, respectively) for every month in a typical year. Figure 5 illustrates the considered residential remote area load profile, during the 12 months of the year.
Figure 2 shows the general schematic of the hybrid system. The system can be divided into three main stages; the first stage is the generation which includes the PV and wind systems.
The second stage is the conversion and storage energy system. The conversion system includes the DC/DC converter for the PV system, the AC/DC converter for the wind generators, and DC/AC inverter which is connected to the DC bus and supplies the 440 V AC power to the load.
The third stage is the grid connected load, where the 60% of the demand is supplied by the hybrid system.
Figure 3: Global Solar Insolation
Figure 4: Wind Speed
Figure 5: Load profile for all months of a typical year

PROBLEM FORMULATION
The major concern in the design of the proposed PV wind hybrid energy system is to determine the size of each component participating in the system so that the load can be economically and reliably satisfied. Hence, the system components are found subject to: 1. minimizing the total cot (CT) of the system, 2.ensuring that the load is served according to certain reliability criteria.
The objective function (CT) is to be minimized, and this cost function is generated by the summation of the present worth (PWs) of all the salvage values of the equipment, the yearly operation and maintenance costs, the initial or capital investments, and the replacement costs of the system components. Thus, the objective function can be formulated as:
(1)
Where the index k is to account for PV, wind, and batteries; Ik is the capital or initial investment of each component k; RPWk is the PW of the replacement cost
of each component k; OMPWk is the PW of the operation and maintenance costs of each component k; SPWk is the PW of the salvage value of each component
k. The constraints that ought to be met, while minimizing the objective function CT, should ensure that the load is served according to some reliability criteria.

Basic Economic Considerations
As Equation (1) suggests, the PWs of some annual payments as well as of salvage values are needed. Thus, assuming a life horizon of N years for the project, an interest rate r, and an inflation rate j (caused by increases in prices), the different PWs can be calculated as follows [16]: –

: Salvage Value
If a component has a salvage value of S ( ) at present (because it is reaching the end of its life cycle), then the salvage value of the component is expected to be S(1+j)N (i.e., N years from now provided that the component is put in service at the present time). The PW of S(1+j)N taking the interest rate into consideration, is
(2)
Let fac1= , then SPWk=Sk facl, for all components k in the hybrid system.

: Operation and Maintenance
If the operating and maintenance cost of a component is OM ( /year), then this tends to escalate each year at a rate not necessarily equal to the general inflation rate. Thus, for escalation rate es the operation and maintenance costs incurred at year y will be OM(1+es)y, and having a PW of:
OM (1+es)y/(1+r)y (3) The summation of the PWs of all the annual payments is, thus, given by:
OMPW=OM.=OM.fac2 (4)
Where fac2 represents a geometric progression, and is given by:
fac2 = ). ], r
N, r = es (5)
Hence, OMPWk=OMk. fac2, for all components k in the system. Note that other PW calculations will be treated in a similar manner throughout the analysis of each component.


Total Cost Coefficients

: The PV Array
Assuming the design variable, in case of the PV array, to be the total array area APV in square meters. This area is constrained by both the maximum available area for the PV Array (e.g., the roof surface of buildings) and the budget preset for the PV modules. With an initial cost of PV ( /m2), the total initial investment would be:
I1 = PV . APV (6)
Note, here, that if the project life span is assumed to be the same as the PV array lifetime, then the replacement cost of the PV modules will be negligible (i.e.,RPW1=0). With a yearly operation and maintenance cost of OMPV ( /m2/year), the total yearly operation and maintenance cost would be OM1=OMPV.APV. Thus, the global PW of the yearly operation and maintenance cost would be
OMPW1= OMPV . APV . fac2 (7)
The salvage value can be found by multiplying the selling price per square meter SPV by the area APV, and the PW of the selling price would be
SPW1= SPV . APV . fac1 (8)
In summary, the PWs of the PV array costs are: I1+RPW1 = PV . APV = c1 . APV
OMPW1 = OMPV . APV . fac2 = c2 . APV SPW1= SPV . APV . fac1 = c3 . APV

