Factors Affecting Heart Diseases through Logistic Linear and Nonlinear Regression

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV6IS070011

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Factors Affecting Heart Diseases through Logistic Linear and Nonlinear Regression

Dr. Jihad. Alfarajat

Al-Hussein Bin Talal University,

College of administrative management and Economics, Maan,

Department of business Jordan

Dr. Mohammad. M. Alalaya

Associate Professor of economics and quantitative methods Al-Hussein Bin Talal University,

College of Administrative Management and Economics, Maan, Jordan,

Abstract : – This paper aims to investigate the effects of some factors which affect heart diseases such as fatty diet, hypertension, diabetes, gender, smoking, family history of heart disease and overweight in patients data of Jordanian hospitals.

The data and statements were established through the medical record sheets of patients who were admitted to the hospitals in Jordan, the sample was collected from three regions of Jordan south, north and middle area.

Log-linear models analyses method has been used to analyze data, likelihood chi-square, Pearson chi-square and odds ratio to ensure the model which choose three variables in each. And logistic regression has been used to estimate the coefficients of these factors of heart disease. We have found that likelihood ratio chi square, Pearson chi- square, odds ratio are significant, all models of 3way &higher, FT-SR are greater than 1.96 of the normal distribution, these results give assign that all of them together as the group of factors are the causes of heart disease.

Keyword : – Heart disease (C. H.D), Log-Linear, Likelihood Chi-Square, Pearson chi-square, Jordan, Jell classification: C12, C41.

Section 1. INTRODUCTION:

This paper investigates the heart diseases of Jordanian patient's hospital Admitted data to ensure whether the variables chosen in the study from their medical records . Almost 18 million people 7% – 0f all Americans have heart disease, 50% of them are under age 65 , elder people are affected by heart disease so much greater than ( American National Academy on Aging Society, 2005 ), whereas the ratio in Jordan was not more than 1.8% of the population, It is reasonably due to the style of life and fatty American food and the air pollution and depression on life there .

The log-linear models required Contingency tables two-way tables which can be formed by cross-classifying categorical variables were typically analyzed by calculating chi-square values testing the hypothesis of independence

.and testing them in order to determine if association and

/or interactions were taking place among the variables. Since L.A Goodman published his series of researches about log-linear models, many papers appear in this field such as( Bishop, Finberg, Holland 1975, Habeman 1975), the base of work introduced of log-linear models to a wide range of variety of models that could be fitted to cross- classified data. (Agresti, 1996 ) .

The log-linear model is one of the specialized cases of generalized linear models for Poisson distribution data, and it is an extension of the two- way contingency table where the conditional relationship between two or more discrete categorical tables.( Chirstensen, R 1997). Also, log-linear models can be used in Multi- way contingency tables, They are commonly used to evaluate tables that involve three or more variables ( Knoke,d &p.j Broke 1980 ).

Therefore the researcher found it's reasonable procedures to utilize of the log-linear model to analyze the data of heart disease patients in Jordan, where heart disease can be defined as a disease of a number of abnormal conditions affecting the heart and the blood vessels in the heart. Types of heart disease include many diseases such as heart attacks, Coronary artery disease. Heart disease is a type of cardiovascular disease. In addition to heart disease, the term cardiovascular disease encompasses a variety of heart conditions, such as hypertension and stroke. Coronary heart disease (CHD) is caused by a narrowing of the coronary arteries, which results in a decreased supply of blood and oxygen to the heart. CHD includes

myocardial infarction, commonly referred to as a heart attack, and angina pectoris, or chest pain. A heart attack is caused by the sudden blockage of a coronary artery, usually by a blood clot. And chest pain occurs when the heart muscle does not receive enough blood. Another type of heart disease is a heart rhythm disorder, which includes rapid heart, heart murmurs, and other unspecified disorders.

Congestive heart failure (CHF), is often the end- stage of heart disease. Also, other types of heart disease considered such as Angina, Heart Attack, Heart failure, heart arrhythmias.

(Suleiman alKattab, et al,2011) in their study aims to shed the light on health service quality in Jordan, and compare the quality of service of public hospitals to private hospitals, in the study sample they have 250 questionnaires

, results indicates that private hospital health services are superior than public hospitals, and patients seems are seems more satisfaction

Hence, the research is divided into four sections, the first section is an introduction, the second section introduces the theoretical approach, the third section presents data and methodology, section four presents a discussion of results and concluded remarks.

