Effect of Staircase on the Seismic Performance of Buildings

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Effect of Staircase on the Seismic Performance of Buildings

Kevin Kuruvila1, Ann Mary Jose2 1PG student, 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,

Mangalam College of Engineering, Kottayam

Abstract – In this paper, the effect of different staircase location during earthquake have been studied in design of building, the staircase is generally not a primary part & considered secondary Structural member in the RC frame building. So, its negligence in Analysis & design causes vulnerable damage in the structure. Here the staircase model in different location is compared to check how it affects the seismic performance of the building.

Key words: Stair case, Story Drift, Base Shear, Earthquake, Location

each mode.Later,theseresponsesarecombinedtodeterminethetotal responseofthestructurebymodalcombinationmethods.Thism ethodisperformedforthestructureswhosemodes,exceptthefun damentalone,influencetheresponseofastructure.Responsesp ectrumistheestimationofmaximumresponses.

  1. Geometrical Properties

    Table 1: Geometrical Parameters

    Height of Building

    24m

    Column Size

    400mmX500mm

    Beam Size

    300mmX400mm

    Slab Thickness

    150mm

    Staircase Slab Thickness

    200mm

    Story Length in X & Y Direction

    24m

    Each Story Height

    3m

    No of bays in X&Y direction

    5nos each

    Height of Building

    24m

    Column Size

    400mmX500mm

    Beam Size

    300mmX400mm

    Slab Thickness

    150mm

    Staircase Slab Thickness

    200mm

    Story Length in X & Y Direction

    24m

    Each Story Height

    3m

    No of bays in X&Y direction

    5nos each

    1. INTRODUCTION

      Earthquake is an impulsive event and acts quite differently. The force generated by seismic action of earthquake is different than other types of loads, such as, gravity, Dead load, Live load and wind load. It strikes the weakest spotin the whole Structural frame building. Ignorance in structural design and poor quality & maintenance of construction result many weaknesses & faults in the structure member and Structural Building also, thus cause vulnerable damage to life and Structural property of building.

      In RC frame structural buildings, the primary structural system to resist Lateral & Gravity load are beams and columns. Besides, primary frame structural system, some structural member also contributes to lateral load resistance. These elements fall in the category of secondary systems. Secondary system can be structural secondary like staircase, structural partition etc and non-structural secondary like storage tanks, machinery etc. A special case of structural secondary members which are normally designed for non- seismic force; are concrete staircase.

      In the present study, the effects of staircase on the seismic performance of the RC frame structural buildings of different plans have been studied in this paper with

  2. Load Parameters

Fig.1 Plan of the building.

different structural seismic parameter e.g. Story displacement, Story drift & storey Shear.

  1. METHODOLOGY

    In this paper, linear dynamic analysis (response spectrum analysis) is performed using ETABS software. This analysis considers dynamic forces which are applied to thestructuresaspercode- baseddesignspectrum.Ithelpstodeterminetheeffectofthehigh ermodesofvibrationanddistributionofforces.Inresponsespect rumanalysis,multiple mode shapes are taken in to consideration. Depending upon the modal mass and modal frequency, a response is read from the design spectrum for

    The seismic parameters considered in dynamic analysis of all the models are assumed as per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002. The buildings are assumed to be in Zone IV&V with the peak ground acceleration value of 0.36g. The importance factor, I is taken as 1.5 (for important building). Also, the response reduction factor R taken as 5 for SMRF system of the buildings. The soil strata beneath the foundation is assumed as medium soil. The gravity and imposed loads are taken as per IS 875 (Part 1 and 2): 1987, self-weight of the structure is calculated and imposed load is assumed to be 3 kN/m2 for a typical residential building.

    Since, the lateral load due to earth pressure on foundation columns does not take part in the seismic weight of the structure, thus its effect is neglected in the analysis to observe only the effect of lateral forces due to seismic loads. However, for design purposes, the effect of lateral earth pressure should be considered. All the models are analysed, designed and checked for any failure of members and hence the size of the columns are varied accordingly as the height of the structure increases.

  2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    In this paper, models with staircase locations at center & corner positions of the buildingat two severe seismic zones IV &V is considered for seismic performance of building. To check seismic performance of building with different staircase location Story displacement, Story drift & Story shear.

    ZONE-IV

    Case1: Stair at centre

    Fig.2 Maximum Storey Displacement

    Fig.3 Maximum Storey Drift

    Fig.4 Maximum Storey Shear

    ZONE-V

    Case2: Stair at corner

    Fig.5 Maximum Storey Displacement

    Fig.6 Maximum Storey Drift

    Fig.7 Maximum Storey Shear

    A. Comparative Study

    Table 2: Comparative Study

    Models

    Max storey displace- ment

    Max storey drift

    Storey shear

    RSX

    RSY

    RSX

    RSY

    RSX

    RSY

    Zone 4

    At center

    15.0

    44

    13.48

    9

    0.00

    0994

    0.0009

    09

    1002.3

    03

    933.97

    8

    At corner

    15.1

    32

    19.65

    8

    0.00

    1007

    0.0013

    33

    937.36

    7

    864.21

    9

    Zone 5

    At center

    22.5

    80

    20.23

    4

    0.00

    1492

    0.0013

    63

    1502.9

    91

    1401.0

    25

    At corner

    22.6

    99

    29.48

    8

    0.00

    151

    0.0019

    99

    1406.0

    51

    1296.3

    28

  3. CONCLUSION

It is clear from the comparative study that the center position of the staircase yields better seismic performance compared to that of the other;

* The maximum storey displacement that, the dog-legged stair models yield less displacement at the center position rather than the corner ones in both the seismic zones in the study.

*Similarly while considering the case of maximum storey drift, greater values are evolved for corner positions of stair in both the zones which implies that the structure could be stiffer by assigning the staircases at centre positions rather than corner.

REFERENCES

  1. Edoardo Cosenza , Gerardo Mario Verderame , Alessandra Zambrano Seismic analysis of stairs in the existing reinforced concrete building , The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering , oct 12-17, 2008.

  2. Zaid M, M Danish, M Shariq, A Masood, A Baqi , Effect of staircase on RC frame structures under seismic load International conference on trends and challenges in concrete structures, December 19-20, 2013

  3. Onkar G Kumbhar , Ratnesh Kumar , Shrabony Adhikary

    ,Effect of staircase on seismic performance of RC frame building Earthquake and structures vol:9 No2 2015.

  4. Mohammed Aghajani D, Mahsa Pahlavikhak V, Khosro Bargi, Effect of staircase on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame building considering the position of the staircase International conference on contemporary Iran on civil engineering architecture and urban development, Aug 16, 2017

  5. Srinivasa Rao Bosta , Kaustubh Dasguptha , Influence of staircase and elevator core location on the seismic capacity of an RC frame building , American society of civil engineers

    ,2017

  6. Sneh B Patel, Arjun M Butala Seismic effect on staircase in performance of RC frame building, International Research Journal of engineering and technology, vol7 ,issue5 ,May 2020

  7. Shaik Shazya, Bodige Narender Seismic behaviour of G+7 RC open ground storey buildings with viscous dampers , Advances in Structural Engineering, January 2020.

  8. IS456:2000,Codeofpracticeforplainandreinforcedconcrete(fourt hrevision).

  9. IS 875-1987, Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings andstructures.

  10. IS 1893 (Part 1). (2002). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Part 1

Generalprovisionsandbuildings(FifthRevision).NewDelhi:Bure auofIndianStandards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *