 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 19
 Authors : Nesrine Ben Hassine, Dana Marinca, Pascale Minet, Dominique Barth
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV4IS04008
 Volume & Issue : PEMWN – 2015 (Volume 4 – Issue 04)
 Published (First Online): 30072018
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Machine Learning and Popularity Prediction of a Video Content
Nesrine Ben Hassine*, Dana Marinca, Pascale Minet*, Dominique Barth
*Inria, Rocquencourt, 78153 Le Chesnay Cedex, France,
DAVID, University of Versailles, 78 000 Versailles, France
Abstract In Content Delivery Networks (CDNs), the knowledge of the popularity of video contents helps the manager to take efficient decisions about which video contents should be cached near the end users and also about the duplication degree of each video to satisfy the end user Quality of Experience. This paper focuses on predicting the popularity of video contents, in terms of number of solicitations. For that purpose, different software entities, called experts compute popularity values of video contents. Each expert uses its own prediction method. The expert prediction accuracy is evaluated by a loss function as the discrepancy between the prediction value and the real number of solicitations. The simulations based on real YouTube traces show that the accuracy of prediction is improved by splitting the video content profile in contiguous phases. Different prediction methods are compared and also different phase changepoints detection methods are evaluated in order to identify the method (or method parameters) minimizing the cumulated discrepancy compared to real solicitations of video contents.
KeywordsCDN, popularity prediction, YouTube contens, phase profile

INTRODUCTION

Context
Due to the increasing use of the Internet services, there has been an important growth in network traffic. This results in decreases in service quality. To overcome the limitation of the Internet, Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) provide a method for a more efficient delivery of contents to end users. CDNs reduce the traffic directed to a single site via caching. They distribute contents geographically; heavily requested contents are cached at various locations, close to users who request them the most. Thereby, it is crucial to determine whether a content is requested sufficiently often so that it is worth caching it. The user request is redirected to the nearest location storing the solicited content. Hence, CDNs improve the network performance and fasten the delivery of requested contents to any end user location. Moreover, cache management is a challenging task. Given its finite storage capacity and the dynamicity of the demand, each stored content has to be continuously monitored so that it is pushed out from the cache once it is no longer required. These issues require an indepth analysis of the dynamics of contents requests.
In the Global Internet phenomena report 2014 [1], streaming traffic remains the major source of Internet traffic in the world. Understanding the dynamics of the number of
requests for streaming traffic is consequently both critical and indispensable for a better resource management. Streaming contents are mainly formed of video contents and they are basically originated from Video on Demand (VoD) platforms and User Generated Content (UGC) systems such as YouTube.
To better manage the enormous number of video contents, Youtube maintains various categories of video contents. The most popular video categories are cartoon, music, sports, movies, news… where some contents may belong to several categories. Hence, this classification helps people find the contents interesting them more easily.
The behavior of video contents over time reveals distinct patterns of popularity evolution. A huge number of contents are viewed only a few times. Others are largely required. There are contents that are popular for a long period of time whereas others are much solicited for few days or even hours. Hence, it is possible to estimate the future popularity of content by examining the types of popularity growth behavior that contents display over time. Therefore, demands can have different behaviors depending on the content and the time interval.
As a matter of fact, popularity evolution pattern is a series of phases. Each phase may be very different from the others, whereas it retains an homogeneous behavior inside. Let us define the concept of phase:
Definition 1: A phase can be defined as an interval of time during which a measured metric remains relatively stable.
Thus, if a phase is properly identified, the prediction within a phase should be more accurate. That is what we want to prove in this paper.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section IB, we describe different methods to detect phase changes. In Section II, we give the problem statement and define the experts used to predict popularity of video contents. Results obtained from real traces are presented and explained in Section III, where we use different methods to detect phase changes. Finally, we conclude in Section IV and list some further work.

