 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 5
 Authors : T. Coumaressin., K. Palaniradja., R. Prakash., V. Vinoth Kumar
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV3IS16148
 Volume & Issue : TITCON – 2015 (Volume 3 – Issue 16)
 Published (First Online): 30072018
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Experimental Analysis of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System using Al_{2}O_{3}/CuOR134a
1T. Coumaressin., 2K. Palaniradja., 3R. Prakash., 4V. Vinoth Kumar
1Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pondicherry Engineering College 2Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pondicherry Engineering College 3,4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College Pondicherry, INDIA
Abstract The objective of this paper is to investigate the influence of Al2O3/CuO nano particles on the heat transfer characteristics and performance of refrigerant based nanofluid flow through the vapour compression refrigeration system. As a replacement to CFCs and HFCs, R134a refrigerant is being widely used in current refrigeration and airconditioning systems. But they consume more power and has high global warming potential. By addition of the nanoparticles to the refrigerant results in improvements in the thermo physical properties and heat transfer characteristics of the refrigerant, thereby improving the performance of the refrigeration system. An experimental apparatus was build according to the national standards of India. Aluminium oxide and copper oxide nano fluids are used with R134a refrigerant in vapour compression refrigeration system and the heat transfer coefficient and performance of the system were evaluated by using TK Solver, using nano concentration 0 to 1%.The experimental results shows that the heat transfer coefficient of refrigerant based nanofluid is higher than that of pure refrigerant and also coefficient of performance is higher than the existing.
Index terms – Aluminium oxide, COP, Copper oxide, heat transfer coefficient, nano refrigerant, R134a, TK solver.
1 INTRODUCTION
Vapour compression refrigeration system is predominantly used for refrigeration and airconditioning systems nowadays. R134a refrigerant has replaced the CFCs and HFCs as they were said to have high ozone depleting potential. R134a has its own negatives like global warming potential, high power consumption and so on. In order to overcome current power scarcity, energy efficient refrigeration system with high heat transfer coefficient has to be developed. Nanofluids are thermal fluids prepared by suspending nano sized particles in conventional base fluids (water, ethylene glycol, refrigerant). Nanofluids are said to have higher thermal conductivity when compared to the base fluids and hence are said to improve the heat transfer characteristics of the base fluids. These thermo physical properties of nano fluids make it possible to be used in refrigeration systems. Eed Abdel Hafez et al [1] had performed heat transfer analysis of vapour compression
refrigeration system using CuO R134a and found that heat transfer coefficient of refrigerant increases with 0.1 to 0.55% of CuO and 15 to 25 nm size of CuO Nano particles. D.Senthilkumar and Dr.R.Elansezhian[4] done investigation of R152a/R134a mixture in refrigeration system using hydrocarbon mixtures of R152a and R134a and concluded that the system worked safely and the maximum cop value 5.26 has obtained. HaoPeng et al [5] studied heat transfer characteristics of refrigerant based nano fluid flow boiling inside a horizontal smooth tube using CuO + R113 and observed that heat transfer coefficient R113 + CuO mixture is larger than that of pure refrigerant and 29.7 % of maximum heat transfer coefficient. T.Coumaressin et al [7] had conducted performance analysis of a refrigeration system using Nano fluid and concluded that evaporator heat transfer co efficient increases with usage of Nano CuOR134a. Juan carlos et al [9] studied applications of nano fluid in refrigeration system and found greater reduction of evaporator area with usage of Cu+H2O nano fluid. D.Senthilkumar and Dr.R.Elansezhian [10] conducted experimental study on Al2O3R134a nano refrigerant in refrigeration system with 0.2% nano concentration and obtained increase of COP as 3.5 for capillary length of 10.5m. N.Subramani and M.J.Prakash [11] conducted an experimental study on vapour compression refrigeration system using nano refrigerants with Al2O3 and found increase of Coefficient of heat transfer by 58%, reduction of power consumption by 18% and increase in COP by 33%.
The main objectives of the paper are (i) To improve the heat transfer characteristics in refrigerator system by adding Al2O3/CuO nano particles to the R134a refrigerant.
(ii) To perform the heat transfer analysis and performance analysis in a vapour compression refrigeration system using a nanofluid as refrigerant. (iii) To develop a mathematical model for such a system. (iv) To perform heat transfer and performance analysis using TK Solver software. (v) To evaluate the heat transfer coefficients and Coefficient of performance for different concentrations of Al2O3/CuO nano particles and to come up with an optimized Al2O3/CuO concentration to maximize the heat
transfer coefficient, Coefficient of performance and refrigeration effect.
2 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
Evaporator, Reciprocating Compressor, Condenser, Expansion valve solenoid Valve, Refrigerant R134a Evaporator vessel diameter, D = 295mm =0.295m
Energy meter constant, E = 750 rev/kWh