Section 2 . THEORETICAL APPROACH:

A ) Heart Disease and Causes:

Heart disease is a number of abnormal conditions affecting the heart and the blood vessels in the heart. Types of heart disease include:

Coronary artery disease is the most common type and is the leading cause of heart attacks. When your arteries become hard and narrow, blood has a hard time getting to the heart, so the heart does not get all the blood it needs, which can lead to angina. Coronary heart disease is the term that describes what happens when your heart's blood supply is blocked, or interrupted, by a build-up of fatty substances in the coronary arteries. Over time, the walls of your arteries can become furred up with fatty deposits. This process is known as atherosclerosis, and the fatty deposits are called atheroma. If your coronary arteries become narrow, due to a build up of atheroma, the blood supply to your heart will be restricted. This can cause angina (chest pains).If a coronary artery becomes completely blocked, it can cause a heart attack. The medical term for a heart attack is the myocardial infarction.

Coronary heart disease is the biggest killer of Jordanians, one in every seven males, and one in every ten females die from the disease in Jordan, approximately not less than 5.000 people have a heart attack each year.

b)Variables of the Study:

According to the risk factors of the study explained, and that focus on these variables listed below, most people who develop heart disease have recognized risk factors which contribute to the cause of the disease. The so-called 'major risk factors' include Raised

cholesterol level in the blood, Raised hypertension, Smoking.

  1. Cholesterol:

    A person gets coronary heart disease when cholesterol is deposited in the inner lining of the coronary arteries. These arteries supply the heart with blood. They lie on the surface of the heart and form a crown (corona) around it. As the heart beats, they twist and bend. Cholesterol is deposited where the arteries bend and divide. The higher the cholesterol levels in the blood, the greater the chance that deposits will form at these sites.

  2. hypertension :

    If a person has hypertension, there is more stress in the places where the arteries bend and dvide. This added pressure increases the speed at which cholesterol is deposited along the walls of the arteries.

  3. Smoking:

Cigarette smoke contains many chemicals, including nicotine and carbon monoxide. Some of these chemicals, along with the carbon monoxide, damage the inner layer of the arteries. Damages of arteries caused by smoking:

A ) cholesterol to enter the artery walls more rapidly. B ) blood clots in the arteries which lead to heart attacks.

  1. Diabetes:

    Diabetes is another risk factor for heart disease. Many diabetics have a high cholesterol level and may also have raised hypertension. Other biochemical changes in diabetics may also accelerate the development of coronary heart disease.

  2. Overweight:

    A person's weight generally has an impact on his\ her cholesterol level. People who have overweight often have high cholesterol and raised blood pressure. Further, their blood is more likely to clot.

  3. Inactivity:

    People who are inactive (the 'couch potatoes') are more likely to have heart attacks, heart disease and early death than those who are generally active (moderately active seems to be enough). Inactive people are more likely to have high cholesterol, Have raised blood pressure, be overweight, be smokers.

    Even without risk factors like smoking and hypertension, people who are not active still have a higher chance of heart disease. The reasons for this are not clear. It might have something to do with blood clotting and the way clots are removed from the body, but there are many other possibilities.

  4. Family history:

    A person's genetic inheritance forms the background for most diseases. Each person's genetic

    makeup is different (except in identical twins). We tend to inherit things like blood pressure levels, cholesterol, blood glucose, clotting tendencies, body build and response to stress (internal and external).

    While a family history of heart disease is a strong marker of risk, you should remember that we usually inherit tendencies rather than diseases. You can overcome some inherited tendencies if you have a healthy diet and an active lifestyle. For example, if you have a family history of heart disease, you can gain enormous advantages if you limit your fat intake, dont smoke and have an active, healthy lifestyle.

  5. Gender and age:

If youre male, you have a disadvantage when it comes to cholesterol levels and blood pressure. Males are more likely to develop coronary heart disease in middle age. The risk then progressively rises as they get older. The risk for females is much less, until after the menopause. Then hormonal changes, combined with higher blood pressure, cholesterol and increased weight progressively increase the risk of heart disease. We can summarize why we chose these factors in our study due to their effect on heart disease occurrence, and the effect of these factors on bad circulation heart and artery disease. Then the health span decreases life span, as the figure (1).