Related Work
Let us consider a time series of data characterizing a phenomenon monitored. Usually, it is possible to identify subsets of contiguous data where a same model can be applied
to represent the phenomenon considered. It is then of the utmost importance to identify the time points at which changes occur in the data collected.
A large number of changepoints detection methods has been proposed to tackle this problem. Most of the studies consider a data set consisting of observations at discrete times
1. . spaced at uniform time intervals, let us assume we can partition the data into an unknown number of partitions,
1. . . One of the most difficult issues is estimating the number of change points.
Instead of estimating that a changepoint has occurred, the Bayesian method computes the probability of a hypothesis. It expresses uncertainty about the number and location of changepoint s. It computes the probability of a changepoint at each location. In the Bayesian analysis, the posterior probability measures how likely we have a changepoint at t. It is the weight given to hypothesis where =
{ }. This probability is computed using the Bayes theorem given by
() ()
Bai and Perron [3] propose a method with an a priori fixed number of changepoint s. Let be the maximum number of
() =
()
changepoint s. For each , a changepoint location is the one ensuring the smallest withinsegment square sums. To select the best number of changepoint s, they pick the partition that minimizes the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The criterion of selection could be SIC (Schwarz Information Criterion) or AIC (Akaike Information Criterion)
In [4], Taylor developed a change point detection method to detect changes in time series (CUmulative SUM). This approach is based on the meanshift model written as =
+ . is the simple average and is the residual term
associated with the observation. Residuals are assumed to be independent and identically distributed with mean zero. The cumulative sum is not the cumulative sum of the values but the sum of differences between the values and the average. The changepoint is detected through searching for the maximum of absolute CUSUM. Once a changepoint is detected, the time series is splitted into two segments and the procedure is repeated.
Structural Change Model (SCM) is another meanshift model based method [4]. Initially, they split time series into two segments at any location . Let the sum of squared residuals be defined as the mean square error estimator.
=1
=+1
() = ( 1)2 + ( 2)2
where E is an evidence. Once we obtain the posterior probability, it is used to compute the posterior prediction distribution. This latter is a weighted average of the predictions of each individual hypothesis.
All the methods mentioned above are offline and could be applied only once all the data are collected. In this paper, we compare an offline method based on the Bayesian approach with two online methods that we will present in Section IID.


THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Problem Statement
The goal of this paper is to predict the number of solicitations of individual video contents. We use real data sets of number of solicitations of video contents extracted from YouTube platform.
We adopt a machine learning approach and propose a model using several software entities called experts. Each expert computes and predicts future solicitation number for individual video contents using its own computation method (for example Basic, DES) with its own parameter set (e.g. size of its observation window, smoothing parameter).
We use a set of experts , each expert computes at time the value ,+1, representing the predicted number of solicitation of a given video, using its own prediction strategy.
Where 1
= =1
, 2
= =+1
. The changepoint is
The goal of each expert is to predict a solicitation number as close as possible of the real solicitation number +1. We will
found by minimizing the sum of squares residuals and located
at = 1().
As CUSUM and SCM, Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS) [5][6] needs the whole data to perform its analysis. Each time a changepoint is detected, data are splitted into two segments at the changepoint location. The method stops when no changepoint can be found in any segment. The location of changepoint is the one maximizing the absolute value of the tstatic, where tstatic is a statistic test given by
, = (, ,) 2
Where , is the mean over {+1 . . }, , is the mean over {1. . +1, +1 . . } and 2 is the corresponding mean squared error.
This work was supported by ANR project NetLearn – ANR13INFR
describe two prediction strategies in Section IIB. The accuracy of experts prediction is evaluated by the cumulative loss, as defined in Section IIC.
Focusing on the evolution of the number of solicitations of a video content, called video profile, we observe the existence of phases. A phase is characterized by a similar evolution of the number of solicitations as shows the video content profile depicted in Figure 1. The video contents considered belong to the Music and Cartoon categories. Figures on the right represent the number of solicitations as a function of time. For each profile, we represent also the cumulated number of solicitations (Figure 1). Tics represent phase changes.
The goal of this study is to answer the following questions:

Can we improve the prediction accuracy through the cooperation of several experts for a given video content instead of one expert prediction?
004

Does the use of phases improve the accuracy of predictions?

Has the phases detection method an impact on the quality of predictions?



Experts
We recall that each expert prediction concerns an individual
video content. At a given time , each expert computes and predicts the value ,+1, which will be compared to the real value at the time + 1.
2) Basic expert:
The basic expert is the expert that at time + 1 predicts
,+1 = + ( 1) = 2 1. In other words, it predicts the last known value plus its increment with the previous value. Such an expert is very simple to implement

Best expert
Informally, the best expert is the one providing the most accurate predictions. This accuracy can be evaluated by the loss incurred by this expert.
Definition 2: For any expert , we define its instantaneous loss at time as , =  , and its cumulated loss at
=0
time as , =
,.
a) Music content: original profile. b) Music content: cumulative profile.