Working
The vapour compression uses a circulating liquid refrigerant as a medium which absorbs and removes heat from the space to be cooled and subsequently rejects that heat elsewhere. Figure 1 depicts the typical, single stage vapour compression system. All such systems have 4 components: A compressor, a condenser, a thermal expansion valve and an evaporator. Circulating refrigerant enters the compressor in the thermodynamic state known as a saturated vapour and is compressed to a higher pressure, resulting in a higher temperature as well. The hot vapour is routed through a condenser where it is cooled and condensed into a liquid by flowing through a coil or tubes with cool air flowing across the coil or tubes.
The condensed liquid refrigerant, in the thermodynamic state known as a saturated liquid, is next routed through an expansion valve where it undergoes an abrupt reduction in pressure. That pressure reduction results in the adiabatic flash evaporation of a part of the liquid refrigerant. The cold mixture is then routed through the coil or tubes in the evaporator. A fan circulates the warm air in the enclosed space across the coil or tubes carrying the cold refrigerant liquid and vapour mixture. That warm air evaporates the liquid part of the cold refrigerant mixtures. At the same time, the circulating air is cooled and thus lowers the temperature of enclosed space to the desired temperature.
Experiment was conducted using the above setup using R134a pure refrigerant and the actual and theoretical COP of solenoid valve and expansion valve expansion are calculated and the following results are obtained.
Table 1. Observations from the refrigeration test rig
2.2261
Observation
Solenoid Valve
Expansion Valve
Initial temp of water (ÂºC)
28
28.6
Final temp of water (ÂºC)
24.6
22.4
Pressure at comp. Inlet (bar)
1.1768
1.9613
Pressure at comp. Outlet (bar)
9.8459
11.0226
Pressure before throttling (bar)
9.7282
10.9246
Pressure after throttling (bar)
1.1866
Temp. at compressor inlet (ÂºC)
31.8
30.08
Temp. at compressor outlet(ÂºC)
69.8
76.2
Temp. before throttling (ÂºC)
41.2
44
Temp. after throttling (ÂºC)
6
12
Mass of water (kg)
16.395
16.395
Table2. Performance of VCRS using pure R134a.
Sl.No
COP
Solenoid Valve
Expansion Valve
1
COP actual
0.7847
1.1127
2
COP theoretical
2.9747
3.8951
3
Refrigeration effect(kJ/Kg)
0.2586
0.4734

Conclusions
The conclusions from the experiment were:
Expansion valve can be preferred over solenoid valve as an expansion device. Refrigeration effect can be enhanced in the evaporator. To enhance the refrigeration effect, we should use a better refrigerant. Nano particlesAl2O3/CuO can be used as refrigerant. We can improve the heat transfer coefficient, Coefficient of performance in a designed evaporator section.

MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Refrigerant to be used : R134a
Nanofluid : Al2O3, CuO
3.1 Thermophysical properties of Nano refrigerant
The thermal conductivity of refrigerant based nanofluid is calculated by Hamilton Crosser equation [16]
rn r
rn r
K = K (Kn+2Kr2(KrKn))
Kn+2Kr+(KrKn)
(1)
Where,
Krn Thermal conductivity of nano refrigerant
Kr – Thermal conductivity of pure refrigerant (R134a)
Kn – Thermal conductivity of nano particle
– Particle volume fraction of nano particle
The dynamic viscosity of nano refrigerant is calculated by Brinkman equation [18]. The Dynamic viscosity of nano refrigerant is as given below,
rn = r
rn = r
1
(1)2.5
Figure 1. VCRS experimental setup
(2)
Where,
r Viscosity of pure refrigerant Particle volume fraction
The specific heat capacity of nano refrigerant is calculated by Pakcho equation (Pak and Cho, 1998). The specific heat of nano refrigerant is as given below.
Cprn = (1 )Cpr + Cpn
(3)
Where,
Particle volume fraction Cpr Specific heat of refrigerant
Cpn Specific heat of nano particle
The Reynoldss number of nano refrigerant can be calculated from the equation given below [16]
Rern = GÃ—Di
Tf Final temperature of water
Cp Specific heat of water = 4.186 KJ/Kg K dT Duration of experiment in sec
Work done by the compressor
Work done= 3600 Ã— 10 KW (12)
E t
Where,
E Energy meter constant = 750 rev/ kWh
T Time taken for 10 revolution of the energy meter disc
3.3 Coefficient of performance
Actual COP of a vapour compression refrigeration system is given by
rn
(4)
COP
Act
= hAT VÃ—I
(13)
Where,
G – mass flux = 100 Kg/m2s
Coefficient of performance of the refrigeration
(COP)actual
Di – Inner diameter of tube
COP actual = Refrigerationeffect
(14)
rn – Viscosity of nano refrigerant
The Prandtl number of nano refrigerant can be calculated from the equation given below [16]
C Ã—
Workdone
Theoretical COP of a
system is given by
COPTheo = H2H1
vapour compression refrigeration
(15)
Prrn = prn rn
Krn
Where,
H4H2
(5)
The Nusselt number of nano refrigerant can be calculated from the equation given below [16]
Nu = 0.023Rern0.8Prrn0.4 (6)
The volume fraction of nano particles used in the above given equations can be obtained using the below relation [5]
= r
r+(1)n
H1 Enthalpy of refrigerant at the inlet of evaporator. H2 Enthalpy of refrigerant at the outlet of evaporator. H4 Enthalpy of refrigerant at the outlet of compressor.
Fluid
Specific heat (J/kgK)
Thermal conductivity (W/mK
Density
(kg/m3)
R134a
1432
0.0803
1199.7
Al2O3
729
40
3880
CuO
535.6
20
6500
Fluid
Specific heat (J/kgK)
Thermal conductivity (W/mK
Density
(kg/m3)
R134a
1432
0.0803
1199.7
Al2O3
729
40
3880
CuO
535.6
20
6500
Table 3. Properties of Nano fluids and R134a.
(7)
Where,
– Mass fraction of nano particle
r – Density of pure refrigerant R134a
n – Density of nano particle
The relation for mass fraction of nano particle is given –
below [5]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Analysis and comparison of thermo physical properties of nano refrigerants
The thermo physical properties such as heat transfer
= Mn
Mn+Mr
Where,
Mn Mass of nano particles
Mn Mass of pure refrigerant (R134a)
(8)
coefficient, thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and dynamic viscosity of Al2O3/CuO R134a nano refrigerant are calculated using TK Solver and their properties for optimized nano concentration are tabulated below.
Convective heat transfer coefficient of nano refrigerant is given by the following relation [16]
2 ]
2 ]
hrn
Krn
Cprn
0.55
0.6502
0.1706
1239.1921
2280.0395
hrn
Krn
Cprn
0.55
0.6502
0.1706
1239.1921
2280.0395
1