: The Wind Turbine
The design variable due to the use of the wind turbine is the total rotor swept area Aw in square meters. This value is constrained by both the space available and the budget of the project. Note that if Aw is known, then it is the task of the designer to distribute Aw among several machines such that the summation of the individual areas gives Aw. Since the lifetime of a wind turbine Lw is usually shorter than that of the PV array N, then it might be necessary to purchase additional wind turbines before the life span of the project comes to an end. The number of times, within N years, a wind turbine is needed is Xw=N/Lw (rounded to the greater integer). If w is the price in /m2 at present, the price at year y would be w.(1 +es)y having the PW of w.(1
+es)y/(1+r)y. Thus, the PW of all the initial and replacement investments in wind turbines is
I2+RPW2 = w . Aw (9)
Where es is the escalation rate, r is the interest rate, Lw is the lifetime of wind turbines, and Xw is the number of times wind turbines are purchased. Note that if Xw equals 1 (i.e., the life span of the wind turbines is greater than or equal to that of the whole project), then RPW2=0 and I2=w . Aw (since the wind turbines are bought once at the beginning of the project). With a
yearly operation and maintenance cost of OMw ( /m2/year), the total yearly operation and maintenance cost would be OM2=OMw.Aw, and the PW of all the yearly costs would be:
OMPW2= OMw . Aw . fac2 (10)
The salvage value of the wind turbine is assumed to decrease linearly from w ( /m2) to Sw ( /m2), when the wind turbine operates along its lifetime Lw (i.e., from its installation to the end of its lifetime, respectively). If the project life comes to an end before the wind turbines have reached the end of their life span, then the wind turbines could be sold at Spw ( /m2), which is a value greater than Sw.
Spw= . Years + w (11) Where years indicates the number of years of operation between the installation of the last wind turbine and the end of the project life span. Therefore, the PW of all the salvage values is found by: SPW2=Sw.Aw + Spw . Aw (12)
If N (i.e., the life span of the project) is a multiple of
that of the wind turbines Lw, then Equation (12) can be reduced to
SPW2=Sw. Aw (13)
In summary, the PWs of the wind turbine are: I2+RPW2 = w . Aw = c4 . Aw
OMPW2= OMw . Aw . fac2 = c5 . Aw
SPW2=Sw.Aw+Spw.Aw= c6 . Aw

: The Storage Batteries
The design variable in the case of storage batteries is their capacity Cb in kilo watt hours. As in the case of wind turbine, the lifetime of a battery Lb is expected to be less than that of the whole project. Hence, batteries of capacity Cb are to be purchased at regular intervals of Lb. The total PW of the capital and replacement investments in batteries is given by:
I3+RPW3 = b . Cb (14)
Where Lb is the battery lifetime, Xb is the number of times batteries should be purchased during the project lifetime: Xb=N/Lb (rounded to the greater integer), and b is the capital cost in ( /kWh). The salvage value of the batteries is assumed to be negligible. With a yearly operation and maintenance cost of OMb ( /kWh/year), the total yearly operation and maintenance cost would be OM3=OMb.Cb, and the PW of all the yearly costs would be:
OMPW3= OMb . Cb . fac2 (15)
In summary, the PWs of the battery costs are: I3+RPW3 = b . Cb = c7 . Cb
OMPW3 = OMb . Cb . fac2 = c8 . Cb SPW3 = 0


System Modelling
Modelling is an essential step before any phase of optimal sizing. For the proposed PVwind hybrid system with a storage battery, as shown in Figure 2, three principal subsystems are included, the PV array, the wind turbine generator (WTG), and the battery storage.

: Modelling of the PV Array
For a PV array having an efficiency PV and area APV (m2), the output power PPV (kW), when subjected to the available solar insolation R (kW/m2) on the tilted surface, is given by [11]
PPV = R . APV . PV (16)
Here, the insolation R incident on the PV array is defined in Figure 3.