Cartoon content: original profile. d) Cartoon content: cumulative profile. Fig. 1. Phases in the number of solicitations of a video content.
We define hereafter two concepts: (a) the observation window , a past time interval ending at time , containing past consecutive values of the number of solicitations for the considered video and (b) the prediction window , starting at time , representing the future time interval at the end of which the accuracy of the prediction ,+1 will be evaluated.

DES expert:

DES experts, Double Exponential Smoothing, [2] have been introduced to cope with trends (e.g. increase) in the data to predict. A DES expert applies two exponential smoothing:

first on the value observed at time when it computes , . We have: = + (1 ) ,
Definition 3: For any set of experts , we define the best expert as the expert that minimizes the cumulated loss. Notice that the expert that minimizes the cumulated loss also minimizes the average instantaneous loss. We now propose to extend the concept of best expert to the best expert on a given phase as follows:
Definition 4: For any given phase, for any set of experts , we define the best expert for this phase as the expert that minimizes the cumulated loss on the phase.


Phase Detection
In this paper we distinguish several methods to detect phase changes.

Detection by a sudden increase of the instantaneous loss of the Basic expert. This detection is simple to implement and can easily be done online.

Detection by applying Bayesian inference method. A phase change is detected by applying Bayesian inference method, implemented in R tool. This detection requires the knowledge of the whole profile and consequently is done offline only. We use the module implemented in the R tool.

Detection of a contiguous period. Each phase has a constant duration of k time units, with k an integer greater than 1. This detection is very simple but may
not correspond to a change in the profile of solicitations. Such detection is well adapted to profiles
,
,
,1
where is the smoothing factor, with 0 < < 1.
, ,

second on the value of when it computes , using the same smoothing factor . We have:
= + (1 ) , with = = .
presenting periodic behaviors.
This paper studies the impact of phase detection method on the prediction accuracy.


The Prediction Method
,
,
,1
,0
,0 0
The value ,+1
predicted by any Double Exponential
We consider several video profiles belonging to different content categories. In an offline analysis we run a lot of DES
Smoothing (DES) expert at time + 1 is given by:
,
,
,+1 = , + ,, where , = 2 denotes the
experts analyzing the considered profiles and predicting the number of solicitations. Among the identified experts we
estimated level and
=
( ) the estimated trend.
determine a subset of DES experts, having a cumulated loss
,
1
,
,
less than 102% of the cumulated loss of the best DES expert
A DES expert has two parameters: the smoothing factor and ow the size of the observation window, which can be different for different experts.
on the entire profiles. These experts are characterized by particular values of the parameters and . This simulation helps us to identfy a short list of DES experts. Furthermore, we consider the profile segmentation according to the
different methods specified in Section IID. For each change point detection method, the cumulated loss of each expert is evaluated at the end of each phase. The best expert on each phase is the expert having the smallest cumulated loss. At the end of the profile, the prediction cumulated loss represents the sum over all phases of the cumulated loss of the best expert on each phase.


SIMULATION RESULTS

Determination of the Best DES Experts
We considered 50 video content solicitation profiles collected from YouTube plateforme, belonging to different video categories (society, music, films, children, etc.). To determine the best values of the smoothing factor and the observation window for the DES experts, we run many simulations on collected profiles. We succeeded to identify a list of six DES experts, the best ones, which are given in Table
I. The parameter corresponds to the duration of the considered phase.
TABLE I. BEST DES EXPERTS.
0.8
= 7 ou
0.93
= 7 ou
0.9999
= 7 ou
The next simulations are based only on the selected subset of the best experts presented in the previous Table.

Phase Change Detection
We now focus on the detection of phase changes. We apply the three methods described in Section IID. For the detection of a contiguous period, we use 7 days, 14 days and 21 days.

Prediction Evaluation

No phase detection:
In the first series of experiments, we consider video contents profiles without distinguishing any phase. We test the Basic expert described in Section II.B.2 and the best DES experts given in Table I. Results obtained on real traces show that for different profiles the associated best experts could be different. In Figure 2, the video content considered belongs to the category Music. For this content, the expert minimizing the cumulated loss is the DES expert with = 0.9999 whatever the size of the observation window. The Basic expert has close results.
Fig. 2. The total loss of selected experts over the whole music contents
We now focus on a video content of category Cartoon. For this content, the Basic expert drastically outperforms the DES experts, as depicted in Figure 3. Notice that all the DES Brown experts have approximately the same cumulated loss. Thereby, the Basic expert has very good results in both cases.
Fig. 3. The total loss of selected experts over the whole cartoon contents.