Table 4. Thermo physical properties of Al2O3R134a nano refrigerant
hcrn
= 0.023 [G4Ã—Cprn2Ã—krn3 5 (9)
DiÃ—rn
3.2 Formula for Experimental calculation
Mass of water in the evaporator vessel m = Density of water Ã— Volume of water
m = Ã— Ã— D2 Ã— h Kg/sec (10)
4
hrn
Krn
Cprn
0.6
.6387
.1460
1237.6381
1884.6961
hrn
Krn
Cprn
0.6
.6387
.1460
1237.6381
1884.6961
Table 5. Thermo physical properties of CuOR134a nano refrigerant
Where,
– Density of water
D Diameter of vessel = 295 mm 0.295 m h Height of water in vessel
Heat absorbed from evaporator water,
*Where = Mass fraction of nano particles, hrn = Heat
Refrigeration effect = mcp(TiTf)
dT
Where,
Ti initial temperature of water
J/sec (11)
transfer coefficient of nano refrigerant, Krn = Thermal conductivity of nano refrigerant, Cprn = Specific heat capacity of nano refrigerant, and = Dynamic viscosity
of nano refrigerant respectvely.
Heat transfer coefficient of Al2O3 and CuO nano refrigerants are compared below. The curve rises gradually and then decreases as shown in the below figure. The peak value is achieved at 0.55% concentration of Al2O3 and at 0.6% concentration of CuO nano refrigerant.
Figure 2. Heat transfer coefficient of Al2O3 and CuO
The curves of thermal conductivity of Al2O3 and CuO nano refrigerants are compared in the below figure. The curve seems to rise gradually as shown below.
Figure 3. Thermal conductivity of Al2O3 and CuO
The characteristics curve for specific heat capacity of Al2O3 and CuO nano refrigerant decreases gradually as shown below.
Figure 4. Specific heat capacity of Al2O3 and CuO
The curve for dynamic viscosity of Al2O3 and CuO nano refrigerants are compared below and seem to be increasing gradually.
Figure 5. Dynamic viscosity of Al2O3 and CuO
4.2 Comparison of performance of Al2O3&CuO
The parameters obtained from the experiment conducted on vapour compression refrigeration system using pure R134a refrigerant are used to calculate the performance of the system with nano refrigerant of various composition and the coefficient of performance for different nano refrigerant combinations with solenoid as well expansion valve are calculated using TK solver and are tabulated below.
Table 6. Performance of Nano R134a refrigerant in
VCRS
Coefficient Of Performance
Al2O3
CuO
Solenoid Valve
Expansion Valve
Solenoid valve
Expansion Valve
2.6911
3.7699
2.643
3.703
The performance of vapour compression refrigeration system (solenoid valve) using Al2O3 and CuO nano refrigerants are calculated and compared below. The peak COP is obtained at 0.55% concentration of Al2O3 (COP=2.6911) and 0.6% concentration of CuO nano refrigerant (COP=2.643)
Figure 6. COP of Al2O3 and CuO R134a nano refrigerants using solenoid valve
The performance of vapour compression refrigeration system (expansion valve) using Al2O3 and CuO nano refrigerants are calculated and compared below. The peak COP is obtained at 0.55% concentration of Al2O3 (COP=3.7699) and 0.6% concentration of CuO nano refrigerant (COP=3.703)
Figure 7. COP of Al2O3 and CuO R134a nano refrigerants using expansion valve
Figure 8. Comparison of experimental average COP and peak nano COP
The above figure shows the comparison between the experimental average actual COP of vapour compression refrigeration system using R134a and the peak actual COP of nano refrigerant at optimized nano concentrations. It is inferred from the above graph, that the COP of vapour compression refrigeration system increases with optimized mixing of nanofluids and Al2O3 is found to produce high COP when compared to other three nano refrigerants taken into account.