: Modelling of the WTG
A WTG produces power Pw when the wind speed V is higher than the cutin speed Vci nd is shutdown when V is higher than the cutout speed Vco. When Vr <V<Vco (Vr is the rated wind speed), the WTG produces rated power Pr. If Vci<V<Vr, the WTG output power varies according to the cube law. The following equations are to be used in order to model the WTG [7, 13]
1)] and to the energy production and consumption situation of the system during the time from t 1 to t. During the charging process, when the battery power PB flows toward the battery (i.e., PB>0), the available battery state of charge at hour t can be described by:
SOC (t) = SOC (t1) + (20)
Where t is the simulation step time (which is set equal to 1 hour), and Cb is the total nominal capacity of the battery in kilowatthours. On the other hand, when the battery power flows outside the battery (i.e., PB<0), the battery is in discharging state. Therefore, the available battery state of charge at hour t can be expressed as:
SOC (t) = SOC (t1) – (21)
To prolong the battery life, the battery should not be over discharged or overcharged. This means that the battery SOC at any hour t must be subject to the following constraint:
(1 – ) SOC (t) (22)
Where DODmax and SOCmax are the battery maximum permissible depth of discharge and SOC, respectively.



SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SIMULATION
First of all, it is assumed, in this work, that the peak power trackers, the battery charger/discharger, and the distribution lines are ideal (i.e., they are lossless). Also, it is assumed that the inverter efficiency inv is constant; the battery charge efficiency b is set to equal to the manufacturers roundtrip efficiency, and the battery discharging efficiency is set to be 1. The total generated power by the PV array and WTG for hour t, Pg(t), can be expressed as
(17)
Where
Pr = CP air Aw (18)
In the above equation, Cp, air, and Aw are the power coefficient, air density, and rotor swept area, respectively. As the available wind speed data Vi (see Figure 4) were estimated at a height Hi =42 feet/12.8 m, then to upgrade these data to a particular hub height H, the following equation is commonly used [1, 7]
(19)
Where V is the upgraded wind speed at the hub height H and a is the powerlaw exponent (1/7 for open land).

: Modelling of the Storage Battery
At any hour t, the state of charge of the battery [SOC (t)] is related to the previous state of charge [SOC (t
Pg (t) = PPV (t) + Pw (t) (23)
L
It is to be noted that the desired load demand at any hour t, P (t), may or may not be satisfied according to the corresponding values of the total generated power Pg(t) and the available battery SOC(t) at that hour. The proposed energy management of the PVwind hybrid system can be summarized as follows:
L
L inv b
L inv

If [Pg(t)>P (t)/ ] and [SOC(t 1)<SOCmax] then satisfy the load and charge the battery [using Equation (20)] with the surplus power [PB(t)=(Pg(t) P (t)/inv)b]. Afterwards, check if [SOC(t)SOCmax] then stop battery charging, set SOC(t)=SOCmax, and dump the surplus power (PDump(t)=Pg(t)[P (t)/ +1000Ã—C /tÃ— bÃ—(SOCmaxSOC(t1))]).
L
L inv

If [Pg(t)>P (t)/ ] and [SOC(t1)SOCmax] then stop charging the battery, satisfy the load, and dump the surplus power [PDump(t)= Pg(t) P (t)/inv].
L inv

If [Pg(t) =P (t)/ ] then satisfy the load only.
L
inv

If [Pg(t)<P (t)/
max
] and [DOD(t1)<DOD
] then
0 Cb Cb max (26)
L inv g
satisfy the load by discharging the battery [using Equation (21)] to cover the deficit in load power [PB(t)= P (t)/ – P (t)]. Afterwards, check if [DOD(t)DODmax] then stop battery discharging, set DOD(t)=DODmax, and calculate the deficit in
load power (Pdeficit(t)=P (t)[P (t)+ 1000Ã—C /tÃ—(