Figure (1) heart disease and health -span

source: Gaydos, C.A., 1996. Replication of Chlamydia pneumonia in vitro in human macrophages, endothelial cells, and aortic artery smooth muscle cells. Infect Immunity 64:1614).

Section Three:

A – Methodology and data:

The method of this paper utilizes the log-linear model which can be on forms 1- way &higher,

2- way&higher,3- way&higher, that are significant through the odds ratio, Pearson chi square and likelihood chi-square, as the results of analyses of the model is saturated in L M model which can be writtenas :

Ln (it ) = +jB +JAB + jC+jBC + j ABC

..(1)

The saturated model form can be written as:

Yit = mean + Aj + Bj+ ABji + Ck + BCjk + ABCjk

(2)

Where : i, j = (1,2,3,4,..n) , A ,B,C number of models . Hierarchical models in this paper are a particular class of models in which no interaction terms specified, thus the method as:

1- when dealing with several models the relative quality of each model must be considered, the quality of the model can be measured by it good of fitness to the data, may be tested by using either of two chi-square statistics, first one is Pearson chi-square which is measured by the following equation:

2=2ik ln (ik milk )2 / ( milk ) (3)

the second is likelihood ratio chi square statistics can be as:

2 = 2gk ln (ik ) / ( milk ) .(4)

If the model goodness of fit is not significant, We can test the model for adequacy by using the chi square test. (See, Fienberg, S, E 1979, Koehler 1986 ).

  1. Test of marginal and partial association:

    The partial association test is constructed as the first fit of the model containing all terms with the same order as the term being tested. From the partial test the second, the marginal association test is constructing by collapsing the table until the term of interest is the highest order interaction and there are no other terms of the same order.This term is the removed and the next lowest model is fit, the 2 value testified the marginal association among the factors in the terms.

  2. Simultaneous order test, if the test of the second order models and higher is significant while the test for third order models and higher is not.

  3. Step down procedures:

The procedure begins with specified model( often the saturated models ) used since it fits the data well. Then the search for the model with fewer terms that still fits well.

( Vermont, j,k 1997. Borooah v, k,2005).

5 – Analysis of residuals:

The residual analysis of log-linear models can evaluate the model fit and can point to the cells display to a lack of fit, in general good of fitness of model. This process involves standardizing the residuals for each cell by dividing the difference between frequencies observed

and frequencies expected by the square root of the frequencies expected,(Tabachnick andFidell 1996 ).

B- Methodological difficulties:

The problems which accompanied analysis of log- linear models such as adequate sample size, we have solved by using a large sample size. Therefore the sample size and response variables are so many . ( Brunkow, P.G . Collins, J, P 1996 ).Also, we notice that expected frequencies were encountered and cause the lowest power. This problem was solved by accepting the reduced power of testing effects association with expected frequencies. Then we have collapse categories for variables ( Agresti, 1996 ), then we deleted some variables to reduce the number of cells with care and delete some variables that were associated with any other variable ( Knoke, D. P.J Bruke 1980 ).

Section Four: Discussion and empirical results:

A ) Logistic regression:

The response variable is fatty nutrition and the added variables are diabetes, gender, blood pressure, logistic regression used to analyze the model results are:

Fatty diet = – 161. 2017 + 36.73 diabetes + 35.7767 gender

+ 35.1686blood pressure. Results are appeared in Table (1).

Table (1 ) Logistic Regression Report

Response : fatty

Forward Variable-Selection

Action

Variable

Added

diabetes

Added

gender

Added blood pres

Parameter

Variable

Estimation Section

Regression Coefficient

Standard Error

Chi-Square Beta=0

Prob Level

Last

R-Squared

Intercept

-161.2017

2399.823

0.00

0.946445

0.000002

diabetes

36.73122

618.6141

0.00

0.952652

0.000001

gender

35.7767

652.8253

0.00

0.956296

0.000001

blood pressure

35.16859

665.929

0.00

0.957882

0.000001

Model Summary Section

Model

Model

Model

Model

R-Squared

D.F.