Detection of Phase Changes:
In the second series of experiments, we want to answer the following question: can we improve the accuracy of prediction by detecting phase changes? Tested video profiles are segmented using the methods given in Section IID. Each method has its detected points which differ from the output of other methods. Results are depicted in Figure 4 for a cartoon video content.
Fig. 4. Cartoon content: Detected changepoints using different methods.
We will compare the cumulated loss obtained by these methods with the cumulated loss obtained when ignoring the profiles phases, denoted as No changepoint detection. More precisely, two cumulated losses are compared over each profile:

Using No changepoint detection method, we compute the cumulated loss of the best expert at the end of the profile;

Using each changepoint detection method, we compute the sum over all profile phases of the cumulated loss of the best expert per phase. At the end of each phase, the cumulated loss of each expert is reinitialized and another best expert can replace the previous one. As depicted in Figures 5 and 6, we observe that regardless of the method used, all changepoint detection methods reduce the cumulated loss obtained without detecting phases. This can be explained by the expert changes at the end of each phase. These simulation results show that the changepoint detection has a strong impact on the accuracy of the prediction.
Fig. 5. Music content: The minimum cumulated loss with no changepoint detection vs the cumulated loss with different changepoint detection methods.
Fig. 6. Cartoon content: The minimum cumulated loss with no changepoint detection vs the cumulated loss with different changepoint detection methods.
As shown in Figures 5 and 6, Basic based changepoint detection provides the largest cumulated loss compared to other changepoint detection methods. Nevertheless, in both figures, the smallest cumulated loss is obtained when the changepoint detection method uses a period of 7 consecutive days. Earlier studies [9] have shown that users access follows a pattern over a week. This explains the results obtained when it is assumed that there exit a change every week. Based on this assumption, the cumulated loss could be further reduced if the end of the interval coincides with the weekend.
Thus, the best method to detect phase changes is the method considering fixed periods of 7 consecutive days. These results justify an approach based on detecting phase changes in video profiles evolution.


Behavior of experts near a phase change:

In the third series of experiments, we evaluate the behavior of experts near phase changes. For instance, in Figure 7, we compare the behavior of Basic and DES experts with and without changepoint detection. We assume that we detect a changepoint every period of 7 consecutive days. The prediction of experts with changepoint detection deviates slightly from the real value. However, experts without change point detection make large errors at the phase change, especially the Basic expert. We also observe that within a phase all selected experts provide predictions close to the real value.
Fig. 7. Cartoon content: Prediction based on changepoint detection using fixed period of 7 days.
IV. CONCLUSION
Performances of Content Delivery Networks are usually measured by the hit ratio of user requests. The main goal of ny cache management policy is to maximize the hit ratio over CDN. In this paper, we propose to predict the popularity of video contents, in terms of the number of solicitations. This popularity can be used to decide which contents to be cached. The best expert predicting the number of solicitations is identified as the expert minimizing the cumulated loss over the profile. This expert provides the prediction the closest to the real value. To improve the accuracy of predictions, we defined different phases over each profile. The best expert per phase outperforms the best expert on the whole video content profile. However a false detection of a phase change (false positive detection) may decrease the quality of the prediction. Our further work will consist in designing a method detecting online phase changes without false positive detections.
REFERENCES

Global Internet phenomena report, Sandvine, Tech. Rep., 2014. https://www.sandvine.com/downloads/general/global internetphenomena/2014/1h2014globalinternetphenomena report.pdf

N. Bianchides, G. Lugosi, Prediction, Learning, and Games, Cambridge University, 2006

J. Bai1, P. Perron, Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models, 2003.

W A. Taylor, Changepoint analysis: A powerful tool for detecting changes, 2000.

Adam B. Olshen, E. S. Venkatraman, Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of arraybased DNA copy number data, 2004.

ES. Venkatraman, AB. Olshen A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data, 2006

K P. Murphy Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective, 2013.

N. Ben Hassine, D Marinca, P. Minet, D. Barth, Popularity Prediction in Content Delivery Networks, PIMRC 2015, HongKong, China, September 2015.

Y. Hongliang, Z. Dongdong, Ben Y. Zhao, W.Zheng, Understanding user behavior in largescale videoondemand systems, EuroSys 2006, New York, USA