CONCLUSION
Al2O3/CuO nano particles with R134a refrigerant can be used as an excellent refrigerant to improve the heat transfer characteristics and performance in a refrigeration system. A successful model has been designed and the basic theoretical heat transfer analysis and performance analysis of the refrigeration system has been done. Heat transfer and performance analysis for the designed section has been successfully performed using TK Solver software. The obtained evaporating heat transfer coefficient and coefficient of performance result have been optimized at its maximum value for the best Al2O3/CuO nano particles concentration in R134a refrigerant. From the analysis it can be concluded that the heat transfer and performance characteristics of the system is higher with the usage of Al2O3 nano particles with R134a refrigerant compared to CuO nano particles.
REFERENCE

Eed Abdel Hafez, Abdel Haddi, SherifHady Taker, Abdel Hamid Mohammed Tork, Sameer SabryHamad, Heat transfer analysis of vapour compression refrigeration system using CuOR134a, International conference on Advanced materials engineering IPCSIT Vol. 15 (2011)

TeshomeBekele, kotu&K.Reji Kumar, Comparison of Heat transfer performance in domestic refrigerator using Nano Refrigerant and Double pipe heat exchanger, School of mechanical & industrial engineering, Bahirdar University.

R.Reji Kumar, K.Sridhar, M.Narasimha, Heat transfer enhancement in domestic refrigerator using R600a/ mineral oil/ NanoAl2O3 as working fluid, International journal of computational engineering research, Vol. 03, issue. 4.

D.Senthil Kumar, Dr.R.Elansezhian, Investigation of R152a/ R134a mixture in refrigeration system, International journal of Engineering and Innovative Tecchnology, Volume 2, issue 6, December 2012.

HaoPeng, Gualiang Ding, Weitingjiang, Haitao Hi, Yifengao, Heat transfer characteristics of refrigerant based Nano fluid flow boiling inside a horizontal smooth tube, International journal of refrigeration 32 (2009) 12591270

R.Krishnasabareesh, N.Gobinath, V.sajith, Sumitesh Das and C.B.Sobhan, Application of TiO2 Nano particles as a lubricant additive for Vapour compression refrigeration system An experimental investigation,
International journal of refrigeration (2012), doi: 10.1016

T.Coumaressin and K.Palaniradja, Performance analysis of a refrigeration system using Nano fluid, International journal of Advanced Mechanical engineering, Research India publications. 2014. ISSN 22503234 Vol(4), Number(4) PP 459470.

Prof(Dr) R.S.Mishra, Methods of improving thermodynamic performance of vapour compression refrigeration system using twelve ecofriendly refrigerants in primary circuit and Nano fluid (water based) in secondary circuit, International journal of Engineering and Technology and Advanced Engineering. ISSN 22502459 Vol. 4, Issue 6. June 2014.

Juan CarlosValdeyLoaiza, Frank chaviano – purzaesky, Jose AlbertoReis Parise, ANumerical Study on the applications of Nano fluids in refrigeration systems, International refrigeration and air conditioning conference, 2010 Purdue University, Paper 1145

D.Senthilkumar, Dr.R.Elansezhian, Experimental study on Al2O3 R134a nano refrigerant in refrigeration system, International journal of modern engineering research (IJMER), Vol.2, PP : 3927 3929 ISSN : 2249 6645. 2012.

N.Subramani, M.J.Prakash, Experimental study on vapour compression refrigeration system using nano refrigerants, Journal of engineering science and technology Vol.3, No.9, PP: 95102. 2011.

Shanmugasundaram, R.ShanthiandVelrajramalingam, Heat transfer enhancements using nano fluids, Thermal science Vol: 16, No. 2, PP : 423 444. 2012.

Subramani.N, Ashwinmohan and Dr.M.Joseprakash, Performance studies on a vapour compression refrigeration system using nanolubricant, International journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology,
Volume 2, Special issue 1, December 2013, ISSN 23476710

N.Subramani and M.J.Prakash, Experimental studies of vapour compression refrigeration system using nano refrigerant, International journal of engineering science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 9, 2011, pp. 95102

Rahulkumarjaiswal and R.S.Mishra, Performance evaluation of Vapour compression refrigeration system using ecofriendly refrigerants 1o circuit and 2o circuit (Nano particle), International research journal of sustainable science & engineering. Vol. 2, Issue 5. May 2014

R.Saidure et al, Thermophysical properties and heat transfer performance of Al2O3/R134a nano refrigerants, International journal of heat and mass transfer 57(2013) 100108.

R.L. Hamilton and O.K.crosser, Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two component systems, Ind. Eg. Chem. Fundamen, 1962, 1 (3), pp 187191.

H.C. Brinkman, The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions, The journal of chemical physics, 1952, Vol. 20 Number 4.