Chi-Square

Prob

0.570583

3

3546.40

0.000000

The chi- square statistics for the model is (3546.4) while the probability level is ( 0.000), which indicates that null hypothesis is not rejected but the good of fitness is accepted due to log-linear model. Also, research used logistic regression to analyze data, but the added variables

– diabetes and smoking, where the response variable is fatty diet, the regression model estimated is:

Fatty diet = -10.9559 + 6.18445 diabetes + 1.3729 smoking,

In the table (2), the odds ratio for diabetes was 485.1471 and odds ratio for smoking was 3.94711 both ratios lie between the upper confidence level and lower confidence level. Where the chi- square model statistic is 2690.9 and prob level 0.00 which indicate that the model had a good of fitness.

Table (2 ) Logistic Regression Report

Response fatty

Forward Variable-Selection

Action

Variable

Added Added

diabetes smoking

Parameter Estimation Section

Regression

Standard

Chi-Square

Prob

Last

Variable Coefficient

Error

Beta=0

Level

R-Squared

Intercept -10.9559

0.4931057

493.65

0.000000

0.156037

diabetes 6.184452

0.2060166

901.15

0.000000

0.252342

smoking 1.372983

0.2046514

45.01

0.000000

0.016578

Odds Ratio Estimation Section

Variable

Regression

Coefficient

Standard

Error

Odds

Ratio

Lower 95%

Conf. Limit

Upper 95%

Conf. Limit

Intercept

-10.955900

0.493106

diabetes

6.184452

0.206017

485.147077

323.975175

726.499140

smoking

1.372983

0.204651

3.947106

2.642891

5.894927

Model Summary Section

Model

Model

Model

Model

R-Squared

D.F.

Chi-Square

Prob

0.501950

2

2690.90

0.000000

B ) Log-linear models:

The log-linear model report for the variables of analyses, smoking, blood pressure, diabetes, indicate that log likelihood ratio and Pearson chi-square allows to quickly determine the maximum order that is significant.We use preset alpha level ( 0.15 ), the value was less than some preset alpha, thus the statistic is considered one to be significant. The K- term tests indicated that all terms are significant, for One way and higher,2 -way and higher, 3-way and higher. These results appeared in likelihood ratio and Pearson chi-square. These tests indicate the significance of all terms of given orders.These results led us to conclude that three order terms will be the highest and the final models.

The other parts of table report is single term test section represents partial and marginal association tests, we notice that even the simultaneous test of all third order terms was significant and highly significant, Therefore we can rationalize in our conclusion that ABC and higher, and the effect in model A, B, C are fairly significant. Where the results are the same when we use the factors ( smoking, hypertension, and overweight) . The results of both multiple term test and k-terms indicate that likelihood chi-square and Pearson in terms of 1-way and higher,2-way and higher, and 3-way and higher are significant. Therefore we can conclude that ABC models are fairly significant, but model AB is mildly significant prob- level was ( 0,0063 ), table(3). chi-square ratios are significant for all hierarchal models in step down model analysis .we notice that algorithm used in a step-down

strategy, begins with saturated model selected ( the algorithm of Habermann 1972 ) to produce the maximum

likelihood estimates.

Table (3 ) Loglinear Models Report

K-Terms

DF

Like. Ratio

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

Pearson

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

1WAY & Higher

7

1050.32

0.0000

951.79

0.0000

2WAY & Higher

4

817.12

0.0000

715.80

0.0000

3WAY & Higher

1

64.31

Like. Ratio

0.0000

Prob

63.17

0.0000

K-Terms

DF

Chi-Square

Level

1WAY Only

3

233.20

0.0000

2WAY Only

3

752.82

0.0000

3WAY Only

1

64.31

0.0000

Factors smoking, diabetes, blood pressure Multiple-Term Test Section

Note Simultaneous test that all interactions of order k are zero. These Chi-Squares are differences in the above table.

Single-Term Test Section

Effect

DF

Partial

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

Marginal

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

A (smoking)

1

77.71

0.0000

77.71

0.0000

B (diabetes)

1

138.84

0.0000

138.84

0.0000

C (blood pressure)

1

16.65

0.0000

16.65

0.0000

AB

1

409.16

0.0000

308.88

0.0000

AC

1

107.76

0.0000

7.48

0.0063

BC

1

436.46

0.0000

336.18

0.0000

ABC

1

64.31

0.0000

64.31

0.0000

The differences in residual are actual and predicted. usually scanned to find cells that are not fitted ell by the model, also the ratio chi-square static, and chi-square absolute values greater than 1.96 are considered larger, Therefore

the model 2 2 2, Thus the factors overweight, smoking, blood pressure chi-square is ( 17.07 ) greater than 1.96 Results are available in table (4).

Table (4) Loglinear Models Report

Counts Variable count+0.5

Factors smoking, blood pressure, overweight

Multiple-Term Test Section

K-Terms DF

Like. Ratio Chi-Square

Prob Level

Pearson Chi-Square

Prob Level

1WAY & Higher

7

975.34

0.0000

982.77

0.0000

2WAY & Higher

4

850.58

0.0000

768.98

0.0000

3WAY & Higher

1

49.44

Like. Ratio

0.0000

Prob

49.99

0.0000

K-Terms

DF

Chi-Square

Level

1WAY Only

3

124.76

0.0000

2WAY Only

3

801.13

0.0000

3WAY Only

1

49.44

0.0000

Single-Term Test

Section

Effect

DF

Partial Chi-Square

Prob Level

Marginal Chi-Square

Prob Level

A (smoking)

1

77.71

0.0000

77.71

0.0000

B (blood pressure)

1

16.65

0.0000

16.65

0.0000

C (overweight)

1

30.40

0.0000

30.40

0.0000

AB

1

41.52

0.0000

7.48

0.0063

AC

1

62.51

0.0000

28.47

0.0000

BC

1

765.19

0.0000

731.15

0.0000

ABC

1

49.44

0.0000

49.44

0.0000

Step-Down Model-Search Section

Step Best

Chi-

Prob

Term

Chi-

Prob

Hierarchical

No No

DF Square

Level

Deleted

DF Square

Level

Model

1

1

1

49.4

0.0000

None

0

0.0

0.0000

AB,AC,BC

2

1

2

91.0

0.0000

AB

1

41.5

0.0000

AC,BC

3

1

2

112.0

0.0000

AC

1

62.5

0.0000

AB,BC

4

1

2

814.6

0.0000

BC

1

765.2

0.0000

AB, AC

DF

Like. Ratio

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

Pearson

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

Model

7

975.34

0.0000

982.77

0.0000

Mean

Parameter Estimation Section

Model

Term

Number

Cells

Count

Percent

Count

Average

Log(Count)

Effect Effect Effect

(Lambda) Std. Error Z-Value

Mean

8

2677

100.00

5.8130

5.8130 0.0193 300.76

overweight

blood pressure

smoking

Actual

Pred

Diff

Chi

FT-SR

1

1

1

348.5

334.6

13.9

0.76

0.76

1

1

2

541.5

334.6

206.9

11.31

9.96

1

2

1

215.5

334.6

-119.1

-6.51

-7.21

1

2

2

90.5

334.6

-244.1

-13.35

-17.52

2

1

1

128.5

334.6

-206.1

-11.27

-13.88

2

1

2

214.5

334.6

-120.1 -6.57 -7.27

2

2

1

418.5

334.6

83.9 4.59 4.34

2

2

2

719.5

334.6

384.9 21.04 17.07

The results of variables hypertension, gender, and diabetes in multiple term test all likelihood chi- square ratio are significant and Pearson chi-square, thus the 3- way only and 3- way and higher are accepted due to the higher significant models, the effect due to partial chi-

square association is significant , and marginal chi-square association is significant too .The step-down model test indicates that prob of chi-square is significant for all models, also FT-SR test indicates that the 2 2 2 model is greater than 1.96 the ratio is (19.72 ).

Table(5) Log-linear Models Report

Factors blood pressure, gender, diabetes

Multiple-Term Test Section

Like. Ratio Prob Pearson Prob

K-Terms DF Chi-Square Level Chi-Square Level

1WAY & Higher

7

1685.73

0.0000

1587.48

0.0000

2WAY & Higher

4

1517.45

0.0000

1502.82

0.0000

3WAY & Higher

1

69.24

0.0000

74.04

0.0000

1WAY Only

3

168.28

0.0000

2WAY Only

3

1448.21

0.0000

3WAY Only

1

69.24

0.0000

Partial

Prob

Marginal

Prob

Effect

DF

Chi-Square

Level

Chi-Square

Level

A (blood pressure)

1

16.65

0.0000

16.65

0.0000

B (gender)

1

12.80

0.0003

12.80

0.0003

C (diabetes)