FINAL FORM AND GA OPTIMIZATION
At this stage, the optimization problem can be written in its final form as follows:
L g b
SOC(t1) (1DODmax))] inv.
L
L
inv
max

If [Pg(t)<P (t)/ ] and [DOD(t1) DOD ] then stop battery discharging and [Pdeficit(t)= P (t) Pg(t). inv.
As it is assumed, in this work, the simulation step time t is equal to 1 h and the generated PV and wind powers are constants during t Then, the power is numerically equal to the energy within t. A flowchart

Minimize the cost function CT
(c1+c2c3).APV+(c4+c5c6). AW + (c7+c8).Cb (27)

Subject to:
0 APV APVmax
0 Aw Aw max
diagram for this program is shown in Figure 6. The
0 C C
(28)
L
input data for this program consist of mean hourly global insolation on a tilted array R, mean hourly wind speed Vi, and desired load power during the year P . Note, here, that for every configuration of the proposed PVwind hybrid system, this program simulates the system. There are three additional bounds that should be imposed on the sizes of the system components, which are:
b b max
To solve the above optimization problem, GA is proposed, where, in this work, the Genetic Algorithm Code under MATLAB software is utilized for solving the previous optimization problem. GA contains the elitist approach.
This means that a solution cannot degrade from one generation to the next, but that best individual of a generation is copied to the next generation without any changes being made to it. To use the GA, for solving the formulated optimization problem, a Mfile (MATLAB Code) has written, to compute the values of the objective function (or called fitness function).
Figure 6: Flowchart of the simulation Program 0 APV APVmax (24)
0 Aw Aw max (25)
The Mfile has to be written to accept a vector (i.e., individual) whose length is the number of independent variables for the objective function and return the corresponding scalar values of the objective function (i.e., cost). In this work, the individual of the considered optimization problem contains three variables (or genes), which are: APV, Aw, and Cb.
The used GA is based upon using the flowchart of Figure 7, to yield the optimal solution. Initially, the GA selects individuals at random from the current population to be parents and uses them to produce the children for the next generation by using the three main operations, which are the selection, crossover, and mutation operations. Then, it can repeatedly modify a population of individual solutions, where, over successive generations, the population evolves toward an optimal solution.
Note, here, that the used different settings in the GA are 100 individuals for the population size, the stochastic uniform function for the selection operation, the scattered crossover function (with a crossover probability of 80%) for the crossover operation, the adaptive feasible mutation function (with
a probability rate of 1%) for the mutation operation, and an elite individual.
At the same time, it is to be noted that the additional three bounds of Equation (28) can be entered directly in the dedicated positions of the GA.
Figure 7: Flowchart of the Genetic Algorithm (GA)