1

138.84

0.0000

138.84

0.0000

AB

1

36.15

0.0000

45.94

0.0000

AC

1

326.38

0.0000

336.18

0.0000

BC

1

1066.09

0.0000

1075.88

0.0000

ABC

1

69.24

0.0000

69.24

0.0000

Step-Down Model-Search Section

Step Best

Chi-

Prob

Term

Chi-

Prob

Hierarchical

No No

DF Square

Level

Deleted

DF Square

Level

Model

1

1

1

69.2

0.0000

None

0

0.0 0.0000

AB,AC,BC

2

1

2

105.4

0.0000

AB

1

36.1 0.0000

AC,BC

3

1

2

395.6

0.0000

AC

1

326.4 0.0000

AB,BC

4

1

2

1135.3

0.0000

BC

1

1066.1 0.0000

AB, AC

DF

Like. Ratio

Chi-Square

Prob

Level

Pearson

Chi-Square

Prob

Level Model

7 1685.73 0.00001587.48 0.0000 Mean

Parameter Estimation Section

Model Term

Number Cells

Percen Count

t

Count

Average Log(Count)

Effect Effect (Lambda) Std. Error

Effect Z-Value

Mean

8

2677

100.00

5.8130

5.8130 0.0193

300.76

Data Table Section

blood

diabetes

gender

pressure

Actual

Pred

Diff

Chi

FT-SR

1

1

1

615.5

334.6

280.9

15.35

13.04

1

1

2

263.5

334.6

-71.1

-3.89

-4.10

1

2

1

89.5

334.6

-245.1

-13.40

-17.63

1

2

2

66.5

334.6

-268.1

-14.66

-20.23

2

1

1

45.5

334.6

-289.1

-15.81

-23.03

2

1

2

321.5

334.6

-13.1 -0.72 -0.71

2

2

1

482.5

334.6

147.9 8.08 7.36

2

2

2

792.5

334.6

457.9 25.03 19.72

When we use the variables smoking, diabetes and family history, we have obtained same results of likelihood chi-square ratio and Pearson chi-square which are significant, hence the 3- way & higher is accepted, the association effect of partial and marginal chi-square is significant while the model AB ( Smoking, family history

is mildly significant ( 0.0412 ) . But the other effects are fairly significant, also the step-down test in hierarchal models appears AB, AC, BC. Because the results of likelihood ratio and Pearson chi-square are a significant ratio, the FT-SR is (12.63) which indicates greater than 1.96.

Table (6 ) Log-linear Models Report

Factors smoking, family history, diabetes

Multiple-Term Test Section

Like. Ratio Prob Pearson Prob

K-Terms DF Chi-Square Level Chi-Square Level

1WAY & Higher

7

1279.35

0.0000

1099.56

0.0000

2WAY & Higher

4

1044.86

0.0000

930.67

0.0000

3WAY & Higher

1

119.17

0.0000

128.06

0.0000

1WAY Only

3

234.49

0.0000

2WAY Only

3

925.69

0.0000

3WAY Only

1

119.17

Partial

0.0000

Prob

Marginal

Prob

Effect

DF

Chi-Square

Level

Chi-Square

Level

A (smoking)

1

77.71

0.0000

77.71

0.0000

B (family history)

1

17.94

0.0000

17.94

0.0000

C (diabetes)

1

138.84

0.0000

138.84

0.0000

AB

1

128.76

0.0000

4.17

0.0412

AC

1

433.47

0.0000

308.88

0.0000

BC

1

612.64

0.0000

488.05

0.0000

ABC

1

119.17

0.0000

119.17

0.0000

Step-Down Model-Search Section

Step Best

Chi-

Prob

Term

Chi- Prob

Hierarchical

No No

DF Square

Level

Deleted

DF Square Level

Model

1

1

1

119.2

0.0000

None

0

0.0 0.0000

AB,AC,BC

2

1

2

247.9

0.0000

AB

1

128.8 0.0000

AC,BC

3

1

2

552.6

0.0000

AC

1

433.5 0.0000

AB,BC

4

1

2

731.8

0.0000

BC

1

612.6 0.0000

AB, AC

Like. Ratio

Prob

Pearson

Prob

DF

Chi-Square

Level

Chi-Square

Level Model

7 1279.35 0.00001099.56 0.0000 Mean

Parameter Estimation Section

Model

Term

Number

Cells

Percent

Count Count

Average

Log(Count)

Effect Effect

(Lambda) Std. Error

Effect

Z-Value

Mean

8

2677 100.00

5.8130

5.8130 0.0193

300.76

diabetes

family history

smoking

Actual

Pred

Diff

Chi

FT-SR

1

1

1

529.5

334.6

194.9

10.65

9.44

1

1

2

300.5

334.6

-34.1

-1.87

-1.90

1

2

1

117.5

334.6

-217.1

-11.87

-14.87

1

2

2

87.5

334.6

-247.1

-13.51

-17.84

2 1 1 45.5 334.6 -289.1 -15.81 -23.03

2

1

2

572.5

334.6

237.9

13.00

11.28

2

2

1

418.5

334.6

83.9

4.59

4.34

2

2

2

605.5

334.6

270.9

14.81

12.63

Concluded remarks:

The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the heart disease and the response of variables (factors). To recognize whether these variables cause the heart disease or not , Logistic regression used to analyze the data were collected as a sample from Jordanian hospital records and patients files , Odds ratios, likelihood chi-square and chi-square , K-terms tests of multiple model in log-linear models, FT-SR to check whether chi-square value would be considered the normal distributed

( Fredman-Tukey standard residual ) .

The analysis of results indicates that all variables analyzed together or as groups are significant or adequately fit the model.In the model summary section of analysis of logistic regression, the R2 is 0,57083 and it fits the model well due to the significance. This proves that heart diseases are the biggest killer in Jordan.

REFERENCES:

  1. Agresti A. (1992): Modeling patterns of agreement and disagreement. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1(2), 201-218.

  2. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. NY: John Wiley, 78-123.

  3. Anderson, E. B. (1996), Introduction to the statistical analysis of categorical data. NY: Springer-Verlag.

  4. Barlow W. (1998): Modeling of the categorical agreement. In: Armitage P, Colton T (eds), The Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, New York: Wiley (pp. 541-545).

  5. Becker MP, Agresti A. Log-linear modeling of pairwise interobserver agreement on a categorical scale. Statistics In Medicine, 1992, 11(1), 101-114

  6. Kristofferson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables, Psychometrika, 40, 5-32.

  7. Gaydos, C.A., (1996 ): Replication of Chlamydia pneumonia in vitro in human macrophages, endothelial cells, and aortic artery smooth muscle cells. Infect Immunity 64:1614).

  8. Danesh, J. and Collins, R., (1997 ): Chronic infections and coronary heart disease: Is there a link, Lancet 350:430.

  9. Haberman Sj (1979): Qualitative data analysis (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Academic Press,

  10. Fienberg, S.E. (1979 ): The Use of Chi-Squared Statistics for Categorical Data Problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical. Society B 41:54-64.

  11. Koehler, K.J. (1986): Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Log-Linear Models in Sparse Contingency Tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81:483-93.

  12. Kaunitz, H. (1986 ): Medium chain triglycerides (MCT) in aging and arteriosclerosis.

  13. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 6 (3-4):115.

  14. Liao, T, Futing (1994): Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ( 32-58) Knoke, D. P, j, Burke (1980 ). log linear models, Sage Publication, Inc.Newberry Park California, USA,( 45-93).

  15. Muthén, B. (1978). The contribution of factor analysis of dichotomous variables, Psychometrika, 43, 551-560.

  16. Rudas, Tamás (1998). Odds ratios in the analysis of contingency tables. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No.

    119. Good basic explanation of odds ratios, many examples, also focuses on the use of conditional odds ratios in analyzing cross-tabulated data

  17. Suleiman AlKattab and AS .AD H .abo rumman(2011):" Healthcare service quality; comparing public and private hospitals in Jordan)",international business management, vol 5,issue 51,pp.242-254.

  18. mpact of Indirect Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising on the Physician-Patient Relationship Quality mpact of Indirect Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising on the Physician-

    Patient Relationship Quality

  19. Suleiman AlKattab and AS .AD Habo rumman. Reham.M

    .Aabed2015):" )" European Journal of business and management, 7,issue 22,2015.

  20. Tabachnick, B, G. L, S, FIDELL 1996, using of multivariate statistics, 3rd edition, Harper Collins, new York, USA, (123- 145).

  21. Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Leave a Reply