APPLICATION RESULTS
The formulated optimization problem of the PVwind hybrid energy system is solved, in this work, by using the GA under MATLAB software, which may provide a number of potential solutions to the given problem. The choice of the final optimum solution is left to the systems designer. The specifications and the related maintenance and installation costs of different wind turbines, PV panels and batteries, which are input to the optimal sizing procedure, are listed in Tables IIII. The maintenance cost of each unit per year and the installation ost of each component have been set at 0 1% and 510% respectively of the corresponding cost.
The life time of Wind Turbine, PV panel and Battery is considered to be 5 years. Since the tower heights of wind turbines affect the results significantly, 12.8m meter high tower at an elevation of 1829m is chosen. The minimization of the system total cost is achieved by selecting an appropriate system configuration. In table IV, it indicates the resulted optimum sizes of the different components included in the hybrid system.
The corresponding fitness function optimization (i.e., minimization of the system cost in rupees) along the successive generations of the GA is shown in Figure 8, which indicates that the system is optimized after forty iterations only.
Table I: Wind Turbine Data
Power Rating (W)
2500
Vr (m/s)
30
Vci (m/s)
15
Vco (m/s)
40
Life Time of the WTG (years)
5
Installation Cost (Rs./m2)
17
Operation and Maintenance Cost (Rs. /yr.)
3.4
Table II: PV Array Data
Voc (V)
2500
Isc (A)
30
Life Time of the PV Panel (years)
5
Installation Cost (Rs./m2)
5.5
Operation and Maintenance Cost (Rs. /yr.)
0.65
Table III: Battery Specifications
Nominal Capacity (Ah)
50
Voltage (V)
12
DOD (%)
80
Efficiency (%)
80
Life Time of the PV Panel (years)
5
Installation Cost (Rs./m2)
13
Operation and Maintenance Cost (Rs. /yr.)
2.6
Table IV: Optimum sizes of the hybrid System.
APV (m2)
Aw (m2)
Cb (kWh)
40.0004
50.0000
30.0000
Figure 8: Optimization of the Objective function using GA
The combination of PV and wind in a hybrid energy system reduces the battery bank and diesel requirements; therefore the system total cost is reduced. TableV shows a comparison between the costs that resulted from solving the formulated optimization problem by using the proposed GAbased technique and the TLBO algorithm using MATLAB software, Thus, TableV indicates that the proposed GAbased technique is better than the TLBO algorithm, in solving such optimization problems, and this is due to the fact that the GA is capable to converge to the global optimum solution instead of convergent at a local optimum one. Teachinglearning is an important process where every individual tries to learn something from other individuals to improve himself / herself. It is an algorithm known as teachinglearning based optimization (TLBO) [18] which simulates the traditional teachinglearning phenomenon of the classroom. The algorithm simulates two fundamental modes of learning: (i) through teacher (known as teacher phase) and (ii) interacting with the other learners (known as the learner phase). TLBO is a population based algorithm where a group of students (i.e. learners) is considered as population and the different subjects offered to the learners is analogous with the different design variables of the optimization problem. The grades of a learner in each subject represent a possible solution to the optimization problem (value of design variables) and the mean result of a learner considering all subjects corresponds to the quality of the associated solution (fitness value).The best solution in the entire population is considered as the teacher. In another Mfile a MATLAB code has written for proposed hybrid PV/Wind energy system
using Teaching Learning Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm. The corresponding fitness function optimization (i.e., minimization of the system cost in rupees) along the successive iterations of the TLBO is shown in Figure 9, which indicates that the system is not optimized even after hundred iterations.
Figure 9: Optimization of the fitness function using TLBO
Table V: Cost comparison using GA and TLBO
Technique
Cost ( )
Genetic Algorithm (GA)
5,893
Teaching Learning Based Optimization
(TLBO)
6,968
Figure 10, 11, and 12 illustrates the generated PV power, wind power, and the total generated power of the suggested PVwind hybrid system, for every month during the year.
Figure 10: PV Power
Figure 11: Wind Power
Figure 12: Total generated Power

CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents a GAbased optimization technique to optimally size a proposed PVwind hybrid energy system, incorporating a storage battery. The optimization problem is formulated, in this work, to achieve a minimum total cost for the system components and to ensure that the load is served reliably. The results yield that the GA converges very well and the proposed technique is feasible for sizing either of the PVwind hybrid energy system, stand alone PV system, or standalone wind system. In addition, the proposed technique is able to be adjusted if insolation, wind speed, load demand, and initial cost of each component participating in the system are changed. The results yield, also, that the PVwind hybrid energy systems are the most economical and reliable solution for electrifying remote area loads.
REFERENCES
[1]. Kellogg, W.D., M.H. Nehrir, G. Venkataramanan, and V. Gerez. 1998. Generation unit sizing and cost analysis for standalone wind, photovoltaic, and hybrid wind/PV systems. IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion 13(1): 7075. [2]. Gupta, A., R.P. Saini, and M.P. Sharma. 2007. Design of an optimal hybrid energy system model for remote rural area power generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE 2007), Lahore, Pakistan, 16. [3]. Hongxing, Y., Z. Wei, and L. Chengzhi. 2009. Optimal design and technoeconomic analysis of a hybrid solarwind power generation system. Applied Energy 86: 163169. [4]. Roman, E., R. Alonso, P. Ibanez, S. Elorduizapatarietxe, and D. Goitia. 2006. Intelligent PV module for gridconnected PV systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 53(4):1066 1073. [5]. Colle, S., S. Luna, and R. Ricardo. 2004. Economic evaluation and optimization of hybrid diesel/PV systems integrated to utility grids. Solar Energy 76: 295299.[6]. Wies, R.W., R.A. Johnson, A.N. Agrawal, and T.J. Chubb. 2005. Simulink model for economic analysis and environmental impacts of a PV with dieselbattery system for remote villages. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 20(2): 692700.
[7]. Borowy, B.S., and Z.M. Salameh. 1996. Methodology for optimally sizing the combination of a battery bank and PV array in a wind/PV hybrid system. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 11(2): 367 375. [8]. Prasad, A.R., and E. Natarajan. 2006. Optimization of integrated photovoltaicwind power systems with battery storage. Energy 31: 19431954. [9]. Shaahid, S.M., and M.A. Elhadidy. 2008. Economic analysis of hybrid photovoltaicdiesel battery power systems for residential loads in hot regionsa step to clean future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: 488503. [10]. Ai, B., H. Yang, H. Shen, and X. Liao. 2003. Computer aided design of PV/wind hybrid system. Renewable Energy 28: 14911512. [11]. Diaf, S., D. Diaf, M. Haddadi, and A. Louche. 2007. A methodology for optimal sizing of autonomous hybrid PV/Wind system. Energy Policy 35: 57085718. [12]. Senjyu, T., D. Hayashi, N. Urasaki, and T. Funabashi. 2006. Optimum configuration for renewable generating systems in residence using genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 21(2): 459466. [13]. Yang, H., L. Lu, and W. Zhou. 2007. A novel optimization sizing model for hybrid solarwind power generation system. Solar Energy 81: 7684. [14]. Karaki, S.H., R.B. Chedid, and R. Ramadan. 1999. Probabilistic performance assessment of autonomous solarwind energy conversion systems. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 14(3): 766 772.
[15]. Chedid, R., H. Akiki, and S. Rahman. 1998. A decision support tech. for the design of hybrid PV/wind systems. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 13: 7682.
[16]. Sweelem, E.A., and A.A. Nafeh. 2006. A linear programming technique for optimally sizing a PV dieselBattery hybrid energy system. AlAzhar University Engineering Journal 9(3): 705716. [17]. Xu Daming, Kang Longyun, Cao Binggang, Standalone hybrid wind/PV power system using the NSGA2, Acta energiae solaris sinica, vol. 27, no. 6, pp.593598, 2006. [18]. R. V. Rao, V. J. Savsani and D. P. Vakharia, Teaching LearningBased Optimization: A Novel Method for Constrained Mechanical Design Optimization Problems, ComputerAided Design, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2011, pp. 303 315. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.01516 years. His field of interest includes Power electronics, Electrical Machines and hybrid energy systems.
BIOGRAPHIES
Satish Kumar Ramoji received the B.Tech Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering from National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), Berhampur, under Biju Patnaik University of Technology (BPUT),
Odisha, India in 2008; currently he is pursuing M.Tech in Power Electronics and Electrical Drives from Aditya Institute of Technology & Management (AITAM), Tekkali under Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU, Kakinada), Andhra Pradesh, India. His field of interest includes Power electronics, Drives, Electrical Machines and hybrid energy systems.
Bibhuti Bhusan Rath received the B.Tech Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering from Orissa Engineering College (O.E.C), Bhubaneswar, India, in 1998; he holds M.Tech in Power Systems from
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU, Hyderabad), Andhra Pradesh, India in 2011. He has been active in the industry and academics for more than